XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math
Thomas Heger wrote:
Sure, the hypothesis needs to fit to the observations.
you don't need obs to have a hypothesis. That's why you have hypothesis
and not facts.
The facts are, what you observe, while the hypothesis is the
explanaition for these facts, by which you explain how these facts came
into existence.
you are fooling around. You said 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱𝘀_𝘁𝗼_𝗳𝗶𝘁_𝘁𝗵𝗲_𝗼𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻. Also, facts are
rather events, which don't need explanation.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)