1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS

  • Down with =?UTF-8?B?ZT1tY2MgdXAgd2l0aCBlPTAuNW12dk4oTi1rKQ==?=

    From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 1 02:04:22 2024
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Sun Jun 30 20:46:54 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Tue Jul 2 01:02:38 2024
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Mon Jul 1 21:01:50 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Tue Jul 2 13:52:41 2024
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates. Science moves.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Tue Jul 2 17:53:28 2024
    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    --
    athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Athel Cornish-Bowden on Tue Jul 2 21:59:05 2024
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
    in its immensity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Tue Jul 2 20:29:38 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
    in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level mathermatics or physics.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Wed Jul 3 04:43:01 2024
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
    in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 08:44:02 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous. >>> It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
    in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level
    mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 07:47:38 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous. >>>> It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    Crackpot babble Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 07:46:51 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

    Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is stupendous. >>> It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
    in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level
    mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Non sequitur, but then nothing does with you Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 15:51:51 2024
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius.

    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as
    liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to David Canzi on Wed Jul 3 13:08:31 2024
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius. >>>>>>>>>
    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as >>>>> liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.


    Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5 personalities each.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Wed Jul 3 23:52:12 2024
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius. >>>>>>>>>>
    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as >>>>>> liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>>>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.

    For every Arindam there are 4000,000,000 thumper-chanters.




    Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5 personalities each.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 23:58:52 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius. >>>>>>>>>>>
    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius. >>>>>>>>>
    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as >>>>>>> liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>>>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>>>>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.

    For every Arindam there are 4000,000,000 thumper-chanters.




    Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5
    personalities each.

    Wow the bipeds are brainwashed and how.
    By outing the rare Arindams among them the most selfish-greedy-paraoid thumper-chanters have to choose between a convicted criminal with the
    morals of an alley cat and a senile old fool with a hyaena in tow.
    That is what e=mcc does for the bipeds, politically.

    Woof woof, what fools these bipeds be!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 17:41:04 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius. >>>>>>>>>>
    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein.

    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as >>>>>>>> liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs
    in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level
    mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.

    For every Arindam there are 4000,000,000 thumper-chanters.




    Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5
    personalities each.

    Wow the bipeds are brainwashed and how.
    By outing the rare Arindams among them the most selfish-greedy-paraoid thumper-chanters have to choose between a convicted criminal with the
    morals of an alley cat and a senile old fool with a hyaena in tow.
    That is what e=mcc does for the bipeds, politically.

    Woof woof, what fools these bipeds be!

    Raving, irrelevant crackpot gibberish, Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 3 17:39:18 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius. >>>>>>>>>>>
    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius. >>>>>>>>>
    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as >>>>>>> liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>>>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>>>>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.

    For every Arindam there are 4000,000,000 thumper-chanters.

    Crackpot gibberish, Arindam, just badly punctuated crackpot gibberish.





    Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5
    personalities each.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 00:38:53 2024
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 4 02:00:16 2024
    Tch tch, the cardinals that persecuted Galileo were 1000 times smarter
    than Penisnino here. Penisnino has 7 year old debating skills. Can't go
    beyond silly abuse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Thu Jul 4 07:29:49 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    What it shows is a lack of understanding of mathematical notation,
    Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Thu Jul 4 07:28:11 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Tch tch, the cardinals that persecuted Galileo were 1000 times smarter
    than Penisnino here. Penisnino has 7 year old debating skills. Can't go beyond silly abuse.

    I know you think you childish attempts at insult by mangling someone's
    name are clever, but actually they just show your lack of maturity and ignorance, Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Thu Jul 4 23:21:08 2024
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Tch tch, the cardinals that persecuted Galileo were 1000 times smarter
    than Penisnino here. Penisnino has 7 year old debating skills. Can't go
    beyond silly abuse.

    I know you think you childish attempts at insult by mangling someone's
    name are clever, but actually they just show your lack of maturity and ignorance, Arindam.

