Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
Do cats walk a straight line?
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing, and math is not science.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not. https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it >>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it >>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it >>>>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or >>>>> Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it >>>>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's >>>>> straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or >>>>> Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
Sure. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
sorry.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!" >>>>>>>>>>>
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There are.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space. >>>>>>>>>>
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it >>>>>>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>>> the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's >>>>>>> straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or >>>>>>> Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in >>> space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
Sure.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
sorry.
You're looking at the forrest, not the Red Wood trees itself
In a perspective, everything comes to a point, it's just an illusion.
https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1309780034/photo/detail-of-a-redwood-tree-trunk.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=is&k=20&c=CeIReGghlUOJiAAqu-kbZPG1PVEKXIyM9Zn6McPPTgQ=
https://www.istockphoto.com/search/2/image-film?phrase=redwood+tree+closeup
put a man's ruler on it and measure it.
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 23:14, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!" >>>>>>>>>>>
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There are.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space. >>>>>>>>>>
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>>> the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's >>>>>>> straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or >>>>>>> Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in >>> space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
Sure.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
sorry.
You're looking at the forrest, not the Red Wood trees itself
In a perspective, everything comes to a point, it's just an illusion.
https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1309780034/photo/detail-of-a-redwood-tree-trunk.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=is&k=20&c=CeIReGghlUOJiAAqu-kbZPG1PVEKXIyM9Zn6McPPTgQ=
https://www.istockphoto.com/search/2/image-film?phrase=redwood+tree+closeup
put a man's ruler on it and measure it.
Oh, for sure they're not perfect straight lines.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 23:14, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!" >>>>>>>>>>>
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There are.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space. >>>>>>>>>>
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>>> the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's >>>>>>> straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in
space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
Sure.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
sorry.
You're looking at the forrest, not the Red Wood trees itself
In a perspective, everything comes to a point, it's just an illusion.
https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1309780034/photo/detail-of-a-redwood-tree-trunk.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=is&k=20&c=CeIReGghlUOJiAAqu-kbZPG1PVEKXIyM9Zn6McPPTgQ=
https://www.istockphoto.com/search/2/image-film?phrase=redwood+tree+closeup
put a man's ruler on it and measure it.
Oh, for sure they're not perfect straight lines.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
This isn't about a perfect or imperfect world...
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
The Starmaker wrote:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 23:14, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There are.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>>>>>> the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's >>>>>>>>>> straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>>>>
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in >>>>>> space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
Sure.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
sorry.
You're looking at the forrest, not the Red Wood trees itself
In a perspective, everything comes to a point, it's just an illusion.
https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1309780034/photo/detail-of-a-redwood-tree-trunk.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=is&k=20&c=CeIReGghlUOJiAAqu-kbZPG1PVEKXIyM9Zn6McPPTgQ=
https://www.istockphoto.com/search/2/image-film?phrase=redwood+tree+closeup
put a man's ruler on it and measure it.
Oh, for sure they're not perfect straight lines.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
This isn't about a perfect or imperfect world...
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
and since Euclidean geometry is 'just a theory'...that means SpaceTime
is just a theory.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist.
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!"
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space.
There are.
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it >>>>> maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?Always.
The Starmaker wrote:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 23:14, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 21:41, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:52, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 19:34, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 08:39, The Starmaker pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 03.02.2025 o 05:30, The Starmaker pisze:
Okay, here is the Truth. SpaceTime does not exist. >>>>>>>>>>>
Newton would say..."I never heard of it, or thought it!" >>>>>>>>>>>
It's just a madeup thing.
So, what is spacetime? it's a math thing
It is not. The Shit's worshippers like to
pretend their shit is math, to improve
its authority.
, and math is not science.
It is.
There are.
There is Space...but there are no straight lines in space. >>>>>>>>>>
Do cats walk a straight line?
On a short distance, sometimes.
