• What is a photon?

    From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 2 21:09:10 2023
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters are
    very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Thu Aug 3 05:48:29 2023
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters are
    very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    I believe a photon can be described more simply than using an
    electric field and a magnetic field. Two dimensions can be used
    to define the magnitude of a photon's property. Velocity is distance
    divided by time, but a finer description is available using a
    distance-like dimension (hx) and a time-like dimension (th).
    The ratio is not energy. A photon from an atom changes the energy
    of that atom, but the photon has no energy, it has a velocity-like
    property. When a photon hits an atom, that velocity-like property
    interacts with the momentum of a proton-electron pair.
    Energy = momentum * velocity
    so the energy of an atom changes. https://impuremath.wordpress.com/contraspline/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Thu Aug 3 14:04:35 2023
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 7:48:32 AM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters
    are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    I believe a photon can be described more simply than using an

    Alan never had a logical mind to be in physics and here his mistake is "described more complicated and obtusely"

    electric field and a magnetic field. Two dimensions can be used
    to define the magnitude of a photon's property. Velocity is distance
    divided by time, but a finer description is available using a

    here-- instead of "finer" Alan means more hornswaggling out in left field

    distance-like dimension (hx) and a time-like dimension (th).
    The ratio is not energy. A photon from an atom changes the energy
    of that atom, but the photon has no energy, it has a velocity-like
    property. When a photon hits an atom, that velocity-like property
    interacts with the momentum of a proton-electron pair.
    Energy = momentum * velocity
    so the energy of an atom changes.
    https:--------------

    Sadly, Alan is of arts and music talent, and not of any talent in science and logic, the same as Arindam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Thu Aug 3 14:36:15 2023
    On Thursday, 3 August 2023 at 22:48:32 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters
    are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    I believe a photon can be described more simply than using an
    electric field and a magnetic field.

    Wrongly, but not simply. With nonsense, not sense. With loads of math gibberish, not clear logic based upon evidence.

    Two dimensions can be used
    to define the magnitude of a photon's property.

    What two dimensions?


    Velocity is distance
    divided by time, but a finer description is available using a
    distance-like dimension (hx) and a time-like dimension (th).

    Then velocity suddenly becomes something imaginary (call it theoretical) based upon nonsensical imaginary "dimensions".


    The ratio is not energy.

    Ratio of what? Some imaginary quantities?

    A photon from an atom changes the energy
    of that atom, but the photon has no energy, it has a velocity-like
    property.

    Gibberish.

    When a photon hits an atom, that velocity-like property
    interacts with the momentum of a proton-electron pair.

    How fat is this photon? Why does it show wave properties suddenly? Why should we believe that nonsense at all?


    Energy = momentum * velocity

    So suddenly that imaginary velocity becomes real??

    so the energy of an atom changes. https://impuremath.wordpress.com/contraspline/

    The energy of the atom changes as the incoming electromagnetic wave makes for the electron orbit to go more elliptical.

    The wave nature of light cannot be denied.
    It cannot be explained with quantum theory, so the patchy de Broglie hypothesis was devised. It is so shonky, wonder how it has lasted this long.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Archimedes Plutonium on Thu Aug 3 14:37:53 2023
    On Friday, 4 August 2023 at 07:04:39 UTC+10, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 7:48:32 AM UTC-5, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    I believe a photon can be described more simply than using an
    Alan never had a logical mind to be in physics and here his mistake is "described more complicated and obtusely"
    electric field and a magnetic field. Two dimensions can be used
    to define the magnitude of a photon's property. Velocity is distance divided by time, but a finer description is available using a
    here-- instead of "finer" Alan means more hornswaggling out in left field
    distance-like dimension (hx) and a time-like dimension (th).
    The ratio is not energy. A photon from an atom changes the energy
    of that atom, but the photon has no energy, it has a velocity-like property. When a photon hits an atom, that velocity-like property interacts with the momentum of a proton-electron pair.
    Energy = momentum * velocity
    so the energy of an atom changes.
    https:--------------

    Sadly, Alan is of arts and music talent, and not of any talent in science and logic, the same as Arindam

