So as I was writing this book on the importance of the number 3 in physics, and in math, I was not able to express the larger meaning of this book-- the meaning that units of math and physics are essentially bound up together in 3 types.

And the Primal Axiom over all Science, including mathematics is All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism.

To form the Equations and laws of Electromagnetism we take New Ohm's Law Voltage = Coulomb*Magnetic Field B * Electric Field E. Now the multiplication by * is a generalized multiplication, it could be scalar or dot product or cross product.

But that Equation has the form V=CBE. And that equation through all permutations of the derivative yields all the laws of electromagnetism. Every one of Maxwell's corrected equations are within V=CBE differential equations.

So now the question is, in V=CBE, do I have 3 variables in math or 4 variables? Is V a variable or is V a resultant answer from only 3 variables.

Here I have to stop and correct the Mathematics and Physics community of their bad and horrible logic. Most never even knew this question exists and there is trouble here.

The trouble is, is V=CBE of 3 axes or of 4 axes where all 4 V,C,B,E are independent?

And here the answer lies within a Logical Hardship that no-one in Old Physics or Old Math recognized. The answer lies in the difference between a Equation of Math and a Function of Math.

Most in Old Physics and Old Math were sloppy, as sloppy as can be. Perhaps every textbook of Old Math and Old Physics write their functions with a equal sign F_x = x^2. Or some write it as Y = x^2. But a function is not an equation, but far different. A
function is a progression of mapping x values to a given y value. And the proper and correct way of writing a function is x^2 --> Y, or x^2 --> F_x.

Once we know that, then our New Ohm's law is really 3 variables of CBE, not 4 variables. And that CBE =V is an equation. The 3 variables, the C makes the x-axis, the B makes the y-axis and the E makes the z axis. There is no independent 4th axis for
voltage.

For example, volume in geometry is Volume= length*width*height, 3 independent variables of math, and volume is a resultant number answer, not a 4th axis nor a 4th dimension.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

czwartek, 10 sierpnia 2023 o 08:48:23 UTC+2 Archimedes Plutonium napisał(a):

252nd book of science// The units of mathematics and physics consolidated// physics research by Archimedes Plutonium

This book has become difficult for me in that writing it up almost finished, it was not logically coherent. Is the book about 3 and the importance of 3, or as I found in the last chapters, the book is more focused on a unification of Units of Math with

Units of Physics.

If we look at units in physics such as this list:

electric current = i = A

Angular momentum L = kg*m^2/s

Magnetic Field = kg /A*s^2

Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2

angular momentum = kg*m^2/s

frequency = 1/s

Force = kg*m/s^2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Power, or radiant flux = Energy times frequency, = kg*m^2 / s^3

Quantity of Electricity, Coulomb = C = A*s ( not the silly daffy + or - charge but a wire of monopoles)

Inertia = ML^2

Energy = Force x distance = work = ML^2T^-2

Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 ML^2T^-2

Force = current x mass x acceleration = ma = MLT^-2

Action = energy*time or it is momentum*length

velocity = LT^-1

acceleration = LT^-2

energy EM = ML^2T^-2

Entropy = ML^2T^-2
force = MLT^-2

frequency = T^-1

linear momentum EM = MLT^-1

linear momentum = MLT^-1

action = ML^2T^-1

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2

Magnetic Field = kg /A*s^2 = kg /C*s

Current = C = A*s = wire ( not the silly daffy + or - charge, but an actual wire of monopoles)

Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2

Pressure = kg/m*s^2
energy EM = ML^2T^-2

Entropy = ML^2T^-2
force = MLT^-2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Force = kg*m/s^2

Power = kg*m^2/s^3

Resistance = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C *A*s^2

Capacitance = A^2*s^4/ kg*m^2

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2

angular momentum L = kg m^2/(A)s

frequency = 1/s

Force = kg*m/s^2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Power, or radiant flux = Energy times frequency, = kg*m^2 / s^3

Quantity of Electricity, current, Coulomb = C = A*s

Voltage is the (a) Electric Potential, the (b) Potential Difference and (c) Electromotive Force and all of which has the Units of W/A = kg*m^2/A*s^3

Capacitance = farad = C/V = A^2*s^4 / kg*m^2

Electrical Resistance = ohm = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^3

