The history of Old Physics; Old Logic; Old Math and those concepts of "old" well-defined // physics-math

Archimedes Plutonium

Preface: This is my 255th published book of science. I needed a book that well-defines what I mean by Old Physics and Old Math and Old Logic, since I use these terms so often in my prior 255 books so far published by September 2023. So I set this book
aside as a well-defining of "old". Many times I have not stopped in my previous books to explain what Old Physics and Old Math and Old Logic means. And this book gives me that chance to detail what is meant by "old". When science of physics or math has
new ideas that replace and toss out old ideas that no longer work is called a "science revolution". I became a science revolutionary soldier starting 1990 with the Atom Totality theory, but then new ideas and new theories kept coming and coming as the
years passed by. So this book is a book to stop and explain in detail what is meant by Old Physics and Old Math and Old Logic. Explain to those, especially not in science, yet curious and intrigued and wish to know a little more about history of science
as it often undergoes revolutions in science.

Cover Picture: I had no idea in early life up to age 40 that I would become a scientist, not to mention a Science Revolutionary leader, leading three or more science revolutions, one in physics and one in math and one in logic. The cover picture is the
start of AP, the Revolutionary soldier in the war to change fake science to true science. The cover picture is two pictures in one--- dating to 1991 when living in New Hampshire and being on the cover of the school newspaper twice that year.


AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I knew I was a science revolutionary in year 1990 when I discovered the Atom Totality theory. And that theory alone was going to change all sciences, especially physics and astronomy, but even biology gets hugely altered for superdeterminism is part of
quantum mechanics physics and replaces Darwin evolution. Some like to call superdeterminism as "quantum entanglement" but I prefer superdeterminism. Superdeterminism means all things are fated to do and become what they do and become. There is no "free
will" in superdeterminism.

So I knew I was a science revolutionary from the start, in 1990. What I did not know, is that I would have new theories, numerous and numerous new theories in all the sciences, as the decades rolled by after 1990. Sometime in those decades I realized I
was more than a good scientist, a science revolutionary, and at one moment in those decades, I realized I was peerless. I was the King of Science. A person that dominates all the sciences, and leads humanity forward. Sometime in the past I started to put
in my signature block to posts of sci.math, sci.physics, and my own newsgroup -- plutonium-atom-universe, I signed off as AP, King of Science. I do not know of the first instance of this?? Was it 2013 when I overhauled all of math Calculus?? Was it 2015
when I overhauled all of Logic, fixing all their mistakes in logic connectors of AND, OR, If-Then, Equal-Not?? Perhaps it was my discovery of the infinity borderline in 2009 with the Huygens tractrix that infinity borderline is 1*10^604 and its inverse.

One of my discoveries lead me to feel my signature should be AP, King of Science, not as bragging rights, but as a emphasis of how serious I am on science. For most people have little of a science mind, and their only major interest in science is the
human touchy feely social aspect. And they need authority figure to tell them-- this is right and that is wrong, unable to reason the truth themselves. So I started to have a signature block of AP, King of Science. And I wrote a book on Kings of Science.
The last one, before myself was Dr.Feynman who wrote the authoritative Physics books up until I came along. All Kings of Science revise and publish the authoritative physics texts of their era.

The Atom Totality theory is huge massive change, super-revolutionary. For its primal axiom tenet encompasses all sciences-- All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but Electricity and Magnetism.

If we want to know the final answers on how anything works, we get those final answers by knowing the electricity and magnetism of the object or material or process.

So the Atom Totality theory quickly dispels as nonsense the Big Bang theory, as childish village idiot science, along with black holes. People that yakkity yack about black holes never even understood the Pauli Exclusion Principle of physics, never
understood that one principle of science does not contradict other science truths. You cannot have Pauli Exclusion and black holes. And it is pointless to even talk science with believers of black holes, they are science frauds.

