• Odd Bodkin (1939-2023) obituary

    From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 24 04:50:04 2023
    The longtime poster at sci.physics has passed away in Canada.
    Bodkin was a resident of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. As a teacher at
    the St. Frances Cree Bilingual School, her emphasis was on
    chemistry and physics for children aged 14 to 18. Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming . Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Thu Aug 24 05:27:46 2023
    On Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 21:50:08 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    The longtime poster at sci.physics has passed away in Canada.
    Bodkin was a resident of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. As a teacher at
    the St. Frances Cree Bilingual School, her emphasis was on
    chemistry and physics for children aged 14 to 18. Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming . Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.

    My condolences. I remember some of Odd's posts.
    Arindam

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Thu Aug 24 13:02:00 2023
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .

    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.

    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.

    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Volney on Fri Aug 25 11:19:03 2023
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Fri Aug 25 15:40:53 2023
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Fri Aug 25 18:33:43 2023
    On 8/25/2023 5:40 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was >>> Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?


    Oh, you want a threesome. Bad Hindu.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Fri Aug 25 19:33:08 2023
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 09:33:49 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/25/2023 5:40 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well >>> hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was >>> Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    Oh, you want a threesome.
    No.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 04:47:47 2023
    On 8/25/2023 9:33 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 09:33:49 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/25/2023 5:40 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well >>>>> hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was >>>>> Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    Oh, you want a threesome.
    No.



    Include "Vulva", then you'll get your threesome. Bad bad Hindu.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 03:34:53 2023
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sat Aug 26 06:27:17 2023
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sat Aug 26 06:28:12 2023
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 19:47:54 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/25/2023 9:33 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 09:33:49 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/25/2023 5:40 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well >>>>> hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    Oh, you want a threesome.
    No.

    Include "Vulva", then you'll get your threesome. Bad bad Hindu.

    Wicked Roachie, keep your prurient thoughts to yourself.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 09:09:58 2023
    On 8/26/2023 8:27 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well >>>>> hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was >>>>> Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.


    No no no no no... Only one reason, not a number of them. You wanted to
    have a threesome with Alan and Archie. You wouldn't give a damn how old
    they were, unless... you wanted a threesome.

    In any case, if you want it happen, your chance is with Vulva and
    Archie, not Alan.





    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 08:42:27 2023
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music
    together.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sat Aug 26 15:04:41 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 00:10:04 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/26/2023 8:27 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well >>>>> hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    No no no no no... Only one reason, not a number of them. You wanted to
    have a threesome with Alan and Archie. You wouldn't give a damn how old
    they were, unless... you wanted a threesome.

    Roachie, I found Odd/Maureen was 84 years old when she died. That is, she has had no excuse for a bad education as certain people of our time may have.
    Also, she was a teacher.
    So there was no reason for her to NOT understand my lucidly explained physics and my rail gun experiments.
    The puzzle thus is, why was she so negative about them. Possibly that is explained by certain cultural factors, less said the better.
    Another point, 15 years ago she was 69. And our Alan, 55.
    Hmm.
    And Natasha/Archie I took it was somewhere around 60.
    Now I have absolutely no idea how physicists of that age operate, in or out of their absurd conferences. Sexual activity, actual or attempted, may be more diverting than the lies they have to spout via e=mcc. This may explain the "why".
    What Alan said they tried to do, and how it turned out, will remain a mystery that I do not care to solve.
    Some mysteries may remain thus.

    As for me, my sex life is and has been highly regulated - strict celibacy followed by monogamy. No other person ever mattered, or will matter, that way. Just the way it is, not just with me, but with all my ancestors and all my friends and relatives.
    So if you are a girl, Roachie, or some adventurous boy, desist from projection of your perverted thoughts upon me.
    I am no great-unca Gandhi, see, making out with rich Jew boys like Kallenbach. Just a normal Hindu, the way a normal Hindu should be.
    Serenity and superiority are the consequences - I kick ass, coolly, with the blessings of the Gods and Goddesses I adore.

    In any case, if you want it happen, your chance is with Vulva and
    Archie, not Alan.

    "if" is a slimy word, Roachie. It is the basis of AI, not NI.
    Chances of the sort you mention are zero, and such was the case when I was much younger and far better looking.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sat Aug 26 15:10:20 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.

    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 15:30:27 2023
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    Odd Bodkin is dead at 84, real name Maureen Flemming
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 18:05:29 2023
    On 8/26/2023 5:04 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:


    As for me, my sex life is


    You're disclosing it to the wrong person, Arindam. The right person, as
    you know, is Vulva :)




    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 18:12:18 2023
    On 8/26/2023 5:10 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>>>> On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well >>>>>>> hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared >> to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music
    together.