Conductance = A/V = A^2*s^3 / kg*m^2

Magnetic Flux = V*s = kg*m^2 /A*s^2

Magnetic Field = tesla = kg /A*s^2

Electric Field is E = kg*m^2/ A*s^2 = kg*m^2/ C*s

Resistance = kg*m^2/A^2*s^3

Inductance = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^2

velocity = LT^-1

acceleration = LT^-2

energy EM = ML^2T^-2

energy = ML^2T^-2

action = ML^2 T^-1

force = MLT^-2

frequency = T^-1

linear momentum = MLT^-1

Angular momentum = ML^2T^-1

Force = MLT^-2

Energy = ML^2T^-2

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2

Angular momentum L = kg*m^2/s

Action = kg*m^2/s where angular momentum = action = electric field

Current = A where the A represents Ampere

Quantity of Current = C = A*s where the C represents Coulomb

Magnetic Field B = kg/ C*s

Electric Field is E = kg*m^2/ A*s^2 = kg*m^2/ C*s

Voltage = C*B*E = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2

Conductance = A/V = A^2*s^3 / kg*m^2

Capacitance = farad = C/V = A^2*s^4 / kg*m^2

If we look at that list, we do see some exponent 3, but rarely, and there is even a exponent 4 in capacitance.

But here is a theme I want to discuss. The derivative of calculus in math is 2 dimensional of a x-axis and y-axis where the integral is area under function graph curve. And when you take the integral, you raise the exponent to a higher power. So if the

function is in 2D and raising it in integral we are in 3D.

If we are in 2D with the function graph and taking the derivative, we lower the exponent by 1 (polynomial power rule of calculus).

For example, we have a function graph of speed meters/second. The derivative is acceleration of meters/seconds^2 and if we include a mass we have force. The integral with respect to meters is meters^2/sec a angular momentum. Taking the derivative of

meters^2/second with respect to seconds is meters^2/seconds^2 which is Energy if we include mass.

So what are the units of Mathematics if the above is a list of units in Physics. That Physics list of units is basically Mass and Meters and Time, the common familiar MKS physics units of meters, kilograms, seconds.

Now math also has units but they never admitted to that fact. In Math, the units are the 3 variables of the x-axis, the y-axis and the z-axis.

So in physics, the units are MKS and in math the units are xyz axes. In fact this is what we do when we take speed as being x axis of time and y axis as distance length, the dy/dx of a function graph, its slope at a point on the graph.

Now in the above physics units listed there appears to be some parameters that are not MKS such as Ampere A or C Coulomb, and even some units have a T temperature. But all those can be reduced to MKS.

And so, what is the link-up here of the number 3 with the units of math or units of physics? The link-up is that we need just 3 such units in both math and in physics.

And it is important that the graph is 2D, which when integrated becomes 3D, and that dimension of Space ends at 3D. So the Calculus of mathematics is going to determine what are meaningful units.

AP

We have a physical mess that hinders the development of this science.
There is confusion/entanglement of artificial concepts, units, values.

The picture of the mess is the breakneck physical constants that make
it possible to convert one artificial concept and value into another in order to enable a caricatured description of physical phenomena.

A step in the right direction was the Planck system of natural units,
which led to a significant reduction in the number of physical constants
(and showed that it was possible).

In the absolute system of units there will be no physical constants
and artificial concepts (e.g. mass, time, temperature...) invented
by man without understanding.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

What I did in mathematics starting 2013 with a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus FTC, was put all of mathematics ideas under the test of calculus. In other words, are the Reals the numbers of mathematics? No they are fake because the
Reals cannot give you a proof of FTC. Are the 4 quadrants of graphing correct or is 1st Quadrant Only the proper graphing? Here again FTC steps in and says we have to throw out 3 of the 4 quadrants. In other words, FTC became a consistency check upon
mathematics. If we take the Reals we throw out calculus. If we take 4 quadrants we throw out calculus. We never want to throw out calculus, thus we throw out the Reals and the other 3 quadrants.

So using Calculus as a consistency check upon mathematics was highly rewarding for it throws out much of the fakery of Old Math.

