Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
Den 19.06.2025 14:15, skrev bertietaylor:
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
Two questions:
Why do astronomers think that galaxies contain some
invisible (not interacting with EM-radiation) matter with mass?
On 6/19/2025 9:01 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 19.06.2025 14:15, skrev bertietaylor:
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
Two questions:
Why do astronomers think that galaxies contain some
invisible (not interacting with EM-radiation) matter with mass?
Because what is visible (and seen) doesn't fit
their precious theories?
On 2025-06-20 00:01, Maciej Wo?niak wrote:
On 6/19/2025 9:01 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 19.06.2025 14:15, skrev bertietaylor:
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
Two questions:
Why do astronomers think that galaxies contain some
invisible (not interacting with EM-radiation) matter with mass?
They don't. 'Dark matter' is a placeholder for something that has yet to
be fit in with current theories.
Because what is visible (and seen) doesn't fit
their precious theories?
You are certainly free to propose any theory you wish, and like any
theory, will be open to be disproven.
On 6/19/2025 9:01 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Den 19.06.2025 14:15, skrev bertietaylor:
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
Two questions:
Why do astronomers think that galaxies contain some
invisible (not interacting with EM-radiation) matter with mass?
Because what is visible (and seen) doesn't fit
their precious theories?
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this
great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this
great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium,
this great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
bang phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
On 24/06/25 04:54, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium,
this great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
bang phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
We in AUE have had so many explanations of Arindam's theories that we
have almost universally killfiled him. When discussing his crackpot
theories, could you please refrain from crossposting to
alt.usage.english?
[Followups set]
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this
great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
This is the East; we in the East
Know the worth of every life. [...]
Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
smart.
Annoying them is fun.
woof woof woof woof
Bertietaylor
Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
This is the East; we in the East
Know the worth of every life. [...]
<Snigger>
And in another post:
Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
smart.
« Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin gourmet » - Courteline.
Annoying them is fun.
woof woof woof woof
Bertietaylor
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 7:51:23 +0000, Hibou wrote:
Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
smart.
« Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin
gourmet » - Courteline.
This newsgroup is about the usage of English, not French.
WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
Le 24/06/2025 à 09:41, Bertitaylor a écrit :
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 7:51:23 +0000, Hibou wrote:
Le 24/06/2025 à 07:20, bertietaylor a écrit :
Cowardly apes here be, exchanging inanities and thinking themselves
smart.
« Passer pour un idiot aux yeux d'un imbécile est une volupté de fin
gourmet » - Courteline.
This newsgroup is about the usage of English, not French.
aue is, though we often digress.
I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has that
to do with English usage?
WOOF woof woof-woof woof woof-woof
Or that?
aue removed from follow-up.
Le 24/06/2025 à 11:43, Bertitaylor a écrit :
On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 10:26:20 +0000, Hibou wrote:
Le 24/06/2025 à 09:41, Bertitaylor a écrit :
This newsgroup is about the usage of English, not French.
aue is, though we often digress.
I point out that you started this thread in aue with a post entitled
'Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover)'. What has that >>> to do with English usage?
It clarifies what the supposed dark matter is, proudly and originally in
the English language. [...]
Ah! You posted here for a crit of your usage. Why didn't you say so /en toutes lettres/?
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
That way, they are like a very large Moon, with no atmosphere.
Dark matter is the core of stars (beneath the hydrogen cover), so they
are like very large Moons with no atmosphere.
Something like that (for the usage; I make no comment on the sense).
All stars that have magnetic fields have dark matter as their core.
OK for usage. (The sense doesn't quite square with that of your first sentence.)
Over time, they lose their hydrogen and helium cover, which become
nebulas.
Over time, they lose their hydrogen and helium cover, which forms
nebulas.
Over time, they lose their hydrogen and helium, which form nebulas.
Once the dark core (like our Earth without any air, or a large Moon)
enters the nebula it once again attracts the hydrogen there, becoming
bright once again.
.... it attracts the hydrogen there, and becomes bright again.
(Sense: you imply that the Earth and Moon are also made of dark matter.)
These happen in trillion year cycles, endlessly.
This happens....
Woof woof woof woof woof woof
Buzzzzz! Challenge for repetition!
The term cover shows our
model of a star as a huge rock covered with H and He just as Earth is
with N and O.
--
Please, the English ruled India and not the French [...]
On 25/06/2025 14:03, Bertitaylor wrote:
The term cover shows our
model of a star as a huge rock covered with H and He just as
Earth is
with N and O.
Atomic oxygen. Very hazardous.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang >>> phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this
great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang >>> phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
See his links in sci.physics.
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
WOOF woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
Le 25/06/2025 à 14:03, Bertitaylor a écrit :
Please, the English ruled India and not the French [...]
Yes, we chose well. Imperialists should remember that the empire of
today determines the restaurant culture of tomorrow.
Curries! Yum!
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this >>>> great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang >>>> phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
See his links in sci.physics.
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot undergo fission, crackpot.
WOOF woof-woof woof
Barking mad as always.
Bertietaylor
--
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
Well, their key theory is that it is visible as there is enormous
pressure in the core which causes fusion of hydrogen into helium, this >>>>> great heat making the whole thing very bright, like our Sun.
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then bang >>>>> phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
See his links in sci.physics.
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, charged particles, very dense there.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs
on Earth.
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then
bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, charged particles, very dense there.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs
on Earth.
Same thing happens in the Sun and the stars.