    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?


    No, no, Arindam, don't go down that road. He's got too much wrinkles for
    you to dig in to get to your mark. Very bad Hindu practice.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sat Aug 26 17:19:46 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time. (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    Odd Bodkin is dead at 84, real name Maureen Flemming
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sat Aug 26 17:25:00 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time. (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz

    What made her crazy?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sat Aug 26 17:24:15 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 09:12:25 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/26/2023 5:10 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>> On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote: >>>>>>> On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a >>>>>> girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their >>>>>> personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who >> is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music
    together.

    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    No, no, Arindam, don't go down that road. He's got too much wrinkles for
    you to dig in to get to your mark. Very bad Hindu practice.

    "Hindu", Roachie, is just a word for Sanatan Dharmis (followers of the eternal path of righteousness) coined by the mlecchas (invaders those with speech issues) could prounce the river Sindhu (known as Indus) as Hindu, as the s sound was beyond them.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 19:55:53 2023
    On 8/26/2023 7:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote: >>> On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a >>>>>>>> girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went
    back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be
    verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we >>>>>>>> continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their >>>>>>>> personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared >>>> to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who >>>> is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music
    together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    Odd Bodkin is dead at 84, real name Maureen Flemming
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)


    Nobody finds anything wrong with the physics you perform. It is
    untouchable. They find something wrong with you :-) Hahhhaha :)



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 20:18:32 2023
    On 8/26/2023 7:24 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    "Hindu", Roachie, is just a word for Sanatan Dharmis (followers of the eternal path of righteousness) coined by the mlecchas (invaders those with speech issues) could prounce the river Sindhu (known as Indus) as Hindu, as the s sound was beyond them.


    Interesting. So much history in there. And all those bright people. One
    of hour best physics professors in Tehran University (Hessabi) was also
    a linguist. One day in his office in which he held his classes, one of
    us asked him why there are two words for sine in Persian, ("sinus" and
    "Jeyb"). He said sinus was Latin and Jeyb comes from the use that an
    Indian mathematician a few thousand years back had made of the concept
    of sine which he had created himself, for finding the width of a river.
    River, to this day in Iran, especially when it is a small one, is
    referred sometimes as "Joob" which is the same word as Jeyb, and the
    technique that the math guy had used (i.e. the sine) was being called
    the Jeyb method, which later was given the name sine as we know it. So
    the word Jeyb survived and was still being used in some books in
    Persian. Even in our trigonometry class in high school! That's where we
    saw the word first.





    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 23:03:21 2023
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 8:25:04 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal. It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time. (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    What made her crazy?
    Natasha is not crazy, she is glib. AP is friendly and outgoing but she
    is limited to pushing buttons on a plastic box. When Archimedes tries
    to go out in the mean streets of Toronto, folks don't love her as much as
    they used to. Middle age can be harsh for a woman. 43 is over the hill.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sat Aug 26 22:51:47 2023
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 8:19:49 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal. It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time. (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    Odd Bodkin is dead at 84, real name Maureen Flemming
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    I am not familiar with your equation Energy = e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    E = a half * mass * velocity squared * (NN-Nk)
    what is N?
    is k Boltzmann's constant?
    Al

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sun Aug 27 05:57:14 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 11:18:39 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/26/2023 7:24 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    "Hindu", Roachie, is just a word for Sanatan Dharmis (followers of the eternal path of righteousness) coined by the mlecchas (invaders those with speech issues) could prounce the river Sindhu (known as Indus) as Hindu, as the s sound was beyond them.
    Interesting. So much history in there. And all those bright people. One
    of hour best physics professors in Tehran University (Hessabi) was also
    a linguist. One day in his office in which he held his classes, one of
    us asked him why there are two words for sine in Persian, ("sinus" and "Jeyb"). He said sinus was Latin and Jeyb comes from the use that an
    Indian mathematician a few thousand years back had made of the concept
    of sine which he had created himself, for finding the width of a river. River, to this day in Iran, especially when it is a small one, is
    referred sometimes as "Joob" which is the same word as Jeyb, and the technique that the math guy had used (i.e. the sine) was being called
    the Jeyb method, which later was given the name sine as we know it. So
    the word Jeyb survived and was still being used in some books in
    Persian. Even in our trigonometry class in high school! That's where we
    saw the word first.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    "Lilavati" by Bhaskaracharya is a condensation of ancient Indian mathematics, expressed in Sanskrit verse.
    A marvellous fusion of poetry and mathematics

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sun Aug 27 05:55:24 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 10:55:59 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/26/2023 7:19 PM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>>>> On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote: >>>>>>>> On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal. >>>>>>>> It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a >>>>>>>> girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is >>>>>>>> Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went >>>>>>>> back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be >>>>>>>> verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we >>>>>>>> continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time.
    (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their >>>>>>>> personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content >>>>>>>> to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who >>>> is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If >>>> she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music >>>> together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    Odd Bodkin is dead at 84, real name Maureen Flemming
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    Nobody finds anything wrong with the physics you perform.

