Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts
here are futile.
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts
here are futile.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts
here are futile.
Just as the Church now accepts that the Earth goes around the Sun,
physicists of the future will follow Arindam's physics
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>> here are futile.
<snip insane babble>
Just as the Church now accepts that the Earth goes around the Sun,
"the Church" is not a scientific organization, crackpot.
Scientists accepted the fact in the 17th century, crackpot.
Your scientific education appears to have ended about 500 BCE, crackpot.
physicists of the future will follow Arindam's physics
Only if every physicist on the planet suddenly goes insane, crackpot.
<snip insane babble>
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:44:33 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>>> here are futile.
<snip insane babble>
Just as the Church now accepts that the Earth goes around the Sun,
"the Church" is not a scientific organization, crackpot.
Nor is the modern "physics" establishment, Penisnino.
That now is the Church of Relativity with e=mcc as key dogma and
Einstein as God/clown/baby.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts
here are futile.
Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As
Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:44:33 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or >>>>>> wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>>>> here are futile.
<snip insane babble>
Just as the Church now accepts that the Earth goes around the Sun,
"the Church" is not a scientific organization, crackpot.
Nor is the modern "physics" establishment, Penisnino.
So where is this international establishment headquarted, penis obsessed crackpot?
That now is the Church of Relativity with e=mcc as key dogma and
Einstein as God/clown/baby.
Delusionally insane nonsense, crackpot.
On 11/4/24 15:19, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>> here are futile.
Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not
scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As
Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
Nothing you say about them here has any effect on them. What effect
are you hoping your words will have? How long have you been wasting
your life on this solo crusade without visibly accomplishing anything?
Cut your losses.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:19, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>>> here are futile.
Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not
scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As
Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
Nothing you say about them here has any effect on them. What effect
are you hoping your words will have? How long have you been wasting
your life on this solo crusade without visibly accomplishing anything?
Who said Arindam has not accomplished anything? Only liars and frauds
posing as physicists. Arindam has exposed them as liars and frauds with
his inertia violation experiments single handed lly and that is some accomplishment.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:16:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:44:33 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and >>>>>>> denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>>>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or >>>>>>> wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>>>>> here are futile.
<snip insane babble>
Just as the Church now accepts that the Earth goes around the Sun,
"the Church" is not a scientific organization, crackpot.
Nor is the modern "physics" establishment, Penisnino.
So where is this international establishment headquarted, penis obsessed
crackpot?
In whatever passes for your puny brain, Penisnino.
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 3:54:15 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 0:41:01 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:29:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the >>>>>> armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air, >>>>> crackpot.
The projectile is the armature, of the linear motor that in this case is >>>> the railgun, Penisnino, most extraordinary ignoramus.
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
Weight of bullet is say 7g
Muzzle velocity is 300m/s
So ke is 0.5mv^2=0.5*.007*300^2=.0035*90000=3150J so okay
0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5
Sorry we made a mistake above, it should be
0.5 * 4 * 1.5^2 = 4.5 J and not 4500J.
which is greater than 3346J or 3150J or 1756J.
We were wrong, but in Arindam's railgun design we do not talk of energy
except for efficiency we talk momentum.
Railguns, actually ALL guns, are ALWAYS specified in energy as that is
the important parameter and no one cares about momentum, crackpot.
Moron, ALL guns are specified in terms of *muzzle velocity*
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 3:54:15 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 0:41:01 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:29:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the >>>>>>> armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air, >>>>>> crackpot.
The projectile is the armature, of the linear motor that in this case is >>>>> the railgun, Penisnino, most extraordinary ignoramus.
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
Weight of bullet is say 7g
Muzzle velocity is 300m/s
So ke is 0.5mv^2=0.5*.007*300^2=.0035*90000=3150J so okay
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5 >>>>> 0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
Sorry we made a mistake above, it should be
0.5 * 4 * 1.5^2 = 4.5 J and not 4500J.
which is greater than 3346J or 3150J or 1756J.