But now, here, I am applying that Calculus as a consistency check upon concepts and ideas in physics. Can we have Calculus if we had 4th dimension or higher? Apparently the answer is that calculus exists only in 2nd and 3rd dimension and no higher.

And we see this in speed and force and energy in physics. Energy is a mere meter^2/second^2. Volume in Space is a mere meters^3. When you integrate on energy of meters^2 you get meters^3.

As we look at the AP-EM Equations of all the laws of Electromagnetism, all of them are confined to the exponent power of 2, so that we can calculus integrate and raise them to exponent 3 and no higher.

Calculus in one sense proves that Space is 3rd dimension and no higher. And in physics, we already know that when you have a perpendicular to locate upon 3rd dimension, there is no more room for a "new unused perpendicular". There is no 4th dimension or
higher for there is no orthogonal new axis other than the xyz axes.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:09:50 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

What I did in mathematics starting 2013 with a geometry proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus FTC, was put all of mathematics ideas under the test of calculus. In other words, are the Reals the numbers of mathematics? No they are fake because

the Reals cannot give you a proof of FTC. Are the 4 quadrants of graphing correct or is 1st Quadrant Only the proper graphing? Here again FTC steps in and says we have to throw out 3 of the 4 quadrants. In other words, FTC became a consistency check upon
mathematics. If we take the Reals we throw out calculus. If we take 4 quadrants we throw out calculus. We never want to throw out calculus, thus we throw out the Reals and the other 3 quadrants.

So using Calculus as a consistency check upon mathematics was highly rewarding for it throws out much of the fakery of Old Math.

But now, here, I am applying that Calculus as a consistency check upon concepts and ideas in physics. Can we have Calculus if we had 4th dimension or higher? Apparently the answer is that calculus exists only in 2nd and 3rd dimension and no higher.

And we see this in speed and force and energy in physics. Energy is a mere meter^2/second^2. Volume in Space is a mere meters^3. When you integrate on energy of meters^2 you get meters^3.

As we look at the AP-EM Equations of all the laws of Electromagnetism, all of them are confined to the exponent power of 2, so that we can calculus integrate and raise them to exponent 3 and no higher.

Calculus in one sense proves that Space is 3rd dimension and no higher. And in physics, we already know that when you have a perpendicular to locate upon 3rd dimension, there is no more room for a "new unused perpendicular". There is no 4th dimension

or higher for there is no orthogonal new axis other than the xyz axes.


So the Calculus is a beautiful way of matching the inability of adding a new perpendicular to the existing three perpendicular axes of math , x, y, z. And thus no 4th dimension.

Now, I am glad I rewrite this book and put Units as the main theme and the number 3 or 1/3 as only sideshows.

And the very best correlation between physics and math is this correlation of geometry to physics, in that Volume is so so much like Voltage = C*B*E.

And in volume, it takes 3 right circular cones to match the volume of associated cylinder, same goes for surface area. And it is here that 3 and 1/3 come in full bloom. That the volume and surface area of enclosed sphere inside cylinder or the reverse is
2/3 volume or 2/3 surface area, and even the reverse of enclosed maximum cylinder inside sphere.

And this ties in to the All is Atom and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism, for the Faraday law is sphere bar magnet thrusting through proton cylinder of torus.

There is a famous expression in Ancient Rome history-- all roads lead to Rome. In physics and math-- all roads lead back to the equations of electromagnetism and pure geometry.

AP, King of Science

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:02:38 AM UTC-5, Enes Richard wrote:

czwartek, 10 sierpnia 2023 o 08:48:23 UTC+2 Archimedes Plutonium napisał(a):

252nd book of science// The units of mathematics and physics consolidated// physics research by Archimedes Plutonium

This book has become difficult for me in that writing it up almost finished, it was not logically coherent. Is the book about 3 and the importance of 3, or as I found in the last chapters, the book is more focused on a unification of Units of Math

with Units of Physics.