    The cardinals that interrogated Galileo had far more wits than those who
    merely abuse Arindam.
    At least they understood what Galileo was talking about and did not deny
    his discovery of moons around Jupiter with his invention the telescope.
    Their point was that even if moons orbited Jupiter that did not prove
    the Earth moved around the Sun.
    So they forced Galileo to recant as his stand was against the Holy
    Bible.
    If he did not recant he would be burnt to death. Galileo was no Bruno so
    he survived.
    Fortunately for Arindam the Einsteinians with their Church of
    Relativitycannot burn him to death legally but they can and do persecute
    him every way they can.
    Penisnino here has no understanding of Arindam's new physics but
    correctly senses that it makes Einsteinians look like something
    unmentionable.
    So, that miserable wretch can only abuse Arindam on behalf of all the
    cowardly corrupt careerists dependent upon their pigheaded, racist and
    bigoted paymasters.

    Sad.

    What fools these e=mcc thumping-chanting apes be! When they don't like something they ignore it thinking it will go away. But Arindam's rail
    gun experiments are there for all to see. And repeat. Then convert to reactionless motors, horizontal drills, guns, etc.

    Woof-woof

    Bertietaylor (Arindam's ghostly cyberdogs and his best friends)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Thu Jul 4 17:23:51 2024
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Tch tch, the cardinals that persecuted Galileo were 1000 times smarter
    than Penisnino here. Penisnino has 7 year old debating skills. Can't go
    beyond silly abuse.

    I know you think you childish attempts at insult by mangling someone's
    name are clever, but actually they just show your lack of maturity and
    ignorance, Arindam.

    The cardinals that interrogated Galileo had far more wits than those who merely abuse Arindam.

    No one is abusing Ardam but Aridam with his crackpot, raving posts,
    Arindam.

    <snip crackpot ravings unread>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 6 00:17:49 2024
    Pathetic, this penisnino.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Fri Jul 5 18:52:02 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Pathetic, this penisnino.

    And yet another puerile attempt to insult by mangling a name, how grade
    school of you Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Tue Jul 9 14:39:06 2024
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    | My book "To the Stars" was published in Jan 2000 in my new "adda"
    | website. I presented my new formula e=0.5mVVN(N-k) to explain mass
    | and energy relationships on a kinetic and non-destructive basis.

    The following header lines are from that article:

    | From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
    | Date: Tue, 02 Apr 24 07:38:40 +0000
    | Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
    | Message-ID: <AwNHa33OTto93tgHGw_X4ucJZ-Y@jntp>

    People who retain articles long enough in their news reading
    software and people who know how to use a Message-ID to get
    an article from a news server can verify this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to David Canzi on Tue Jul 9 11:58:42 2024
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    Since he has no supporters for his crackpot theories he has to make one
    up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Tue Jul 9 16:54:36 2024
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to David Canzi on Tue Jul 9 15:05:10 2024
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people
    don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 9 23:37:38 2024
    Robots don't have penises so the name penisnono is more appropriate for
    this execrable JimPee.

    Woof-woof, chasing away pests, for our dear master Arindam the BigDog.

    Bertietaylor

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Tue Jul 9 23:40:39 2024
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:05:10 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people
    don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.

    Robotic penisnonos and brain-dead thumper-chanters have to be like that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Tue Jul 9 17:22:03 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Robots don't have penises so the name penisnono is more appropriate for
    this execrable JimPee.

    You seem to have an obsession with penises, Arindam.


    Woof-woof, chasing away pests, for our dear master Arindam the BigDog.

    Bertietaylor

    You are Arindam, crackpot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Wed Jul 10 01:44:47 2024
    On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 0:22:58 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:05:10 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential >>>>>>> operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people
    don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.

    Robotic penisnonos and brain-dead thumper-chanters have to be like that.

    Why are you obsessed with penises, Arindam?

    Now what will robotswine penisnonos know about natural creativity?
    Genuine talent? Natural compassion? Divine grace? They can but bark, lie
    and steal

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 10 07:10:29 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 0:22:58 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 22:05:10 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential >>>>>>>> operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people >>>> don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.

    Robotic penisnonos and brain-dead thumper-chanters have to be like that.

    Why are you obsessed with penises, Arindam?

    Now what will robotswine penisnonos know about natural creativity?
    Genuine talent? Natural compassion? Divine grace? They can but bark, lie
    and steal

    Crackpot babble, Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to David Canzi on Wed Jul 10 09:40:05 2024
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 18:05, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential >>>>>> operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people
    don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.