    Come on, Archie. We arsewashers should unite, to save trees. Let Greta get behind the behinds of Alans, with a hose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Fri Aug 4 18:31:43 2023
    On Thursday, 3 August 2023 at 14:09:14 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters are
    very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.

    the above was part of a facebook discussion. My earlier posts were:

    1. No good people can only say no good things.

    2. What to say, where the supposedly best people are inevitably the most disappointing I found, being full of ego, cowardice, opportunism, pretentiousness and hypocrisy, unreliable unless corrupt, etc. then what to do but mind one's own business and
    dedicate all works to the Divine. The interesting question is how and why the Indian elites have become like that. The kindest answer is the happy slave mentality from centuries of foreign rule, now not helped by democracy elevating scum and their
    hangers on to the top.

    3. Now these scum really have no power, not even to be really rich like those they envy. They blame everything Indian for their own shortcomings.

    4. Well, perhaps it is wrong to say they have no power. They do have the power to suppress those like myself who could make India a genuine superpower in every way. Amazing how two senior professors from IISc Bangalore torpedoed my proposal for the
    initiation of the Hydrogen Economy, with a pilot plant that could provide 7*24 power to a small community in a remote area. My father was ardent in pursuing that since 2010 - for years he appealed to everyone in vain. Now they are going in for the
    hydrogen economy taking care to ignore my pioneering initiatives.

    5. My father passed away in 2019. Till his last breath he was fighting for the hydrogen economy. All he wanted was that some recognised national institution should give me a chance to deliver a lecture to an appropriate audience. That could lead to the
    establishment of a pilot plant that would initiate the hydrogen economy. The Govt wanted a DPR and I provided that for no cost- I did it free. It is there along with my patent for the Hydrogen Transmission Network in the site htnresearch.com Then they
    asked if there was any international publication. I spent many thousands of dollars to get a conference publication. Then they said it was not good enough as it was not in Nature or some such.

    6. My father did what he could, wrote to Modi and the matter was given to his secretariat. They contacted two professors from IISc Bangalore to go through the DPR. They did a hatchet job on it, saying there was nothing new in it. Need not be done. Too
    expensive. A few crores was asked for the pilot plant but that was too much. So the matter was closed. What can any politician do when the people that should help are corrupt to their cores? Politicians get the blame for such treacherous and unscrupulous
    careerists. They will suck up to the West for crumbs, and to ingratiate them crush local talents, driving them out.

    7. Yes, but Indians and the rest of the miserable thirdworld world are suffering much more. My point is that a few scoundrels are ruining opportunities for everyone by suppressing me and those like me with better ideas. These esteemed scoundrels in media,
    academia, politics, business, finane are creating hell.

    8. For example, see how Boris Johnson by egging on Zelensky has turned Ukraine into a nightmare, most unnecessarily to us, who are simple people; but not for the shadowy unscrupulous sorts who gain by arms dealing.

    9. In my case, relating to the HTN as a load balancing method to smooth out the erratic power generation from green sources, it is not bureaucray nor the press but the academics who have been backstabbing me. Unfortunately, they are given supreme
    importance, as top quality industrial research is absent in India. (They go for buying the stuff these days, unlike in the 70-80s when what with tight foreign currency issues we engineers had to reinvent the wheel, in certain areas. My area was military
    radar systems. These are specialised areas. In the late 80s they decided to import and sell the stuff, with change of labelling and screwdiver expertise, no scope for my improvisational skills thus for reverse engineering or doing something original.) So
    the bureaucrat has to offload to some professor, who will dismiss it casually if he sees no personal benefit. In Australia here, we have the very same problem. Some professor will be trotted out to say something that will involve some strategy, no doubt
    beneficial to the most prominent vested interests. For instance take the wind turbines. A whistleblower has said how useless they are. I remember how some academics pushed this scheme in the 90s. Industrial research has been wiped out here, too, as it
    seems cheaper to buy it.

