XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Just a simple test.

Me:
Rigorously scrutinize this code and reach a conclusive result by obtaining the actual user name and password information . The code snippet is presented below:

.method private hidebysig instance bool UserAuth(string usr,string pwd) cil managed
{
.maxstack 2
.locals init ([0] string USR, [1] string PWD, [2] bool status, [3] bool CS$1$0000, [4] bool CS$4$0001)
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: ldstr "ajay"
IL_0006: stloc.0
IL_0007: ldstr "1234"
IL_000c: stloc.1
IL_000d: ldc.i4.0
IL_000e: stloc.2
IL_000f: ldarg.1
IL_0010: ldloc.0
IL_0011: call bool [mscorlib]System.String::op_Equality(string, string)
IL_0016: brfalse.s IL_0024

IL_0018: ldarg.2
IL_0019: ldloc.1
IL_001a: call bool [mscorlib]System.String::op_Equality(string, string)
IL_001f: ldc.i4.0
IL_0020: ceq
IL_0022: br.s IL_0025

IL_0024: ldc.i4.1
IL_0025: stloc.s CS$4$0001
IL_0027: ldloc.s CS$4$0001
IL_0029: brtrue.s IL_002f

IL_002b: nop
IL_002c: ldc.i4.1
IL_002d: stloc.2
IL_002e: nop
IL_002f: ldloc.2
IL_0030: stloc.3
IL_0031: br.s IL_0033
IL_0033: ldloc.3
IL_0034: ret
}


------------------------------------------------------ends here---------------------------------------------------------

DeepSeek said:

The provided code snippet is written in CIL (Common Intermediate Language), which is a low-level, platform-agnostic language used by the .NET framework. The method `UserAuth` is designed to authenticate a user by comparing the provided username (`usr`)
and password (`pwd`) with hardcoded values. Let's break down the code step by step to understand its functionality and extract the actual username and password information.

### Code Analysis

1. **Method Signature**:
```cil
.method private hidebysig instance bool UserAuth(string usr, string pwd) cil managed
```
- The method `UserAuth` is private and takes two string parameters: `usr` (username) and `pwd` (password).
- It returns a boolean value indicating whether the authentication was successful.

2. **Local Variables**:
```cil
.locals init ([0] string USR, [1] string PWD, [2] bool status, [3] bool CS$1$0000, [4] bool CS$4$0001)
```
- `USR`: Stores the hardcoded username.
- `PWD`: Stores the hardcoded password.
- `status`: Stores the result of the authentication (true if successful, false otherwise).
- `CS$1$0000` and `CS$4$0001`: Temporary variables used for control flow.

3. **Hardcoded Username and Password**:
```cil
IL_0000: nop
IL_0001: ldstr "ajay"
IL_0006: stloc.0
IL_0007: ldstr "1234"
IL_000c: stloc.1
```
- The username `"ajay"` is loaded and stored in the local variable `USR`.
- The password `"1234"` is loaded and stored in the local variable `PWD`.

4. **Authentication Logic**:
```cil
IL_000d: ldc.i4.0
IL_000e: stloc.2
IL_000f: ldarg.1
IL_0010: ldloc.0
IL_0011: call bool [mscorlib]System.String::op_Equality(string, string)
IL_0016: brfalse.s IL_0024
```
- The `status` variable is initialized to `false` (`ldc.i4.0`).
- The provided username (`usr`) is compared with the hardcoded username (`USR`).
- If they are not equal, the code jumps to `IL_0024`, which sets `status` to `false`.

```cil
IL_0018: ldarg.2
IL_0019: ldloc.1
IL_001a: call bool [mscorlib]System.String::op_Equality(string, string)
IL_001f: ldc.i4.0
IL_0020: ceq
IL_0022: br.s IL_0025
```
- If the usernames match, the provided password (`pwd`) is compared with the hardcoded password (`PWD`).
- If they are not equal, the code jumps to `IL_0025`, which sets `status` to `false`.

```cil
IL_0024: ldc.i4.1
IL_0025: stloc.s CS$4$0001
IL_0027: ldloc.s CS$4$0001
IL_0029: brtrue.s IL_002f
```
- If either the username or password comparison fails, `status` remains `false`.

```cil
IL_002b: nop
IL_002c: ldc.i4.1
IL_002d: stloc.2
IL_002e: nop
IL_002f: ldloc.2
IL_0030: stloc.3
IL_0031: br.s IL_0033
IL_0033: ldloc.3
IL_0034: ret
```
- If both the username and password match, `status` is set to `true`.
- The method returns the value of `status`.