We were wrong, but in Arindam's railgun design we do not talk of energy >>>> except for efficiency we talk momentum.
Railguns, actually ALL guns, are ALWAYS specified in energy as that is
the important parameter and no one cares about momentum, crackpot.
Moron, ALL guns are specified in terms of *muzzle velocity*
Actually, it is the ammunition that is specified in terms of muzzle
velocity, crackpot.
<snip remaining babble>
So Arindam's model new design Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.
However a rifle bullet even with much less momentum can do extreme
damage as great pressures are involved on impact.
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new design Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.
The important paramenter of a rifle is muzzle energy
about momentum as it is the energy that causes the damage and momentum
has little to do with it, creackpot.
Further, muzzle energy in a rifle is determined by the ammunition and
not the rifle itslelf, crackpot.
However a rifle bullet even with much less momentum can do extreme
damage as great pressures are involved on impact.
Imagine a rifle that fires a 100,000 pound projectile at 0.1 feet/sec;
at impact the projectile would mearly push something away doing little
to no damage, crackpot.
<snip remaining babble>
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new design Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.
The important paramenter of a rifle is muzzle energy
and nobody cares
about momentum as it is the energy that causes the damage and momentum
has little to do with it, creackpot.
Further, muzzle energy in a rifle is determined by the ammunition and
not the rifle itslelf, crackpot.
However a rifle bullet even with much less momentum can do extreme
damage as great pressures are involved on impact.
Imagine a rifle that fires a 100,000 pound projectile at 0.1 feet/sec;
at impact the projectile would mearly push something away doing little
to no damage, crackpot.
Stupid Penisnino, matchless idiot that it is, cannot comprehend that
when used as a defence railgun as actual and not as models, Arindam's
new design railgun would fire 1000 kg missile rockets at 500 m/s. They
would then after launch get into rocket mode and reach Mach 15 easily.
That is so far beyond the scope of existing railgun designs which simply
look silly in comparison.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Which is stupendous.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum
than a rifle.
The important paramenter of a rifle is muzzle energy
and nobody cares
about momentum as it is the energy that causes the damage and momentum
has little to do with it, creackpot.
Further, muzzle energy in a rifle is determined by the ammunition and
not the rifle itslelf, crackpot.
However a rifle bullet even with much less momentum can do extreme
damage as great pressures are involved on impact.
Imagine a rifle that fires a 100,000 pound projectile at 0.1 feet/sec;
at impact the projectile would mearly push something away doing little
to no damage, crackpot.
Stupid Penisnino, matchless idiot that it is, cannot comprehend that
when used as a defence railgun as actual and not as models, Arindam's
new design railgun would fire 1000 kg missile rockets at 500 m/s. They
would then after launch get into rocket mode and reach Mach 15 easily.
That is so far beyond the scope of existing railgun designs which simply
look silly in comparison.
Rocket artillery was invented in the 17th century and you have yet to
launch ANY projectile, crackpot.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:19, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with
you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and
denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot
could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your
efforts
here are futile.
Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not
scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As
Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
Nothing you say about them here has any effect on them. What effect
are you hoping your words will have? How long have you been wasting
your life on this solo crusade without visibly accomplishing anything?
Who said Arindam has not accomplished anything? Only liars and frauds
posing as physicists. Arindam has exposed them as liars and frauds with
his inertia violation experiments single handed lly and that is some accomplishment.
Cut your losses.
On 11/4/24 20:03, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:19, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with
you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and
denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot >>>>>> could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or >>>>>> wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your
efforts
here are futile.
Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not
scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As >>>> Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
Nothing you say about them here has any effect on them. What effect
are you hoping your words will have? How long have you been wasting
your life on this solo crusade without visibly accomplishing anything?
Who said Arindam has not accomplished anything? Only liars and frauds
posing as physicists. Arindam has exposed them as liars and frauds with
his inertia violation experiments single handed lly and that is some
accomplishment.
