Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Penisnino shows off his ape mentality by repeating its crappy
indoctrinations with no clue about them. Woeful education. What an
idiot!
Woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time
and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time.
On 4/19/2025 1:44 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time
and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time.
Haven't you even heard that there is no
acceleration for free falling objects?
On 4/19/2025 4:53 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/19/2025 1:44 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>>> of physics.
Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time
and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time.
Haven't you even heard that there is no
acceleration for free falling objects?
No, not from anyone sane.
Surely not from anyone sane. Einstein's
elevator - sounds familiar?
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/19/2025 1:44 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>> of physics.
Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time
and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time.
Haven't you even heard that there is no
acceleration for free falling objects?
No, not from anyone sane.
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to
the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein, constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to
the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein, constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started
writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to
the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein,
constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them
to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals
of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started
writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to
the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein,
constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them
to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 23:34:32 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>> of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started >>> writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to >>> the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein,
constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them
to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Ultimately it is up to the new students of physics to decide their
destiny. To follow corrupt warped modern physics or to follow Arindam's future physics for a brilliant future.
What kinetic strategies need to be implemented in the classrooms for the latter course, must have impulse.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 23:39:17 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 23:34:32 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>>> of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started >>>> writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to >>>> the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein, >>>> constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them
to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Ultimately it is up to the new students of physics to decide their
destiny. To follow corrupt warped modern physics or to follow Arindam's
future physics for a brilliant future.
What kinetic strategies need to be implemented in the classrooms for the
latter course, must have impulse.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--
The students must remember that advances in technoligies have nothing to
do with the gibberish of modern physics. Even more important is to note
how the mediocre physicists take unjustified credit for technical
advances, done for their companies by engineers with their discovered superior sciences that are blocked to the public under confidentiality labels. Gibberish pseudoscience for the dumb masses presented by smooth
award winning celebrities; while anything original and productive from
worthy engineers is kept well hidden.
Arindam's professional work has always been classified. However there
were some allowed for publication, to be found in rarefied circles. But
all that is history, life flows on. Still, googling did happen because
of Arindam and blogging as well.
Woof woof woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 23:34:32 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>> of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started >>> writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to >>> the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein,
constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them
to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Ultimately it is up to the new students of physics to decide their
destiny. To follow corrupt warped modern physics or to follow Arindam's future physics for a brilliant future.
What kinetic strategies need to be implemented in the classrooms for the latter course, must have impulse.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 23:39:17 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 23:34:32 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>>>> of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some >>>>> cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started >>>>> writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to >>>>> the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein, >>>>> constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them >>>> to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Ultimately it is up to the new students of physics to decide their
destiny. To follow corrupt warped modern physics or to follow Arindam's
future physics for a brilliant future.
What kinetic strategies need to be implemented in the classrooms for the >>> latter course, must have impulse.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--
The students must remember that advances in technoligies have nothing to
do with the gibberish of modern physics. Even more important is to note
how the mediocre physicists take unjustified credit for technical
advances, done for their companies by engineers with their discovered
superior sciences that are blocked to the public under confidentiality
labels. Gibberish pseudoscience for the dumb masses presented by smooth
award winning celebrities; while anything original and productive from
worthy engineers is kept well hidden.
Arindam's professional work has always been classified. However there
were some allowed for publication, to be found in rarefied circles. But
all that is history, life flows on. Still, googling did happen because
of Arindam and blogging as well.
Conventional science
the Global Navigation Satellite System, pulse doppler radar, the metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor and very-large-scale integrated circuits which enable things like cell phones and hand held computers, lasers, the Large Hadron Collider which allows study of the fundamental constituents of matter and all the other wonders of the
modern world.
Arindam's work rolls pipes slowly down rails.
Woof woof woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:40:01 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 21:27:57 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the fundamentals >>>> of physics.
Your schooling must have been terrible.
Woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
The Roachie, Archie and Penisnino types must have studied under some
cretin of a physics teacher who after mumbling something quickly started >>> writing down formulas on a blackboard. They had to be mugged up and
regurgitated, with no one having a clue about what they meant.