    Every "physicist" finds everything wrong with my physics, Roachie. Haven't you noticed that? What is really wrong about my physics for their point of view is that they cannot prove my new physics to be wrong. What is worse is that it shows them up as
    blithering nincompoops for generations now, with e=mcc physics now blasted by my inertia violating rail gun. "Electrodynamics of moving bodies" indeed. Hah.
    So they can never touch my new physics, for their careers are far more important than genuine scientific research.
    *****
    Far easier for them to ignore and abuse me.
    *****
    As long as they get funding from their deluded sponsors in govt., academia, media, finance etc. they can continue their charade, their outrageous frauds, and they know it.
    Well, an engineer friend told me back in 2000 after he read my book "To the Stars!' that it would take at least 30 years for the world to catch on to my new ideas based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k) replacing e=mcc. Looks like, he was right on track.
    I got further confirmation of the rightness, validation really, when a very senior scientist of CSIRO told me angrily (in 2003) that I was driving certain people to despair. There was no way that they would give up on e=mcc stuff. If I valued my career I
    should repent and become another e=mcc chanter. He was right too - I was hounded out of employment soon after, and never got any decent job in Australia. Other elites in my Bengali society ostracised me, and only recently there seems to have been some
    change of attitude after decades of smug aloofness and covert sneering.

    Science comes first, for science is about the realisation of pure truth. One can never compromise if one is a genuine scientist, not fake posing careerists as the PhD wallahs have to be. So I gave up my PhD degree at RMIT because I would not lie about my
    rail gun experiments, to support the e=mcc stuff. How could I crush the future of my grandchildren and their friends?

    It is
    untouchable.

    Right you are, Roachie. It is untouchable in more than one way.


    They find something wrong with you :-) Hahhhaha :)

    hee hee hee hee :-)

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sun Aug 27 05:31:20 2023
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 16:03:26 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 8:25:04 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 08:30:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 6:10:24 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Sunday, 27 August 2023 at 01:42:31 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 9:27:20 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 20:34:57 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 6:40:56 PM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    On Saturday, 26 August 2023 at 04:19:06 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 1:02:04 PM UTC-4, Volney wrote:
    On 8/24/2023 7:50 AM, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    Odd Bodkin's
    real name was Maureen Edith Flemming .
    Out of curiosity, how do you know this? Odd kept his/her identity well
    hidden the entire time here.

    Odd was one of the few sane ones here.
    Please offer a
    prayer for Odd.
    My condolences to Maureen's family, regardless of whether or not she was
    Odd Bodkin.
    I first met Odd Bodkin near a physics conference in Montreal.
    It was at a bar 15 years ago on Cote de Neiges. She was dating a
    girl you know as Archimedes Plutonium, and whose real name is
    Natasha Lipshitz. We had a few laughs together and then went back to my hotel room for a threesome. They turned out to be verbally abusive towards me so I cut short our romp. Still, we
    continued to correspond via sci.physics for a long time. (Natasha did not use the moniker AP at that time). I found their
    personal attacks to be tolerable and their scientific content
    to be adequate.

    If you want more details, let me know.
    How old is Archie/ Natasha? How old are you?
    I am as old as Vladamir Putin. You got a problem wit dat?
    So you are 70 now, and Maureen was 84. I suppose Archie/Natasha is between 70 and 84.
    My problem is puzzlement. For a number of reasons.
    Never mind.
    I did not ask Archimedes, 15 years ago, what her age was, but she appeared
    to be between 18 and and 28 years old. I do not really want a woman who
    is as old as me. Archimedes Plutonium was one hot chick back then! If
    she knew when to shut her mouth, we could have made beautiful music together.
    Mathematically, we have 28, 55 and 69.
    I was surprised about Archie's age, and gender. I thought she was a grumpy old fool, around 70 or so. If Natasha is only 43 now, max, that explains a lot. Thanks for the inside info.
    Now look here, Natasha aka Archie, stop stalking me and everybody else. Behave.