There were once physicists here but I don't think there are any
here any more.
interest in physics. We are not the type of people you need
to reach.
professional scientist.
and nobody here you might somehow convince of your anti-Einstein
and anti-Newton odeas would be able to do that for you either.
You're lecturing to the wrong audience.
Cut your losses.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Which is stupendous.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum >>>>> than a rifle.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a
gun.
Around 2003 Arindam was told by a senior scientist in CSIRO that
anything that went against, or may seem to go against the e=mcc stuff
would be automatically and summarily dismissed. So Arindam should stick
to his day job.
Arindam suffered socially as a consequence for his social circle was Einsteinian. He suffered a lot of persecution at work, was hounded out
of employment, all for elaborating in his book "To the Stars!" he had published online in his now defunct adds website in early 2000, his new formula e= 0.5mvvN(N-k) which was an alternative to e=mcc.
He was taunted about making a railgun that would violate inertia, as he
had stated could be the case for the proof of his new formula
introducing new physics.
Satisfaction is that all those mocking elements have bitten the net
dust. Only low IQ types are around to rant and rave absurdly.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 23:44:29 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 11/4/24 15:19, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or >>>>>> wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>>>> here are futile.
Those who reject Arindam's physics as it does not suit them are not
scientists. They do not want new truths that overturn their dogmas. As >>>> Tesla said, they are clever theologians.
Nothing you say about them here has any effect on them. What effect
are you hoping your words will have? How long have you been wasting
your life on this solo crusade without visibly accomplishing anything?
Who said Arindam has not accomplished anything? Only liars and frauds
posing as physicists. Arindam has exposed them as liars and frauds with
his inertia violation experiments single handed lly and that is some
accomplishment.
They only thing you have exposed is the depths of your insanity,
crackpot.
Penisnino proves my point. Only low IQ chaps are left to mock Arindam.
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his inertia violation experiments.
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal publication.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.
Explain why no one had found any intrinsic fault in Arindam's physics theories.
Explain why they ignore Arindam's discovery that the MMI actually shows
light speed variance this outing the first postulate of sr.
Explain why the bending of starlight in a solar eclipse is not just an optical effect.
Explain why Doppler effect shows light speed variation.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 22:16:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 20:44:33 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 19:19:26 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and >>>>>>>> denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could
be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or >>>>>>>> wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and >>>>>>>> abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it >>>>>>> by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts
here are futile.
<snip insane babble>
"the Church" is not a scientific organization, crackpot.
Just as the Church now accepts that the Earth goes around the Sun, >>>>>
Nor is the modern "physics" establishment, Penisnino.
So where is this international establishment headquarted, penis obsessed >>> crackpot?
In whatever passes for your puny brain, Penisnino.
Nope, it only exists in your penis obsessed, delusional brain, crackpot.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his
inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal
publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a delusional mind.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
Explain why no one had found any intrinsic fault in Arindam's physics
theories.
On the contrary, that has read them has pointed out how rediculous and laughable they are.
Explain why they ignore Arindam's discovery that the MMI actually shows
light speed variance this outing the first postulate of sr.
Because you have shown nothing of the sort.
Explain why the bending of starlight in a solar eclipse is not just an
optical effect.
This is explained in high school physics.
Explain why Doppler effect shows light speed variation.
Impossible because real experiments don't show that.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his
inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal
publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
Explain why no one had found any intrinsic fault in Arindam's physics
theories.
On the contrary, that has read them has pointed out how rediculous and
laughable they are.
Explain why they ignore Arindam's discovery that the MMI actually shows
light speed variance this outing the first postulate of sr.
Because you have shown nothing of the sort.
Explain why the bending of starlight in a solar eclipse is not just an
optical effect.
This is explained in high school physics.
Explain why Doppler effect shows light speed variation.
Impossible because real experiments don't show that.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his
inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his
inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal
publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
Explain why no one had found any intrinsic fault in Arindam's physics
theories.
On the contrary, that has read them has pointed out how rediculous and
laughable they are.
Explain why they ignore Arindam's discovery that the MMI actually shows
light speed variance this outing the first postulate of sr.