Can you point to me a straight line out there in space? a photo of it
maybe?? anywhere in space or another planet??
A photo - why not.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>>> the edges of those rulers are straight lines.
I said "out there in space", not man made straight lines..Nature's
straight lines.
Are there any Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in space, or
Earth if you prefer.
https://www.istockphoto.com/pl/search/2/image-film?phrase=ruler >>>>>>
Not perfectly straight, but straight enough for me.
Straight lines are an invention of...Man.
To put it simply...Does Nature make straight lines?
Sure it does. Not any perfect ones, of course.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
Can you point to me any of Nature's Straight Lines anywhere out there in
space, or
on Earth if you prefer??? a photo of it?
Sure.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/books/article/7-us-national-parks-with-incredible-trees
My mistake, it should be that link instead repeating the ruler,
sorry.
You're looking at the forrest, not the Red Wood trees itself
In a perspective, everything comes to a point, it's just an illusion.
https://media.istockphoto.com/id/1309780034/photo/detail-of-a-redwood-tree-trunk.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=is&k=20&c=CeIReGghlUOJiAAqu-kbZPG1PVEKXIyM9Zn6McPPTgQ=
https://www.istockphoto.com/search/2/image-film?phrase=redwood+tree+closeup
put a man's ruler on it and measure it.
Oh, for sure they're not perfect straight lines.
Nothing is perfect in the real world.
This isn't about a perfect or imperfect world...
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30
chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
space–time
"A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of time.
In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities
and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded
as obvious to any competent observer.
In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of
geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are regarded as entwined,
so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events.
In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
"space and time are considered as separate entities"
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30
chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of time.."
Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth dimension", or even the third dimension.
(or anyone else for that matter)
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein writes it)
it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And
it also is biased towards Einstein.
The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no existence out there, anywhere.
It's all in the mind.
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
space–time
"A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of time.
In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer.
In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are regarded as entwined,
so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events.
In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
"space and time are considered as separate entities"
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical
geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30 chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't
heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein
writes it)
it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And
it also is biased towards Einstein.
The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no existence out there, anywhere.
It's all in the mind.
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
space–time
"A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of time.
In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded
as obvious to any competent observer.
In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are regarded as entwined,
so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events.
In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
"space and time are considered as separate entities"
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30 chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Now, the very next sentence reads: "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
Everybody knows the smartest person in the world EVER is Newton.
"In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
'space and time are separate entities'
"as obvious to any competent observer."
The Starmaker wrote:
the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of time.."
Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth dimension", or even the third dimension.
(or anyone else for that matter)
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein writes it)
it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And
it also is biased towards Einstein.
The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no existence out there, anywhere.
It's all in the mind.
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
space–time
"A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
time.
In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities
and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer.
In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are regarded as entwined,
so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events.
In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
"space and time are considered as separate entities"
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical
geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30 chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't
heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Okay, let's jump to Einstein...
The first BIG LIE is..."In Einstein’s concept of the physical
universe,..."
"concept" relates to the mind, and "physical" relates to concrete
bodies, concept is relating to the mind as oppsed to the concrete
physical bodies.
The author of the definition is pulling a 'fast one'.
You cannot trust these motherfuckers.
and injects:
based on a system of geometry , space and time are entwined,..."
"entwined"?? oh, oh...here come the curves!
There are no straight lines or curves in the physical universe...it
exist Only In The Mind.
That is just a concept/theory/opinion/hypothesis, etc.
"In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,..." translates to...
"In Einstein’s opinion of the physical universe,..."
"In Einstein’s notion of the physical universe,..."
"In Einstein’s theory of the physical universe,..."
"In Einstein’s view of the physical universe,..."
Nothing is real.
Oh my gawd, I'm getting strangled in spacetime by twined vines!
The web of the universe is of a mingles yarn...
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, the very next sentence reads: "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
Everybody knows the smartest person in the world EVER is Newton.