Engineers make advances - the best of them, like Arindam, do so for
sheer survival. Or fun. Such advances feed all physicists who play
around with pet dogmas, seeing how those fit.
What the physicists are really good at is being parasites. Sucking up to >>> the politicians for funding, using math abracadabra and holy Einstein,
constitute their existences.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Trump has to treat the establishment physicists as so many criminal
illegal immigrants. Cut off their findings comprehensively. Force them
to follow Arindam's physics. Only then can he Maga on a grand scale.
Conventional science gives us things like positron emission tomography,
the Global Navigation Satellite System, pulse doppler radar, the metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor and very-large-scale integrated circuits which enable things like cell phones and hand held computers, lasers, the Large Hadron Collider which allows study of the fundamental constituents of matter and all the other wonders of the
modern world.
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:fundamentals
On 4/19/2025 4:53 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/19/2025 1:44 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the
time.of physics.
Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time
and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to
Haven't you even heard that there is no
acceleration for free falling objects?
No, not from anyone sane.
Surely not from anyone sane. Einstein's
elevator - sounds familiar?
Yes, and unlike you I understand the implications which you quite
clearly do not.
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Velocity with respect to what?
Define "space is inflating".
On 4/19/2025 6:42 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:fundamentals
On 4/19/2025 4:53 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/19/2025 1:44 AM, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
Wow you guys are so thoroughly wrongly educated about the
time.of physics.
Acceleration is the first derivative of velocity with respect to time >>>>>> and velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to
Haven't you even heard that there is no
acceleration for free falling objects?
No, not from anyone sane.
Surely not from anyone sane. Einstein's
elevator - sounds familiar?
Yes, and unlike you I understand the implications which you quite
clearly do not.
Clearly you do not; don't worry, most of
your brothers in Einstein can't comprehend
that inconsistent mumble of your divine
guru as well.
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
A dodge.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
Velocity with respect to what?
To the observer.
Define "space is inflating".
Didn't your fellow idiots care?
Still rambling gibberish.
And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.
On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
A dodge.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
Velocity with respect to what?
To the observer.
Define "space is inflating".
Didn't your fellow idiots care?
On 4/20/2025 5:30 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
A dodge.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
Velocity with respect to what?
To the observer.
Define "space is inflating".
Didn't your fellow idiots care?
Still rambling gibberish.
Still easier to wave arms and scream
"GIBBERISH!!!!" than to answer questions.
And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.
But it has something to do with your
other assertion. Sorry, trash,"velocity
is the first derivative of position with
respect to time" no longer holds in
that moronic mumble your moronic religion
is generating.
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:When I do - a relativistic idiot can only
On 4/20/2025 5:30 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
A dodge.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
Velocity with respect to what?
To the observer.
Define "space is inflating".
Didn't your fellow idiots care?
Still rambling gibberish.
Still easier to wave arms and scream
"GIBBERISH!!!!" than to answer questions.
When you actually come up with cogent question...
It may appear, who cares about "appearance".
And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.
But it has something to do with your
other assertion. Sorry, trash,"velocity
is the first derivative of position with
respect to time" no longer holds in
that moronic mumble your moronic religion
is generating.
It appears you have no understanding of calculus or simple motion.
velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time is a rather trivial observable.Still it no longer holds in that moronic mumble
Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.Asserting, not showing. And, as said, you've
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.
On 4/20/2025 6:27 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:When I do - a relativistic idiot can only
On 4/20/2025 5:30 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
A dodge.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
Velocity with respect to what?
To the observer.
Define "space is inflating".
Didn't your fellow idiots care?
Still rambling gibberish.
Still easier to wave arms and scream
"GIBBERISH!!!!" than to answer questions.
When you actually come up with cogent question...
rave, spit and slander; no surprise.
It may appear, who cares about "appearance".
And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.
But it has something to do with your
other assertion. Sorry, trash,"velocity
is the first derivative of position with
respect to time" no longer holds in
that moronic mumble your moronic religion
is generating.