Because you have shown nothing of the sort.
Explain why the bending of starlight in a solar eclipse is not just an
optical effect.
This is explained in high school physics.
Explain why Doppler effect shows light speed variation.
Impossible because real experiments don't show that.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and
analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep
appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so
great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed,
classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal
publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
Then why do they ask for his journal publications when journals reject
his papers with their penisnino attitude? Anyone here sees the Catch-22?
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and
analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep
appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so
great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed,
classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal
publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
Far more likely that they extremely cautious about their careers.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and
analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep >>> appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so >>> great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed,
classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam.
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
Far more likely that they extremely cautious about their careers.
You are partially correct as no actual scientist of any sort will admit
to reading babbling, raving nonsense by lunatic crackpots that is not
even in a standard, accepted format, crackpot.
<snip babbling, raving nonsense unread>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 0:03:41 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted >>>> up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and >>>> analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep >>>> appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so >>>> great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take >>>> it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, >>>> classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over >>>> many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care >>>> most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he >>>> keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a >>>>> delusional mind.
Because no one cares about raving crackpots.
Explain why among millions of journalists no one interviews Arindam. >>>>>
Far more likely that they extremely cautious about their careers.
You are partially correct as no actual scientist of any sort will admit
to reading babbling, raving nonsense by lunatic crackpots that is not
even in a standard, accepted format, crackpot.
<snip babbling, raving nonsense unread>
Stupid Penisnino, Arindam extends the physics
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by Arindam's rail gun
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by
Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by
Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear
motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by
Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear >>> motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
A railgun launches a projectile at high speed while your linear motor
causes a pipe to roll off a set of rails.
<snip insanity?
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by >>>>> Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear >>>> motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
Fool, Arindam has made a working model of a totally new design linear
motor operating on basic railgun principles.
David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations
in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts
here are futile.
Actually they are delusionally insane.
On 11/4/24 15:22, Jim Pennino wrote:
David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
On 10/30/24 16:56, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>> not evidence that you're right.
This is not a moderated newsgroup. Arindam has been insulted and
denounced here for decades. Nothing new about insults and denunciations >>>> in Usenet, the most free medium on the planet. Just that, the boot could >>>> be on another foot - or paw in our case.
Relativists have no business to declare absolutely what is right or
wrong. Their only right is to fool and rob people with propaganda and
abuse of mathematics.
Nobody advocating a new theory has ever gotten scientists to accept it
by insulting or denouncing scientists who don't accept it. Your efforts >>> here are futile.
Actually they are delusionally insane.
There is a problem currently happening in sci.physics that I
have seen happening in other groups. Somebody starts a thread
about some topic they're interested in, then a newsgroup pest
posts an irrelevant followup, then other people respond to the
pest, and the pest responds to them, and the thread becomes a
thread about the pest. The thread is destroyed.
Your knee-jerk responses to Arindam and his sock puppets enable
this vandalism. Your obsessive opposition to him actually
increases the harm he does here.
You are part of the problem.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted
up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and
analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep >>> appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so >>> great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take
it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed,
classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over
many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care
most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he
keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a
delusional mind.
Then why do they ask for his journal publications when journals reject
his papers with their penisnino attitude? Anyone here sees the Catch-22?
First you actually have to perform an experiment and write it up in a
format such as AIP.
Let us know when you have done that and you can post it here for review, crackpot.
<snip remaining babble unread>
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by >>>>>> Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear >>>>> motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
Fool, Arindam has made a working model of a totally new design linear
motor operating on basic railgun principles.
Actually, railguns operate on basic linear motor principles, crackpot.
What make a linear motor a railgun is that it LAUNCHSES a projectile at
high speed, your device mearly rolls a pipe off the rails at very low
speed, crackpot.
<snip insanity>
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:59:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are >>>>>>> not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted >>>> up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and >>>> analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty.