If we look at units in physics such as this list:

electric current = i = A

Angular momentum L = kg*m^2/s

Magnetic Field = kg /A*s^2

Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2

angular momentum = kg*m^2/s

frequency = 1/s

Force = kg*m/s^2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Power, or radiant flux = Energy times frequency, = kg*m^2 / s^3

Quantity of Electricity, Coulomb = C = A*s ( not the silly daffy + or - charge but a wire of monopoles)

Inertia = ML^2

Energy = Force x distance = work = ML^2T^-2

Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 ML^2T^-2

Force = current x mass x acceleration = ma = MLT^-2

Action = energy*time or it is momentum*length

velocity = LT^-1

acceleration = LT^-2

energy EM = ML^2T^-2

Entropy = ML^2T^-2
force = MLT^-2

frequency = T^-1

linear momentum EM = MLT^-1

linear momentum = MLT^-1

action = ML^2T^-1

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2

Magnetic Field = kg /A*s^2 = kg /C*s

Current = C = A*s = wire ( not the silly daffy + or - charge, but an actual wire of monopoles)

Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2

Pressure = kg/m*s^2
energy EM = ML^2T^-2

Entropy = ML^2T^-2
force = MLT^-2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Force = kg*m/s^2

Power = kg*m^2/s^3

Resistance = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C *A*s^2

Capacitance = A^2*s^4/ kg*m^2

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2

angular momentum L = kg m^2/(A)s

frequency = 1/s

Force = kg*m/s^2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Power, or radiant flux = Energy times frequency, = kg*m^2 / s^3

Quantity of Electricity, current, Coulomb = C = A*s

Voltage is the (a) Electric Potential, the (b) Potential Difference and (c) Electromotive Force and all of which has the Units of W/A = kg*m^2/A*s^3

Capacitance = farad = C/V = A^2*s^4 / kg*m^2

Electrical Resistance = ohm = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^3

Conductance = A/V = A^2*s^3 / kg*m^2

Magnetic Flux = V*s = kg*m^2 /A*s^2

Magnetic Field = tesla = kg /A*s^2

Electric Field is E = kg*m^2/ A*s^2 = kg*m^2/ C*s

Resistance = kg*m^2/A^2*s^3

Inductance = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^2

velocity = LT^-1

acceleration = LT^-2

energy EM = ML^2T^-2

energy = ML^2T^-2

action = ML^2 T^-1

force = MLT^-2

frequency = T^-1

linear momentum = MLT^-1

Angular momentum = ML^2T^-1

Force = MLT^-2

Energy = ML^2T^-2

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2

Angular momentum L = kg*m^2/s

Action = kg*m^2/s where angular momentum = action = electric field

Current = A where the A represents Ampere

Quantity of Current = C = A*s where the C represents Coulomb

Magnetic Field B = kg/ C*s

Electric Field is E = kg*m^2/ A*s^2 = kg*m^2/ C*s

Voltage = C*B*E = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2

Conductance = A/V = A^2*s^3 / kg*m^2

Capacitance = farad = C/V = A^2*s^4 / kg*m^2

If we look at that list, we do see some exponent 3, but rarely, and there is even a exponent 4 in capacitance.

But here is a theme I want to discuss. The derivative of calculus in math is 2 dimensional of a x-axis and y-axis where the integral is area under function graph curve. And when you take the integral, you raise the exponent to a higher power. So if

the function is in 2D and raising it in integral we are in 3D.

If we are in 2D with the function graph and taking the derivative, we lower the exponent by 1 (polynomial power rule of calculus).

For example, we have a function graph of speed meters/second. The derivative is acceleration of meters/seconds^2 and if we include a mass we have force. The integral with respect to meters is meters^2/sec a angular momentum. Taking the derivative of

meters^2/second with respect to seconds is meters^2/seconds^2 which is Energy if we include mass.

So what are the units of Mathematics if the above is a list of units in Physics. That Physics list of units is basically Mass and Meters and Time, the common familiar MKS physics units of meters, kilograms, seconds.

Now math also has units but they never admitted to that fact. In Math, the units are the 3 variables of the x-axis, the y-axis and the z-axis.

So in physics, the units are MKS and in math the units are xyz axes. In fact this is what we do when we take speed as being x axis of time and y axis as distance length, the dy/dx of a function graph, its slope at a point on the graph.

Now in the above physics units listed there appears to be some parameters that are not MKS such as Ampere A or C Coulomb, and even some units have a T temperature. But all those can be reduced to MKS.