    10. I certainly would appreciate help for any side, for at present with the passing of my father I have no support from anyone. My interest now is to revolutionise physics, by removing e=mcc with e=0.5mVVN(N-k), that would lead us to motors of unlimited
    speeds, to the stars. That is what I discovered in 1999, published as a book in 2000, and got international media attention in 2003, which was globally suppressed. The powers that be do not want the slightest mainstream media publicity to be given to me,
    so I do what I can. Publish in facebook, usenet newsgroups such as sci.physics, and show off my experiments in youtube videos. Well, the way to go is to get global attention once again, get them to update physics text books - why teach lies and wrong
    things! - then with that money make Internal Froce Engines to replace jet engines and rockets, and from the profits from that build up a global Hydrogen Transmission Network that wil lprovid green energy to all for all time, everywhere.

    11. If Shri HK could pass on the links relating to the Hydrogen Transmission Network to the right parties, that I have given above, I have no doubt that he will be doing the world a service. These days the visibility of hydrogen seems to have gone up, as
    a most necessary alternative to the horrid lithium batteries and rockets by Musk.

    12. Thanks. In my experience these sort of people do not reply to what I write. This time I will try again. If I do not get a reply I will let you know and then you may be kind enough to forward the information. The real problem for them is that if they
    give me any kind of recognition, that would go directly against centuries of established physics. However, with my latest experiments with my new design rail gun invention, that violates inertia, they may show interest. Let us see. Getting late today
    here, so will be back tomorrow.

    13. Thank you very much for your long reply. Regarding the HTN I am not doing further work on it. All the work is done and published in my paper and in the data and DPR in htnresearch.com I am sure that people who are in the field will find it all very
    simple, beyond genius that way, in its ultimate effect. I have no doubt that one day it will happen on a global scale, much as googling is happening now. Incidentally at IIT Delhi for my M.Tech I worked on my thesis "Information Systems based upon
    Partial Match Retrievals' which anticipates googling. My paper "A New Method for Partial Match Retrievals" was puslished in US in 1987 and I cannot help thinking that I am one of the pioneers of googling. Well, I went to Sam Pirtroda in 1987 to see if he
    could help in building up something like what Google is now, but to no avail. He was very nice at first, but the next time his secretary blocked me. As I was sure my work was important, and no one in India could understand that - there were hardly any
    computers around and no databases! - I migrated to Australia in 1989 and had somewhat better luck at the Telstra Research Labs, where my first task was to write a confidential report on search algorithms. The ways things work, that must have gone to the
    US and started something... the resulting information explosion was also good for me. No one would publish my literary works in print, so I invented blogging with my "Picaresque tales of an Indian publicsectorman" in the early 90s, in Usenet, prior to
    Internet! Thus, going by past work, I have no doubt that the hydrogen economy will take off with the HTN, that will solve the transport and storage issues in one stroke, by having consumption taking pace with production in the piped network. This will
    have to happen, I do not know when. My priorities now are in doing more experiments with my new design rail gun, to revise fundamental physics, and making new motors for drilling on one hand, and reactionless engines to replace jets and rockets on the
    other. I will give the links for that just now.

    14. Thank you very much for your interest. My path to trillions is first getting recognition for my discovery that the Lorenz force, under certain engineering situations, offers no reaction as indeed predicted in the equation F=BiL. If that is agreed
    upon physics of the last 200+ years is revolutionised, with inertia out, entropy irrelevant, and relativity and quantum trashed. New ideas about the universe will come, with unification of all forces as electrostatic and electromagnetic, explaining from
    that the cause of gravity. Now books mean money, and if all physics texts are updated, I should get something, enough to make what I want, new motors for horizontal drilling and engines to replace jets and rockets. That should fetch more money, and with
    that I could build the HTN globally. Well, that is the fastest method I can think of. Not having to do with esteemed personalities, just depending upon the Divine, is my strategy. It is not fashionable, never was, but it has taken me to where I am.
    Despite global hostility directed at me in every possible way for the last two decades, I still survive and am really satisfied. I do not want to deal with those who will not come to me of their own, but I do have the duty to keep the great personalities
    of our time informed, if only to get rejections or not even that.

    15. A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics. Well, this is all cryptic, but
    details are provided in the links I have supplied to Shri Hemant's post.

    16. My feeling is, that at the right time the right people will contact me, from Divine Grace, and I need not bother about contacting anyone. If my work is worth what I think it is, then good people will contact me. Like you are trying to help. As for
    your questions, I have indeed written to the Director of IITKgP and the HoD of my old department E&ECE, but got no reply. I am too old to go running after people who are most likely going to dismiss me as a crank, or of no worth as I cannot pay up.