    Is whodumbo also female, I wonder?
    Yes, your math is now correct.
    Archimedes Plutonium is 43 years old, real name Natsha Lipschitz
    What made her crazy?
    Natasha is not crazy, she is glib. AP is friendly and outgoing but she
    is limited to pushing buttons on a plastic box. When Archimedes tries
    to go out in the mean streets of Toronto, folks don't love her as much as they used to. Middle age can be harsh for a woman. 43 is over the hill.
    I had no clue about this! From now on I will let our dear Archie/Natasha alone with her works, not respond.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 06:34:34 2023
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    I am not familiar with your equation Energy = e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    E = a half * mass * velocity squared * (NN-Nk)
    what is N?
    is k Boltzmann's constant?
    Al

    It starts with the fact that a body can be moved with internal force. That is, within a given geometry there is a system which is independent of other masses or energies. A rocket is a good illustration - the thrust comes from the escaping gas. But the
    gas escapes the body - in a universe where there is nothing else but the rocket, its centre of gravity stays exactly where it was. Ditto for any gun firing a bullet. Stop the bullet in the barrel, there will be an explosion, but the gun will go nowhere.
    The centre of gravity stays put. Such is inertia.
    Let us assume we have a "rocket" which gets thrust, but does not eject mass. In other words, it goes by pure internal force. Obviously, that cannot be! The laws of motion will be violated. For every action there has to be an equal and opposite reaction.
    Just cannot happen. But for the sake of argument, let us say it does and see to what it leads to.
    Some energy E stored within the "rocket" will be expended to move it from inertia and in the absence of any friction or other forces, it will continue to move in a straight line after accelerating over the period over which the internal force acts.
    It will have a velocity say v.
    Its kinetic energy with respect to the base reference state will be 0.5mv^2. It will be less than the energy E, for there will be losses involved.
    Let us now introduce a efficiency k factor. k is greater than 1.
    Thus E = 0.5mV^2k
    Let the above processes be repeated N times. So with respect to the earliest frame of reference, the velocity of the "rocket" will be Nv. The energy expended will be NE.
    The kinetic energy of the "rocket" with respect to the base reference state will be 0.5m(Nv)^2 where m is the mass of the "rocket".
    When N is large compared to k, the term
    (0.5m(Nv)^2 - NE) will be positive, indicating that extra energy has been created. Let us call it e.
    Then
    e = 0.5m(Nv)^2 - NE
    or e = 0.5mNNv^2 - 0.5mNkv^2
    or e = 0.5mNv^2(N-k)
    This was derived in my book "To the Stars" published online in my (now defunct) adda website in January 2000.

    More details in:
    Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion" https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

    Section 1
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

    Section 1 (contd.)
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

    Section 2
    The Creation and Destruction of Energy https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan Folmsbee@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sun Aug 27 07:10:14 2023
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 9:34:38 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    I am not familiar with your equation Energy = e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    E = a half * mass * velocity squared * (NN-Nk)
    what is N?
    is k Boltzmann's constant?
    Al
    It starts with the fact that a body can be moved with internal force. That is, within a given geometry there is a system which is independent of other masses or energies. A rocket is a good illustration - the thrust comes from the escaping gas. But the
    gas escapes the body - in a universe where there is nothing else but the rocket, its centre of gravity stays exactly where it was. Ditto for any gun firing a bullet. Stop the bullet in the barrel, there will be an explosion, but the gun will go nowhere.
    The centre of gravity stays put. Such is inertia.
    Let us assume we have a "rocket" which gets thrust, but does not eject mass. In other words, it goes by pure internal force. Obviously, that cannot be! The laws of motion will be violated. For every action there has to be an equal and opposite reaction.
    Just cannot happen. But for the sake of argument, let us say it does and see to what it leads to.
    Some energy E stored within the "rocket" will be expended to move it from inertia and in the absence of any friction or other forces, it will continue to move in a straight line after accelerating over the period over which the internal force acts.
    It will have a velocity say v.
    Its kinetic energy with respect to the base reference state will be 0.5mv^2. It will be less than the energy E, for there will be losses involved.
    Let us now introduce a efficiency k factor. k is greater than 1.
    Thus E = 0.5mV^2k
    Let the above processes be repeated N times. So with respect to the earliest frame of reference, the velocity of the "rocket" will be Nv. The energy expended will be NE.
    The kinetic energy of the "rocket" with respect to the base reference state will be 0.5m(Nv)^2 where m is the mass of the "rocket".
    When N is large compared to k, the term
    (0.5m(Nv)^2 - NE) will be positive, indicating that extra energy has been created. Let us call it e.
    Then
    e = 0.5m(Nv)^2 - NE
    or e = 0.5mNNv^2 - 0.5mNkv^2
    or e = 0.5mNv^2(N-k)
    This was derived in my book "To the Stars" published online in my (now defunct) adda website in January 2000.

