• Re: On Arindam Banerjee's recoil-less rail gun and Newton's 3rd Law vio

    From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Ross Finlayson on Sat Apr 27 23:31:08 2024
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity, sci.math

    Ross Finlayson wrote:

    On 04/27/2024 06:50 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
    Le 27/04/2024 à 19:50, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit : >>> bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:


    That is not the case, so this is a new discovery - the Lorentz force
    does
    NOT have an equal and opposite reaction. Your point is merely
    theoretical.
    My evidence is experimental.

    Correct, merely experimental.

    Heh-heh.
    Now the e=mcc wallahs will say the Sun goes around the Earth.
    And the Moon is a superstructure, created by our distant ancestors. They
    have even made a movie about it, "Moonfall" that I saw yesterday.
    These guys si

    It stands falsified by a reliable theory.

    A theory is a conjecture that is widely shared. It is falsified by
    experimental evidence.
    Of course, that is from the scientific standpoint, not the theological
    standpoint.
    But then, physics is pure theology now, with e=mcc as dogma and Einstein
    as God-Clown-Baby.

    FYI, the Maxwell-Lorentz equations as they stand
    do conserve energy-momentum.

    No, they do not. Force = Magnetic field times current times length of
    conductor in a nice vector relationship, with only one current as
    variable, is intrinsically without reaction. It is most widely used by
    all electrical and electronics engineers. It is the basis for modern
    electric motor design.


    If you want to be taken seriously it is up to you to tell the world
    what is wrong with Maxwell-Lorentz,
    and how these equations must be modified.

    Nothing wrong with them. They are perfectly correct. My only grouse is
    why the name of Lorentz should be there, it should be replaced by
    Heaviside, for the vector notation he introduced. And the Lorentz force
    must be renamed as Thomson-Heaviside Force, or abbreviated as THE force.
    Out with Lorentz!

    Maxwell in, Einstein out, is the word. The universe is full of aether,
    it is infinite, and all matter linked with lines of electric force.
    No big bang, no black holes, extreme cold below our feet at the cores of
    the planets and stars.
    Stars have trillion year cycles of birth and death, with gaining
    hydrogen cover from nebulas and losing them to nebulas.
    Gravity is an electrostatic phenomenon, like strong nuclear force.


    As long as you can't do that you are merely an incompetent tinkerer,

    Hardly. The Arindam-Newton Laws of Motion will take humanity to the
    stars, after expanding all over the solar system.

    And all the books on relativity-depravity and quantum-bunkum will be
    burnt in a huge bonfire that will make the fires in Nalanda and
    Alexandria universities look like small campfires.

    Cheers,
    Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee, greatest genius of all time,
    sole god among lotsa devils.

    Jan



    Force is a function of time.


    Force is mass multiplied by the acceleration on the mass.
    When there is no movement the result is static, causing stress.
    When there is movement for the mass we enter the world of dynamics.
    Overall it is called mechanics.


    (Was, "Heyy, Einstein, what are you, retarded?" The notion of
    the accelerated and retarded potentials of course is a usual
    thing in physics to effect to reflect the sum-of-histories / sum-of-potentials that represents the instantaneous classical
    with regards to the non-linear/un-linear, the multipole,
    and all the higher orders of acceleration, in a model
    of classical motion, and accelerated/accelerating potentials.)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retarded_potential

    The empirical already has this stuff all over the place.
    The role of the fundamental and foundations, is for mathematics,
    what OWES physics more and better mathematics of continuity
    and infinity and infinitesimals and infinite expressions
    of the infinitely-many higher orders of acceleration
    in dynamics in motion, to provide these mathematics,
    what results MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS and the "ubiquitous
    success of mathematics in physics".

    Which is never wrong, ....

    IP, as they say.


    Force: is a function of time.

    It's sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials, and, "GR first".

    GPS satellites and driving the world, today,
    are as according to the PPN ephemeris.

    -
    https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson
    (See "Moment and Motion" under "Philosophical Foreground".)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)