"In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
'space and time are separate entities'
"as obvious to any competent observer."
The Starmaker wrote:
the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of time.."
Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth dimension", or even the third dimension.
(or anyone else for that matter)
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein writes it)
it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And it also is biased towards Einstein.
The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no
existence out there, anywhere.
It's all in the mind.
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
space–time
"A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
time.
In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities
and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded
as obvious to any competent observer.
In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are regarded as entwined,
so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events.
In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
"space and time are considered as separate entities"
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the
Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical
geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30 chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't
heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
On 2/13/25 11:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Do I make myself clear?
Le 14/02/2025 à 07:05, Physfitfreak a écrit :
On 2/13/25 11:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Do I make myself clear?
Not really.
What must be understood is that the theory of relativity is basically
true, but so misunderstood and poorly taught that it all becomes
appalling.
This poses two problems; one which is benign, and which is the writing of
a whole new theory to be rewritten, or rather to be corrected.
A theory capable of explaining things with extraordinary simplicity.
Someone who has read Doctor Richard Hachel, helped by artificial
intelligence can easily, very easily do it.
The other is immense, colossal, and goes beyond the scientific framework
to enter the psychological or even theological framework.
"Certainly, it is magnificent, no one has understood RR better than him,
and no one has taught it as clearly as he. But we do not want this man to reign over us".
The die is cast.
R.H.
There should be a Law, or a Rule...
that the word "concept" actually means the same thing as the word "opinion".
"In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,.."
The Law, or a Rule...should be mandated that the word:OPINION should be written befome making any statement by Albert Einstein.
OPINION: In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, space and time are regarded as entwined.
OPINION
OPINION
OPINION
to prevent misinformation.
From now on from this day forward, if anyone post a statment made by Albert Einstein, it should be first followed
with the word.
OPINION:
Because, that's all it is...an Opinion.
Not worth the paper it is written on.
For example...
OPINION: 'Nothing travel faster than the speed of light.'
OPINION: "Time and space are modes by which we think and not conditions in which we live."
OPINION: "The only reason for time is so that everything doesn’t happen at once."
OPINION: "When a man sits with a pretty girl for an hour, it seems like a minute. But let him sit on a hot stove for a minute, and it’s longer than any hour. That’s relativity."
OPINION: "Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute, and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute. That’s relativity."
OPINION: "The distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion."
OPINION: "There is no absolute space and absolute time. Time and space are relative to the observer."
OPINION: "An observer who is in relative motion with respect to another will experience time and space differently."
OPINION: "A hundred times a day I remind myself that my inner and outer life depend on the labors of other men, living and dead, and that I must exert myself in order to give in the same measure as I have received."
OPINION: "Common sense is nothing more than a deposit of prejudices laid down in the mind before the age of eighteen."
OPINION: "Space-time does not claim existence on its own but only as a structural quality of the field."
OPINION: "The special theory of relativity owes its origins to Maxwell’s equations of the electromagnetic field."
OPINION: "Since the mathematicians have invaded the theory of relativity, I do not understand it myself anymore."
OPINION: "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one."
OPINION: "If the facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts."
OPINION: "It followed from the special theory of relativity that mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing."
OPINION: "Time and space are fused together in a four-dimensional continuum known as space-time."
OPINION: "In the framework of general relativity, space-time tells matter how to move, and matter tells space-time how to curve."
OPINION: "The speed of light is the same for all observers, no matter how they are moving."
OPINION: "The more successful the quantum theory is, the sillier it looks."
OPINION: "The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing."
Do I make myself clear?
The Starmaker wrote:
Okay, let's jump to Einstein...
The first BIG LIE is..."In Einstein’s concept of the physical
universe,..."
"concept" relates to the mind, and "physical" relates to concrete
bodies, concept is relating to the mind as oppsed to the concrete
physical bodies.
The author of the definition is pulling a 'fast one'.