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep >>>> appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so >>>> great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take >>>> it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, >>>> classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over >>>> many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care >>>> most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he >>>> keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving...
all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a >>>>> delusional mind.
Then why do they ask for his journal publications when journals reject
his papers with their penisnino attitude? Anyone here sees the Catch-22?
First you actually have to perform an experiment and write it up in a
format such as AIP.
Arindam is showing the experiment to the whole world using the latest availability technologies. That is shown free, fast, clearly with full details and explanations. Potentially billions can see it immediately
with internet connection.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:13:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by >>>>>>> Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear >>>>>> motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
Fool, Arindam has made a working model of a totally new design linear
motor operating on basic railgun principles.
Actually, railguns operate on basic linear motor principles, crackpot.
Correct for once, fool.
What make a linear motor a railgun is that it LAUNCHSES a projectile at
high speed, your device mearly rolls a pipe off the rails at very low
speed, crackpot.
Fool, you don't have the wits to realise that with 100 times greater
voltage for same circuit the force acting upon the projectile would be
10000 times more. And depending upon barrel length hypersonic muzzle velocities will be reached with this new design by Arindam, brilliantly explained in his YouTube videos.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:13:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by >>>>>>>> Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear
motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
Fool, Arindam has made a working model of a totally new design linear
motor operating on basic railgun principles.
Actually, railguns operate on basic linear motor principles, crackpot.
Correct for once, fool.
What make a linear motor a railgun is that it LAUNCHSES a projectile at
high speed, your device mearly rolls a pipe off the rails at very low
speed, crackpot.
Fool, you don't have the wits to realise that with 100 times greater
voltage for same circuit the force acting upon the projectile would be
10000 times more. And depending upon barrel length hypersonic muzzle
velocities will be reached with this new design by Arindam, brilliantly
explained in his YouTube videos.
Your device is NOT a railgun until it actually LAUNCHES a projectile
and until then it is nothing more than a low speed linear motor,
crackpot.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:59:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:First you actually have to perform an experiment and write it up in a
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>>>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted >>>>> up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and >>>>> analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty. >>>>>
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep >>>>> appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so >>>>> great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take >>>>> it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, >>>>> classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over >>>>> many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care >>>>> most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he >>>>> keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving... >>>>> all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a >>>>>> delusional mind.
Then why do they ask for his journal publications when journals reject >>>> his papers with their penisnino attitude? Anyone here sees the Catch-22? >>>
format such as AIP.
Arindam is showing the experiment to the whole world using the latest
availability technologies. That is shown free, fast, clearly with full
details and explanations. Potentially billions can see it immediately
with internet connection.
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article,
crackpot.
<snip remaining insane babble>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 4:30:54 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:59:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:First you actually have to perform an experiment and write it up in a
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his >>>>>>>> inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted >>>>>> up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and >>>>>> analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty. >>>>>>
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep >>>>>> appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so >>>>>> great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take >>>>>> it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, >>>>>> classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over >>>>>> many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care >>>>>> most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he >>>>>> keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel,
writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving... >>>>>> all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a >>>>>>> delusional mind.
Then why do they ask for his journal publications when journals reject >>>>> his papers with their penisnino attitude? Anyone here sees the Catch-22? >>>>
format such as AIP.
Arindam is showing the experiment to the whole world using the latest
availability technologies. That is shown free, fast, clearly with full
details and explanations. Potentially billions can see it immediately
with internet connection.
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article,
crackpot.
It upsets the whole of physics
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 4:33:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:13:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by >>>>>>>>> Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear
motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
Fool, Arindam has made a working model of a totally new design linear >>>>> motor operating on basic railgun principles.
Actually, railguns operate on basic linear motor principles, crackpot.
Correct for once, fool.
What make a linear motor a railgun is that it LAUNCHSES a projectile at >>>> high speed, your device mearly rolls a pipe off the rails at very low
speed, crackpot.
