Archimedes Plutonium<
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
3:11 AM (1 hour ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
It looks like AP is going to have to apologize to all the biologists on Meiosis. But 1/2 of the fault is their fault for lousy presentation. Finally a YouTube clip explains the process. Maybe YouTube will take over Education of our Youth. And now I have
a wholescale rewrite of my biology book of Meiosis.
It looks like I finally found someone to explain this clearly, in Interphase, the chromosomes of Meiosis duplicate but stay attached to the centromeres and is called -- still -- 46 chromosomes, or 92 chromotids.
Newly duplicated chromosome is still attached at the centromere location.
From YouTube Amoeba Sisters.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
3:19 AM (25 minutes ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Now, has anyone actually "timed" from start to finish the process of meiosis, and "timed" the process of mitosis from start to finish?
Probably not, probably as slipshod and lousy in experimentation watching as chemists and physicists in Water Electrolysis, so stupid in not weighing the mass of the hydrogen test tube compared to oxygen test tube.
I was looking in Genetic Analysis of where they got their pictures on pages 60-61.
It says (Modified from J. McLeish and B. Snoad, Looking at Chromosomes, 1958.)
It could be, that only a handful-- 2, 3, perhaps 5 people in all the history of biology that watched mitosis and meiosis in action from start to finish. And that everyone else in biology hung their own theoretical nonsense thinking, their "group nonsense"
on just five peoples watching. And no wonder no biologist would say-- "stop a moment, can you see how dumb and silly it is to say 46 goes to 92, in order to end up at 23"?? Can you see how absurd, how paradoxical, how contradictory that looks like, that
Nature needs to double the chromosomes to 92 to get to 23???
Leave it to biologists who hate math calculus, and then have to decipher meiosis. Maybe it is their moment of revenge for failing calculus, that they can get back at mathematicians with teaching 46 goes to 92 to get to 23.
But there is one very excellent, very nice form of Confirmation by Physics. Does the process of Meiosis last as long and as the same time as Mitosis?? Or does Meiosis require 2 times the Time interval, from start to finish?
If it takes the very same length of time for Mitosis to end up with 2 cells identical as it takes for a cell in Meiosis to have two cells of 23 chromosomes, is Proof that just like mitosis there was one division.
Looking at the Web, and with all these nuisance robots, fogging up the place. It is said that Meiosis from start to finish takes 74 hours.
Surprisingly, it says that Mitosis takes longer than meiosis.
This would indicate that Meiosis has just one division and the Meiosis Two is just mitosis.
Nature is not going to invest energy in meiosis more than it takes for mitosis.
AP
After watching a YouTube clip by Amoeba Sisters I finally understand this 46 to 92 to 23.
This is the most excellent advantage of YouTube, as a teacher for which blackboard teachers cannot explain.
And in the above of "time", the robots on Google are becoming more of a bad thing than a good thing as they are all over the map and hinder science, not help it. Meiosis takes almost 3 times as long to complete as mitosis.
AP
P.S. I thought I would help my book of My 9th published book.
Biology's Meiosis Error, DNA-Capacitor// biophysics series, book 6
by Archimedes Plutonium (Author) (Amazon's Kindle)
Fixing the huge errors of Biology--Meiosis has no duplication.
Old Biology had two major errors, for they thought the human chromosomes of 46 went to 92 in order to get to 23, and secondly, they thought the reduction phase in meiosis is in the first phase, not the
second phase, which is really goofy, for why even have a second phase when what you wanted is achieved in first phase.
This book aims to correct Old Biology's silly and stupid and illogical mistakes of Meiosis. Why did it have so many mistakes? I do not know but am guessing that much of Old Biology is a word soup game. Where biologists sit around dreaming up concepts
that are not real concepts, and when they apply this word soup to actual science itself-- it interferes with them getting the correct answer. An example of word soup nonsense is "reverse altruism", when it is dubious that there even is altruism, and on
top of that-- a "reverse". But an all-time word soup game of biology was evolution's "the fittest fit".
In the below treatise, we see where Miami Univ finally and directly and clearly comes out and states it does not go from 46 to 92. But then, Miami Univ fails in the reduction phase by saying it takes place in Meiosis 1, while AP says that is illogical,
for why even have Meiosis 2.
No mitosis duplicates the human DNA of 46 going to 92 chromosomes, and then we have the Meiosis, and because no mitosis goes from 46 chromosomes to 92 chromosomes all the math failure biologists want to go from 46 chromosomes to 92, and end up with their
goal of 23 end result.
Cover Picture: my own personal drawing rendering of a phase of meiosis. Many times in biology class in High School we had to do drawings of biology objects. So I had some practice in rendering a biology drawing, before this one.
Length: 150 pages
Product details
File Size: 1070 KB
Print Length: 150 pages
Publication Date: March 13, 2019
Sold by: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Language: English
ASIN: B07PRXPHS3
Text-to-Speech: Enabled carrot._CB192251235_.gif
X-Ray:
Not Enabled carrot._CB192251235_.gif
Word Wise: Enabled
Lending: Enabled
Enhanced Typesetting: Enabled carrot._CB192251235_.gif
Amazon Best Sellers Rank: #300,029 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
#111 in Cell Biology (Books)
#30 in Cell Biology (Kindle Store)
Turns out I need to rewrite it, for Meiosis in the sense of chromotids goes from 46 to 92 to 23.
Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
Archimedes Plutonium<
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com>
3:27 AM (17 minutes ago)
to Plutonium Atom Universe
Spelling is Chromatids, 92 chromatids.
Interphase is not part of mitosis or meiosis. And apparently the signalling I was looking for earlier is the Interphase process, not the Leptotene, Zygotene, Pachytene phase.
I apologize to all biologists, for apparently they are correct on meiosis.
But I do not apologize to any biologist for their lack of clarity, their poor teaching of this subject, for they should have realized that teaching 46 goes to 92 goes to 23 needs extra delicate and Clear teaching.
The Amoeba Sisters YouTube is the standard example of Clear teaching.
AP
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)