    If replacing c^2 with cc in Einstein's formula is Arindam's way of
    expressing disdain for Einstein's formula, what are we to make of
    the fact that Arindam's formula, e=0.5mVVN(N-k), contains VV instead
    of V^2? Is he disdaining his own formula?

    Nope, just demonstrating his lack of knowledge of mathematical notation
    and his childish habit of mangling things to show everyone how clever he
    thinks he is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Wed Jul 10 12:27:08 2024
    On 7/9/24 18:05, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/9/24 14:58, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 20:38, bertietaylor wrote:
    The nonsense that is e=mcc cannot be glorified with the exponential
    operator and an extra letter.
    Arindam's contraction to e=mcc shows his disdain.

    Arindam has used this same disdainful gesture on his own
    formula that he offers as a superior alternative to E=mcc

    This is Arindam.

    It isn't always necessary to say so.

    True, it is pretty obvious to anyone paying attention, but most people
    don't pay any attention to your posts, Aridam.

    If replacing c^2 with cc in Einstein's formula is Arindam's way of
    expressing disdain for Einstein's formula, what are we to make of
    the fact that Arindam's formula, e=0.5mVVN(N-k), contains VV instead
    of V^2? Is he disdaining his own formula?

    That's the point I was trying to make, but you didn't read far
    enough or think over what I wrote well enough to understand
    the contradiction I was pointing out.

    You're not very bright, are you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 10 22:59:14 2024
    Contraction can be affectionate and that is so usually. Or it could be disdainful. Arindam's use of vv instead of v^2 is for convenience.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Wed Jul 10 17:47:12 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Contraction can be affectionate and that is so usually. Or it could be disdainful. Arindam's use of vv instead of v^2 is for convenience.

    You are Arindam, crackpot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 11 07:00:35 2024
    Arindam has no use for the robotic-pathetic e=mcc penisnono
    thumper-chanters. We are his ghostly cyberdogs who know far better
    physics than the blackholic Nobel Laureates. Out of kindness we impart Arindamic physics to whatever humour and intelligence around. And make
    fun of the stupid or evil p* creatures.

    Bertietaylor
    (Bertius Bowus Wowus and Tyler Bhooncho Tayler)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Thu Jul 11 06:07:18 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Arindam has no use for the robotic-pathetic e=mcc penisnono
    thumper-chanters. We are his ghostly cyberdogs who know far better
    physics than the blackholic Nobel Laureates. Out of kindness we impart Arindamic physics to whatever humour and intelligence around. And make
    fun of the stupid or evil p* creatures.

    Incoherent crackpot babble and you are Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 12 00:47:31 2024
    Jimpee the penisnino is a dull creature.
    Still, that foolish carp does bite.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Volney@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Fri Jul 12 00:47:48 2024
    On 7/3/2024 4:08 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
    David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
    On 7/3/24 04:44, bertietaylor wrote:
    bertietaylor wrote:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2024-07-02 13:52:41 +0000, bertietaylor said:

    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.

    All off your hero's "theories" violate Newton's Laws genius. >>>>>>>>>>
    They update Newton and dismiss Einstein's silly notions.

    Newton's Laws has been unchanged for over 300 years genius.

    High time all accept Arindam's updates.

    I'd be more inclined to accept Thomas Heger's annotations to Einstein. >>>>>>
    Your choice to accept Gobbledygook is not surprising.

     Science moves.

    Yes, but crackpots will always be with us.

    Liars and frauds with little intelligence will abuse when exposed as >>>>>> liars and frauds. The scope of the e=mcc liars and frauds is
    stupendous.
    It is global. It beats hollow the flat earth wnd crystal sphere wallahs >>>>>> in its immensity.

    Crackpots that write "e=mcc" just show they don't know high school level >>>>> mathermatics or physics.

    Nonsense needs abbreviation and ridicule.

    Especially when the likes of Cardinal Penisnino of the Church of
    Relativity tries to give Arindam the Galileo treatment.

    For every Galileo there are 10,000 cranks.


    Actually only about 4,000 cranks as cranks seem to average about 2.5 personalities each.