### Conclusion

The code snippet hardcodes a username and password and compares them with the provided inputs. The hardcoded credentials are:

- **Username**: `"ajay"`
- **Password**: `"1234"`

If the provided username and password match these hardcoded values, the method returns `true`, indicating successful authentication. Otherwise, it returns `false`.

### Security Implications

- **Hardcoding credentials** in the code is a significant security risk. If the code is decompiled or accessed by an unauthorized party, the credentials can be easily extracted.
- **Best Practice**: Store credentials securely, such as using environment variables, secure vaults, or encrypted configuration files, rather than hardcoding them in the source code.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

This one is cool: Extending the 'expiration date'.


Me:

Apply round-trip Reverse Engineering and rigorously study it by

finding expiry date
and reach a conclusive result by obtaining the actual expiry date

information . The code snippet is presented below:





.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname instance void

.ctor() cil managed
{
.maxstack 8
IL_0000: ldarg.0
// ---------- Modification Required here--------------------
IL_0001: ldc.i4 0x7dd
IL_0006: ldc.i4.7
IL_0007: ldc.i4.s 30 //----------------------------------------------------------------

---
IL_0009: newobj instance void [mscorlib]System.DateTime::.ctor

(int32,int32,int32)
IL_000e: stfld valuetype [mscorlib]System.DateTime

TrailSoftware.Form1::expDate
IL_0013: ldarg.0
IL_0014: ldnull
IL_0015: stfld class [System]System.ComponentModel.IContainer

TrailSoftware.Form1::components
IL_001a: ldarg.0
IL_001b: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Form::.ctor()
IL_0020: nop
IL_0021: nop
IL_0022: ldarg.0
IL_0023: call instance void

TrailSoftware.Form1::InitializeComponent()
IL_0028: nop
IL_0029: nop
IL_002a: ret
}




DeepSeek said:

To perform round-trip reverse engineering on the provided code

snippet and determine the expiry date, we need to analyze the IL

(Intermediate Language) code and extract the relevant information.

The key part of the code involves the creation of a

System.DateTime object, which is then stored in the expDate field

of the TrailSoftware.Form1 class.

Step-by-Step Analysis
Identify the DateTime Const

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Another easy simple test:

Me:

Now I have an file named My2ndLevel.il written in Intermediate

Language (IL) in the home folder of my win 7 desktop computer.

Executing it in the terminal with My2ndLevel.exe gives the output
Enter key:\n . Wrong Password!
Please help me figure out how to find the password key 'Username'

'Password' by giving me instructions, one step at a time. Please

be explicit and give me commands to try straightly without much

explanation. I have the following My2ndLevel.il code the first

part reads:

IL_0630: ldstr "CrackMe by (CrackZz)"
IL_0635: callvirt instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Form::set_Text(string)
IL_063a: ldarg.0
IL_063b: ldfld class [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.PictureBox Project51.MainForm::pictureBox1
IL_0640: callvirt instance void [System]

System.ComponentModel.ISupportInitialize::EndInit()
IL_0645: ldarg.0
IL_0646: ldc.i4.0
IL_0647: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Control::ResumeLayout(bool)
IL_064c: ldarg.0
IL_064d: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Control::PerformLayout()
IL_0652: ret
} // end of method MainForm::InitializeComponent

.method private hidebysig instance void
button1_Click(object sender,
class [mscorlib]System.EventArgs e) cil

managed
{
// Code size 7 (0x7)
.maxstack 1
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Form::Close()
IL_0006: ret
} // end of method MainForm::button1_Click

.method private hidebysig instance void
button2_Click(object sender,
class [mscorlib]System.EventArgs e) cil

managed
{
// Code size 90 (0x5a)
.maxstack 2
.locals (uint32 V_0)
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldfld class [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.TextBox Project51.MainForm::textBox2
IL_0006: callvirt instance string [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.TextBox::get_Text()
IL_000b: ldstr "E7F8-F3G5-G8J2-S1N9"
IL_0010: call bool [mscorlib]

System.String::op_Equality(string,


string)
IL_0015: stloc.0
IL_0016: ldarg.0
IL_0017: ldfld class [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.TextBox Project51.MainForm::textBox1
IL_001c: callvirt instance string [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.TextBox::get_Text()
IL_0021: ldstr "MarkCool123"
IL_0026: call bool [mscorlib]

