Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
On 2025-06-20 18:55:34 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 9:06:49 +0000, Mikko wrote:
On 2025-06-19 17:37:29 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
Perplexity:
"The First Postulate of Special Relativity
Statement of the First Postulate
The first postulate of special relativity, also known as the principle >>>>> of relativity, states:
The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of
reference."
"truism
/?tr?iz?m/ n. a statement that is obviously true and says nothing new >>>>> or interesting. —truistic/tr?istik/ adj." -Oxford American.
The first postulate is not a truism. It is possible to imagine a world >>>> where it is not true and to believe that we actually live in a such
world.
Your reply does not explain how it is not obviously true and nothing new >>> that wasn't already known long before Einstein.
I did explain. And what I said was indeed known long before Einstein.
If the first postulate were a truism nobody would ever have believed
otherwise. But ancinet literature shows that the opposite belief was
common.
Indeed.
In particular Maxwell's equations were generally believed before 1905
to hold only in one prefered frame. (the rest frame of the aether)
Einstein's postulate applied to electromagnetism
was new and revolutionary, and seen as such at the time,
(by those who mattered)
Jan
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 505 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 68:19:02 |
Calls: | 9,927 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 13,804 |
Messages: | 6,346,847 |
Posted today: | 2 |