On 2/4/25 6:43 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
Hi,
Maybe you don't understand what I wrote,
when you write:
I don't think your understanding, as well
as your sincerity, of the role of physics in
machine learning is truthful, or even real.
The role of physics is dimishing. There
are certain forms of machine learning,
which have hardly anything to do with physics,
maybe with simulated annealing. But they
can excell simulated annealing:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulated_annealing
The math needed to understand all the new AI,
is currently quite disputed. Some say its
extremly easy and you can learn it on the fly:
And if it is math, it don't need to be physics,
physics is an applied science of math. Not all
math tools, even when they are used in physics,
are automatically physics.
Don't change the subject. Don't run away when I'm walking toward you.
It's too late for you. Go discuss your fucked up mind with Ross
Finlayson or someone. You're a fraud!
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 507 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 175:26:46 |
Calls: | 9,954 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,825 |
Messages: | 6,354,868 |
Posted today: | 1 |