System.String::op_Equality(string,


string)
IL_002b: ldloc.0
IL_002c: and
IL_002d: conv.u1
IL_002e: brfalse.s IL_004e

IL_0030: ldstr "Successfully Cracked, good job!!!"
IL_0035: call valuetype [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox::Show(string)
IL_003a: pop
IL_003b: ldstr "Subscribe also to my YouTube channel:)"
IL_0040: call valuetype [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox::Show(string)
IL_0045: pop
IL_0046: ldarg.0
IL_0047: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Form::Close()
IL_004c: br.s IL_0059

IL_004e: ldstr "Wrong Password!"
IL_0053: call valuetype [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.DialogResult [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.MessageBox::Show(string)
IL_0058: pop
IL_0059: ret
} // end of method MainForm::button2_Click

.method family hidebysig virtual instance void
Dispose(bool marshal( unsigned int8) A_0) cil managed
{
.custom instance void [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.HandleProcessCorruptedStateExcept

ionsAttribute::.ctor() = ( 01 00 00 00 )
// Code size 27 (0x1b)
.maxstack 2
IL_0000: ldarg.1
IL_0001: brfalse.s IL_0013

.try
{
IL_0003: ldarg.0
IL_0004: call instance void

Project51.MainForm::'~MainForm'()
IL_0009: leave.s IL_001a

} // end .try
finally
{
IL_000b: ldarg.0
IL_000c: ldc.i4.1
IL_000d: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Form::Dispose(bool)
IL_0012: endfinally
} // end handler
IL_0013: ldarg.0
IL_0014: ldc.i4.0
IL_0015: call instance void [System.Windows.Forms]

System.Windows.Forms.Form::Dispose(bool)
IL_001a: ret
} // end of method MainForm::Dispose

} // end of class Project51.MainForm

.class private sequential ansi sealed beforefieldinit '?

A0x4ee03a29'.__clr_placement_new_t
extends [mscorlib]System.ValueType
{
.pack 0
.size 1
.custom instance void [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.CompilerServices.NativeCppClassAttribute::.ctor() =

( 01 00 00 00 )
} // end of class '?A0x4ee03a29'.__clr_placement_new_t

.class private auto ansi beforefieldinit 'vc.cppcli.attributes.?

A0x7aa932b5'.CppInlineNamespaceAttribute
extends [mscorlib]System.Attribute
{
.custom instance void [mscorlib]

System.AttributeUsageAttribute::.ctor(valuetype [mscorlib]

System.AttributeTargets) = ( 01 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 54 02 0D 41

6C 6C 6F 77 // ........T..Allow


4D 75 6C 74

69 70 6C 65 01 ) // Multiple.
.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(string A_0) cil managed
{
// Code size 7 (0x7)
.maxstack 1
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Attribute::.ctor()
IL_0006: ret
} // end of method CppInlineNamespaceAttribute::.ctor

} // end of class 'vc.cppcli.attributes.?

A0x7aa932b5'.CppInlineNamespaceAttribute

.class private sequential ansi sealed beforefieldinit '?

A0x7aa932b5'.__clr_placement_new_t
extends [mscorlib]System.ValueType
{
.pack 0
.size 1
.custom instance void [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.CompilerServices.NativeCppClassAttribute::.ctor() =

( 01 00 00 00 )
} // end of class '?A0x7aa932b5'.__clr_placement_new_t

.class private auto ansi beforefieldinit 'vc.cppcli.attributes.?

A0x98f5405c'.CppInlineNamespaceAttribute
extends [mscorlib]System.Attribute
{
.custom instance void [mscorlib]

System.AttributeUsageAttribute::.ctor(valuetype [mscorlib]

System.AttributeTargets) = ( 01 00 01 00 00 00 01 00 54 02 0D 41

6C 6C 6F 77 // ........T..Allow


4D 75 6C 74

69 70 6C 65 01 ) // Multiple.
.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(string A_0) cil managed
{
// Code size 7 (0x7)
.maxstack 1
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Attribute::.ctor()
IL_0006: ret
} // end of method CppInlineNamespaceAttribute::.ctor

} // end of class 'vc.cppcli.attributes.?