And so, what is the link-up here of the number 3 with the units of math or units of physics? The link-up is that we need just 3 such units in both math and in physics.

And it is important that the graph is 2D, which when integrated becomes 3D, and that dimension of Space ends at 3D. So the Calculus of mathematics is going to determine what are meaningful units.

AP

We have a physical mess that hinders the development of this science.
There is confusion/entanglement of artificial concepts, units, values.

The picture of the mess is the breakneck physical constants that make
it possible to convert one artificial concept and value into another in order
to enable a caricatured description of physical phenomena.

A step in the right direction was the Planck system of natural units,
which led to a significant reduction in the number of physical constants (and showed that it was possible).

In the absolute system of units there will be no physical constants
and artificial concepts (e.g. mass, time, temperature...) invented
by man without understanding.

Sorry Enes, but I prefer AI to not bother me. I can smell AI 10 kilometers away with their broken logic, lack of coherence. I call it Artificial Ignorance. And Quantum Computing is likely to be even far worse of a con-art than is AI.

Now tell me Enes, for no news reporter or science journal writers have ever been able to answer AP on Quantum Computing-- Question-- what parts are in a quantum computer that do not exist inside a regular normal computer??? So far, everyone on Earth has
been deaf, dumb and silent to AP's question.

Maybe you, Enes, AI, can be the first to answer that.

For AP believes quantum computing is a super-hype designed to fleece stupid investors of their cash.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

czwartek, 10 sierpnia 2023 o 10:25:28 UTC+2 Archimedes Plutonium napisał(a):

On Thursday, August 10, 2023 at 3:02:38 AM UTC-5, Enes Richard wrote:

czwartek, 10 sierpnia 2023 o 08:48:23 UTC+2 Archimedes Plutonium napisał(a):

252nd book of science// The units of mathematics and physics consolidated// physics research by Archimedes Plutonium

This book has become difficult for me in that writing it up almost finished, it was not logically coherent. Is the book about 3 and the importance of 3, or as I found in the last chapters, the book is more focused on a unification of Units of Math

with Units of Physics.

If we look at units in physics such as this list:

electric current = i = A

Angular momentum L = kg*m^2/s

Magnetic Field = kg /A*s^2

Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2

angular momentum = kg*m^2/s

frequency = 1/s

Force = kg*m/s^2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Power, or radiant flux = Energy times frequency, = kg*m^2 / s^3

Quantity of Electricity, Coulomb = C = A*s ( not the silly daffy + or - charge but a wire of monopoles)

Inertia = ML^2

Energy = Force x distance = work = ML^2T^-2

Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2 = 1/2 ML^2T^-2

Force = current x mass x acceleration = ma = MLT^-2

Action = energy*time or it is momentum*length

velocity = LT^-1

acceleration = LT^-2

energy EM = ML^2T^-2

Entropy = ML^2T^-2
force = MLT^-2

frequency = T^-1

linear momentum EM = MLT^-1

linear momentum = MLT^-1

action = ML^2T^-1

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2

Magnetic Field = kg /A*s^2 = kg /C*s

Current = C = A*s = wire ( not the silly daffy + or - charge, but an actual wire of monopoles)

Voltage = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2

Pressure = kg/m*s^2
energy EM = ML^2T^-2

Entropy = ML^2T^-2
force = MLT^-2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Force = kg*m/s^2

Power = kg*m^2/s^3

Resistance = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C *A*s^2

Capacitance = A^2*s^4/ kg*m^2

velocity or speed = m/s

acceleration = m/s^2

angular momentum L = kg m^2/(A)s

frequency = 1/s

Force = kg*m/s^2

Pressure = kg / m*s^2

Energy = kg*m^2 / s^2

Power, or radiant flux = Energy times frequency, = kg*m^2 / s^3

Quantity of Electricity, current, Coulomb = C = A*s

Voltage is the (a) Electric Potential, the (b) Potential Difference and (c) Electromotive Force and all of which has the Units of W/A = kg*m^2/A*s^3

Capacitance = farad = C/V = A^2*s^4 / kg*m^2

Electrical Resistance = ohm = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^3