One of my major discoveries occurred after my cancer surgery in 2016-2017, and is what I consider my 2nd greatest discoveries in all of science. I was in the end of writing my 8th edition of Atom Totality and wanted a chapter on Elementary Particles of
Physics, the subatomic particles. And while writing that chapter, I noticed that if I multiply the mass of muon by 9 that it was within Sigma Error of the mass of the proton and neutron. In 2016 I had included Sigma Error in my math textbooks of Teaching
True Mathematics, and so when I saw that 9 times muon mass is actually the neutron, the lights bells and whistles went off in my mind. That a proton was not really 938 MeV, but rather it was 840MeV with a muon inside the proton torus doing the Faraday
law. And thus in 2017 I realized subatomic particles all had jobs and functions to do, not balls sitting around, idling doing nothing. This then lead to the realization the Sun and stars shine from Faraday law and not from fusion, and that we better make
Europa our second home in the next 1,000 years or get fried to death by our Sun gone Red Giant phase.

So the Atom Totality theory led to the true electron of atoms was the muon, and that JJ Thomson in 1897 made a mistake for he discovered a particle of 0.5MeV that he thought was the Atom's electron, but it was not. It was the Dirac magnetic monopole that
Thompson had discovered.

And by 2017, I figured that the then current mainstream theory of Standard Model would be thrown out and trashcanned, thrown into the dumpster of shame by the discovery that the true electron of Atoms was the muon. I thought some brave physicist would
notice in their machines that the proton was two particle-- the muon inside a proton torus.

I thought someone would re-do the Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden gold foil experiment over again in especial precision and realize that the 180 degree bounce back meant the alpha particles hit a chain of muons inside gold atoms that hit head-on with the alpha
particle and gave them more velocity in bounce back than what they entered the gold atom.

But then in 2023, I realized that if Atoms all had subatomic particles as doing some electricity and magnetism job, function or task, that you cannot have hydrogen be an Atom, with only a proton with muon inside. It needed a parallel plate capacitor such
as a neutron to be a Atom, at all. That meant the hydrogen atom could not be H alone, but that the hydrogen atom was H2. That H2 was not a molecule but a hydrogen atom where one of the protons acts like a neutron to the other proton and their muons
inside. That implied that Water was not H2O but rather H4O, and here is where an easy experiment of Water Electrolysis will not only prove water is H4O, and if so, throws the dumb and stupid Standard Model of mainstream physics onto the trashpile of
shame.

I expected a re-trial of the Rutherford gold leaf experiment to trashcan the Standard Model. But now, here in September of 2023, it looks like Water Electrolysis that actually weighs the mass of hydrogen test tube versus oxygen test tube and finds a
atomic-mass-ratio of 1/4 proving water is H4O. If it is 1/8, then Old Physics mainstream and Old Chemistry mainstream is correct.

Any day now, I can expect some research report proving H4O. And if that comes in, then the Standard Model is pitched out onto the garbage pile of shame.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

As of this writing the mainstream of Physics is in a awful position of moron science. They have the Big Bang along with black holes nonsense and as for atomic physics and chemistry they have the mindless Standard Model.

Logically speaking the Big Bang and black holes is only a little better than the Ancient cosmology idea of a gigantic turtle holding up the world as a flat plate continent. A repulsive idea of some giant animal being in cosmology. And so the only
difference between Big Bang and a giant turtle is that physicists of the 20th and 21st century omitted the giant animal and says a big explosion is the cosmos.

Sad that 20th and 21st century physicists never had enough logical marbles in the head to posit-- the only theory of science that lasted as true from Ancient Greek times to today was the Atomic theory. The Atomic theory is the correct cosmology. And to
apply the Atomic theory, all that is needed is to say-- The Cosmos itself is a Atom, a big Atom.

Physicists of the 20th and 21st century simply and purely lacked logical reasoning ability. Sure, they omitted the giant turtle for some big cosmic explosion. But why have an explosion in a world where Atoms are both physics and chemistry? Why an
explosion?