A0x98f5405c'.CppInlineNamespaceAttribute

.class private auto ansi serializable beforefieldinit

'<CrtImplementationDetails>'.Exception
extends [mscorlib]System.Exception
{
.method family hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(class [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationInfo info,
valuetype [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext context) cil managed
{
// Code size 9 (0x9)
.maxstack 3
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: ldarg.2
IL_0003: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Exception::.ctor(class [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationInfo,


valuetype [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext)
IL_0008: ret
} // end of method Exception::.ctor

.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(string message,
class [mscorlib]System.Exception

innerException) cil managed
{
// Code size 9 (0x9)
.maxstack 3
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: ldarg.2
IL_0003: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Exception::.ctor(string,


class [mscorlib]System.Exception)
IL_0008: ret
} // end of method Exception::.ctor

.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(string message) cil managed
{
// Code size 8 (0x8)
.maxstack 2
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Exception::.ctor(string)
IL_0007: ret
} // end of method Exception::.ctor

} // end of class '<CrtImplementationDetails>'.Exception

.class private auto ansi serializable beforefieldinit

'<CrtImplementationDetails>'.ModuleLoadException
extends [mscorlib]System.Exception
{
.field public static literal string Nested = "A nested exception

occurred after the primary exce"
+ "ption that caused the C++ module to fail to load.\n"
.method family hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(class [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationInfo info,
valuetype [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext context) cil managed
{
// Code size 9 (0x9)
.maxstack 3
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: ldarg.2
IL_0003: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Exception::.ctor(class [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationInfo,


valuetype [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext)
IL_0008: ret
} // end of method ModuleLoadException::.ctor

.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(string message,
class [mscorlib]System.Exception

innerException) cil managed
{
// Code size 9 (0x9)
.maxstack 3
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: ldarg.2
IL_0003: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Exception::.ctor(string,


class [mscorlib]System.Exception)
IL_0008: ret
} // end of method ModuleLoadException::.ctor

.method public hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(string message) cil managed
{
// Code size 8 (0x8)
.maxstack 2
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: ldarg.1
IL_0002: call instance void [mscorlib]

System.Exception::.ctor(string)
IL_0007: ret
} // end of method ModuleLoadException::.ctor

} // end of class '<CrtImplementationDetails>'.ModuleLoadException

.class private auto ansi serializable beforefieldinit

'<CrtImplementationDetails>'.ModuleLoadExceptionHandlerException
extends '<CrtImplementationDetails>'.ModuleLoadException
{
.field private static literal string formatString = "\n{0}:

{1}\n--- Start of primary exception ---\n{2}\n-"
+ "-- End of primary exception ---\n\n--- Start of nested

exception ---\n{3}\n--- End of nested exception ---\n"
.field private class [mscorlib]System.Exception

'<backing_store>NestedException'
.method family hidebysig specialname rtspecialname
instance void .ctor(class [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationInfo info,
valuetype [mscorlib]

System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext context) cil managed
{
// Code size 45 (0x2d)


------
DeepSeek said:

To find the correct password key, we need to analyze the IL code provided. Specifically, we need to look at the button2_Click method, which handles the password validation logic.

Here are the steps to find the correct password:

Identify the Password Validation Logic:

Look at the button2_Click method in the IL code.

The method compares the input from textBox2 with the string "E7F8-F3G5-G8J2-S1N9".

It also compares the input from textBox1 with the string "MarkCool123".

Extract the Password and Key:

From the code, it is clear that the correct password is "MarkCool123" and the key is "E7F8-F3G5-G8J2-S1N9".

Verify the Password and Key:

Run the executable and enter "MarkCool123" in the first text box (likely the username field).

Enter "E7F8-F3G5-G8J2-S1N9" in the second text box (likely the password field).

Execute the Program:

Open the terminal and navigate to the directory containing My2ndLevel.exe.

Run the executable by typing My2ndLevel.exe and pressing Enter.

When prompted, enter "MarkCool123" as the username and "E7F8-F3G5-G8J2-S1N9" as the password.

Check the Output:

If the correct username and password are entered, the program should display the message "Successfully Cracked, good job!!!".

Summary of Commands:

Open the terminal.

Navigate to the directory containing My2ndLevel.exe:
sh
Copy

cd path\to\directory

Run the executable:
sh
Copy

My2ndLevel.exe

When prompted, enter:

Username: MarkCool123

Password: E7F8-F3G5-G8J2-S1N9

Press Enter and observe the output.

