Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
12:25 AM (29 minutes ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
Fortunately for me, this book comes on the eve of one of the most important experiments in physics history, the proving that Water is really H4O and not H2O, for that experiment destroys the vapid and stupid Standard Model of Old Physics.

AP
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
12:53 AM (1 minute ago)



to Plutonium Atom Universe
First off, I need to define what is Old Physics and what is New Physics, and what is Old Math and what is New Math.

I was the creator of these four terms due to the science I discovered from 1990 through present current time of 2023.

Old Physics is that which has no function, no job, no task of subatomic particles and considers subatomic particles as balls, tiny balls that mostly sit around doing nothing in a nucleus of Atoms. Even the electron of Old Physics is a tiny ball but flys
around the outside of the nucleus of atoms.

New Physics starts in year 1990 with the Atom Totality theory, for that theory demands All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. So in New Physics, when we understand something to a large degree of understanding, is because we
reduced the explanation to electricity and magnetism. In Old Physic their proton was 938MeV, in New Physics the Proton is 840MeV and is a proton torus with the electron as muon inside the proton torus doing the Faraday law producing new electricity, and
is the reason Sun and stars shine. Sun and stars shine not from fusion, but from Faraday law of every proton in that star doing the Faraday law.

Old Math is where the numbers are Reals and geometry is a continuum, a continuum of Reals. But unfortunately mathematicians starting 1900 were too stupid and far too arrogant to follow the developments going on in physics. For physics starting 1900 was
undergoing a revolution in the discovery of the Atomic theory and atomic energy and this was called Quantum Mechanics. Quantum means discrete, not continuous. And there was not a single mathematician that took notice that continuity was absent in
physics.

New Math is discrete math where the true numbers of mathematics are Decimal Grid Number Systems starting with the smallest Grid of 10 grid. And this discrete numbers also is ingrained in geometry space as discrete geometry. New Math starts with the Atom
Totality theory for that is quantum mechanics, but New Math accelerates in year 2013 when AP starts his epic writing of textbooks called "True Calculus". In one of those editions of "True Calculus" AP happens to fall into a diagram picture of a cell in
mathematics function which is the proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Mind you, I was not looking for a proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, but by sheer happenstance landed or fell into a proof, and fortunately I almost immediately
recognized it as a proof. Here is that picture diagram.


Start with this rectangle as the area or integral of a function from E to D interval:

__A__C
| |
|B |
| |
---------
E D
And the derivative at x= A where A is the midpoint of top side of the rectangle, above is merely the dy/dx involving points A and B. Thus, it can never be a curve in Calculus. And the AB is part of the function graph itself. No curves exist in
mathematics and no continuum exists in mathematics.

So the derivative is a hinge at point A and we lift up the right triangle with hypotenuse AB and set it upon the other line segment AC.


To this:
B
/|
/ |
A /----| C
/ |
| |
|____|
E D

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Funny how physicists let a rogue crew inside physics get away with a cheap dumb name as Standard Model.

Usually a important theory of physics has a name that speaks of the geometry involved. Such as Thermodynamics is the motion of thermal energy. Or, electrodynamics is electricity and magnetism in motion.

So why did the physicists allow a gang of silly fools get away with Standard Model??

Probably because it was merely a game of Numerology Algebra, and they well knew, the rogue band, well knew that Numerology Algebra would sink the moment it was announced.

But honestly that is the name that is apt for what the Standard Model was, dumb tykes playing games with algebra. For there never was any predictions in Standard Model, for it was all that of Postdiction. News of experiment results would come in and the
jerks of Standard Model sprinted as fast they could to their desks to play and jiggle juggle algebra, then blare out-- our Standard Model predicted that.

