On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
Obviously water vapor involves invisibly small nanodroplets of liquid H2O and not monomolecular gaseous H2O, you vague nitwit.
You simpletons have no business in a scientific discussion.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
Obviously water vapor involves invisibly small nanodroplets of liquid H2O and not monomolecular gaseous H2O, you vague nitwit.
You simpletons have no business in a scientific discussion.
Posting your delusionally insane nonsense twice only makes it even more insane, crackpot.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 3:01:13 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:Posting your delusionally insane nonsense twice only makes it even more
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
Obviously water vapor involves invisibly small nanodroplets of liquid H2O and not monomolecular gaseous H2O, you vague nitwit.
You simpletons have no business in a scientific discussion.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
insane, crackpot.
You got nothing!!!
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 3:01:13 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >> On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:Posting your delusionally insane nonsense twice only makes it even more >> insane, crackpot.
The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
Obviously water vapor involves invisibly small nanodroplets of liquid H2O and not monomolecular gaseous H2O, you vague nitwit.
You simpletons have no business in a scientific discussion.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
You got nothing!!!So says the uneducated, unemployable and delusionally insane crackpot
with a multiple personality disorder that makes him post everything
twice and who refuses to read any books, including dictionaries, because
the content of books threaten his delusions.
McGinn's delusions leaves him with nothing to say other than to babble insane nonsense and obscene insults as he has no actual knowledge of
any subject and becomes angry and terrified when confronted with actual facts.
Meanwhile, the real world has thousands of years of history with untold numbers of scientists doing an untold number of documented experiments,
all of which can be found in books by people who are not terrified of reading them because of crippling delusions, crackpot.
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:46:16 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 3:01:13 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:So says the uneducated, unemployable and delusionally insane crackpot
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >> >> On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote: >> >> >> > On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:Posting your delusionally insane nonsense twice only makes it even more >> >> insane, crackpot.
The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
Obviously water vapor involves invisibly small nanodroplets of liquid H2O and not monomolecular gaseous H2O, you vague nitwit.
You simpletons have no business in a scientific discussion.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
You got nothing!!!
with a multiple personality disorder that makes him post everything
twice and who refuses to read any books, including dictionaries, because
the content of books threaten his delusions.
McGinn's delusions leaves him with nothing to say other than to babble
insane nonsense and obscene insults as he has no actual knowledge of
any subject and becomes angry and terrified when confronted with actual
facts.
Meanwhile, the real world has thousands of years of history with untold
numbers of scientists doing an untold number of documented experiments,
all of which can be found in books by people who are not terrified of
reading them because of crippling delusions, crackpot.
All you need is one, dumbass. You got nothing!!!
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 6:46:16 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, October 21, 2023 at 3:01:13 PM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:So says the uneducated, unemployable and delusionally insane crackpot
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 3:06:20 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:Posting your delusionally insane nonsense twice only makes it even more
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 8:57:06 AM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021 at 10:46:10 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
The H2O phase diagram clearly shows water vapor in the atmosphere at under 100°C. you *still* don't know how to interpret this key tool...
Obviously water vapor involves invisibly small nanodroplets of liquid H2O and not monomolecular gaseous H2O, you vague nitwit.
You simpletons have no business in a scientific discussion.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/08/Phase_diagram_of_water.svg/700px-Phase_diagram_of_water.svg.png
insane, crackpot.
You got nothing!!!
with a multiple personality disorder that makes him post everything
twice and who refuses to read any books, including dictionaries, because >> the content of books threaten his delusions.
McGinn's delusions leaves him with nothing to say other than to babble
insane nonsense and obscene insults as he has no actual knowledge of
any subject and becomes angry and terrified when confronted with actual >> facts.
Meanwhile, the real world has thousands of years of history with untold >> numbers of scientists doing an untold number of documented experiments, >> all of which can be found in books by people who are not terrified of
reading them because of crippling delusions, crackpot.
All you need is one, dumbass. You got nothing!!!Nothing other than this, crackpot:
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete nonsense.
They show, among many other things:
Gaseous H2O exists both below the boiling point of water and below the freezing point of water.
Partial pressure of gases exist.