If physicists of the 20th and 21st century had logical brains, they would look at the world from Ancient Greek times and said-- look, the only idea that comes down through all that history unscathed and even increased in stature was --- the Atomic Theory.

Stands to reason, the most valuable theory in all of science history, the most valuable theory would be the center piece of cosmology. For, .... if everything is made up of Atoms (Feynman in his Lectures on Physics first few pages... the most important
theory of all-- Atomic theory)... stands to reason, the Universe itself is an Atom.

So the Big Bang is just empty silly talk of nothing.

A logical physicist, a reasoned physicist would see that Atomic theory is the #1 theory in all of science, and would base his/her cosmology on the Atomic Theory. Would put Atoms, front and center in a Cosmology theory.

The other boneheaded stupid physics theory that is still mainstream is the Standard Model although it has many mindless, and worthless contenders in stupid string theory, stupid quarks and other hideious assinine notions.

The Standard Model is nothing more than a stick-ball idea of Atoms and their subatomic particles. The Standard Model does not even make the laws of electricity and magnetism be the function and job of subatomic particles like the proton, neutron,
electron.

And AP is going to trash-can the Standard Model as a pathetic moronic idea by several or all of these experiments.

1) Water Electrolysis weighing the mass of hydrogen and compare to mass of oxygen

2) Re-do the Rutherford-Geiger-Marsden experiment proving the alpha particles in gold foil rammed head-on collision with a chain of 79 muons going in the opposite direction to the alpha particle to give the alpha particle increased velocity upon exiting
than upon entrance

3) CERN and other large machines observing that the Proton is not 938MeV but is rather 840MeV as a proton torus, and inside the proton is a muon of 105MeV doing the Faraday law with the proton torus.

I expect all three of these to be proven true, and soon... And once reported, the Standard Model is buried as shameful trash of science.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

This book explains in detail what Old Physics is and how it ends, what Old Logic is and how it ends, and what Old Math is and how it ends.

We can call the New Physics, the physics that full endorses the Plutonium Atom Totality theory with its primal-axiom --- All is Atom, and Atoms are nothing but electricity and magnetism. This means that the full explanation of anything in science, needs
to get down to the level of electricity and magnetism. New Physics tosses out onto the junkpile that of Big Bang, black holes, Standard Model, string nonsense, quark nonsense.

New Logic is the corrected logic connectors as given in AP's textbook series on Logic. Logic is a algebra of correct thinking in physics and is a part of physics. Logic is a subset of Physics. And mathematics is a subset of logic. We can call mathematics
as special cases of logic. Old Logic included Boole & Jevons nonsense, included Godel and Wittgenstein nonsense. And what finally tosses all that nonsense onto the junkpile of shame is the mindless annoyance of Old Logic encoded into computers with their
2 OR 1 = 3 with AND as subtraction. All because the logic fools of Boole and Jevons got AND mixed up with OR, for the true truth table of AND is TTTF and not TFFF.

New Math is math that has professors who can recognize mistakes made in mathematics and work to fix mistakes. Professors who can see that the slant cut of a cone is Oval, not ellipse because slant cut of cylinder is ellipse. Professors who are forced to
take logic courses in college to think straight and think clearly. Who recognize that calculus is geometry and therefore the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus needs a geometry proof. Who understand that the limit in math is moron b.s. and a limit analysis
is not a proof, for analysis is not a proof. Professors who can do a valid geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Professors who realize the only valid function of math is a polynomial function, and if not a polynomial you must convert it to
a polynomial to proceed in calculus. Professors who see that negative numbers, irrationals, complex, imaginary is all b.s. and the only numbers in all of mathematics are Decimal Grid Numbers. Professors who understand that mathematics is a tiny subset of
physics, for the reason that numbers exist at all is because Atoms are numerous. And the reason that geometry exists at all, is because Atoms have shape, and size.

AP

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)