    How many personalities does Arindam have? At least 3? (Arindam himself
    and the mutt personalities refer to themselves in the plural) ? Or just
    two? (Arindam himself but the mutt(s) seem to have just one personality
    among them) ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 12 08:46:47 2024
    Another carp bites.
    This one had the sense to change its name.
    That did nothing to make it less moronic.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 12 14:03:43 2024
    Pathetic, these e=mcc tnumper-chanters. Beyond redemption, as they
    choose to be useless robots.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Fri Jul 12 06:46:24 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Jimpee the penisnino is a dull creature.

    Why are you obsessed with the word penis Arindam?

    Still, that foolish carp does bite.

    Crackpot gibberish Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Fri Jul 12 07:36:07 2024
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Pathetic, these e=mcc tnumper-chanters. Beyond redemption, as they
    choose to be useless robots.

    Crackpot gibberish Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Fri Jul 12 17:02:54 2024
    On 7/10/24 18:59, bertietaylor wrote:
    Contraction can be affectionate and that is so usually. Or it could be disdainful. Arindam's use of vv instead of v^2 is for convenience.

    I see here only desperate rationalizing to try to save face.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 12 22:35:04 2024
    See more when you open his links to his brilliant new physics.
    That may be expecting too much.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 12 22:36:05 2024
    Arindam has no use for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Fri Jul 12 16:35:15 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    See more when you open his links to his brilliant new physics.

    you mean YOUR crackpot links and insane "theories" Arindam?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Fri Jul 12 16:34:03 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Arindam has no use for you.

    You are Arindam, crackpot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 13 08:16:27 2024
    No one expects anything clever from a dull robo-parrot like you,
    Penisnino.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 13 08:14:04 2024
    You are dull, Penisnino.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Sat Jul 13 07:53:26 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    No one expects anything clever from a dull robo-parrot like you,
    Penisnino.

    Why are you obsessed with the word penis Arindam?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Sat Jul 13 07:52:39 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    You are dull, Penisnino.

    Why are you obsessed with the word penis Arindam?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 13 23:16:20 2024
    Now how can e=mcc programmed robots understand anything about
    creativity!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Sat Jul 13 17:13:09 2024
    bertietaylor wrote:
    Now how can e=mcc programmed robots understand anything about
    creativity!

    Incoherent crackpot babble Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Sun Jul 14 14:25:23 2024
    On 7/12/24 18:35, bertietaylor wrote:
    See more when you open his links to his brilliant new physics.
    That may be expecting too much.

    The formula is e=0.5mvvN(N-k)

    What are N and k? Avogadro's number and Boltzmann's constant?
    If so, the formula fails one of the most basic sanity checks
    in physics. No point going to his site, there is no truth to
    be found there.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 14 23:25:14 2024
    Search and ye shall find.
    Arindam has explained them hundreds of times in his online posts on sci.physics.
    Use Google groups for searching.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 15 00:43:41 2024
    Up Newton down Einstein.
    c(v)=c+v or light speed varies with velocity of emitter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Sun Jul 14 20:22:45 2024
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Up Newton down Einstein.
    c(v)=c+v or light speed varies with velocity of emitter

    Crackpot nonsense Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 15 07:13:16 2024
    Newton's 3rd law, updated:
    To every MECHANICAL action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    In Newton's first law delete the qualifier "external"


    These updates done by Arindam in 1998 will take humanity to the stars
    after fixing energy and motion issues on Earth for all and for ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Mon Jul 15 07:27:03 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 7:13:16 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:

    Newton's 3rd law, updated:
    To every MECHANICAL action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    In Newton's first law delete the qualifier "external"


    These updates done by Arindam in 1998 will take humanity to the stars
    after fixing energy and motion issues on Earth for all and for ever.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Pennino@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Mon Jul 15 06:58:19 2024
    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Newton's 3rd law, updated:
    To every MECHANICAL action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    In Newton's first law delete the qualifier "external"


    These updates done by Arindam in 1998 will take humanity to the stars
    after fixing energy and motion issues on Earth for all and for ever.

    Your crackpot theories are disproven by high school level experiments
    Arindam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Canzi@21:1/5 to bertietaylor on Mon Jul 15 14:20:16 2024
    On 7/14/24 19:25, bertietaylor wrote:
    Search and ye shall find.
    Arindam has explained them hundreds of times in his online posts on sci.physics.
    Use Google groups for searching.