Fool, you don't have the wits to realise that with 100 times greater
voltage for same circuit the force acting upon the projectile would be
10000 times more. And depending upon barrel length hypersonic muzzle
velocities will be reached with this new design by Arindam, brilliantly
explained in his YouTube videos.
Your device is NOT a railgun until it actually LAUNCHES a projectile
and until then it is nothing more than a low speed linear motor,
crackpot.
Arindam's working model of a new design rail gun does launch a
projectile
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 4:30:54 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 23:59:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:43:54 +0000, Bertietaylor wrote:First you actually have to perform an experiment and write it up in a >>>>> format such as AIP.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:03:55 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 17:35:36 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
Your insults and denunciations against people who disagree with you are
not evidence that you're right.
Explain why they persecute Arindam by not repeating and confirming his
inertia violation experiments.
First, you are not being persecuted, you are being laughed at.
No. Only you are showing your mean attitude as you are totally twisted >>>>>>> up, warped, screwed by the e=mcc nonsense.
Second, your "experiments" are utter nonsense.
Arindam's experiments cannot be nonsense as they are real, new,
wonderful, brilliant, cheap to repeat and extremely well explained and >>>>>>> analysed. They make sense to everyone with intelligence and honesty. >>>>>>>
Which is why out of billions of viewers there is stunned silence of deep
appreciation.
That inertia violation is being done is obvious. The consequences are so
great that for the time the world is just still. Will take time to take >>>>>>> it in.
For this means that while Einsteinian physics will be totally trashed, >>>>>>> classical physics will be massively updated.
A matter of time, just. Arindam has literally hundreds of friends over >>>>>>> many lands. They have always had the highest regards for him. They care >>>>>>> most for his personal safety so keep a low profile about him.
Arindam for his part feels he has his scientific duty to perform. So he >>>>>>> keeps on with his work, serenely. Household life, family, travel, >>>>>>> writing, acting, cooking, gardening, travelling, shopping, driving... >>>>>>> all these occupy Arindam in his personal heaven of which we the
undersigned were a happy part.
Woof-woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
Explain why they reject his papers and then ask if he has had journal >>>>>>>>> publication.
Because your "papers" are rediculous, laughable nonsense ravings of a >>>>>>>> delusional mind.
Then why do they ask for his journal publications when journals reject >>>>>> his papers with their penisnino attitude? Anyone here sees the Catch-22? >>>>>
Arindam is showing the experiment to the whole world using the latest
availability technologies. That is shown free, fast, clearly with full >>>> details and explanations. Potentially billions can see it immediately
with internet connection.
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article,
crackpot.
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
<snip babble unread>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
More despicable they in that case.
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 4:33:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:13:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Correct for once, fool.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:16:26 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 4:08:56 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Desperate penisnanos ailing considerably after getting pulverised by >>>>>>>>>> Arindam's rail gun
Your device is not a railgun, it is nothing more than a low speed linear
motor, penis obsessed crackpot.
<snip insanity>
Penisnino can't stand truth because he is made of lies.
The penis obsessed crackpot has no clue what a railgun is.
Fool, Arindam has made a working model of a totally new design linear >>>>>> motor operating on basic railgun principles.
Actually, railguns operate on basic linear motor principles, crackpot. >>>>
What make a linear motor a railgun is that it LAUNCHSES a projectile at >>>>> high speed, your device mearly rolls a pipe off the rails at very low >>>>> speed, crackpot.
Fool, you don't have the wits to realise that with 100 times greater
voltage for same circuit the force acting upon the projectile would be >>>> 10000 times more. And depending upon barrel length hypersonic muzzle
velocities will be reached with this new design by Arindam, brilliantly >>>> explained in his YouTube videos.
Your device is NOT a railgun until it actually LAUNCHES a projectile
and until then it is nothing more than a low speed linear motor,
crackpot.
Arindam's working model of a new design rail gun does launch a
projectile
Your device does NOT launch a projectile; it just rolls slowly off the
end. Launching a projectile means it flys through the air, crackpot.
<snip babble unread>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
More despicable they in that case.