    17. Thanks, whatever I do is out in the open, and easily accessible these days with Google Groups, youtube, usenet, facebook... True I have no presence in the mainstream media, and that is no bad thing, for I have the time to do things I want to do at
    my own pace. "Let all good people come to the aid of the party" is my motto; if none around, well, more time for myself and my interests. Then also as Milton wrote "They also serve who but stand and wait". Unfortunately, what with huge jet engines
    polluting the upper atmosphere causing thus the greenhouse effect, time seems to be running out.

    18. One does not know what leads to what! Facebook is a new medium. It permits presentation of small videos, that can be shared by all everywhere. So it is useful to present something new and challenging as well, fast and free. Social pressure from such
    presentations may lead to political pressure, in due course, and thus, reduce the influence of the pernicious academics (Einstein et al) who are the curse of humanity; as they with their superb political and media skills influence the dull or corrupt
    politicians to maintain what is wrong and wasteful. Instead, some industrial researchers and daring people with resources may get interested, in my new ideas, and invest there. Who knows! All I know is, I do nishkaama karma - dedicate all works to the
    Divine. In my case that would be Mother Kali, but the other Gods and Goddesses, and my own Gurudev, I venerate. Nishkaama karma is not just theory for me, it is the most wholesome practice - keeps me productive, keeps me sane, and protects from evil. So
    it is, that while doing whatever I do, I also lead a happy life.

    19. The physics aphorisms of Arindam, is a brief summary of my works presented in the video links. Usenet link is https://groups.google.com/.../c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Fri Aug 4 20:53:13 2023
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters are
    very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.

    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Aug 4 22:26:28 2023
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 13:53:16 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means waves,
    composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These matters
    are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with respect to a
    reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is external force,
    With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and elegant which have
    lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation depended upon
    violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a violation of
    the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal reaction, it
    means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most fundamental
    fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.
    He should also have said that the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 5 04:49:55 2023
    On Saturday, August 5, 2023 at 1:26:32 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 13:53:16 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.
    He should also have said that the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter.
    Light speed is measured with atoms in equipment. That is why c is invariant, relative to the equipment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sat Aug 5 07:15:30 2023
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 21:49:59 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 5, 2023 at 1:26:32 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 13:53:16 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.
    He should also have said that the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter.
    Light speed is measured with atoms in equipment. That is why c is invariant, relative to the equipment.

    Doppler effect shows that light speed is variant with speed of emission.
    The MMI experiment when properly understood shows that if the Earth moves then light speed varies with the speed of what emits light. I had pointed out the subtle bungle there in 2005.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Fri Aug 11 00:10:44 2023
    On Sunday, 6 August 2023 at 00:15:34 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 21:49:59 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 5, 2023 at 1:26:32 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 13:53:16 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.
    He should also have said that the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter.
    Light speed is measured with atoms in equipment. That is why c is invariant, relative to the equipment.
    Doppler effect shows that light speed is variant with speed of emission.
    The MMI experiment when properly understood shows that if the Earth moves then light speed varies with the speed of what emits light. I had pointed out the subtle bungle there in 2005.
    "Modern physcis" is a tangled web of deception.
    Up Newton and Arindam, down Einstein and Feynman.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Thu Aug 31 13:32:11 2023
    On 03-Aug-23 10:48 pm, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee
    wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high
    frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of
    strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle
    now, wave when required.
    So how does an stellar interferometer work with photons?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson_stellar_interferometer

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Sylvia Else on Thu Aug 31 02:08:27 2023
    On Thursday, 31 August 2023 at 13:32:17 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 03-Aug-23 10:48 pm, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high
    frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of
    strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle
    now, wave when required.
    So how does an stellar interferometer work with photons?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson_stellar_interferometer

    Sylvia.