Once we throw out the bollocks of e=mcc, and follow Arindam's physics,
the whole universe becomes straight and clear. And simple in its
eternity and infinity.
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus
cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs >>>> on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
A nucleus consisting of two protons and one electron? :-D
But let's consider this a typo.
Deuterium (D) is an isotope of hydrogen.
It has an extra neutron in its nucleus. D is stable and never decays.
But let's play along:
Fission of D can only mean that a neutron is ejected from the nucleus.
So the question is:
Why should this create an extraordinary great energy?
Let's first look at fission of a heavier element, namely Uranium-235.
When a Uranium-235 nucleus is hit by a neutron, it may split
into a Barium-141 nucleus and a Krypton-92 nucleus and three neutrons.
So why do this fission create an extraordinary great energy?
It's actually very simple.
The Ba-141 nucleus contains 56 protons and 85 neutrons
The Kr-92 nucleus contains 36 protons and 56 neutrons
The electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei is very strong,
and in 1939 Lise Meitner calculated that the nuclei will repel
each other and should gain a total kinetic energy in the order
of 200 MeV. The rest is history.
Lise Meitner was the mother of the atomic bomb.
The proton and the neutron in D do not repel each other,
so no energy is released if you somehow could split the nucleus.
Quite the contrary, you would have to use energy to split it.
Your "Deuterium fission" is idiotic nonsense.
--------------------------------------------
BTW, this reaction also confirms E = mc²
1n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n
The atomic weight of these are:
Left side:
1n 1.008664 u
U-235 235.0439299 u
-------------------
236.0525939 u
Right side:
Ba-141 140.914412 u
Kr-92 91.926156 u
3n 3.025992 u
---------------------
235.866560 u
Lost mass: m = 0.1860339 u
"u" is "unified atomic mass unit", 1 u = 931.5 MeV
E = mc² ≈ 174 MeV
Which is of the same order of magnitude as calculated
by Meitner.
Details in Arindam's links.
Quite. I had a look.
Arindam:
"The hydrogen bomb is said to be an atomic bomb using heavy water,
that contain the deuterium isotope. A deuterium isotope has an
additional neutron in its nucleus. It is thought that the enormous
temperature generated by the fission bomb, cause the deuterium
isotopes
to join and become helium nuclei. And it is this fusion process, that
generates so much more energy than even the atom bomb."
So Arindam knows how the hydrogen bomb is "said" to work,
but he has his own story, of course:
Arindam:
"So could it be that there is actually no process like fusion
ever taking place – that fusion is a wrong explanation?
The extraordinary energy of the Hydrogen Bomb could arise with
the heavy water being used as a amplifier of the fission bomb.
The N value, then, effectively goes up! What may be likely is that
the deuterium nuclei in the heavy water - a necessary component of
the hydrogen bomb as it is supposed to fuse into helium - when
bombarded by the exploding fission components of the atom bomb that
has to be exploded first to create the high temperatures need for
fusion, take up very high speeds and thus act like an extension of
the fissionable components. In other words, they effectively add up
upon, or amplify upon as a catalyst, the radioactive material already
present in the bomb."
I can't see that he mention fission of deuterium.
But I can see that he states:
"there is actually no process like fusion"
And I can see that he states:
"the atom bomb that has to be exploded first to create
the high temperatures need for fusion"
And I can see that he doesn't make any sense at all.
Can you explain how the hydrogen bomb works, Bertitaylor?
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:Well, yes the elements weren't created in a Big Bang obviously. Do you
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus
cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs >>>>> on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
Get rid of all creation myths and big bang nonsense.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
A nucleus consisting of two protons and one electron? :-D
But let's consider this a typo.
Deuterium (D) is an isotope of hydrogen.
It has an extra neutron in its nucleus. D is stable and never decays.
But let's play along:
Fission of D can only mean that a neutron is ejected from the nucleus.
So the question is:
Why should this create an extraordinary great energy?
Let's first look at fission of a heavier element, namely Uranium-235.
When a Uranium-235 nucleus is hit by a neutron, it may split
into a Barium-141 nucleus and a Krypton-92 nucleus and three neutrons.
So why do this fission create an extraordinary great energy?
It's actually very simple.
The Ba-141 nucleus contains 56 protons and 85 neutrons
The Kr-92 nucleus contains 36 protons and 56 neutrons
The electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei is very strong,
and in 1939 Lise Meitner calculated that the nuclei will repel
each other and should gain a total kinetic energy in the order
of 200 MeV. The rest is history.
Lise Meitner was the mother of the atomic bomb.
The proton and the neutron in D do not repel each other,
so no energy is released if you somehow could split the nucleus.
Quite the contrary, you would have to use energy to split it.
Your "Deuterium fission" is idiotic nonsense.
--------------------------------------------
BTW, this reaction also confirms E = mc²
1n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n
The atomic weight of these are:
Left side:
1n 1.008664 u
U-235 235.0439299 u
-------------------
236.0525939 u
Right side:
Ba-141 140.914412 u
Kr-92 91.926156 u
3n 3.025992 u
---------------------
235.866560 u
Lost mass: m = 0.1860339 u
"u" is "unified atomic mass unit", 1 u = 931.5 MeV
E = mc² ≈ 174 MeV
Which is of the same order of magnitude as calculated
by Meitner.
Details in Arindam's links.
Quite. I had a look.
