• Liar vs liar, in a MAD world

    From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 22 14:55:45 2023
    The spamming crazy fruitcake of Arindam Banerjee--his failure in physics and mind-rot opinions of physics, actually hostile towards physics-- his denial of Apollo 11, as some staged hoax from Hollywood or Bollywood.
    Forget Apollo 11, Archie.
    Say how come Luna 25 vanished after the Soviet Lunakhod roved on the Moon some 50 years ago and came back with samples.
    Were they all, all lIars?
    Like all the e=mcc wallahs.
    Something like, far too big and fat and popular to be proved wrong.
    The puzzle was, that if Apollo 11 happened in some desert in the US, why did the USSR not make a propaganda blitz out of that fraud?
    Evidently, they came up with a fraud of their own. Lunakhod, which apparently went to the Moon, took samples, and returned, to show how safe and smart the Communists were.
    Hmm.
    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what. Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    It would cost a lot less than US$500000000 which was wasted by the whodumbos on their failed naval rail guns.
    More like the A$380000000 which is what the Premier Dan Andrews is paying the lawyers and their accomplices to NOT have the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne.
    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Tue Aug 22 20:35:27 2023
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.

    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint
    trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail
    when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Volney on Tue Aug 22 17:51:17 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail
    when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.
    Uh-huh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Tue Aug 22 20:59:50 2023
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint
    trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail
    when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh

    Did you look? I didn't think so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Volney on Tue Aug 22 18:34:11 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:59:57 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint
    trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail
    when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh
    Did you look? I didn't think so.

    I did not. No point.
    I don't see why I should trust any site on the web for such an important issue. If the Chinese Govt. has an opinion in its website on that matter, I would be interested.
    But then, they too could have a deal with the US/Russia to keep mum.
    Money money money - it is a whodumbic e=mcc world. Corruption rules! Blackmail works!

    Really, the only way to know is to go there and see.
    Space tourism for the masses, using IFE based upon my new physics and engineering, will be very profitable.
    But, such is the power of the whodumbos, who rule from every nook and cranny, that not even the most "courageous" of "dare devil" journalists avoid me and my original works!

    $500000000 down the drain for new and failed rail guns for the Navy - now this is not my information. It was provided by Jim Pennino.
    AU$380000000 to feed lawyers and their accomplices for NOT having the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne. Comes straight from the Premier's mouth.

    Rather such wastes, and much much more, than give me far less to make a new motor to the stars, start creating the HTN, develop proper optimisation schemes using sensible maths, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Tue Aug 22 18:38:10 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 11:34:17 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:59:57 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint >> trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail >> when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh
    Did you look? I didn't think so.
    I did not. No point.
    I don't see why I should trust any site on the web for such an important issue.
    If the Chinese Govt. has an opinion in its website on that matter, I would be interested.
    But then, they too could have a deal with the US/Russia to keep mum.
    Money money money - it is a whodumbic e=mcc world. Corruption rules! Blackmail works!

    Really, the only way to know is to go there and see.
    Space tourism for the masses, using IFE based upon my new physics and engineering, will be very profitable.
    But, such is the power of the whodumbos, who rule from every nook and cranny, that not even the most "courageous" of "dare devil" journalists avoid me and my original works!

    $500000000 down the drain for new and failed rail guns for the Navy - now this is not my information. It was provided by Jim Pennino.
    AU$380000000 to feed lawyers and their accomplices for NOT having the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne. Comes straight from the Premier's mouth.

    Now AU$380000000 may seem like a lot of money, but it is only barely adequate living for just 20 lawyers.

    Rather such wastes, and much much more, than give me far less to make a new motor to the stars, start creating the HTN, develop proper optimisation schemes using sensible maths, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Tue Aug 22 19:29:13 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 11:34:17 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:59:57 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint >> trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail >> when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh
    Did you look? I didn't think so.
    I did not. No point.
    I don't see why I should trust any site on the web for such an important issue.
    If the Chinese Govt. has an opinion in its website on that matter, I would be interested.
    But then, they too could have a deal with the US/Russia to keep mum.
    Money money money - it is a whodumbic e=mcc world. Corruption rules! Blackmail works!

    Really, the only way to know is to go there and see.
    Space tourism for the masses, using IFE based upon my new physics and engineering, will be very profitable.
    But, such is the power of the whodumbos, who rule from every nook and cranny, that not even the most "courageous" of "dare devil" journalists avoid me and my original works!

    Oops, cut out the *not* between "that" and "even" in the above line.