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
McGinn has ranted and raved for years that there are no such experiments, yet here they are and they are over 200 years old and have been repeated verified thousands upon thousands of times.
McGinn will never read any of these essays because that would destroy
his delusions, and even if by some miracle he did read them, he can
not provide any rational objection to them as he has no experiments
or data of his own.
McGinn is now left with nothing to say other than to babble childish nonsense and depraved insults.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete nonsense.
They show, among many other things:
Gaseous H2O exists both below the boiling point of water and below the freezing point of water.
Partial pressure of gases exist.
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
I say this is impossible. Provide details, you fucking vague nitwit.
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:17:47 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point
of water.
I say this is impossible. Provide details, you fucking vague nitwit.Asked and answered many times in the past. Have you already forgotten?
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 8:20:48 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 7:17:47 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
Evaporation is liquid water becoming gaseous below the boiling point of water.
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.I say this is impossible. Provide details, you fucking vague nitwit.Asked and answered many times in the past. Have you already forgotten?
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
James McGinn / delusionally insane crackpot
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.OK, it is all in Dalton's essays of 1802 as you have been told many
times before, crackpot.
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete nonsense.
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:01:14 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote:OK, it is all in Dalton's essays of 1802 as you have been told many
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
times before, crackpot.
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water.
The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously
show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete
nonsense.
So, it's clear and unambiguous, but you can't find it?
Can you not see that this makes no sense at all?
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:01:14 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >OK, it is all in Dalton's essays of 1802 as you have been told many
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
times before, crackpot.
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water. >> The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously >> show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete
nonsense.
So, it's clear and unambiguous, but you can't find it?See the photocopy of Dalton's essays as noted above starting at
page 535 at:
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Or if you go to a large enough library you will find an original copy of
the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester.
Can you not see that this makes no sense at all?Can you not see how insane this makes you look, crackpot?
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 10:16:12 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 7:01:14 AM UTC-7, Jim Pennino wrote:See the photocopy of Dalton's essays as noted above starting at
Solving Tornadoes <solvingt...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 22, 2023 at 11:36:12 PM UTC-7, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >> >OK, it is all in Dalton's essays of 1802 as you have been told many
Fucking morons. Let's keep it simple. Explain how a person would verify that the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous, you fucking vague nitwit. Go ahead, explain the procedure, dumbass.Read a dang textbook... if you can actually read...
The answer is you can't and it's never been done.
You simpleton's ASSUME that clear moist air is gaseous. You idiots can do that because you are not scientists. I am a scientist. Nobody cares what you but scratchers chose to believe. Sorry, but science requires verification.
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small liquid (as I maintain).
Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile.
times before, crackpot.
A photocopy of Dalton's essays of 1802 can be found in the Memoirs of
the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, page 535.
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
These essays fully describe experiments, methods used and the data
collected that were conducted by John Dalton in the late 18th and
early 19th Century on the properties of various gases, including
the gaseous phase of substances that are normally liquid such as water. >> >> The results of these experiments and their data clearly and unambiguously >> >> show that all of the "theories" of James McGinn are utter and complete
nonsense.
So, it's clear and unambiguous, but you can't find it?
page 535 at:
https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Or if you go to a large enough library you will find an original copy of
the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester.
Can you not see how insane this makes you look, crackpot?
Can you not see that this makes no sense at all?
You got nothing!!!
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures
one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is
genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small
liquid (as I maintain). Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile. James McGinn / Genius
On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 7:33:34 PM UTC-7, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 10/23/2023 7:58 AM, Solving Tornadoes wrote:
LOL Okay, butt scratcher. Let's keep it simple. Describe the procedures
one would take to detect whether the moisture in clear moist air is
genuinely gaseous (as you maintain) or nanodroplets of invisibly small
liquid (as I maintain). Put up or shut up, you butt scratching imbecile. >>> James McGinn / Genius
You're asking too much of him. He's a type 3 autistic, an "engineer."
They grow up reading pseudoscience for science.
Even at the age of 0.6 he was a done deal. He couldn't talk, but he was
I bet farting in this sequence:
You are supporting Jimbo McGinn? Are you serious?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 468 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 16:16:58 |
| Calls: | 9,440 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,594 |
| Messages: | 6,109,573 |