Arindam:
"The hydrogen bomb is said to be an atomic bomb using heavy water,
that contain the deuterium isotope. A deuterium isotope has an
additional neutron in its nucleus. It is thought that the enormous
temperature generated by the fission bomb, cause the deuterium
isotopes
to join and become helium nuclei. And it is this fusion process, that
generates so much more energy than even the atom bomb."
So Arindam knows how the hydrogen bomb is "said" to work,
but he has his own story, of course:
Arindam:
"So could it be that there is actually no process like fusion
ever taking place – that fusion is a wrong explanation?
The extraordinary energy of the Hydrogen Bomb could arise with
the heavy water being used as a amplifier of the fission bomb.
The N value, then, effectively goes up! What may be likely is that
the deuterium nuclei in the heavy water - a necessary component of
the hydrogen bomb as it is supposed to fuse into helium - when
bombarded by the exploding fission components of the atom bomb that
has to be exploded first to create the high temperatures need for
fusion, take up very high speeds and thus act like an extension of
the fissionable components. In other words, they effectively add up
upon, or amplify upon as a catalyst, the radioactive material already
present in the bomb."
I can't see that he mention fission of deuterium.
But I can see that he states:
"there is actually no process like fusion"
And I can see that he states:
"the atom bomb that has to be exploded first to create
the high temperatures need for fusion"
And I can see that he doesn't make any sense at all.
Can you explain how the hydrogen bomb works, Bertitaylor?
--
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 23:49:07 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:Well, yes the elements weren't created in a Big Bang obviously. Do you
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus >>>>>>> cannot
undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally. >>>>>> Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation, >>>>>> charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused >>>>> to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs >>>>>> on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder!
Yes it was the most gigantic blunder to think that fusion at all
happens.
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of? >>> The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
Get rid of all creation myths and big bang nonsense.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Very not obviously. The fission of the deuterium nucleus (two protons
held by one electron) creates extraordinary force creating great
energies as produced by the stars.
A nucleus consisting of two protons and one electron? :-D
But let's consider this a typo.
Deuterium (D) is an isotope of hydrogen.
It has an extra neutron in its nucleus. D is stable and never decays.
But let's play along:
Fission of D can only mean that a neutron is ejected from the nucleus.
So the question is:
Why should this create an extraordinary great energy?
Let's first look at fission of a heavier element, namely Uranium-235.
When a Uranium-235 nucleus is hit by a neutron, it may split
into a Barium-141 nucleus and a Krypton-92 nucleus and three neutrons.
So why do this fission create an extraordinary great energy?
It's actually very simple.
The Ba-141 nucleus contains 56 protons and 85 neutrons
The Kr-92 nucleus contains 36 protons and 56 neutrons
The electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei is very strong,
and in 1939 Lise Meitner calculated that the nuclei will repel
each other and should gain a total kinetic energy in the order
of 200 MeV. The rest is history.
Lise Meitner was the mother of the atomic bomb.
The proton and the neutron in D do not repel each other,
so no energy is released if you somehow could split the nucleus.
Quite the contrary, you would have to use energy to split it.
Your "Deuterium fission" is idiotic nonsense.
--------------------------------------------
BTW, this reaction also confirms E = mc²
1n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n
The atomic weight of these are:
Left side:
1n 1.008664 u
U-235 235.0439299 u
-------------------
236.0525939 u
Right side:
Ba-141 140.914412 u
Kr-92 91.926156 u
3n 3.025992 u
---------------------
235.866560 u
Lost mass: m = 0.1860339 u
"u" is "unified atomic mass unit", 1 u = 931.5 MeV
E = mc² ≈ 174 MeV
Which is of the same order of magnitude as calculated
by Meitner.
Details in Arindam's links.
Quite. I had a look.
Arindam:
"The hydrogen bomb is said to be an atomic bomb using heavy water,
that contain the deuterium isotope. A deuterium isotope has an
additional neutron in its nucleus. It is thought that the enormous
temperature generated by the fission bomb, cause the deuterium
isotopes
to join and become helium nuclei. And it is this fusion process, that
generates so much more energy than even the atom bomb."
So Arindam knows how the hydrogen bomb is "said" to work,
but he has his own story, of course:
Arindam:
"So could it be that there is actually no process like fusion
ever taking place – that fusion is a wrong explanation?
The extraordinary energy of the Hydrogen Bomb could arise with
the heavy water being used as a amplifier of the fission bomb.
The N value, then, effectively goes up! What may be likely is that
the deuterium nuclei in the heavy water - a necessary component of
the hydrogen bomb as it is supposed to fuse into helium - when
bombarded by the exploding fission components of the atom bomb that
has to be exploded first to create the high temperatures need for
fusion, take up very high speeds and thus act like an extension of
the fissionable components. In other words, they effectively add up
upon, or amplify upon as a catalyst, the radioactive material already
present in the bomb."
I can't see that he mention fission of deuterium.
But I can see that he states:
"there is actually no process like fusion"
And I can see that he states:
"the atom bomb that has to be exploded first to create
the high temperatures need for fusion"
And I can see that he doesn't make any sense at all.
Can you explain how the hydrogen bomb works, Bertitaylor?
--
know it is believed that our galaxy has only spun around 60 times? Big Bangers have a very young and naive universe! The elements continue to
form in the stars contrary to the Big Bang baloney.
Well, yes the elements weren't created in a Big Bang obviously.
Do you
know it is believed that our galaxy has only spun around 60 times? Big Bangers have a very young and naive universe! The elements continue to
form in the stars contrary to the Big Bang baloney.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
Get rid of all creation myths and big bang nonsense.