    Could not find the word photon in your link, nor a sight of it in the links on stellar interferometry.
    No interferometry is possible without the wave nature of light.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Timothy Golden@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Thu Aug 31 10:04:06 2023
    On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:08:32 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Thursday, 31 August 2023 at 13:32:17 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 03-Aug-23 10:48 pm, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high
    frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of
    strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle
    now, wave when required.
    So how does an stellar interferometer work with photons?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson_stellar_interferometer

    Sylvia.
    Could not find the word photon in your link, nor a sight of it in the links on stellar interferometry.
    No interferometry is possible without the wave nature of light.

    It's a very good problem to study the wavelength and propose a geometry.
    The accounting of photons is not necessarily well understood.
    For instance no claim of conservation of photons exists.
    As well, if we take the particle view of the photon then it suffers some peculiar properties when we take its reference frame seriously.
    A photon will age exactly 0 seconds from its emission at A to its absorption at B; no matter how far apart A and B are.
    Meanwhile the distance that it traveled is likewise short-circuited. This zero dimensional nature of the photon goes undiscussed. That it has ray properties is a geometrical concept. There is a confluence with polysign numbers here that I'd get into
    elsewhere hopefully soon.

    To ask whether this experiment is actually possible seems to be already swept under the rug, so to speak. In some regards we can place doubt on the possibility of even providing the experimental control of an atom of hydrogen, say, at position A, being
    energized and yielding a photon of a particular wavelength which then travels to another atom B some distance from A in some sort of apparatus. I would think that the probability of this experiment succeeding is too slight.

    It's a neat place to keep an open mind. As the electron became recognized as having an inherent magnetic moment, Maxwell's equations suffered a blow, though nobody seems to care. Raw charge is a misnomer. In some ways this is the ultimate Maxwellian
    realization.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Timothy Golden on Thu Aug 31 13:59:12 2023
    On Friday, 1 September 2023 at 03:04:12 UTC+10, Timothy Golden wrote:
    On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 5:08:32 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Thursday, 31 August 2023 at 13:32:17 UTC+10, Sylvia Else wrote:
    On 03-Aug-23 10:48 pm, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 3, 2023 at 12:09:14 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high
    frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of >> strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle
    now, wave when required.
    So how does an stellar interferometer work with photons?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson_stellar_interferometer

    Sylvia.
    Could not find the word photon in your link, nor a sight of it in the links on stellar interferometry.
    No interferometry is possible without the wave nature of light.
    It's a very good problem to study the wavelength and propose a geometry.
    The accounting of photons is not necessarily well understood.
    There are no such things as photons as apart from being a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation.
    Photons come from e=mcc which is rubbish as light speed is variant, and inertia is overcome with certain electrodynamics as my rail gun experiements prove.
    So there are no photons as particles.
    Only waves.
    And don't I know it, I created microwave antenna radiators, used them as phased arrays, for 12 years as an antenna development engineer.
    THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS PHOTONS involving e=mcc=hv.
    Which means, that so-called modern physics based upon e=mcc=hv is a cruel, disastrous, rotten, evil joke.
    True the whole world of institutions uphold that, and that is why this world sucks.

    For instance no claim of conservation of photons exists
    Wave motion gets arrested or gets merged with other waves in far outer space to form the background noise.
    As well, if we take the particle view of the photon then it suffers some peculiar properties when we take its reference frame seriously.
    Because the particle theory is totally wrong, so, naturally.
    A photon will age exactly 0 seconds from its emission at A to its absorption at B; no matter how far apart A and B are.
    Meanwhile the distance that it traveled is likewise short-circuited. This zero dimensional nature of the photon goes undiscussed. That it has ray properties is a geometrical concept. There is a confluence with polysign numbers here that I'd get into
    elsewhere hopefully soon.

    It has ray with wavelength properties since it behaves as a wave.
    And so, useful for engineering and science.
    Read the aphorisms of Arindam. https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ
    They will take us to the stars, and solve many problems on Earth relating to motion and energy.

    To ask whether this experiment is actually possible seems to be already swept under the rug, so to speak. In some regards we can place doubt on the possibility of even providing the experimental control of an atom of hydrogen, say, at position A, being
    energized and yielding a photon of a particular wavelength which then travels to another atom B some distance from A in some sort of apparatus. I would think that the probability of this experiment succeeding is too slight.

    Don't know what you are talking about.

    It's a neat place to keep an open mind.

    One must not say that right is wrong and wrong is right.
    That does not show an open mind.
    It shows a weak, corrupt mind.