You cannot trust these motherfuckers.
and injects:
based on a system of geometry , space and time are entwined,..."
"entwined"?? oh, oh...here come the curves!
There are no straight lines or curves in the physical universe...it
exist Only In The Mind.
That is just a concept/theory/opinion/hypothesis, etc.
"In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe,..." translates to...
"In Einstein’s opinion of the physical universe,..."
"In Einstein’s notion of the physical universe,..."
"In Einstein’s theory of the physical universe,..."
"In Einstein’s view of the physical universe,..."
Nothing is real.
Oh my gawd, I'm getting strangled in spacetime by twined vines!
The web of the universe is of a mingles yarn...
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, the very next sentence reads: "In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
Everybody knows the smartest person in the world EVER is Newton.
"In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities..."
'space and time are separate entities'
"as obvious to any competent observer."
The Starmaker wrote:
the it reads: "...ncludes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
time.."
Yet Einstein admits that he cannot explain in words what the "fourth dimension", or even the third dimension.
(or anyone else for that matter)
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, if you study this offical definition of ...spacetime (as einstein
writes it)
it's filled with falsehoods, discrpencies, bias and contrdictions. And
it also is biased towards Einstein.
The definition starts off with..."A geometry...."
Geometry is not science, it's Math..just a language. And numbers have no
existence out there, anywhere.
It's all in the mind.
The Starmaker wrote:
Now, for those of yous that don't know the definion of "spacetime":
space–time
"A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a fourth dimension of
time.
In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities
and whether or not events are simultaneous is a matter that is regarded
as obvious to any competent observer.
In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a system of
geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864–1909), space and time are
regarded as entwined,
so that two observers in relative motion could disagree regarding the
simultaneity of distant events.
In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a
fourdimensional continuum."
"space and time are considered as separate entities"
it's about Euclidean geometry.
Straight lines is ...'just a theory'.
In other words...the lines people are refering to are not in space.
Euclidean geometry, Straight lines is ...'just a theory'..it's Math, and
Math does not exist. It's not even a science! It'a a ...language.
The lines people are refering to are not in space...they exist in the
Twilight Zone ...in a dimension of imagination called, SpaceTime.
SpaceTime, a land of imagination contains straight lines and curved
lines...oh, and they got another theory of curved lines called Spherical
geometry.
Spherical geometry is...'just a theory'.
Hell, Gravity is 'just a theory!
Don't you guys got anything ...real????
Haven't you learn anything about Albert Einstein's experiences, 30
chasing string theory and it turns out to be...false.
Like that chick at SETI spending 50 years listening for UFO's and hasn't
heard anything.
Who told her Life exist at other planets? The lied to her.
Hello, I love you, why don't you tell me your name.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable, to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
Richard Hachel wrote:
Le 14/02/2025 à 07:05, Physfitfreak a écrit :
On 2/13/25 11:17 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Do I make myself clear?
Not really.
What must be understood is that the theory of relativity is basically
true, but so misunderstood and poorly taught that it all becomes
appalling.
This poses two problems; one which is benign, and which is the writing of
a whole new theory to be rewritten, or rather to be corrected.
A theory capable of explaining things with extraordinary simplicity. Someone who has read Doctor Richard Hachel, helped by artificial intelligence can easily, very easily do it.
The other is immense, colossal, and goes beyond the scientific framework
to enter the psychological or even theological framework.
"Certainly, it is magnificent, no one has understood RR better than him, and no one has taught it as clearly as he. But we do not want this man to reign over us".
The die is cast.
R.H.
"basically true"???? Which part ISN'T mostly True?
On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
The bottom line is that you have two different opinions:
Newton says space and time are two separate entities.
Einstein’s sez space and time are two entwined entities.
You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's
how they're referred in physics.
But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ...
anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only,
and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it,
got to last better than those who didn't.
You're a life form, Star :)
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
The bottom line is that you have two different opinions:
Newton says space and time are two separate entities.