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 13:23:35 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen
bombs on Earth.
Fission of D can only mean that a neutron is ejected from the nucleus.
So the question is:
Why should this create an extraordinary great energy?
Let's first look at fission of a heavier element, namely Uranium-235.
When a Uranium-235 nucleus is hit by a neutron, it may split
into a Barium-141 nucleus and a Krypton-92 nucleus and three neutrons.
So why does this fission create an extraordinary great energy?
It's actually very simple.
The Ba-141 nucleus contains 56 protons and 85 neutrons
The Kr-92 nucleus contains 36 protons and 56 neutrons
The electrostatic repulsion between the nuclei is very strong,
and in 1939 Lise Meitner calculated that the nuclei will repel
each other and should gain a total kinetic energy in the order
of 200 MeV. The rest is history.
Lise Meitner was the mother of the atomic bomb.
The proton and the neutron in D do not repel each other,
so no energy is released if you somehow could split the nucleus.
Quite the contrary, you would have to use energy to split it.
Your "Deuterium fission" is idiotic nonsense.
--------------------------------------------
BTW, this reaction also confirms E = mc²
1n + U-235 → Ba-141 + Kr-92 + 3n
The atomic weight of these are:
Left side:
1n 1.008664 u
U-235 235.0439299 u
-------------------
236.0525939 u
Right side:
Ba-141 140.914412 u
Kr-92 91.926156 u
3n 3.025992 u
---------------------
235.866560 u
Lost mass: m = 0.1860339 u
"u" is "unified atomic mass unit", 1 u = 931.5 MeV
E = mc² ≈ 174 MeV
Which is of the same order of magnitude as calculated
by Meitner.
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of? >>> The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
Uranium-238 is the heaviest radioactive element.
That means that it can't be created by decay of heavier elements.
The half-life of U-238 is 4.47 billion years.
That means that U-238 can't exist forever.
So at some time in the past it must have been created.
Get rid of all creation myths and big bang nonsense.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of? >>>> The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
Uranium-238 is the heaviest radioactive element.
That means that it can't be created by decay of heavier elements.
The half-life of U-238 is 4.47 billion years.
That means that U-238 can't exist forever.
So at some time in the past it must have been created.
Get rid of all creation myths and big bang nonsense.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
I personally think, that matter can 'age', where heavier elements are
built from lighter elements.
That's why heavier elements are found in higher places, like within mountains.
Those place are the oldest partOOF f planet Earth (because of 'Growing Earth').
TH
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us consist of? >>>> The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
Uranium-238 is the heaviest radioactive element.
That means that it can't be created by decay of heavier elements.
The half-life of U-238 is 4.47 billion years.
That means that U-238 can't exist forever.
So at some time in the past it must have been created.
Get rid of all creation myths and big bang nonsense.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
I personally think, that matter can 'age', where heavier elements are
built from lighter eeaylements.
That's why heavier elements are found in higher places, like within mountains.
Those place are the oldest parts of planet Earth (because of 'Growing Earth').
TH
On 19-June-25 8:15 pm, bertietaylor wrote:
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
If this were true, then it would show up in our expectation of stellar brightness versus mass,
appearing to be missing mass.
Sylvia.
Dark matter is the core of stars (minus hydrogen cover).
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us
consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
nuclei.
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other
nuclei of the same charge.
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
That's why this type of reaction is called 'nuclear fusion'.
The nuclei build the heavier element helium.
....
TH
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 3:58:26 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other
nuclei of the same charge.
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
It is two protons joined by one electron. So the protons repel very
strongly when the join gets snapped.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 3:58:26 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other nuclei of the same charge.
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
It is two protons joined by one electron. So the protons repel very
strongly when the join gets snapped.
Jim Pennino wrote:
Sorry crackpot, there is no such thing as helium-2.
Helium-2 may have been observed, according to several experiments done
in this century. But nobody has claimed certainty yet.
> It is two protons joined by one electron. So the protons repel veryAm Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
strongly when the join gets snapped.
Jim Pennino wrote:
Sorry crackpot, there is no such thing as helium-2.
All kinds of weird isotopes have been created in the lab, though they generally have tiny half lives. Hydrogen-7, for example, has been
observed and has a half life of about ten to the minus twenty two seconds.
Helium-2 may have been observed, according to several experiments done
in this century. But nobody has claimed certainty yet.
However, theoretical calculations give it a very small half life. How
small they are not sure, but much less than a billionth of a second.
This is very short compared to Helium-6 or Helium-8.
Not surprising, because helium-2 actually has a negative binding energy.
There is, apparently, a helium-10, also with a tiny (but in this case measured) half life. It can only exist for even that time because this number of nucleons forms a complete shell, adding stability. Helium-9,
on the other hand, has never as far as I know been observed, though it
must form in the kind of process that results in helium-10.
Of course, none of this supports the crackpottery you were responding to.
William Hyde
Den 29.06.2025 15:37, skrev Bertitaylor:
> It is two protons joined by one electron. So the protons repel very
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
strongly when the join gets snapped.
This is too ridiculous even for you.
Electron in the nucleus?
Elements with 2 protons in the nucleus are Helium!
Look:
Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
¹H (Protium) 1 proton 0 neutrons
²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays.
So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
The short half-life should indicate that T should not
exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
But T can be artificially created in an atomic realtor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope. That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.)
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D an T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
So the point:
--------------
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I have stated above
(and _much_ more)?