    More details in:
    Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion" https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

    Section 1
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

    Section 1 (contd.)
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

    Section 2
    The Creation and Destruction of Energy https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee
    The efficiency k is greater than 1. I do not see why. Maybe k is less than 1, because of friction.
    In your theory k could be 20. So the energy E is 20 times 1/2 mvv. That is not persuasive, yet
    Continue please. I hope Natasha Lipschitz (AP) will join this discussion soon, about our late mutual
    friend Odd Bodkin.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Physfitfreak@21:1/5 to Arindam Banerjee on Sun Aug 27 10:39:43 2023
    On 8/27/2023 7:55 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    Every "physicist" finds everything wrong with my physics, Roachie.


    True :) You're not open about it. You're hustling, not explaining.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sun Aug 27 14:28:48 2023
    On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 01:39:48 UTC+10, Physfitfreak wrote:
    On 8/27/2023 7:55 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    Every "physicist" finds everything wrong with my physics, Roachie.
    True :) You're not open about it. You're hustling, not explaining.
    I explain. They hustle. You project.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Arindam Banerjee@21:1/5 to Alan Folmsbee on Sun Aug 27 14:33:29 2023
    On Monday, 28 August 2023 at 00:10:19 UTC+10, Alan Folmsbee wrote:
    On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 9:34:38 AM UTC-4, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    Alan Folmsbee is 71 years old, Real name Alan Folmsbee
    I spend Summers in Connecticut and Winters in Maui, Hawaii
    Aloha !
    A real person at last!
    Now tell me, what do you find wrong about my new physics based on e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    I am not familiar with your equation Energy = e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
    E = a half * mass * velocity squared * (NN-Nk)
    what is N?
    is k Boltzmann's constant?
    Al
    It starts with the fact that a body can be moved with internal force. That is, within a given geometry there is a system which is independent of other masses or energies. A rocket is a good illustration - the thrust comes from the escaping gas. But
    the gas escapes the body - in a universe where there is nothing else but the rocket, its centre of gravity stays exactly where it was. Ditto for any gun firing a bullet. Stop the bullet in the barrel, there will be an explosion, but the gun will go
    nowhere. The centre of gravity stays put. Such is inertia.
    Let us assume we have a "rocket" which gets thrust, but does not eject mass. In other words, it goes by pure internal force. Obviously, that cannot be! The laws of motion will be violated. For every action there has to be an equal and opposite
    reaction. Just cannot happen. But for the sake of argument, let us say it does and see to what it leads to.
    Some energy E stored within the "rocket" will be expended to move it from inertia and in the absence of any friction or other forces, it will continue to move in a straight line after accelerating over the period over which the internal force acts.
    It will have a velocity say v.
    Its kinetic energy with respect to the base reference state will be 0.5mv^2. It will be less than the energy E, for there will be losses involved.
    Let us now introduce a efficiency k factor. k is greater than 1.
    Thus E = 0.5mV^2k
    Let the above processes be repeated N times. So with respect to the earliest frame of reference, the velocity of the "rocket" will be Nv. The energy expended will be NE.
    The kinetic energy of the "rocket" with respect to the base reference state will be 0.5m(Nv)^2 where m is the mass of the "rocket".
    When N is large compared to k, the term
    (0.5m(Nv)^2 - NE) will be positive, indicating that extra energy has been created. Let us call it e.
    Then
    e = 0.5m(Nv)^2 - NE
    or e = 0.5mNNv^2 - 0.5mNkv^2
    or e = 0.5mNv^2(N-k)
    This was derived in my book "To the Stars" published online in my (now defunct) adda website in January 2000.

    More details in:
    Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion" https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

    Section 1
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

    Section 1 (contd.)
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

    Section 2
    The Creation and Destruction of Energy https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

    Cheers,
    Arindam Banerjee
    The efficiency k is greater than 1. I do not see why. Maybe k is less than 1, because of friction.
    The energy 0.5mvv after a hit has to be less than E.
    Thus if we put it as I have k is greater than 1.
    electrical energy is used in my experiments.
    Meaning loss of charge.

    In your theory k could be 20. So the energy E is 20 times 1/2 mvv. That is not persuasive, yet

    That is an engineering matter.
    Continue please. I hope Natasha Lipschitz (AP) will join this discussion soon, about our late mutual
    friend Odd Bodkin.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)