• Science Fruad

    From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 12:21:35 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    “Folks think that if it is published in a top peer-reviewed journal,
    therefore it must be true, ..."


    There is a sucker scientists born every minute. Only stupid people read 'Science Journals'.



    How Scientific Journals Became MAGA’s Latest Target
    Publications like Science and the New England Journal of Medicine have
    long been essential forums for new research. Now the Trump
    administration is accusing them of political bias, corporate influence
    and fraud.

    In April, the Justice Department sent letters to 15 of the country’s top science and medical journals inquiring about “fraud,” “political bias”
    and “censorship.”

    “You have a bunch of leftists who are sitting on big pots of money
    from pharma, and they all entertain each other and publish their
    friends,” McCabe said. “They were basically publishing lies.”

    “We’re probably going to stop publishing [the work of government
    scientists] in the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and
    those other journals because they’re all corrupt,”

    Publishing in peer-reviewed journals is crucial to advancing any
    scientist’s career, so researchers overwhelmingly pursue studies that
    have a strong chance of getting published. This demand has led to a proliferation of journals, many of them for-profit and sometimes of
    dubious quality. The number of articles published in science journals
    grew 47% between 2016 and 2022, from 1.92 million to 2.8 million,
    according to a study published in the journal Quantitative Social
    Sciences.
    That growth—and the vastly expanded reach of these journals online—has
    also been accompanied by increased attention to errors. Retraction
    Watch, a website that monitors journals and pushes for greater
    transparency, documented 41 retractions in scientific journals in 2000.
    Last year, the number was 5,128. Roughly two-thirds of those retractions
    are due to misconduct, typically fabricating or falsifying data or
    plagiarism.

    “Folks think that if it is published in a top peer-reviewed journal,
    therefore it must be true, ..."

    "Why should a small group of people be the gatekeepers of which research
    is read by most doctors in America?”



    https://www.wsj.com/science/how-scientific-journals-became-magas-latest-target-9874b6f7?mod=itp_wsj



    wanna place your paper in my Science Journal? i take payapl! https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1166218593597444102/photo/1

    If it is in my science journal it's all true!







    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Mon Jun 16 07:40:18 2025
    XPost: sci.physics.relativity

    On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 19:21:35 +0000, The Starmaker wrote:

    “Folks think that if it is published in a top peer-reviewed journal, therefore it must be true, ..."

    Dumbasses


    There is a sucker scientists born every minute. Only stupid people read 'Science Journals'.

    Stupid people swallow them.



    How Scientific Journals Became MAGAÂ’s Latest Target
    Publications like Science and the New England Journal of Medicine have
    long been essential forums for new research. Now the Trump
    administration is accusing them of political bias, corporate influence
    and fraud.

    Good, good. Let El Presidente Trumpo insert a bamboo of considerable
    girth up theirs.

    In April, the Justice Department sent letters to 15 of the country’s top science and medical journals inquiring about “fraud,” “political bias” and “censorship.”

    Yay!

    “You have a bunch of leftists who are sitting on big pots of money
    from pharma, and they all entertain each other and publish their
    friends,” McCabe said. “They were basically publishing lies.”

    Bigbang blackhole wallahs are liars through and through. Their toxicity
    spreads to all areas.

    “We’re probably going to stop publishing [the work of government scientists] in the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and those other journals because they’re all corrupt,”

    Obsolete at best. Peer to peer information transmission via online works
    best for research. Word of mouth. Patents. Recoveries.

    Publishing in peer-reviewed journals is crucial to advancing any
    scientistÂ’s career,

    For careerist political minded bigbang blackhole pseudoscientific
    jabbering types, yes.



    so researchers overwhelmingly pursue studies that
    have a strong chance of getting published. This demand has led to a proliferation of journals, many of them for-profit and sometimes of
    dubious quality. The number of articles published in science journals
    grew 47% between 2016 and 2022, from 1.92 million to 2.8 million,
    according to a study published in the journal Quantitative Social
    Sciences.

    Wow and Arindam's one second video of his new design railgun is worth
    far more than all of them.

    That growth—and the vastly expanded reach of these journals online—has
    also been accompanied by increased attention to errors. Retraction
    Watch, a website that monitors journals and pushes for greater
    transparency, documented 41 retractions in scientific journals in 2000.
    Last year, the number was 5,128. Roughly two-thirds of those retractions
    are due to misconduct, typically fabricating or falsifying data or plagiarism.

    “Folks think that if it is published in a top peer-reviewed journal, therefore it must be true, ..."

    "Why should a small group of people be the gatekeepers of which research
    is read by most doctors in America?”



    https://www.wsj.com/science/how-scientific-journals-became-magas-latest-target-9874b6f7?mod=itp_wsj



    wanna place your paper in my Science Journal? i take payapl! https://twitter.com/Starmaker111/status/1166218593597444102/photo/1

    If it is in my science journal it's all true!







    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)