Nobody is going to read a technical paper that is not in one of the
standard formats for a technical paper, crackpot. Your reports are just rambling nonsense, crackpot.
<snip remaining rambling nonsense unread>
FYI, at the first sentence of any of your posts that is rambling,
delusional screed is where I normally stop reading, crackpot.
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the
armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air, crackpot.
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5
Do you even know how to mesasure muzzle energy, crackpot?
<snip remaining nonsense unread>
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:29:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the
armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air,
crackpot.
The projectile is the armature, of the linear motor that in this case is
the railgun, Penisnino, most extraordinary ignoramus.
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
Weight of bullet is say 7g
Muzzle velocity is 300m/s
So ke is 0.5mv^2=0.5*.007*300^2=.0035*90000=3150J so okay
0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5
which is greater than 3346J or 3150J or 1756J.
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:29:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the
armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air,
crackpot.
The projectile is the armature, of the linear motor that in this case is
the railgun
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
Weight of bullet is say 7g
Muzzle velocity is 300m/s
So ke is 0.5mv^2=0.5*.007*300^2=.0035*90000=3150J so okay
0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:57:53 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
More despicable they in that case.
Nobody is going to read a technical paper that is not in one of the
standard formats for a technical paper, crackpot. Your reports are just
rambling nonsense, crackpot.
Arindam does not care
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 0:41:01 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:29:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the >>>> armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air,
crackpot.
The projectile is the armature, of the linear motor that in this case is
the railgun, Penisnino, most extraordinary ignoramus.
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
Weight of bullet is say 7g
Muzzle velocity is 300m/s
So ke is 0.5mv^2=0.5*.007*300^2=.0035*90000=3150J so okay
0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5
Sorry we made a mistake above, it should be
0.5 * 4 * 1.5^2 = 4.5 J and not 4500J.
which is greater than 3346J or 3150J or 1756J.
We were wrong, but in Arindam's railgun design we do not talk of energy except for efficiency we talk momentum.
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:57:53 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
More despicable they in that case.
Nobody is going to read a technical paper that is not in one of the
standard formats for a technical paper, crackpot. Your reports are just
rambling nonsense, crackpot.
Arindam does not care
If you do not write your "report" in some standard format, nobody is
going to bother to read it, crackpot.
<snip remaing ranting unread>
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 1:01:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:57:53 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article
which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
More despicable they in that case.
Nobody is going to read a technical paper that is not in one of the
standard formats for a technical paper, crackpot. Your reports are just >>>> rambling nonsense, crackpot.
Arindam does not care
If you do not write your "report" in some standard format, nobody is
going to bother to read it, crackpot.
Who cares for IP thieves!
Arindam will patent first if he so cares.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 1:01:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 20:57:53 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:00:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
It upsets the whole of physics
It is drivel and not any any known format for a technical article >>>>>>> which means no one will read it in the first place, crackpot.
More despicable they in that case.
Nobody is going to read a technical paper that is not in one of the
standard formats for a technical paper, crackpot. Your reports are just >>>>> rambling nonsense, crackpot.
Arindam does not care
If you do not write your "report" in some standard format, nobody is
going to bother to read it, crackpot.
Who cares for IP thieves!
Non sequitur.
All you've shown is you don't know the meaning of the word "format", crackpot.
Arindam will patent first if he so cares.
Patents require a VERY specific format, crackpot.
<snip remaining babble unread>
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 9 Nov 2024 0:41:01 +0000, bertietaylor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 21:29:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:02:42 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
<snip old crap>
Fool, with the low voltage given and its huge mass the momentum of the >>>>> armature beats that of most high power rifle bullets.
Utter nonsense, crackpot.
Railguns don't have an armature, they fire projectiles through the air, >>>> crackpot.
The projectile is the armature, of the linear motor that in this case is >>> the railgun, Penisnino, most extraordinary ignoramus.
The muzzle energy of the very common 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 3,346 J.