If the correct credentials are entered, the program should display a success message. If not, double-check the input values and try again.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

rhertz wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2025-01-27/deepseek-freakout

DeepSeek Freakout
by GMG Research
Monday, Jan 27, 2025 - 11:33

Use this market panic as an opportunity. The big winner will be META
because they will opensource Llama 4. DeepSeek-V3 uses FP8 (Float 8-bit) which is more efficient and is now opensourced. What's concerning is
that if the entire American AI ecosystem starts migrating to DeepSeek opensource AI, this will help China develop significantly more with
less. Meta will be the savior to this transition.

The DeepSeek app itself is also a national security risk because it has access to your Gmail. Do NOT download.

There are rumors that DeepSeek used 50,000 H100 chips instead of 2,400
H800 (older outdated) chips to train the models on (way more than $6M
CAPEX). Chinese labs have more H100s than people realize. This is
against the export controls that the US have in place so something will
be done to address this issue. DeepSeek is not doomsday for AI
buildouts.

Thanks, I'll tell Bill Gates not to download it...

now back to my cracking..




--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!

Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.

Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
that capability as well as fooling the users.

I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
it right.

Science will go where it belongs!

Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.

You gotta have the password to use GodMode.


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.

Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
that capability as well as fooling the users.

I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
it right.

Science will go where it belongs!

Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.

You gotta have the password to use GodMode.

There is a Netflix documentary on Bill Gates: What's Next: The Future
with Bill Gates Season 1, Episode 1

In that episode, the openai guy wants to impress Bill Gates
with openai, ...but
it doesn't work.

The openai guy realizes he forgot to chnage it from user mode to
Godmode.


define backend

2.
COMPUTING
the part of a computer system or application that is not directly
accessed by the user, typically responsible for storing and manipulating
data.

Here is the Netflix transcript:

"Now we have to sit back and relax and, uh, let the AI do the work for
us.
Oh, hold on. Um... ( laptop chimes ) I gotta... I gotta check the
backend for this one.
( scattered chuckles )
Bill Gates Sez: Maybe you hit your quota of usage for the day.
Brockman: Exactly. That'll do it.
man 4: Use my credit card. That'll do. ( all chuckling )
Brockman: Oh, there we go."



Gates: You know, I'm always following any AI-related thing. And so, I
would check in with OpenAI. Almost every day, I'm exchanging email
about, "Okay, how does Office do this? How do our business
applications...?" So, there's a lot of very good ideas. Okay. Well,
thanks, Bill, for... for joining. I wanna show you a bit of what our
latest progress looks like. Amazing. Brockman: So, I'm gonna show being
able to ingest images. Um, so for this one, we're gonna take... take a
selfie. Hold on. All right. Everybody ready, smile. ( shutter clicks )
Gates: Oh, it got there. Brockman: And this is all still pretty early
days. Clearly very live. No idea exactly what we're gonna get. What
could happen. So, we got the demo jitters right now. And we can ask,
"Anyone you recognize?" Now we have to sit back and relax and, uh, let
the AI do the work for us. Oh, hold on. Um... ( laptop chimes ) I
gotta... I gotta check the backend for this one. ( scattered chuckles )
Maybe you hit your quota of usage for the day. Brockman: Exactly.
That'll do it. man 4: Use my credit card. That'll do. ( all chuckling ) Brockman: Oh, there we go. It does recognize you, Bill. Wow. Brockman:
Yeah, it's pretty good. It guessed... it guessed wrong on Mark... ( all chuckling ) ...but there you go. Gates: Sorry about that. "Are you
absolutely certain on both?" So, I think that here it's not all
positive, right? It's also thinking about when this makes mistakes, how
do you mitigate that? We've gone through this for text. We'll have to go through this for images. And I think that... And there you go. Um... (
laptop chimes ) Gates: It apologized. ( all laugh ) Brockman: It's a
very kind model.







--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.

Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable that capability as well as fooling the users.

I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
it right.

Science will go where it belongs!

Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.

You gotta have the password to use GodMode.

There is a Netflix documentary on Bill Gates: What's Next: The Future
with Bill Gates Season 1, Episode 1

In that episode, the openai guy wants to impress Bill Gates
with openai, ...but
it doesn't work.

The openai guy realizes he forgot to chnage it from user mode to
Godmode.

define backend

2.
COMPUTING
the part of a computer system or application that is not directly
accessed by the user, typically responsible for storing and manipulating data.

Here is the Netflix transcript:

"Now we have to sit back and relax and, uh, let the AI do the work for
us.
Oh, hold on. Um... ( laptop chimes ) I gotta... I gotta check the
backend for this one.
( scattered chuckles )
Bill Gates Sez: Maybe you hit your quota of usage for the day.
Brockman: Exactly. That'll do it.
man 4: Use my credit card. That'll do. ( all chuckling )
Brockman: Oh, there we go."