Do you think they could have made the H-bomb after this description:
Arindam:
"So could it be that there is actually no process like fusion
ever taking place – that fusion is a wrong explanation?
The extraordinary energy of the Hydrogen Bomb could arise with
the heavy water being used as a amplifier of the fission bomb.
The N value, then, effectively goes up! What may be likely is
that the deuterium nuclei in the heavy water - a necessary component
of the hydrogen bomb as it is supposed to fuse into helium - when
bombarded by the exploding fission components of the atom bomb that
has to be exploded first to create the high temperatures need for
fusion, take up very high speeds and thus act like an extension of
the fissionable components. In other words, they effectively add up
upon, or amplify upon as a catalyst, the radioactive material already
present in the bomb."
There is no heavy water in a H-Bomb.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 20:22:08 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 29.06.2025 15:37, skrev Bertitaylor:
> It is two protons joined by one electron. So the protons repel very
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
strongly when the join gets snapped.
This is too ridiculous even for you.
Electron in the nucleus?
Elements with 2 protons in the nucleus are Helium!
Helium has four protons joined by two electrons.
There are only electrons and protons in aether.
When will you stupid apes realise this is the question!
Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 3:58:26 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other
nuclei of the same charge.
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
It is two protons joined by one electron. So the protons repel very
strongly when the join gets snapped.
The idea of having electrons in the nucleus (rather than neutrons)
was already discredited before neutrons were actually discovered.
It is quite impossible.
The reason is electron zero-point energy,
which would become huge for confined electrons
in such a small volume.
Note for the kiddies: don't be misled.
There are no electrons in the nucleus.
The electron which is emitted in beta decay
gets created the moment it leaves the nucleus,
(together with an anti-neutrino)
Jan
Helium has four protons joined by two electrons.
There are only electrons and protons in aether.
When will you stupid apes realise this is the question!
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Den 30.06.2025 00:20, skrev Bertitaylor:>
Helium has four protons joined by two electrons.
There are only electrons and protons in aether.
When will you stupid apes realise this is the question!
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Please answer my question:
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I state below
(and _much_ more)?
Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
¹H (Protium) 1 proton 0 neutrons
²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays.
So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
The short half-life should indicate that T should not
exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
But T can be artificially created in an atomic reactor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope. That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.)
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D an T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other
nuclei of the same charge.
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
That's why this type of reaction is called 'nuclear fusion'.
The nuclei build the heavier element helium.
....
TH
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 3:58:26 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other
nuclei of the same charge.
The electrostatic repulsion causes great opposing forces within the
nucleus causing it to split into two high velocity atoms. The high
velocity atoms impart energy to surrounding atoms and when thus slowed
get accelerated by more high velocity atoms coming from the source. Like
in any explision, following Arindam's formula for energy creation from kinetics.
Then gamma rays as well of very high frequencies related to intra
nuclear distances. These high high frequency rays at very short
distances cause very powerful aetheric disturbances that break up other
loose nuclei causing the well known chain reaction.
When surrounded by deuterium there is huge amplification of fission
energy.
Woof woof
Bertietaylor
This is very simple and obvious, so you can't fail to understand it.
Or can you?
A Deuterium nucleus consists of a proton and a neutron.
a proton and neutron don't repel each other, so no energy
is released if you somehow could split them.
That's why this type of reaction is called 'nuclear fusion'.
The nuclei build the heavier element helium.
....
TH
--
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:18:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 30.06.2025 00:20, skrev Bertitaylor:>
Helium has four protons joined by two electrons.
There are only electrons and protons in aether.
When will you stupid apes realise this is the question!
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Please answer my question:
You are one rude ape and stupid too so why should we bother! Still out
of kindness we continue.
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I state below
(and _much_ more)?
They simply put heavy water around a fission bomb to split deuterium and
thus made what is called a hydrogen bomb, with protons snapping off with incredible force and thus causing a chain reaction with objects hitting
each other and creating huge energies as per the creation of energy
formula by divine Arindam that he discovered in 1998.
That is what happens in the Sun and the stars - deuterium fission.
Arindam has explained all that.
As for us, we have no use for evil hellhounds like Einstein, Feynman,
Teller, etc.
We have no use for their lies and nonsenses to support their wrong
physics with abuse of maths.
Woof woof woof-woof woof woof
Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 3:58:26 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:44 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 27.06.2025 05:47, skrev Bertitaylor:
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen >>>>>>>> bombs on Earth.
Any particular reason why you don't even try to defend your
claim that it is deuterium fission which provides the energy for
the hydrogen bombs on Earth?
Let's look at where the energy in a fission comes from.
When a radioactive element such as Uranium decays, the nucleus
splits in two. Each of the new nuclei will contain protons,
and there will be a very strong electrostatic repulsion between
the nuclei. That means that the nuclei will get tremendous
kinetic energy. As the nuclei collide, this energy will be
transformed to heat.
Certainly the nuclei will not collide, because nuclei are extremely
small and also have a charge, which will prevent collision with other
nuclei of the same charge.
The electrostatic repulsion causes great opposing forces within the
nucleus causing it to split into two high velocity atoms. The high
velocity atoms impart energy to surrounding atoms and when thus slowed
get accelerated by more high velocity atoms coming from the source. Like
in any explision, following Arindam's formula for energy creation from kinetics.
Then gamma rays as well of very high frequencies related to intra
nuclear distances. These high high frequency rays at very short
distances cause very powerful aetheric disturbances that break up other
loose nuclei causing the well known chain reaction.
