• Re: The definition of inertia is perpetual motion

    From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Fri Feb 9 13:38:19 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    If motion continues because there is
    not absolute rest motions stay perpetual.
    Even the world lines comes back to
    motion... Perpetual inertia is the rule.

    Confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sat Feb 10 11:22:30 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 1:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    If motion continues because there is
    not absolute rest motions stay perpetual.
    Even the world lines comes back to
    motion... Perpetual inertia is the rule.
    Confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    Inertia is a form of perpetual motion if
    motion does go to an absolute rest.
    Your body frame still has its inner motion.

    Yet more confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sun Feb 11 10:42:45 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, February 10, 2024 at 11:31:11 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 1:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    If motion continues because there is
    not absolute rest motions stay perpetual.
    Even the world lines comes back to
    motion... Perpetual inertia is the rule.
    Confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    Inertia is a form of perpetual motion if
    motion does go to an absolute rest.
    Your body frame still has its inner motion.
    Yet more confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    We are moving in more than one way.
    Our world line shares our own inner body motion.
    We share the Earth's turn by sharing its rotating surface.
    We share the Earth's orbital motion as well.
    In the universe we are moving in more than one
    way. It shows individual motion is an absolute math.

    And yet another steaming pile of confused, incoherent, ignorant,
    babbling nonsense from the resident moron who after YEARS of being told
    why, still doesn't understand why a lunar eclipse is red.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to mitchr...@gmail.com on Sun Feb 11 16:37:44 2024
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchrae3323@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Sunday, February 11, 2024 at 10:46:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
    mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, February 10, 2024 at 11:31:11 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 1:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> >> mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
    If motion continues because there is
    not absolute rest motions stay perpetual.
    Even the world lines comes back to
    motion... Perpetual inertia is the rule.
    Confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    Inertia is a form of perpetual motion if
    motion does go to an absolute rest.
    Your body frame still has its inner motion.
    Yet more confused, ignorant, babbling gibberish.

    We are moving in more than one way.
    Our world line shares our own inner body motion.
    We share the Earth's turn by sharing its rotating surface.
    We share the Earth's orbital motion as well.
    In the universe we are moving in more than one
    way. It shows individual motion is an absolute math.
    And yet another steaming pile of confused, incoherent, ignorant,
    babbling nonsense from the resident moron who after YEARS of being told
    why, still doesn't understand why a lunar eclipse is red.

    You don't have it right.
    If an eclipse is a shadow how could it be red instead...?

    An eclipse isn't a shadow, it is an event, moron.

    It is more science science can't do objectively.
    Shadows have never been red.
    Since when have occlusions had color?
    The Moon covered by the Earth's shadow
    has an unknown science for its red.


    As I said, you have been told many times by many people over many years
    what happens during an eclipse.

    The explaination is simple enough that grade school children can
    understand what goes on.

    Yet for all the years and all the times it has been explained to you,
    you are STILL a babbling, incoherent moron on the subject.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)