On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 8:16:08 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:theories for explaining them. Einstein's theory of gravitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air pending the outcome."
Claudius Denk <claudi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 10:11:56 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 9:25:15 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor". As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!
Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
Find another hobby, moron.
Who let you out of the Funny Farm today, Jimbo? Are they crazy, too? >> >> > >
"Facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away while scientists debate rival
Let's ask ChatGPT.- Stephen Jay Gould
LOL. So, is it my fault that you are too dumb to make the distinction? >> >> There is no distinction, Jimbo, water vapor is the gaseous form of water, period.
Obviously there is. You are just a moron.
Q: What is water vapor?
A: Water vapor is the gaseous form of water, made up of molecules of
water in the air. It is invisible to the naked eye and is often
present in the Earth's atmosphere in the form of fog, clouds, and
humidity.
Q: Is the phrase "water vapor" ambiguous?
A: The phrase "water vapor" is not inherently ambiguous. It refers
specifically to the gaseous state of water, which can exist at various
temperatures and pressures depending on the ambient conditions.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
The phase of H2O in the atmosphere is determined by the physical properties of water. It isn't determined by consensus or by a computer program.
You simpletons have no business in scientific discussion.
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".
Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
Find another hobby, moron.
I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.
As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!
And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.
Consensus isn't science.
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 8:16:08=E2=80=AFAM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wro= te:
Claudius Denk <claudi...@gmail.com> wrote:=20wrote:=20
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 10:11:56 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.com=
om wrote:=20On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 9:25:15 PM UTC-8, claudi...@gmail.c=
om wrote:=20On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, pnal...@gmail.c=
wrote:=20On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn =
wrote:=20On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino=
=20=20
Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry=
you convoluted nitwit.=20=20
You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, =
er vapor". As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vap= or is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!=20=20There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "wat=
Find another hobby, moron.=20
o?=20=20
Who let you out of the Funny Farm today, Jimbo? Are they crazy, to=
of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structur= es of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away while sc= ientists debate rival theories for explaining them. Einstein's theory of gr= avitation replaced Newton's, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-a= ir pending the outcome."=20=20
"Facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy=
n?=20=20- Stephen Jay Gould=20
LOL. So, is it my fault that you are too dumb to make the distinctio=
er, period.=20There is no distinction, Jimbo, water vapor is the gaseous form of wat=
=20Let's ask ChatGPT.=20
Obviously there is. You are just a moron.
=20
Q: What is water vapor?=20
=20
A: Water vapor is the gaseous form of water, made up of molecules of=20 water in the air. It is invisible to the naked eye and is often=20
present in the Earth's atmosphere in the form of fog, clouds, and=20 humidity.=20
=20
Q: Is the phrase "water vapor" ambiguous?=20
=20
A: The phrase "water vapor" is not inherently ambiguous. It refers=20 specifically to the gaseous state of water, which can exist at various=20 temperatures and pressures depending on the ambient conditions.=20
=20
=20
James McGinn / Delusionally Insane Crackpot
The phase of H2O in the atmosphere is determined by the physical properties=
of water. It isn't determined by consensus or by a computer program.
You simpletons have no business in scientific discussion.
James McGinn / Genius
On Monday, February 19, 2024 at 8:46:09 AM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote:
James McGinn <jimmc...@gmail.com> wrote:What are you talking about, you babbling moron.?
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:43:04 PM UTC-8, Paul Alsing wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:50:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote: >> >> > On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:46:08 PM UTC-8, Jim Pennino wrote: >> >> >Nope, that is your delusions talking, crackpot.
There is nothing ambiguous about the definition of the phrase "water vapor".Water vapor can exist in the air even when the air is too dry
You are using the phrase "water vapor,' in an ambiguous manner, you convoluted nitwit.
Find another hobby, moron.
I stated that it is your usage that is ambiguous.
As per virtually every textbook in the freakin' world, water vapor is the gaseous form of water... nothing complicated about that!
And you admit that your evidence is not empirical. It's consensus.
Consensus isn't science.
Science is performing experiments that give the same results no matter
who performs them, cackpot.
It is your delusions that dismiss such actions as "consensus" crackpot.
It is interesting to note that it took you 14 months to come up with
this delusional nonsense, crackpot.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 505 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 53:29:43 |
| Calls: | 9,922 |
| Calls today: | 9 |
| Files: | 13,804 |
| Messages: | 6,347,965 |