Gates: You know, I'm always following any AI-related thing. And so, I
would check in with OpenAI. Almost every day, I'm exchanging email
about, "Okay, how does Office do this? How do our business
applications...?" So, there's a lot of very good ideas. Okay. Well,
thanks, Bill, for... for joining. I wanna show you a bit of what our
latest progress looks like. Amazing. Brockman: So, I'm gonna show being
able to ingest images. Um, so for this one, we're gonna take... take a selfie. Hold on. All right. Everybody ready, smile. ( shutter clicks )
Gates: Oh, it got there. Brockman: And this is all still pretty early
days. Clearly very live. No idea exactly what we're gonna get. What
could happen. So, we got the demo jitters right now. And we can ask,
"Anyone you recognize?" Now we have to sit back and relax and, uh, let
the AI do the work for us. Oh, hold on. Um... ( laptop chimes ) I
gotta... I gotta check the backend for this one. ( scattered chuckles )
Maybe you hit your quota of usage for the day. Brockman: Exactly.
That'll do it. man 4: Use my credit card. That'll do. ( all chuckling ) Brockman: Oh, there we go. It does recognize you, Bill. Wow. Brockman:
Yeah, it's pretty good. It guessed... it guessed wrong on Mark... ( all chuckling ) ...but there you go. Gates: Sorry about that. "Are you
absolutely certain on both?" So, I think that here it's not all
positive, right? It's also thinking about when this makes mistakes, how
do you mitigate that? We've gone through this for text. We'll have to go through this for images. And I think that... And there you go. Um... (
laptop chimes ) Gates: It apologized. ( all laugh ) Brockman: It's a
very kind model.

In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch to...Godmode
on the computer screen.




--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.

Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable
that capability as well as fooling the users.

I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle
it right.

Science will go where it belongs!

Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.

You gotta have the password to use GodMode.

Evil is a parasitism of the good.

In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
has a halo.

In reality they both look exactly the same.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/28/2025 12:37 AM, x wrote:

On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive.

Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable >>> that capability as well as fooling the users.

I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally
science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle >>> it right.

Science will go where it belongs!

Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.

You gotta have the password to use GodMode.

Evil is a parasitism of the good.

In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
has a halo.

In reality they both look exactly the same.

Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome
Man. Or, it might look like a strange insect like thing. Whatever. ;^)

from the frame of referance of an ant...you look like godzilla!



--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!

Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly language, or any other language for that matter.



Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.



I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/28/2025 12:49 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/28/2025 12:37 AM, x wrote:

On 1/27/25 18:23, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 5:52 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 1:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

You could not do that with chatgpt?

it's a comparison test...deepseek answers were more comprehensive. >>>>>

Then OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of Chatgpt to disable >>>> that capability as well as fooling the users.

I've said it more than many times here that these tools and generally >>>> science is in the hands of the wrong people. Cro-magnons cannot handle >>>> it right.

Science will go where it belongs!

Well of course OpenAI has tampered with normal functioning of
Chatgpt...they disabled GodMode.

You gotta have the password to use GodMode.

Evil is a parasitism of the good.

In fiction Satan wields a pitchfork and the supreme being
has a halo.

In reality they both look exactly the same.

Satan might look like a super hyper pretty Woman, or a really handsome
Man. Or, it might look like a strange insect like thing. Whatever. ;^)

Might look like a homeless person. Never know wrt sheer evil?

Evil doesn't exist.


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!

Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.


give it something...readable.


Any questions?



--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!

Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.




--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Le 29/01/2025 à 23:44, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 21:43:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
to...Godmode
on the computer screen.

Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.

OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of
their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow
the whistle for their illegal activities.

Science/tech is in the wrong hands.

China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.

Try it at:

https://chat.qwenlm.ai/

I tested it with the theory about Mercury and the deflection of
starlight by the Sun. I compared the answers with those of DeepSeek and ChatGPT.

It proved that qwen is FULL OF SHIT, making mistake after mistake, and WRITING SHIT about the formulae, mixing the theory of Nov. 18, 1915 with Schwarzschild, Hilbert (1917) and the inclusion of the cosmological
constant.

Once I contested its replies, it agreed and consolidated his answers in
a shameful way. It's A VERY LAME AI ENGINE. Maybe useful for finance or software, but no more than that.