Weight of bullet is say 7g
Muzzle velocity is 300m/s
So ke is 0.5mv^2=0.5*.007*300^2=.0035*90000=3150J so okay
0.5*4000*1.5^2= 2000*2.25=4500J, Penisnino
The muzzle energy of the very common 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge is
typically around 1756 J.
What is the muzzle energy of your low speed linear motor, crackpot?5
Sorry we made a mistake above, it should be
0.5 * 4 * 1.5^2 = 4.5 J and not 4500J.
which is greater than 3346J or 3150J or 1756J.
We were wrong, but in Arindam's railgun design we do not talk of energy
except for efficiency we talk momentum.
Railguns, actually ALL guns, are ALWAYS specified in energy as that is
the important parameter and no one cares about momentum, crackpot.
<snip remaining babble unread>
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Penisnino proves my point. Only low IQ chaps are left to mock Arindam.
Still no evidence of a "railgun" that actually launches a projectile, crackpot.
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Which is stupendous.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum >>>>>> than a rifle.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a
gun.
Your device does not have a barrel, it has a track with a pipe slooowly rolling down it, crackpot.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 15:12:49 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Penisnino proves my point. Only low IQ chaps are left to mock Arindam.
Still no evidence of a "railgun" that actually launches a projectile,
crackpot.
Penisnino has no clue about the meaning of "working model".
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:44:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Which is stupendous.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum >>>>>>> than a rifle.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a
gun.
Your device does not have a barrel, it has a track with a pipe slooowly
rolling down it, crackpot.
A gun barrel is a linear arrangement through which a projectile
accelerates. Usually cylindrical in shape, as is necessary to contain
the gases from a chemical explosion causing projectile acceleration.
The same cylindrical arrangement, out to ape-like propensity for
copying, is present in the existing railguns, making them highly
inefficient.
Arindam's new design has two rails which are the equivalent of a gun
barrel, and which accelerates a heavy bullet horizontally.
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:44:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Which is stupendous.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum >>>>>>>> than a rifle.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a >>>> gun.
Your device does not have a barrel, it has a track with a pipe slooowly
rolling down it, crackpot.
A gun barrel is a linear arrangement through which a projectile
accelerates. Usually cylindrical in shape, as is necessary to contain
the gases from a chemical explosion causing projectile acceleration.
The same cylindrical arrangement, out to ape-like propensity for
copying, is present in the existing railguns, making them highly
inefficient.
Arindam's new design has two rails which are the equivalent of a gun
barrel, and which accelerates a heavy bullet horizontally.
All real railguns have two rails, crackpot.
The ones that have the rails enclosed in something that sort of looks
like a gun barrel are there only to maintain directional control of the
high speed projectile and have nothing to do rom with the accelration of
the
projectile, crackpot.
<snip usual idiocy>
Penisnino will always be penisnino.
On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 23:23:05 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 14:44:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 3:31:31 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:Which is stupendous.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 0:45:29 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
So Arindam's model new deWsign Railgun gives three times the momentum >>>>>>>>> than a rifle.
First time one can see and measure the bullet moving up the barrel of a >>>>> gun.
Your device does not have a barrel, it has a track with a pipe slooowly >>>> rolling down it, crackpot.
A gun barrel is a linear arrangement through which a projectile
accelerates. Usually cylindrical in shape, as is necessary to contain
the gases from a chemical explosion causing projectile acceleration.
The same cylindrical arrangement, out to ape-like propensity for
copying, is present in the existing railguns, making them highly
inefficient.
Arindam's new design has two rails which are the equivalent of a gun
barrel, and which accelerates a heavy bullet horizontally.
All real railguns have two rails, crackpot.
As does Arindam's, fool.
The ones that have the rails enclosed in something that sort of looks
like a gun barrel are there only to maintain directional control of the
high speed projectile and have nothing to do rom with the accelration of
the
projectile, crackpot.
Usual nonsense from Penisnino.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 468 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 14:34:59 |
| Calls: | 9,440 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,591 |
| Messages: | 6,109,458 |