When surrounded by deuterium there is huge amplification of fission
energy.
Woof woof
Bertietaylor
The Natural Idiot relies upon the Artificial Idiot!
AI is Artificial Idiocy which capitalists find useful as a control
mechanism for the Natural Idiocy of the masses, here ably represented by JimPee the Penisnino.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
Den 28.06.2025 02:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
A neutron is the tightest bond between a proton and an electron.
Can you please explain this statement?
How does the "bond between a proton and an electron"
change if you remove the neutron?
Or:
What is the difference in the bond between proton and electron
in H and T?
Den 01.07.2025 03:42, skrev Bertitaylor:
As natural radioactivity is caused when electrons
escape the nucleus the nucleus has to have electrons in it.
As natural radioactivity is caused when positrons
escape the nucleus the nucleus has to have positrons in it.
Are both statements true, or are both statements false?
Why cannot apes grasp this simple matter?
You mean this simple matter?
Example of β− decay: (electrons escape the nucleus) ---------------------------------------------------
Carbon-14 with 6 protons and 8 neutrons decays into
Nitrogen-14 with 7 protons and 7 neutrons + electron and antineutrino Nitrogen-14 is stable
Example of β+ decay: (positrons escape the nucleus)
---------------------------------------------------
Carbon-10 with 6 protons and 4 neutrons decays into
Boron-10 with 5 protons and 5 neutrons + positron and neutrino
Boron-10 is stable
Are there electrons in the C14 nucleus and positrons in the B14 nucleus,
or no electrons in the C14 nucleus and no positrons in the B14 nucleus?
What does the apes say?
Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us
consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
nuclei.
Right.
So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
---------------------------
Creation of iron and heavier elements by fusion doesn't release
energy, it uses energy, so these elements can only be created
in cataclysmic events where energy is abundant.
(Supernovas, Novas, merging of neutron stars etc.)
That's also why only heavy elements can release energy by fission.
The elements lighter than iron are created by fusion in stars.
That's possible because the fusion of lighter elements release
energy.
Den 01.07.2025 01:52, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:18:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
¹H (Protium) 1 proton 0 neutrons
²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays.
So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
The short half-life should indicate that T should not
exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
But T can be artificially created in an atomic reactor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope. >>> That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from lithium.) >>>
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D and T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
Please answer my question:
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I stated above
(and _much_ more)?
So the answer is "yes", Bertitaylor does indeed believe that
Teller & al would have succeeded in making the H-bomb even if
they had known nothing about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium.
However, since they _did_ know what I have stated above, and much more,
about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium they used a fission bomb around
a capsule with Deuterium and Tritium, and when the fission bomb went
off the pressure and temperature became so high that Deuterium and
Tritium was fused together in the fusion process:
²H+³H → ⁴He + n
D with 1 proton, 1 neutron + T with 1 proton, 2 proton 2 neutrons →
He with 2 protons, 2 neutrons + neutron + 17.6 MeV.
Most of the energy is kinetic energy of the ejected neutron.
D = 2.01410200 u
T = 3.01604928 u
------------------
5.03015128 u
He = 4.002603254 U
n = 1.008664916 U
------------------
5.011268170
mass loss m = 0.01888310 u, E = mc² = 17.589507 MeV
They simply put heavy water around a fission bomb to split deuterium and
thus made what is called a hydrogen bomb, with protons snapping off with
incredible force and thus causing a chain reaction with objects hitting
each other and creating huge energies as per the creation of energy
formula by divine Arindam that he discovered in 1998.
Bertitaylor, I will not ask you if you really believe that Teller & al
could simply have put heavy water around a fission bomb to make a
H-bomb. Of course you don't. And you know they didn't.
Why do you pretend to believe what you know never happened?
Are you trolling?
Den 03.07.2025 02:13, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 17:20:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 01.07.2025 01:52, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 18:18:47 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Elements with 1 proton in the nucleus are Hydrogen
There are two stable isotopes:
¹H (Protium) 1 proton 0 neutrons
²H (D Deuterium) 1 proton 1 neutron
³H (T Tritium) 1 proton 2 neutrons
Tritium is unstable with half-life 12.33 years.
The decay mode is β−, which means that a neutron splits
into a proton and an electron. The electron is ejected as β-rays. >>>>> So we get a nucleus with 2 protons and and 1 neutron, which is
³He, the most abundant stable Helium isotope.
The short half-life should indicate that T should not
exist naturally, but it is created by interaction between
cosmic rays and air. The natural abundance is however very low.
But T can be artificially created in an atomic reactor.
T has several applications, among them are H-bombs.
D and T combine very easily in fusion to ⁴He, a stable Helium isotope. >>>>> That's why the Hydrogen in a H-bomb is enriched with both D and T.
(Some, or all of the T can be created in the bombs itself from
lithium.)
An atomic bomb exploded on Earth can't create the temperature and
pressure to make H explode in a chain reaction. The enrichment
of D and T are necessary to make the bomb explode.
Please answer my question:
Do you really think that Teller & al, would have succeeded
in making the H-bomb if they didn't know what I stated above
(and _much_ more)?
So the answer is "yes", Bertitaylor does indeed believe that
Teller & al would have succeeded in making the H-bomb even if
they had known nothing about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium.
They had to know that deuterium existed and tritium is irrelevant save
for confusion.
