they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the oppositeThe ususal word salad, confused, moron gibberish.
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 7:01:11 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.The ususal word salad, confused, moron gibberish.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Stars that were in stable orbits for billions of years
if they were to become BH they would not spiral
in.. as everything keeps its stable orbit. Even heat
does not push anything out of its orbit...
Look at comets. They keep their same ellipses
where there is heat.
Mitchell Raemsch
they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 7:01:11 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.The ususal word salad, confused, moron gibberish.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Stars that were in stable orbits for billions of yearsStars are not generally in orbit around anything other than the galaxy, moron.
if they were to become BH they would not spiralThis is all word salad, babbling gibberish, moron.
in.. as everything keeps its stable orbit. Even heat
does not push anything out of its orbit...
Look at comets. They keep their same ellipses
where there is heat.
Mitchell Raemsch
On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
gravitational waves.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Ditto.
Why is the Moon doing the oppositeIt is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than gravitational wave emission.
getting further away?
Sylvia.
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
gravitational waves.
If stars were not stable they would have collided billions of years ago
Man makes his own unstable orbits. Some time nature does.
But it is not for the stars. It is for accretion discs...
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Ditto.
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.
On 02-Sept-23 10:17 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
gravitational waves.
But if you supposedly don't know it can't be used as a argument sylvia.If stars were not stable they would have collided billions of years agoThat rather depends on how long it takes, and how far apart the stars
were in the first place, doesn't it? If some stars had already collided because they started out not so far apart, would you know?
Man makes his own unstable orbits. Some time nature does.
But it is not for the stars. It is for accretion discs...
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Ditto.
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.Yes, due to tidal drag.
Sylvia.
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 11:46:15 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 7:01:11 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:Stars are not generally in orbit around anything other than the galaxy,
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.The ususal word salad, confused, moron gibberish.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Stars that were in stable orbits for billions of years
moron.
Then how could they as BH collide with another in their future jim?
What about binary or more system required for BHs to collide?
If they started in stable orbit for billions of years ago they
would not leave it.
they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 5:40:42 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 02-Sept-23 10:17 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the >>>> long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
gravitational waves.
Sylvia? How can everything have always been in unstable orbit?
Everything in the universe would have already collided.
Why haven't more thing collided by all these unstable orbits?
That rather depends on how long it takes, and how far apart the stars
If stars were not stable they would have collided billions of years ago
were in the first place, doesn't it? If some stars had already collided
because they started out not so far apart, would you know?
But if you supposedly don't know it can't be used as a argument sylvia.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than
gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.
Yes, due to tidal drag.
No. The Moon ellipse orbit is expanding.in size.
On 9/2/2023 9:01 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 5:40:42 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 02-Sept-23 10:17 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the >>>> long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
gravitational waves.
Sylvia? How can everything have always been in unstable orbit?That's really stupid, Roy, even for you. If it takes 15 billion years
Everything in the universe would have already collided.
Why haven't more thing collided by all these unstable orbits?
for two stars in an unstable orbit to collide but the universe is less
than 14 billion years old, the stars couldn't have collided yet and are still in their unstable orbit.
No. Its repeating same ellipse is expanding.were in the first place, doesn't it? If some stars had already collided >> because they started out not so far apart, would you know?
If stars were not stable they would have collided billions of years ago >> That rather depends on how long it takes, and how far apart the stars
But if you supposedly don't know it can't be used as a argument sylvia.No, we just wouldn't know it. But we could know that other stars will collide (but haven't yet) if we get clear enough observations and data
about their unstable orbits.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than
gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.
Yes, due to tidal drag.
No. The Moon ellipse orbit is expanding.in size.Because of tidal drag. Can't you read what Sylvia wrote??
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 9:10:05 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the oppositehttps://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/01/aa33485-18/aa33485-18.html#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20the%20blue,(Collier%20%26%20Jenkins%201984).
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Scroll down to #4
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 9:32:50 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 9/2/2023 9:01 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 5:40:42 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 02-Sept-23 10:17 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:That's really stupid, Roy, even for you. If it takes 15 billion years
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>>>> On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the >>>>>> long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
gravitational waves.
Sylvia? How can everything have always been in unstable orbit?
Everything in the universe would have already collided.
Why haven't more thing collided by all these unstable orbits?
for two stars in an unstable orbit to collide but the universe is less
than 14 billion years old, the stars couldn't have collided yet and are
still in their unstable orbit.
Where is your evidence that all stars have collided or
are going to collide?
What is the difference between stars that will and
stars that.
Evidence only shows star stable orbits.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than
gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.
Yes, due to tidal drag.
No. The Moon ellipse orbit is expanding.in size.
Because of tidal drag. Can't you read what Sylvia wrote??
No. Its repeating same ellipse is expanding.
On 9/2/2023 1:44 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:If all orbits have to be unstable that is the destiny.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 9:32:50 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 9/2/2023 9:01 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 5:40:42 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >>>> On 02-Sept-23 10:17 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:That's really stupid, Roy, even for you. If it takes 15 billion years
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
gravitational waves.
Sylvia? How can everything have always been in unstable orbit?
Everything in the universe would have already collided.
Why haven't more thing collided by all these unstable orbits?
for two stars in an unstable orbit to collide but the universe is less
than 14 billion years old, the stars couldn't have collided yet and are >> still in their unstable orbit.