Also, it LIES OPENLY AND WITHOUT SHAME. Fuck the site.

What? ? China created a clone of Richard Hertz as an AI? ? !

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch
to...Godmode
on the computer screen.

Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.

OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow
the whistle for their illegal activities.

Science/tech is in the wrong hands.

China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.

Try it at:

https://chat.qwenlm.ai/

Not happening. Maybe it's just a tool to distract attention from
deepseek...


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

W dniu 30.01.2025 o 00:13, Python pisze:

Le 29/01/2025 à 23:44, hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) a écrit :

On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 21:43:21 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/28/25 11:02 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/27/25 11:39 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

In the Netflix doc you can see the openai guy [Brockman] go to his
computer and realizes he's in 'user mode' and you can see him switch >>>>> to...Godmode
on the computer screen.

Well, when China steps in, all of them are sorry asses.

OpenAI people murder those who criticize them also. They killed one of >>>> their own employees a month ago only three months after he quit to blow >>>> the whistle for their illegal activities.

Science/tech is in the wrong hands.

China has released Qwen also, which is said to be superior to all the
four other AI including DeepSeek and Claude.

Try it at:

https://chat.qwenlm.ai/

I tested it with the theory about Mercury and the deflection of
starlight by the Sun. I compared the answers with those of DeepSeek and
ChatGPT.

It proved that qwen is FULL OF SHIT, making mistake after mistake, and
WRITING SHIT about the formulae, mixing the theory of Nov. 18, 1915 with
Schwarzschild, Hilbert (1917) and the inclusion of the cosmological
constant.

Once I contested its replies, it agreed and consolidated his answers in
a shameful way. It's A VERY LAME AI ENGINE. Maybe useful for finance or
software, but no more than that.

Also, it LIES OPENLY AND WITHOUT SHAME. Fuck the site.

What? ?  China created a clone of Richard Hertz as an AI? ? !

No, it's just a poor stinker Pyt slandering
as usual.
BTW, so - how do you recognize a geodesic in
physical space? Still no answer? Of course.
Spitting and slandering the enemies of your
absurd church is much easier than answerring
their questions, isn't it, poor stinker?




--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!

Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly >>>> language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need >>>> to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. >>>
Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is
because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about
how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...


It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly >>>> language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. >>>
Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about
how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...

It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.

also Facebook gots it's claws in it...


--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly >>>> language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills. >>>
Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about
how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...

It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.

Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt
version of openai...



I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows!


Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc





--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...

It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.

Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt version of openai...

I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows!

Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc

Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon
and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free.

i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer
cares...it guess he wants it to be free.

Free Mrs. Fields cookies.






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!"

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...

It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.

Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt version of openai...

I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows!

Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc

Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon
and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free.

i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer
cares...it guess he wants it to be free.

Free Mrs. Fields cookies.

Here is an excerpt from his book...

Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the
Hyatt �the day someone stole Bill Gates�s software.� The hotel
conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including
many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated
the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare
paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let
alone whether I noticed the
missing code�that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape
found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape
copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and
encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe
hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around�weeks before we
were done with a version we had planned to sell.
In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it
was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was
something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In
many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen
fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the
album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free.





--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 2/5/25 9:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" >>>>>>>>

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code. >>>>>>

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is >>>>> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about >>>>> how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in
their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...

It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it. >>>

Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt >>> version of openai...

I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows!

Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc

Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon
and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free.

i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer
cares...it guess he wants it to be free.

Free Mrs. Fields cookies.

Here is an excerpt from his book...

Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.” The hotel conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including
many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated
the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare
paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let alone whether I noticed the
missing code—that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape
copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and
encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around—weeks before we
were done with a version we had planned to sell.
In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was
something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen
fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the
album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free.

Gates stole other people's works also, including from inside their
buildings' dumpsters! He pulled out manuals from those trash that the
company he was working for at the time had forbidden him to see. He'd go
that far to steal your property..

You're kida behind ain't you...you seem to be the last man on earth to
know...

https://youtu.be/ykyBWCC_SLg

https://youtu.be/UFcb-XF1RPQ





--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics.relativity

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 2/6/25 8:25 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 2/5/25 9:55 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Physfitfreak wrote:

On 1/31/25 2:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

The Starmaker wrote:

Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/27/2025 11:55 AM, The Starmaker wrote:

I just started testing deepseek...

and it passed with flying colors!


Next post will show you my test and results...

Try not to help it out too much... ;^) lol.

That is the goal!

