• Re: If there could be steady motion it would not have its own weight eq

    From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Wed Jan 31 19:44:48 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    Free fall is changing frame motion without weight.
    There is no steady motion manifesting.
    Science cannot identify steady motion in the real world.
    Einstein's definition doesn't work if
    frame motion is everywhere subject to gravity.
    Is not everything subject to escape velocity?
    Even the steady inertial frame out in deep space
    would have to change speed a little bit.

    Babbling moron gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Thu Feb 1 11:25:50 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 31, 2024 at 7:46:09 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    Free fall is changing frame motion without weight.
    There is no steady motion manifesting.
    Science cannot identify steady motion in the real world.
    Einstein's definition doesn't work if
    frame motion is everywhere subject to gravity.
    Is not everything subject to escape velocity?
    Even the steady inertial frame out in deep space
    would have to change speed a little bit.
    Babbling moron gibberish.

    An inertial frame would have no opposite speed weight.
    Steady motion energy is unchanging kinetic energy.
    That would theoretically not manifest its own weight.

    Yet more moronic, babbling gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)