Where is your evidence that all stars have collided orWhen did I say *all* stars will or have collided, Roy Masters Jr.?
are going to collide?
What is the difference between stars that will andStars that what, Roy?
stars that.
Evidence only shows star stable orbits.Nope. Several pulsars are known to be in unstable orbit.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than >>>>>> gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.
Yes, due to tidal drag.
No. The Moon ellipse orbit is expanding.in size.
Because of tidal drag. Can't you read what Sylvia wrote??
No. Its repeating same ellipse is expanding.Which is technically an unstable orbit.
I do believe it is believed the moon's orbit will stabilize once the
earth becomes tidally locked to the moon.
Anyway, if the ellipse is expanding, it's not repeating the sameYes a same geometry can expand.
ellipse, is it.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 1:43:35 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
On 9/2/2023 1:44 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:If all orbits have to be unstable that is the destiny.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 9:32:50 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:When did I say *all* stars will or have collided, Roy Masters Jr.?
On 9/2/2023 9:01 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 5:40:42 AM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote: >> >>>> On 02-Sept-23 10:17 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:That's really stupid, Roy, even for you. If it takes 15 billion years
On Friday, September 1, 2023 at 10:22:16 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 01-Sept-23 2:10 pm, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.What makes you think their orbits were ever stable? No orbit is in the
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
long term, because of the energy being emitted in the form of
gravitational waves.
Sylvia? How can everything have always been in unstable orbit?
Everything in the universe would have already collided.
Why haven't more thing collided by all these unstable orbits?
for two stars in an unstable orbit to collide but the universe is less
than 14 billion years old, the stars couldn't have collided yet and are >> >> still in their unstable orbit.
Where is your evidence that all stars have collided or
are going to collide?
But there is no evidence for it. There is just an assumption
that stars that were in stable orbit could become unstable.
And that would never happen.
What is the difference between stars that will andStars that what, Roy?
stars that.
Evidence only shows star stable orbits.Nope. Several pulsars are known to be in unstable orbit.
Then they should have collided before they were pulsars.
Which is technically an unstable orbit.Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
It is experiencing tidal drag, which is a much larger effect than
gravitational wave emission.
No. It's orbit ellipse is expanding.
Yes, due to tidal drag.
No. The Moon ellipse orbit is expanding.in size.
Because of tidal drag. Can't you read what Sylvia wrote??
No. Its repeating same ellipse is expanding.
No. It's ellipse is getting larger.
Just like galaxies grow in cosmology.
Their star orbits continue to expand.
I do believe it is believed the moon's orbit will stabilize once the
earth becomes tidally locked to the moon.
It has always been tidally locked. It formed that way.
Anyway, if the ellipse is expanding, it's not repeating the sameYes a same geometry can expand.
ellipse, is it.
It has always been tidally locked. It formed that way.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:03:59 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 9:10:05 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the oppositehttps://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/01/aa33485-18/aa33485-18.html#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20the%20blue,(Collier%20%26%20Jenkins%201984).
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Scroll down to #4
Orbits are repeating stable ellipses more than anything.
And they are never spirals.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:31:56 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:03:59 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 9:10:05 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the oppositehttps://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/01/aa33485-18/aa33485-18.html#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20the%20blue,(Collier%20%26%20Jenkins%201984).
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Scroll down to #4
Orbits are repeating stable ellipses more than anything.And your evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
And they are never spirals.
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:05:57 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:31:56 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:03:59 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> > > On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 9:10:05 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:And your evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
they would not spiral inward at any point after.https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/01/aa33485-18/aa33485-18.html#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20the%20blue,(Collier%20%26%20Jenkins%201984).
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Scroll down to #4
Orbits are repeating stable ellipses more than anything.
And they are never spirals.
Has the Earth's orbit changed?
What about any planet paul?
Where is their spiral?
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:05:57 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:31:56 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:03:59 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:And your evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 9:10:05 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/01/aa33485-18/aa33485-18.html#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20the%20blue,(Collier%20%26%20Jenkins%201984).
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Scroll down to #4
Orbits are repeating stable ellipses more than anything.
And they are never spirals.
Has the Earth's orbit changed?
What about any planet paul?
Where is their spiral?
On Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 9:31:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:05:57 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >> On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:31:56 AM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, September 2, 2023 at 10:03:59 AM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:And your evidence for this claim is what, Mitch?
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 9:10:05 PM UTC-7, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
they would not spiral inward at any point after.https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/01/aa33485-18/aa33485-18.html#:~:text=The%20majority%20of%20the%20blue,(Collier%20%26%20Jenkins%201984).
They would stay in their original
stable orbits. They have no reason
to collide.
The same with orbiting neutron stars.
If they were stars in stable orbit.
They have no reason to collide.
Why is the Moon doing the opposite
getting further away?
Galaxies growing shows their star orbits
are expanding. No inward spiraling
is happening for all stable orbits.
Scroll down to #4
Orbits are repeating stable ellipses more than anything.
And they are never spirals.
Has the Earth's orbit changed?
What about any planet paul?
Where is their spiral?
If supermassive stars are spiraling in
how did they stay in their stable orbits
for 10s of billions of years for their
lifes? No. There is no reason to go
from stable orbital life time to a
spiral in. What could change that?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 504 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 10:35:51 |
| Calls: | 9,901 |
| Calls today: | 10 |
| Files: | 13,797 |
| Messages: | 6,343,277 |
| Posted today: | 6 |