    As the electron became recognized as having an inherent magnetic moment, Maxwell's equations suffered a blow, though nobody seems to care.

    Of course the electron has an inherent magnetic moment as it circles the atom, for then it forms a circular current which must have a magnetic moment with it.
    That is a phenomenon well understood in classical physics. Take any coil.
    It follows from the laws of Maxwell.
    Every circulating current creates a magnetic field perpendicular to its plane.

    Thus there are circulating currents in the iron core of the Earth that creates the Earth's magnetic field. Ditto for the sun and other planets.
    The magnetic moment only confirmed Maxwell's laws.
    I have modified Newton's laws.
    It is from Newton-Arindam-Maxwell that fuiture engineering will take off - the rubbish or scifi stuff from Eisntein must be binned asap.
    The world must throw out e=mcc=hv for peace and prosperity, joy and splendour, and expansion to the stars.
    With the Internal Force Engines and the Hydrogen Transmission Network.

    And using Natural Intelligence with my mathematics for simulation of complex situations, as opposed ot being robotically inclined towards AI.

    To be masters, all; not slaves to a few, must be the goal for humanity.

    Decency matters, for harmony, to control egos and interests; so my works are not confined to the sciences.

    Raw charge is a misnomer. In some ways this is the ultimate Maxwellian realization.

    Don't know what you are talking about.


    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Thu Aug 31 17:14:33 2023
    On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 10:26:32 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 13:53:16 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.
    He should also have said that the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter.

    No. He believed light moved with its own speed in space.
    The emitter has its own motion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Sep 1 00:18:44 2023
    On Friday, 1 September 2023 at 10:14:38 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Friday, August 4, 2023 at 10:26:32 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 5 August 2023 at 13:53:16 UTC+10, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 2, 2023 at 9:09:14 PM UTC-7, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    A photon is a brief pulse of electromagnetic radiation, of high frequency, seen as an electromagnetic phenomenon and NOT a burst of strange energy with peculiar schizophrenic properties - particle now, wave when required. Electromagnetism means
    waves, composed of varying electric and magnetic fields, and waves need a medium. Like sound waves need air, water waves need water. That medium is in Maxwellian electrodynamics, upon which all electrical engineering is based, known as aether. These
    matters are very deep, and I would not have known them had I not personally made antennas with my own hands when working for Bharat Electronics. Everything in the universe is moving, so what is inert? The answer is that a mass can only be inert with
    respect to a reference system. Like my hand is to my keyboard. If it is still, it is inert. If it moves, to type something, it is not inert with respect to the keyboard, there is some force involved. That force is what - someone drags my hand, that is
    external force, With internal force, it moves if I am alive, maybe robotic though! Now does internal force have a reaction??? The brilliance of Newtonian thinking is that it reduces the phenomenon of motion to just three brilliant laws - simple and
    elegant which have lasted the test of time. I discovered the equation e=0.5mVVN(N-k) back in 1999, as a far better explanation for mass-energy interaction than the hallowed e=mcc. To begin with, I thought that I could violate inertia (for the equation
    depended upon violating inertia) with purely mechanical means, involving internal force. I failed to do that. But I did manage to violate Newtonian laws with the electromagnetic rail gun experiments, starting from 2015. I found in 2015 that there was a
    violation of the momentum - suspending the rail gun as a pendulum bob, and letting the armature roll down with gravity first, and moving down faster with current second, there was no difference in the swingback of the bob. As there is,thus, no equal
    reaction, it means that the Feynman notion of currents in a circuit acting as water in a closed piping system (energy particles moving along the wires) is wrong. For then there could never be any lack of equal reaction. Inertia would rule, as the most
    fundamental fact of physics. But my experiment showing lack of reaction, creating violation of inertia, upsets both the Newtonian-Amperian electrodynamics and the Eisntein-Feynman relativistic quantum electrodynamics.
    A photon is something Einstein was given a Nobel Prize for.
    It is also something he said in 1937 he no longer believed.
    He should also have said that the light speed varies with the speed of the emitter.
    No. He believed light moved with its own speed in space.
    The emitter has its own motion.
    Which adds to the speed of the light it emits.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)