• Re: "superhumaness" excels "stackoverflow reputation" (Re: Im memoriam

    From Mild Shock@21:1/5 to Physfitfreak on Sun Dec 1 11:37:00 2024
    Hi,

    Chatgpt is definitely unreliable.

    So is stackoverflow, you have no guarantee
    to get a realiable answer. Sometimes they
    have even biased nonsense, due to the over

    representation of certain communities on
    stackoverflow. But ChatGPT it is easier to
    re-iterate a problem and explore solutions,

    you don't get punished for sloppy questions,
    or changing topic midflight exploring corner
    digging deeper and deeper.

    ChatGPT certainly beats stackoverflow.

    Also stackoverflow is extremly hysteric about
    keeping every comment trail, and has a very
    slow garbage collection. I think stackoveflow

    automatically deletes a answer with negative
    votes after a while. On the other hand ChatGPT
    keeps a side bar with all the interactions,

    and you can delete an interaction any time
    you want to do so. There is no maniac idea to
    keep interactions. Stackoverflow possibly

    only keeps this interactions to be able to
    send people to their virtual prison. Basically
    they have become a perverted para-governemental

    institution that exercises violence.

    Physfitfreak schrieb:
    On 11/30/24 6:11 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
    Who do I use as a programming companion, stackoverflow
    or ChatGPT. I think ChatGPT is the clear winner


    Neither.

    One is a joke, the other is not reliable.

    The few people in stackoverflow aren't there to tell you what the
    solution to a particularly difficult, or novel, question is. They're
    there to learn from _you_. In interacting with those Bozos you'll end up struggling more and more to find the solution because of how idiotically
    they behave and try to make you hopeless, and when you at last find the solution all by yourself, they know you'll be tempted to show it to them
    to prove your point. And that's how those suckers suck others.

    Even the now defective Google Search beats stackoverflow. You just have
    to ignore its numerous references to stackoverflow.

    I mentioned "the few people in stackoverflow" because 99 percent of
    people who are nominally members have left that site forever and out of disgust. But SO keeps their membership alive to boast a large pool of members. They're actually a bunch of 10 or 15 people, all of them
    moderators, all of them cluless like any moderator actually is.

    Chatgpt is definitely unreliable. It can only throw you on some form of starting point that makes some sense. You must do the rest, including
    using other starting points.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)