1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS

  • Re: How does science define the difference between relative and absolut

    From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Fri Aug 18 18:20:44 2023
    On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:16:16 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?

    Mitchell Raemsch
    Moron gibberish.

    If science can't define the difference between absolute and relative
    motion how are they going to argue the difference?
    Where is science's measurement of them?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Aug 18 18:14:47 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?

    Mitchell Raemsch

    Moron gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sat Aug 19 00:44:54 2023
    On 8/18/2023 7:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?

    Simple. Relative motion exists. Absolute motion doesn't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sat Aug 19 07:12:54 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 6:16:16 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?

    Mitchell Raemsch
    Moron gibberish.

    If science can't define the difference between absolute and relative
    motion how are they going to argue the difference?
    Where is science's measurement of them?

    Nonsense gibberish, moron.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mitchrae3323@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Volney on Sat Aug 19 10:28:03 2023
    On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 9:44:59 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
    On 8/18/2023 7:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?

    Simple. Relative motion exists. Absolute motion doesn't.

    It is just science's assumption. How is it measured?
    Einstein said absolute motion does. as light.
    But the atom can compete with that... in space
    leaving it behind at a motion BH
    At a motion BH the atom is moving ahead
    of light at near light speed. How can they both
    compete? it suggests the atom is like light.
    So what is your measurement that shows
    relative motion is real and not absolute?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sat Aug 19 11:01:47 2023
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, August 18, 2023 at 9:44:59 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
    On 8/18/2023 7:40 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    forms of motion? What is their defining difference science?

    Simple. Relative motion exists. Absolute motion doesn't.

    It is just science's assumption. How is it measured?
    Einstein said absolute motion does. as light.
    But the atom can compete with that... in space
    leaving it behind at a motion BH
    At a motion BH the atom is moving ahead
    of light at near light speed. How can they both
    compete? it suggests the atom is like light.
    So what is your measurement that shows
    relative motion is real and not absolute?

    Moron babble.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)