    With your extensive knowledge of everything that happens inside
    Arindam's head, you must surely know what N and k represent. It
    would take you less effort to tell us than it would take for me
    to hunt for it. It would take you less effort to tell us than
    you have already spent rationalizing and evading in this thread.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to David Canzi on Tue Jul 16 00:31:56 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 18:20:16 +0000, David Canzi wrote:

    On 7/14/24 19:25, bertietaylor wrote:
    Search and ye shall find.
    Arindam has explained them hundreds of times in his online posts on
    sci.physics.
    Use Google groups for searching.

    With your extensive knowledge of everything that happens inside
    Arindam's head, you must surely know what N and k represent. It
    would take you less effort to tell us than it would take for me
    to hunt for it. It would take you less effort to tell us than
    you have already spent rationalizing and evading in this thread.

    Ah, well, as you say it nicely unlike the Penisnino. Arindam Banerjee
    is a very nice man, and so here goes...

    Assume that you can somehow with internal energy leading to internal
    force without reaction give with that internal energy a closed mass m an acceleration leading to a gain of velocity v.
    Now this is impossible with our existing notions about physics for it
    will violate Newton's first law.
    Again, suppose it can be done.
    Then with no friction (as in outer space) with N hits the body will gain
    the velocity Nv.
    Energy is required for each hit, that energy coming from sources in the
    closed mass.
    Let kE be the internal energy required for each hit, where E is the
    energy required for accelerating the mass and k is a factor which is
    greater than unity, being a measure of the energy loss in the process of accelerating the mass. In other words, a loss factor relating to heat generation, that is dissipated.

    Right so far? (Apart from the assumption, about which, later.)

    Now, for N hits the internal energy expended will be NkE.

    E=0.5mv^2 - always for every reference frame with velocity reference Nv.
    So the internal energy expended will be Nk0.5mv^2. (1)

    The mass will take a velocity of Nv with a kinetic energy of 0.5m(Nv)^2
    (2)

    As per the law of conservation of energy they should be the same, but
    that is not the case with large N and a fixed k.

    So there is a gain of energy e for the mass m which is the difference
    between (2) and (1)

    or e=0.5mvvN(N-k)

    Now, about going to the stars.
    Go to speed Nv after N hits. (Gain heaps of energy)
    Cruise.
    Then turn around.
    Reach speed -Nv after N hits. (Lose heaps of energy)

    Thus showing energy is eternally created and destroyed in the universe.

    Quod Erat Demonstrandum

    woof-woof

    Bertietaylor (Arindam's ghostly cyberpooches)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to Jim Pennino on Tue Jul 16 00:33:28 2024
    On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 13:58:19 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

    bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
    Newton's 3rd law, updated:
    To every MECHANICAL action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

    In Newton's first law delete the qualifier "external"


    These updates done by Arindam in 1998 will take humanity to the stars
    after fixing energy and motion issues on Earth for all and for ever.

    Your crackpot theories are disproven by high school level experiments Arindam.

    More experiments will fix matters, when the high school teachers are
    allowed to do so.

    The violation of inertia with a new design rail gun in motor mode
    Arindam Banerjee,
    HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne
    10 Nov 2023
    (All rights reserved)

    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

    ***

    Experiments (2022) showing my invention of a new kind of rail gun https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYtyOMbgiZ0

    Which is improved upon in, and its potential for ejecting matter into
    near space , and horizontal tunneling shown in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6pjy0Wvujs&t=19s

    and the following shows how a new class of linear motor violating
    inertia can be developed by arresting the momentum of the armature and imparting that to the whole system, giving it an increased velocity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc&t=2s

    *****

    Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion" https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

    Section 1
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
    design of Interstellar Spacecraft https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

    Section 1 (contd.)
    Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the
    design of Interstellar Spacecraft https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

    Section 2
    The Creation and Destruction of Energy https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

    Section 3
    The Structure of Heavenly Bodies https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

    Section 4
    The Nature of Explosion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

    Section 5
    The forces involved in rotational motion https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

    *******

    2017 videos of rail gun experiments with theory in detail

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
    IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
    IFE - 2 Experimental setups

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
    IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
    IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
    IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
    IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
    IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
    IFE - 8 New Physics

    ****
    The physics aphorisms of Arindam https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

    The cause of gravity https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

    Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
    1
    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

    Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories -
    2
    https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

    *****

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)