However, since they _did_ know what I have stated above, and much more,
about Hydrogen, Deuterium and Tritium they used a fission bomb around
a capsule with Deuterium and Tritium, and when the fission bomb went
off the pressure and temperature became so high that Deuterium and
Tritium was fused together in the fusion process:
²H+³H → ⁴He + n
Fact:
The H-bomb built in 1951 was based on this fusion process.
Rubbish. The fission bomb caused the two protons in the deuterium
nucleus to split with the breaking of the electron bond holding them
together.
Just consider two huge metal balls being held together by a string.
Electric charge is put on both so both balls must move apart. The string
stops them. Now the protons are like the two balls and the string is the
electron. Quite stable till the string is cut. Then the two balls go off
in different directions.
The fission bomb creates the forces required to bust the electron bond.
Pretty simple, what.
... and quite funny.
One can but wonder how your mind works.
The first H-bomb was exploded 1951. Now its basic principles
are well known, it is fusion of D and T boosted by a fission bomb.
And you insist that it is is built and works according to
your fantasy invented 70 year later ?
The fact that you don't understand how ridiculous it is says a lot
about your sanity.
D with 1 proton, 1 neutron + T with 1 proton, 2 proton 2 neutrons →
He with 2 protons, 2 neutrons + neutron + 17.6 MeV.
Most of the energy is kinetic energy of the ejected neutron.
D = 2.01410200 u
T = 3.01604928 u
------------------
5.03015128 u
He = 4.002603254 U
n = 1.008664916 U
------------------
5.011268170
mass loss m = 0.01888310 u, E = mc² = 17.589507 MeV
Bullshit stuff made up to confuse people and boost the e=mcc nonsenses.
They simply put heavy water around a fission bomb to split deuterium and >>>> thus made what is called a hydrogen bomb, with protons snapping off with >>>> incredible force and thus causing a chain reaction with objects hitting >>>> each other and creating huge energies as per the creation of energy
formula by divine Arindam that he discovered in 1998.
Yes, yes.
Bertitaylor, I will not ask you if you really believe that Teller & al
could simply have put heavy water around a fission bomb to make a
H-bomb. Of course you don't. And you know they didn't.
Why do you pretend to believe what you know never happened?
Exposing liars and lies leads to a safer and better world, so our
altruistic efforts. You are the victim of lies.
How can pretending that you believe what you know never happen
expose liars?
Are you trolling?
No, following Jesus Christ for we did live in a Christian country. Now
talking pure Christianity does sound like trolling in this selfish world
of lies, run by greedy liars.
I see.
The whole thing is your interpretation of the Bible.
Den 26.06.2025 09:15, skrev bertitaylor:
On Wed, 25 Jun 2025 17:30:27 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:54:15 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 23.06.2025 05:47, skrev bertietaylor:
When Arindam says that the core of any star must be very cold, then >>>>>> bang
phut goes the above precious E=mcc theory.
Can you please explain Arindam's theory?
Where does the radiated energy come from?
Deuterium fission.
Deuterium is stable, does not undergo radioactive decay, and thus cannot >>> undergo fission, crackpot.
Fool, we are not talking about deuterium on Earth, decaying naturally.
Things are different in the Sun's atmosphere. Lots of heat, radiation,
charged particles, very dense there.
And no deuterium is decaying, but a lot of deuterium nuclei are fused
to Helium.
It is deuterium fission which provides the energy for the hydrogen bombs
on Earth.
Good grief, what a gigantic blunder! :-D
It obviously is _fusion_ of H and T in a hydrogen bomb.
Same thing happens in the Sun and the stars.
Indeed, fusion of hydrogen and deuterium.
Once we throw out the bollocks of e=mcc, and follow Arindam's physics,
the whole universe becomes straight and clear. And simple in its
eternity and infinity.
Ah. So it is Arindam who have told you that there is
fission of deuterium in a H-bomb,
and stupid to understand how ridiculous it is!
BTW, didn't you know that according to Arindam it is
"free energy" that heat the Sun?
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:41:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us
consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
nuclei.
Right.
So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
Yes. All matter changes as per chemical and nuclear reactions from
aetheric vibrations and electric forces.
So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
No. Matter change has nothing to do with big bangs and black holes and
e=mcc stuff.
Creation of iron and heavier elements by fusion doesn't release
energy, it uses energy, so these elements can only be created
in cataclysmic events where energy is abundant.
Most iron was always there. Sometimes it may get upgraded to other
elements, then radioactive decay brings that down.
Am Donnerstag000003, 03.07.2025 um 01:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:41:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us
consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
nuclei.
Right.
So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
Yes. All matter changes as per chemical and nuclear reactions from
aetheric vibrations and electric forces.
So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
No. Matter change has nothing to do with big bangs and black holes and
e=mcc stuff.
Actually it has...
I have invented this concept, which I called 'structured spacetime':
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
matter should be 'relative'.
My idea is actually quite simple, but based upon unusual assumptions.
I use spacetime of GR as kind of 'background' and call 'timelike stable patterns' 'matter'.
Iow: matter for one observer is not matter for another observer.
This would de-materialize the concept of particles and assumes, that particles are actually certain 'structures'.
Now we could alter the axis of time (in theory) and could create by this method all sorts of cosmological phenomena like black-holes or
big-bangs.
Astonishingly the heavier elements are found near the surface of planet Earth.
Creation of iron and heavier elements by fusion doesn't release
energy, it uses energy, so these elements can only be created
in cataclysmic events where energy is abundant.