It appears you have no understanding of calculus or simple motion.
That
velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time is aStill it no longer holds in that moronic mumble
rather trivial observable.
your moronic religion is generating.
Come on, poor idiot - both position and time are
coordinates, have you ever observed a coordinate?
Have you ever observed a derivative?
Pre-relativistic physics has trained/programmed/
taught you to treat v as dx/dt, current physics is
training you in [occasional] violating that.
That's all.
Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.Asserting, not showing. And, as said, you've
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.
never got the simplest consequences of that.
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic" means orYou're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
Blazingly obvious to everone.
Nothing in physics has changed any of that.
Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.Asserting, not showing. And, as said, you've
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.
never got the simplest consequences of that.
Actually experiments that show such to be true
On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic" means or
your doubts don't matter.
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.
Blazingly obvious to everone.
Like flat, immobile Earth was once.
Not even mentioning V Euclid's axiom.
Nothing in physics has changed any of that.
Oh, yes, "inflation" did. You're a physicist, no
surprise you can't comprehend basic relations
between the words you're using. The words are
not physical and neither relations between them
are. And, well, they're a bit complicated too...
unlike your quantum physics.
Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.Asserting, not showing. And, as said, you've
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.
never got the simplest consequences of that.
Actually experiments that show such to be true
Actually they only show it to the faithful
ones. A very basic psychological effect -
of course, too complicated for an idiot
physicist.
You've never understood what "truth" is.
No one of you. Will you dare denying that?
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 6:27 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:When I do - a relativistic idiot can only
On 4/20/2025 5:30 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.
Gibberish.
A dodge.
Positions have 3 coordinates.
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
Velocity with respect to what?
To the observer.
Define "space is inflating".
Didn't your fellow idiots care?
Still rambling gibberish.
Still easier to wave arms and scream
"GIBBERISH!!!!" than to answer questions.
When you actually come up with cogent question...
rave, spit and slander; no surprise.
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic" means or
that there is general and special relativity which deal with two
separate concepts.
It may appear, who cares about "appearance".
And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.
But it has something to do with your
other assertion. Sorry, trash,"velocity
is the first derivative of position with
respect to time" no longer holds in
that moronic mumble your moronic religion
is generating.
It appears you have no understanding of calculus or simple motion.
That
velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time is aStill it no longer holds in that moronic mumble
rather trivial observable.
your moronic religion is generating.
Come on, poor idiot - both position and time are
coordinates, have you ever observed a coordinate?
Have you ever observed a derivative?
Pre-relativistic physics has trained/programmed/
taught you to treat v as dx/dt, current physics is
training you in [occasional] violating that.
That's all.
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
Blazingly obvious to everone.
instantaneous velocity = the first derivative of position with respect
to time.
Blazingly obvious to anyone that understands calculus.
Nothing in physics has changed any of that.
Most of what you wrote here is babbling gibberish.
Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.
Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.
Asserting, not showing. And, as said, you've
never got the simplest consequences of that.
Actually experiments that show such to be true started about 500 CE and
have continued into the modern era, the most recent of which I can find
is the MICROSCOPE experiment which published results on 4 December 2017.
The equivalence principle was measured to hold true within a precision
of
10^−15, improving prior measurements in 2008 by Schlamminger, et al. by
two orders of magnitude.
The earliest documented experiment I can find with a measured precision
was by Simon Stevin in 1585 with a precision of 5X10^-2.
What experiments can you cite that show any of your gibberish has any meaning?
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic" means or
your doubts don't matter.
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.
Meaningless gibberish. Cite an experiment that says otherwise.
Nothing in physics has changed any of that.
Oh, yes, "inflation" did. You're a physicist, no
surprise you can't comprehend basic relations
between the words you're using. The words are
not physical and neither relations between them
are. And, well, they're a bit complicated too...
unlike your quantum physics.
Inflation has nothing whatsoever to do with the equivalence principal.
The results of experiments are undeniable.
On 4/20/2025 11:08 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
your doubts don't matter.