    $500000000 down the drain for new and failed rail guns for the Navy - now this is not my information. It was provided by Jim Pennino.
    AU$380000000 to feed lawyers and their accomplices for NOT having the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne. Comes straight from the Premier's mouth.

    Rather such wastes, and much much more, than give me far less to make a new motor to the stars, start creating the HTN, develop proper optimisation schemes using sensible maths, etc.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From whodat@21:1/5 to Volney on Tue Aug 22 22:52:02 2023
    On 8/22/2023 7:35 PM, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie
    bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world,
    is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking
    it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.

    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail
    when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.


    He wants it to be done with his "engine" on an airplane. We already know
    his "engine" doesn't work. We also know that to adapt an airplane to
    space flight will cost more than building a new vehicle from scratch.

    Pipe dreams are made of this...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Wed Aug 23 01:02:10 2023
    On 8/22/2023 9:34 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:59:57 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint >>>> trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail >>>> when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh

    Did you look? I didn't think so.

    I did not. No point.

    Of course not. You aren't even smart enough to find them without
    explicit references (like Mitch), and (like Mitch) you won't even look
    even if you did have the references.

    Maybe I need to estimate your already-low IQ estimate from about the
    same as ArchiePoo to that of Mitch.

    I don't see why I should trust any site on the web for such an important issue.
    If the Chinese Govt. has an opinion in its website on that matter, I would be interested.

    Which begs the obvious question, why trust the Chinese when they are
    almost as bad as the Russians at lying?

    But then, they too could have a deal with the US/Russia to keep mum.

    Of course there is no way Russia would have kept quiet if they had any
    evidence of a fake moon landing. They were listening in to the Apollos
    the entire time. (and the US to theirs).

    Really, the only way to know is to go there and see.

    Well I just told you that they already went there and saw. BTW I even
    think it may have been an Indian orbiter which photographed the sites.

    Space tourism for the masses, using IFE based upon my new physics and engineering, will be very profitable.

    Snake oil frequently is profitable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to whodat on Tue Aug 22 21:53:17 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 13:52:13 UTC+10, whodat wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 7:35 PM, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie
    bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world,
    is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking
    it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.

    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    He wants it to be done with his "engine" on an airplane. We already know
    his "engine" doesn't work.

    Whodumbo is so dumb that he does not know that not even the first prototype of my engine has been made!
    Its feasibility has been demonstrated, by the fact that it violates Newtonian laws, with my rail gun experiments. That are ignored by the whodumbos on a global scale.
    The crucial power stroke breaking the inertial condition, shown in my youtube videos, proves my new physics.
    Which is NOT based on e=mcc; it is based on e = 0.5mVVN(N-k); but that is not what the whodumbos can accept, for then they will be proven blithering nincompoops, howling howler monkeys, clowns, freaks, frauds, etc. on the most awesome scale imaginable.
    Anything but that!

    So what can the whodumbo do"

    Poor wretch, he states the heavy armature causing the power stroke moves because the table for testing is on an inclined plane!

    To think, that such creatures are in charge of science in US, is shocking but also amusing in a peculiar way.

    We also know that to adapt an airplane to
    space flight will cost more than building a new vehicle from scratch.

    Pipe dreams are made of this...

    Kick out the whodumbos from every nook and cranny, replace them with my followers, for long-lasting joy to be the result - till inertia once again stifles; petty matters get undue prominence; then, like some dormant virus, the whodumbos will rise yet
    again.
    But we will have the HTN and IFE before that happens. Plentiful power for all on Earth everywhere, and off to the stars we go.

    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Volney on Wed Aug 23 00:11:25 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 15:02:17 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 9:34 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:59:57 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint >>>> trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail >>>> when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh

    Did you look? I didn't think so.

    I did not. No point.
    Of course not. You aren't even smart enough to find them without
    explicit references (like Mitch), and (like Mitch) you won't even look
    even if you did have the references.

    I have no use for opinions from entities like you, Moroney.
    So there is no reason for me to follow what you say. I have placed you as a moronic liar, reliable just that way. You do not have my respect, let alone my trust.

    If you as a compulsive liar say the moon landings happened then chances are good they did not land on the Moon. No site can do anything about that non-event to convince me. This is the age of artificiality, or fakeness. Why the Moon, they could be
    walking on Mars! Such is the power of fakery.
    Say something truthful for a change.
    Just try.
    Trying to say I am not smart shows what a silly liar you are.

    Maybe I need to estimate your already-low IQ estimate from about the accelerating > same as ArchiePoo to that of Mitch.