Einstein’s sez space and time are two entwined entities.
You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's
how they're referred in physics.
But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ...
anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is
meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only,
and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such
concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it,
got to last better than those who didn't.
You're a life form, Star :)
I can only go by the official words of Physics that 'they' used:entities
https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
space—time (space-time continuum) "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a
fourth dimension of time. In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is
a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer. In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a
system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864—1909), space and time are regarded as entwined, so that two observers
in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events. In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
The bottom line is that you have two different opinions:
Newton says space and time are two separate entities.
Einstein’s sez space and time are two entwined entities.
You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's how they're referred in physics.
But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ... anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only,
and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it,
got to last better than those who didn't.
You're a life form, Star :)
I can only go by the official words of Physics that 'they' used:entities
https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
space—time (space-time continuum) "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a
fourth dimension of time. In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is
a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer. In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a
system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864—1909), space and time are regarded as entwined, so that two observers
in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events. In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
Are they any 'competent observers' in this newsgroups?
The Starmaker wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/15/25 2:10 AM, The Starmaker wrote:
The bottom line is that you have two different opinions:
Newton says space and time are two separate entities.
Einstein’s sez space and time are two entwined entities.
You need to replace the word "entity" with "physical quantities". That's how they're referred in physics.
But outside physics tools and procedures, time and "change" and ... anything requiring a memory mechanism activity inside a life form, is meaningless. They're just fixtures concocted by some life forms only,
and only exists inside them. They didn't decide to create and use such concept either. It just happened that those who had a thing about it,
got to last better than those who didn't.
You're a life form, Star :)
I can only go by the official words of Physics that 'they' used:entities
https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
https://archive.org/details/a-dictionary-of-physics/page/n841/mode/2up
space—time (space-time continuum) "A geometry that includes the three dimensions and a
fourth dimension of time. In Newtonian physics, space and time are considered as separate entities and whether or not events are simultaneous is
a matter that is regarded as obvious to any competent observer. In Einstein’s concept of the physical universe, based on a
system of geometry devised by Hermann Minkowski (1864—1909), space and time are regarded as entwined, so that two observers
in relative motion could disagree regarding the simultaneity of distant events. In Minkowski’s geometry, an event is identified by a world point in a fourdimensional continuum."
Are they any 'competent observers' in this newsgroups?
Keep in mind that the Official definition of the word 'spacetime' contains two opposing opinions,
one that space and time are separate, and the other that space and time are linked.
That means that it's definion has 'not yet' been settled.
I. Newton's's IQ was 190
Einstein's IQ was 160
Einstein is incompetent..he reached his level of incompetence.
Let me put it simply this way...
if our Sun were to simply disapear..
out Earth will feel it's disaperance..immeditaly, ...not minutes later.
--
On 2/15/25 11:44 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Are they any 'competent observers' in this newsgroups?
Yes, my dick.
Oxford speaks in the English language, not in physics language. The word "entity" does not exist in physics.
On 2/16/25 9:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/16/25 9:42 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
My guess is that the information of its disappearance will travel
towards Earth at, or below, the light's speed (i.e. max speed for any
physical quantity) and when it reaches Earth, the path of Earth
motion becomes almost linear from that moment on.
Actually it can crush the Earth into pieces because parts of the Earth
closer to the absent Sun's position will begin moving linearly while
the rest of the Earth still continues on the usual orbit. So a
crushing of Earth into itself will take place for a couple of seconds
or so.
This could actually be one of the sources of earthquakes on Earth. When
Sun quickly gives off huge masses in some of its storms, the resulting
change in gravity will hit the closer parts of the Earth first before traveling through its diameter. So parts of the earth crashes against
itself as the tiny change of the orbit passes through the entire mass of Earth.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 468 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 15:17:28 |
| Calls: | 9,440 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,591 |
| Messages: | 6,109,504 |