Conductance = A/V = A^2*s^3 / kg*m^2

Magnetic Flux = V*s = kg*m^2 /A*s^2

Magnetic Field = tesla = kg /A*s^2

Electric Field is E = kg*m^2/ A*s^2 = kg*m^2/ C*s

Resistance = kg*m^2/A^2*s^3

Inductance = kg*m^2 /A^2*s^2

velocity = LT^-1

acceleration = LT^-2

energy EM = ML^2T^-2

energy = ML^2T^-2

action = ML^2 T^-1

force = MLT^-2

frequency = T^-1

linear momentum = MLT^-1

Angular momentum = ML^2T^-1

Force = MLT^-2

Energy = ML^2T^-2

Pressure = ML^-1T^-2

Power = ML^2T^-3

Entropy = ML^2T^-2

Angular momentum L = kg*m^2/s

Action = kg*m^2/s where angular momentum = action = electric field

Current = A where the A represents Ampere

Quantity of Current = C = A*s where the C represents Coulomb

Magnetic Field B = kg/ C*s

Electric Field is E = kg*m^2/ A*s^2 = kg*m^2/ C*s

Voltage = C*B*E = kg*m^2 /A*s^3 = kg*m^2 /C*s^2

Conductance = A/V = A^2*s^3 / kg*m^2

Capacitance = farad = C/V = A^2*s^4 / kg*m^2

If we look at that list, we do see some exponent 3, but rarely, and there is even a exponent 4 in capacitance.

But here is a theme I want to discuss. The derivative of calculus in math is 2 dimensional of a x-axis and y-axis where the integral is area under function graph curve. And when you take the integral, you raise the exponent to a higher power. So if

the function is in 2D and raising it in integral we are in 3D.

If we are in 2D with the function graph and taking the derivative, we lower the exponent by 1 (polynomial power rule of calculus).

For example, we have a function graph of speed meters/second. The derivative is acceleration of meters/seconds^2 and if we include a mass we have force. The integral with respect to meters is meters^2/sec a angular momentum. Taking the derivative

of meters^2/second with respect to seconds is meters^2/seconds^2 which is Energy if we include mass.

So what are the units of Mathematics if the above is a list of units in Physics. That Physics list of units is basically Mass and Meters and Time, the common familiar MKS physics units of meters, kilograms, seconds.

Now math also has units but they never admitted to that fact. In Math, the units are the 3 variables of the x-axis, the y-axis and the z-axis.

So in physics, the units are MKS and in math the units are xyz axes. In fact this is what we do when we take speed as being x axis of time and y axis as distance length, the dy/dx of a function graph, its slope at a point on the graph.

Now in the above physics units listed there appears to be some parameters that are not MKS such as Ampere A or C Coulomb, and even some units have a T temperature. But all those can be reduced to MKS.

And so, what is the link-up here of the number 3 with the units of math or units of physics? The link-up is that we need just 3 such units in both math and in physics.

And it is important that the graph is 2D, which when integrated becomes 3D, and that dimension of Space ends at 3D. So the Calculus of mathematics is going to determine what are meaningful units.

AP

We have a physical mess that hinders the development of this science. There is confusion/entanglement of artificial concepts, units, values.

The picture of the mess is the breakneck physical constants that make
it possible to convert one artificial concept and value into another in order
to enable a caricatured description of physical phenomena.

A step in the right direction was the Planck system of natural units, which led to a significant reduction in the number of physical constants (and showed that it was possible).

In the absolute system of units there will be no physical constants
and artificial concepts (e.g. mass, time, temperature...) invented
by man without understanding.

Sorry Enes, but I prefer AI to not bother me. I can smell AI 10 kilometers away with their broken logic, lack of coherence. I call it Artificial Ignorance. And Quantum Computing is likely to be even far worse of a con-art than is AI.

Now tell me Enes, for no news reporter or science journal writers have ever been able to answer AP on Quantum Computing-- Question-- what parts are in a quantum computer that do not exist inside a regular normal computer??? So far, everyone on Earth

has been deaf, dumb and silent to AP's question.

Maybe you, Enes, AI, can be the first to answer that.

For AP believes quantum computing is a super-hype designed to fleece stupid investors of their cash.

AP

I have nothing to do with AI, I don't know about quantum computers
... but I have similar doubts as AP at first.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)