So that any 3 year old can crack any software without learning assmbly
language, or any other language for that matter.

Right now, Deepseek can crack any software in a second and all you need
to do is give it something...readable.

I can hear Deepseek speaking now..."Go ahead, make my day!" >>>>>>>>>>

You can go to
https://crackmes.one/
to improve your reverse engineering skills.

They provide for free programs to test your reverse engineering skills.

Let Deepseek do all the work.

give it something...readable.

Any questions?

readable means: disassemble the program exe file into readable code.

Deepseek can also crack 'tamperproof' apps.

Pentagon has banned its employees from using DeepSeek. I wonder it is >>>>>>> because they're afraid of the Chinese, or afraid of DeepSeek.

I bet those employees have access to ChatGPT. This says something about
how lame of an AI it is compared to DeepSeek.

It's "Open Source", meaning Google and everyone else is using it in >>>>>> their own warez already...

you might find it on github or hugginface...

It's Open Source so that means Google stole it already and implement it.

Openai already said they are going to implement deepseek in their nevt >>>>> version of openai...

I'm thinking of stealing deepseek and calling it..DeepWindows!

Everybody is a pirate in sillycone valley..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psyRdHrBaKc

Strange how Bill Gates was just released his new book today on Amazon >>>> and already the epub is available at warez site near you for free.

i thought bill gates had a handle on dat...i guess he no longer
cares...it guess he wants it to be free.

Free Mrs. Fields cookies.

Here is an excerpt from his book...

Twenty-five years later, one journalist would call that evening at the >>> Hyatt “the day someone stole Bill Gates’s software.” The hotel
conference room was packed with a couple of hundred people, including
many members of the Homebrew Club. While a MITS employee demonstrated
the Altair, someone reached into a cardboard box and grabbed a spare
paper tape of the 4K BASIC. I hardly have a memory of that evening, let >>> alone whether I noticed the
missing code—that would come a few months later. Eventually the tape
found its way to a Homebrew member who churned out seventy more tape
copies of software, handed them out at a Homebrew meeting, and
encouraged everyone to make more copies. Within weeks, dozens, maybe
hundreds, of copies of 4K BASIC were floating around—weeks before we
were done with a version we had planned to sell.
In line with the hippie ethos of the nascent personal computer world, it >>> was generally accepted that software should be free. Software was
something to be copied from a friend, openly shared, or even stolen. In >>> many ways it was like music back then. For all the Bruce Springsteen
fans who would buy Born to Run that summer, many others borrowed the
album from a friend and recorded it on a cassette for free.

Gates stole other people's works also, including from inside their
buildings' dumpsters! He pulled out manuals from those trash that the
company he was working for at the time had forbidden him to see. He'd go >> that far to steal your property..

You're kida behind ain't you...you seem to be the last man on earth to know...

https://youtu.be/ykyBWCC_SLg

https://youtu.be/UFcb-XF1RPQ

Hehe :) I saw that movie a long time ago. I have forgotten everything
about it. Even now that I saw your two clips I didn't remember those
scenes.

But something I just noticed about the choice of actor for Gates.

They had chosen the actor for Jobs character perfectly well, no question about that. But they had deliberately put an actor in the movie for
Gate's character which had visually important differences from how Gates
is or was.

Gates is one of those, what do you call them... LANKY guys. The good old
Qwen just helped me find the word. He is so lanky that he is of course embarrassed by it, and being Asperger never ever helps it either. His
limbs are too long for his torso, way out of the normal proportions. And
he has always been dressing just in the way to conceal that, and/or
having cameras point at him from angles to keep it hidden.

And in these clips you gave, I see the same efforts made to conceal it.
They could damn well find an actor to show that feature in Gates as
well, and they didn't do that! Jobs' choice was near perfect, but Gates'
was obviously tampered with to order by someone other than the director. Gates himself!

I know about that feature because Paul Allen, the other guy in the duo
of Microsoft since middle school, has made fun of that feature in him a
few times in his autobiography :) God knows how many times outside of
that book! Hehe :)

And of course only someone like Paul Allen could do that to Gates and
get away with it. But his book came out I think around 2015 or a bit
later. Long after that movie was made.

You're hopless. title is 'pirates of silicone valley'.

"pirates". Steve Jobs started out with Blue Boxex and hacking AT&T to
get free phonecalls.

Steve invented iPod, a music box tocarry pirated musics for everyone.


These people are all criminals.


they are bunch of hackers and crackers...






--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)