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic" means or >>> You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.
Meaningless gibberish. Cite an experiment that says otherwise.
Meaningless gibberish. Experiments have never
said a word, it's always a human hanging around
them. Can you realize that? Or are you too stupid
even for that?
Nothing in physics has changed any of that.
Oh, yes, "inflation" did. You're a physicist, no
surprise you can't comprehend basic relations
between the words you're using. The words are
not physical and neither relations between them
are. And, well, they're a bit complicated too...
unlike your quantum physics.
Inflation has nothing whatsoever to do with the equivalence principal.
But it has introduced distance changes
without motion. You can't eat cookie and
have cookie, poor idiot. If you want
to have motionless distance changes -
motion velocity is no longer the derivative
of distance in time.
The results of experiments are undeniable.
Cite an experiment confirming somehow
your utterly idiotic assertion.
What you say are YOUR words, not the
words of your moronic experiments.
You imagine some Higher Force speaking
through you, making you an unfailable
demigod and your idiocies undeniable.
MYS-TI-CAL DE-LU-SIONS.
Whatever you say can be denied in alef0
possible ways. That's how the words work.
And you're an incredibly arrogant DK
idiot speaking about things he has no clue
about.
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:means or
On 4/20/2025 11:08 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic"
You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
your doubts don't matter.
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.
Meaningless gibberish. Cite an experiment that says otherwise.
Meaningless gibberish. Experiments have never
said a word, it's always a human hanging around
them. Can you realize that? Or are you too stupid
even for that?
Yet more raving gibberish typical of
Nothing in physics has changed any of that.
Oh, yes, "inflation" did. You're a physicist, no
surprise you can't comprehend basic relations
between the words you're using. The words are
not physical and neither relations between them
are. And, well, they're a bit complicated too...
unlike your quantum physics.
Inflation has nothing whatsoever to do with the equivalence principal.
But it has introduced distance changes
without motion. You can't eat cookie and
have cookie, poor idiot. If you want
to have motionless distance changes -
motion velocity is no longer the derivative
of distance in time.
Yet more raving gibberish typical of
The results of experiments are undeniable.
Cite an experiment confirming somehow
your utterly idiotic assertion.
I have already done so several times
What you say are YOUR words, not the
words of your moronic experiments.
You imagine some Higher Force speaking
through you, making you an unfailable
demigod and your idiocies undeniable.
MYS-TI-CAL DE-LU-SIONS.
Whatever you say can be denied in alef0
possible ways. That's how the words work.
And you're an incredibly arrogant DK
idiot speaking about things he has no clue
about.
Yet more raving gibberish typical of a
On 4/21/2025 3:26 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:means or
On 4/20/2025 11:08 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic"
You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
your doubts don't matter.
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.
Meaningless gibberish. Cite an experiment that says otherwise.
Meaningless gibberish. Experiments have never
said a word, it's always a human hanging around
them. Can you realize that? Or are you too stupid
even for that?
Yet more raving gibberish typical of
Your raving gibberish won't help, no
experiment has ever spoken a word.
It's always a human hanging around.
You're too stupid to realize even
that, but can't say I'm surprised.
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/21/2025 3:26 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:means or
On 4/20/2025 11:08 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:
On 4/20/2025 8:25 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
I highly doubt you have the slightest clue what "relativistic"
You're a fanatic, narcisstic idiot mad of hatred,
your doubts don't matter.
average velocity = the change in postion divided by the time
With your "inflation" idiocy - no longer.
Meaningless gibberish. Cite an experiment that says otherwise.
Meaningless gibberish. Experiments have never
said a word, it's always a human hanging around
them. Can you realize that? Or are you too stupid
even for that?
Yet more raving gibberish typical of
Your raving gibberish won't help, no
experiment has ever spoken a word.
It's always a human hanging around.
You're too stupid to realize even
that, but can't say I'm surprised.
Since you are incapable of posting anything other than childish kook
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 468 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 16:08:05 |
| Calls: | 9,440 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,594 |
| Messages: | 6,109,572 |