    Tch tch, ad hom is all you got. The world that notes rotfl about your science, especially about your scientific opinion of my pthe armature down the rails with one finger.

    Still, in your moronic mendacious way, you are funny. Less funny than wrong, of course.


    I don't see why I should trust any site on the web for such an important issue.
    If the Chinese Govt. has an opinion in its website on that matter, I would be interested.
    Which begs the obvious question, why trust the Chinese when they are
    almost as bad as the Russians at lying?

    As you are a liar, that indicates the Chinese are truthful. More truthful than you whodumbic e=mcc sorts, anyway.

    But then, they too could have a deal with the US/Russia to keep mum.
    Of course there is no way Russia would have kept quiet if they had any evidence of a fake moon landing. They were listening in to the Apollos
    the entire time. (and the US to theirs).
    No, they could use that to blackmail. Both sides could put up fake stories to fool the world, to show off their superiority. More mutually beneficial than truth-telling. Morality has no place in power politics. Apollo vs Lunakhod.

    Really, the only way to know is to go there and see.
    Well I just told you that they already went there and saw. BTW I even
    think it may have been an Indian orbiter which photographed the sites.

    There is no reason to believe e=mcc chanting liars.

    Space tourism for the masses, using IFE based upon my new physics and engineering, will be very profitable.
    Snake oil frequently is profitable.

    And don't you e=mcc wallahs know it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Wed Aug 23 15:27:54 2023
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 17:11:29 UTC+10, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 15:02:17 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 9:34 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:59:57 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 8:51 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Wednesday, 23 August 2023 at 10:35:33 UTC+10, Volney wrote:
    On 8/22/2023 5:55 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

    A MAD business, this spy vs spy situation! I lie big, let you lie bigger, what.
    Ah well, only thing to do now, if truth has any place in this world, is to make an IFE, put it on a plane, just go to the Moon and checking it all out. The flag, fat footprints, etc.
    That has already been done. A low altitude lunar orbiter has
    photographed all 6 Apollo landing sites and shows the lander, footprint
    trails, some scientific equipment and the lunar rovers and their trail
    when appropriate. You can find the photos of the sites on the web.

    Uh-huh

    Did you look? I didn't think so.

    I did not. No point.
    Of course not. You aren't even smart enough to find them without
    explicit references (like Mitch), and (like Mitch) you won't even look even if you did have the references.
    I have no use for opinions from entities like you, Moroney.
    So there is no reason for me to follow what you say. I have placed you as a moronic liar, reliable just that way. You do not have my respect, let alone my trust.

    If you as a compulsive liar say the moon landings happened then chances are good they did not land on the Moon. No site can do anything about that non-event to convince me. This is the age of artificiality, or fakeness. Why the Moon, they could be
    walking on Mars! Such is the power of fakery.
    Say something truthful for a change.
    Just try.
    Trying to say I am not smart shows what a silly liar you are.

    Maybe I need to estimate your already-low IQ estimate from about the accelerating > same as ArchiePoo to that of Mitch.

    Tch tch, ad hom is all you got. The world that notes rotfl about your science, especially about your scientific opinion of my pthe armature down the rails with one finger.

    Sorry, I missed writing "accelerating" the armature, above.

    Still, in your moronic mendacious way, you are funny. Less funny than wrong, of course.
    I don't see why I should trust any site on the web for such an important issue.
    If the Chinese Govt. has an opinion in its website on that matter, I would be interested.
    Which begs the obvious question, why trust the Chinese when they are almost as bad as the Russians at lying?
    As you are a liar, that indicates the Chinese are truthful. More truthful than you whodumbic e=mcc sorts, anyway.
    But then, they too could have a deal with the US/Russia to keep mum.
    Of course there is no way Russia would have kept quiet if they had any evidence of a fake moon landing. They were listening in to the Apollos
    the entire time. (and the US to theirs).
    No, they could use that to blackmail. Both sides could put up fake stories to fool the world, to show off their superiority. More mutually beneficial than truth-telling. Morality has no place in power politics. Apollo vs Lunakhod.
    Really, the only way to know is to go there and see.
    If they were that good in the 60s there would have been a lunar colony there by now, with chaps jumping ten feet.

    Well I just told you that they already went there and saw. BTW I even think it may have been an Indian orbiter which photographed the sites.
    There is no reason to believe e=mcc chanting liars.
    Space tourism for the masses, using IFE based upon my new physics and engineering, will be very profitable.
    Snake oil frequently is profitable.
    And don't you e=mcc wallahs know it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)