But the name I want to give to Standard Model is the geometry application the Standard Model was all about. The geometry of the Standard Model was Stick-and-Ball theory. So the name the Standard Model should have had in its sick history of physics should
have been the Stick-and-Ball theory. For it looked upon Atoms as balls and if bonded to another atom would have a stick as that bond between two tiny balls. And the Standard Model had a nucleus for atoms and here we have protons as balls and neutrons as
balls and the sticks would represent the strong-nuclear-force. And their electron was actually the Dirac magnetic monopole but those in Standard Model were far too dumb to realize 940MeV for neutron and 105MeV for muon were within Sigma Error of saying a
neutron was composed of 9 muons-- and transferring that idea the proton is actually 8 muons with a muon as bar magnet inside proton torus doing Faraday law. No, no-one in physics was keen enough, smart enough to see that proton at 938MeV was within sigma
error of 9 x muons. All and all, the Standard Model was silly and stupid and retarded the progress of physics.

And just right now, as I am writing this book, comes news of some people doing the AP experiment of weighing the mass of the hydrogen and oxygen in Water Electrolysis. So AP's theory of Atom Totality-- All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but electricity
and magnetism, means that the geometry of Atoms and their subatomic particles are no longer the childish silly stick and ball, but rather every geometry in electricity and magnetism-- a coil and bar magnet in Faraday law as the proton is a torus coil
with muon as bar magnet inside thrusting through the proton torus. The neutron as a parallel plate capacitor making skin cover over the proton torus and where Dirac magnetic monopoles reside on these parallel plates to engage in chemistry bonding of one
atom with another atom.

So the AP theory of Atom Totality PREDICTS the hydrogen atom is really H2 where one of the protons becomes a neutron-like capacitor to the other proton. That is a prediction!!!

And thus, as more and more experiments come in verifying the first, that the hydrogen mass is 1/4 the mass of oxygen in electrolysis, means the hydrogen Atom is actually H2, and water is actually H4O.

AP, King of Science

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I honestly do not know if a comparison of physics to math is feasible, for math is the language of physics. And physics creates math, for the central idea of Physics is All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. I call this the
primal axiom of science.

Math exists only because atoms are numerous giving rise to numbers and algebra. And because Atoms have shape and size gives rise to geometry math.

So to make a comparison of history of physic with math is unreasonable and I should not have "compared" in the title.

Now there are several major events in physics history and to briefly list those as follows.

1) Atomic Theory of Ancient Greeks
2) Kepler-Galileo-Newton laws of motion
3) Faraday-Maxwell laws of electricity and magnetism
4) Starting 1900 Quantum Mechanics
5) 1990 Atom Totality enters the scene

Major events in math history listed.

1) Pythagorean theorem relating physical world to numbers of math, relating distance to a right angle
2) Circle ratio a constant of circumference/diameter
3) Decimal Number System
4) Italian mathematicians such as Tartaglia, Cardan on polynomial theory
5) Calculus discovered by Newton and Leibniz
6) Huygens tractrix
7) AP's valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus

These are major events in physics and math. And it appears to be that when physics had major events that math was sort of quiet, and when math had major events, that physics of the time was rather quiet.

For example, much of the 1900 to 1990 was strong in advances of physics, while math lay fallow and quiet, even going in counter productive means such as Cohen's continuum work while physics was quantum discrete mechanics.

Huge advances from 1800 to 1900 in electricity magnetism of physics while little to nothing going on in mathematics that survives today.

Can I give some logical reason for this advance of one while the other stagnates? Perhaps the one that is enjoying progress causes a brain drain of the other. Witness, the building of the bomb in World War two, had a brain drain of math that went into
physics.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

No, this book is a history not of comparison between physics and math but of a definition of what Old Physics means and what Old Math means.

In some sense, a scrutiny of what is called a Science Revolution, the old no longer tenable and the new comes in to replace the old. And there has been frequent old and new transitions in physics and in mathematics. Although not as well noticed in
mathematics.

However, there is one idea, that has not changed at all since its birth in Ancient Greek times-- The Atomic Theory. Ever since its birth, it has only been elaborated upon and detailed more and more through the centuries and milleniums.

Even mathematics changes and has not been as "constant" as the physics Atomic Theory. Witness the discovery of Calculus by Newton and Leibniz many centuries ago, yet here in 2013 is the first time we have a valid proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus,
where we throw out all functions except polynomials, and where for the first time in math history we have the true numbers of mathematics-- Decimal Grid Number Systems, meaning all the math before with Reals was a rubbish math.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)