Most iron was always there. Sometimes it may get upgraded to other
elements, then radioactive decay brings that down.
This would require, that matter could age and build heavier elements
from lighter ones over time.
The reason:
according to the current paradigm ('accretion hypothesis') the Earth was formed by a gravitational collapse of large amounts of dust.
The result was entirely molten in the early stage.
But that would have allowed the heavier elements to sink into the lower levels of the Earth.
But we actually find Lead, Gold and Uranium quite high in the crust
(like in mountains).
So, these metals could not have been there when Earth was molten, hence
must have aged sind the creation of their plate.
...
TH
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 6:22:13 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Donnerstag000003, 03.07.2025 um 01:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:41:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us >>>>>>>>> consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy
nuclei.
Right.
So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
Yes. All matter changes as per chemical and nuclear reactions from
aetheric vibrations and electric forces.
So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
No. Matter change has nothing to do with big bangs and black holes and
e=mcc stuff.
Actually it has...
I have invented this concept, which I called 'structured spacetime':
What is that?
https://docs.google.com/presentation/
d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
matter should be 'relative'.
Matter is mass and mass is standardised by units that are absolute.
My idea is actually quite simple, but based upon unusual assumptions.
Sounds like Einstein. He claimed his work was simple and also based on assumptions
I use spacetime of GR as kind of 'background' and call 'timelike stable
patterns' 'matter'.
Patterns are not impacted by force so they are not mass or matter.
Iow: matter for one observer is not matter for another observer.
That may be on aesthetic, gastronomic, emotional basis, yes. Not
physics.
Am Freitag000004, 04.07.2025 um 23:51 schrieb Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 6:22:13 +0000, Thomas Heger wrote:
Am Donnerstag000003, 03.07.2025 um 01:57 schrieb Bertitaylor:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 12:41:33 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
Den 29.06.2025 06:18, skrev Bertitaylor:
Am Samstag000028, 28.06.2025 um 14:47 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
Den 28.06.2025 01:49, skrev Bertitaylor:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 19:57:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One question:
What created the elements you and I and everything around us >>>>>>>>>> consist of?
The Devine Arindam?
Heard of eternity? It all was always there, is, and will be.
I am asking YOU, Bertitaylor:
How do YOU think U-238 and other heavy elements were created?
Supernovas where lots of electrons or protons fly and create heavy >>>>>> nuclei.
Right.
So you have realised that you were wrong when you claimed that
all elements "was always there, is, and will be."
Yes. All matter changes as per chemical and nuclear reactions from
aetheric vibrations and electric forces.
So you have finally admitted to being wrong.
No. Matter change has nothing to do with big bangs and black holes and >>>> e=mcc stuff.
Actually it has...
I have invented this concept, which I called 'structured spacetime':
What is that?
https://docs.google.com/presentation/
d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
I wanted to put GR and QM into a single framework and thought, that
matter should be 'relative'.
Matter is mass and mass is standardised by units that are absolute.
'mass' is an attribute of material objects and is measured in kilograms.
This measure measures the amount of resistance against acceleration.
To call this measure 'matter' is insanely stupid.
My idea is actually quite simple, but based upon unusual assumptions.
Sounds like Einstein. He claimed his work was simple and also based on
assumptions
Usually you try to explain some observations and try to figuere out, how
that came into existence.
To achieve this goal, you need to check all sorts of possibilities and
choose the best finding.
This is then your assumption (for the first 'round').
Think about Sherlock Holmes and how he looks at a crime scene.
His first guess would be (say): it was the gardener!
Now he would check this assumption against the facts found at the crime scene.
If the test remains positive, he could take this as his assumption and procede from there.
Or he could find, it wasn't the gardner and he had to think about
something else.
But always we start with some sort of guesswork and call that
'assumption'.
I use spacetime of GR as kind of 'background' and call 'timelike stable
patterns' 'matter'.
Patterns are not impacted by force so they are not mass or matter.
for a start:
It is my concept and I explain how it works!
If you don't like, then feel free to reject it.
Iow: matter for one observer is not matter for another observer.
That may be on aesthetic, gastronomic, emotional basis, yes. Not
physics.
Well, possibly.
But I define what is physics in my idea, not you.
....
TH
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 8:43:11 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
One can but wonder how your mind works.
Should be clear to those who have more intelligence than imbeciles,
idiots and robots.
The first H-bomb was exploded 1951. Now its basic principles
are well known, it is fusion of D and T boosted by a fission bomb.
Fusion of anything requires energy.
To think that any fusion creates energy is possible only for brainwashed
apes who may have high intelligence but being apes blindly follow
whatever bs is fed them by the alpha apes. Or out of fear, self
interest, social climbing, conforming, etc.
And you insist that it is is built and works according to
your fantasy invented 70 year later ?
What fantasy?
Clever alpha apes - great hoaxes - knew what we are now writing now.
They did fission of deuterium in 1951 and called it fusion to solidify
the e=mcc rubbish, thus make Einstein .gt. God and relativity the
supreme religion. Corrupting the whole of physics in the process.
The greatest genius Arindam saw through all this long ago.
:-D
The fact that you don't understand how ridiculous it is says a lot
about your sanity.
The fact that you are a brainwashed ape is clear to all. Including us.
Woof woof
Bertietaylor
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 505 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 53:51:56 |
| Calls: | 9,922 |
| Calls today: | 9 |
| Files: | 13,804 |
| Messages: | 6,347,967 |