On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:18:46 AM UTC-4, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:339-
On 2023-09-26 04:41:32 +0000, Paul Alsing said:
On Monday, September 25, 2023 at 4:40:19 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
Unlike claims to have proved god's existence?Astrophysics is OFF TOPIC on this thread...
999 –Errr... this is a relativity forum!--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 36 years; mainly
in England until 1987.
999 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 –[Hyannis Cape Cod MA you is]
.
Hello Prof. Athel Cornish-Bowden –
.
We're both 80 years old and HIGHLY active!
.
You have the advantage of hobnobbing with
high-powered OXFORD UNIVERSITY intellectuals
for many years. Therefore I assume you are
"highly educated" – SO AM, by dint of 40 years
of constant study I !!!!
.
RECENTLY I WROTE: –
.[Hammond]: –
">> Astrophysics is OFF TOPIC on this thread..."
.
AND YOU REPLIED –
[Bowden] –
"Unlike claims to have proved god's existence?"
.
[Hammond] –
whether you believe it or not Athel – the
HOBBIT METRIC: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aks the Hobbit Metric).
|ooo-1/a²|
.
DOES CONSTITUTE the world's first
scientific proof of God – whether you,
Richard Dawkins, or anyone else
thanks so – AND I HAVE PROVED IT !
.
The absolutely STUPEFYING FACT about
all this is that –
.
A 5,000 man worldwide PhD ARMY of research
Psychometrists are the ones who have actually
provided the LIBRARY SIZED peer reviewed
experimental data – that PROVES this!
,
AND THEY ARE NOT EVEN AWARE OF IT !.
.
It took them 50 years, and $50 million to do this
– to discover the entire EIGENVECTOR PYRAMID
of human "Personality Structure" – and they have
declared the existence of the TOP EIGENVECTOR
of PSYCHOLOGY – and they have
Named It –
.
THE GENERAL FACTOR of PSYCHOLOGY (GFP)
.
And they DON'T KNOW WHAT IT IS !!!
.
And PHYSICIST GEORGE HAMMOND is the only
person who knows, and has proved, that it is in fact,
....... THE GFP IS THE GOD OF THE BIBLE
.
I have proven that the 13 2nd order eigenvectors of
the Pyramid are the "12 Olympian gods" of antiquity
.
I have proven that the 4 3rd order eigenvectors of the
Pyramid are the 4 gospel personalities Mt, Mk, Lk, Jn
.
And THEREFORE the TOP EIGENVECTOR (the GFP)
is ASSUREDLY without any doubt, the GOD OF THE BIBLE.
.
Now believe it or not ATHEL – someone in your position
may very likely be – the ONLY PERSON with sufficient
CUMULATIVE INTELLECTUAL/SCIENTIFIC EDUCATION
2
to be able to actually comprehend this
STARTLING scientific fact
.
IT MAY EVEN BE TRE THAT RICHARD DAWKINS IS
actually able to intellectually understand it – unfortunately
he's not talking to me – and YOU ARE !.
.
George
.
On September 28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Claiming laws 'proven' by incomplete induction is just plain wrong,
Is it proven that galaxies are receding at various speeds?
Merely an empirical fit, straight line through a finite number of
data points,
Missing the point - what are those data points?
Ponder incomplete induction -
Doesn't matter. For any finite data set there are infinitely many
formulae that fit the data exactly, so none can be considered 'proven'.
In this case, the data points are galaxy velocities?
RichD <r_dela...@yahoo.com> wrote:433 –
On September 28, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Claiming laws 'proven' by incomplete induction is just plain wrong,
Is it proven that galaxies are receding at various speeds?
Merely an empirical fit, straight line through a finite number of data points,
Missing the point - what are those data points?
Ponder incomplete induction -
Doesn't matter. For any finite data set there are infinitely many formulae that fit the data exactly, so none can be considered 'proven'.
In this case, the data points are galaxy velocities?No, the redshifts, and the distances.
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be trusted
on its empirical merits.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,
and there have even been fairly long times in which there were two
mutually incompatible prefered values,
Jan
--
"A prediction is no stronger than the theory upon which it rests" (who?)
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be
trusted on its empirical merits.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:789 –
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't beAbsolutely.
trusted on its empirical merits.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept,
even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
Tom Roberts
Tom Roberts <tjobe...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be
trusted on its empirical merits.
Absolutely.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,
Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept,That's theory. The origin of this thread was the claim
even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
that you can 'prove' things from experiment. (by incomplete induction)
And yes, in the case of the Hubble constant
that is even more nonsensical than usual.
But back to the, by now far away, origin:
The space-time metric being (locally) Lorentzian
cannot be 'proven from experiment',
no matter how much you potter about with rulers and clocks.
It needs to be postulated.
(and judged indirectly, by the consequences)
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be
trusted on its empirical merits.
Absolutely.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,
Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the
"Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept,
even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
Tom Roberts <tjobe...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:432 –
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be
trusted on its empirical merits.
Absolutely.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,
Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept, even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.That's theory. The origin of this thread was the claim
that you can 'prove' things from experiment. (by incomplete induction)
And yes, in the case of the Hubble constant
that is even more nonsensical than usual.
But back to the, by now far away, origin:
The space-time metric being (locally) Lorentzian
cannot be 'proven from experiment',
no matter how much you potter about with rulers and clocks.
It needs to be postulated.
(and judged indirectly, by the consequences)
Jan
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:43:38 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't beAbsolutely.
trusted on its empirical merits.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept, even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
Tom Roberts789 –
789 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
789 –[Cape Cod MA USA]
.
Dear (Dr). Tom Roberts –
.
While you are here – let me tell you something
that you may be only vaguely aware of – but has
now become a HARD SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT: –
The following metrics are ubiquitous in
modern Relativity: –
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. | = (Special Relativity)
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 7%/gigayear)
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 5%/year)
|ooo-1/a²| = (HOBBIT METRIC)
.
Okay – in the FLRW (da/dt) is known as the
HUBBLE CONSTANT
.
In the HOBBIT METRIC da/dt is known as the
"human growth rate "which is about 5%/year
for people under 20 years of age.
.
So what we see Is that Human Beings
experience TWO UNIVERSES: –
.
1 – the universe we see with the naked eye,
...... and is called the "subjective universe"
.
2 – the universe measured by Astrophysicists,
...... and is called the "objective universe"
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!
.
In particular the concept of "God" enters the
situation because the "apparent size and speed"
of the "subjective universe" varies from person
to person depending upon the AGE of the person!
.
While the size and speed of the objective universe
is determined by scientific measurement and does
NOT vary from person-to-person!
.
Now – while there is no God in the OBJECTIVE
universe – but there IS A GOD in the SUBJECTIVE
universe !.
.
The reason for this is because: –
.
NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH
.
In fact the world average adult is only about
85% fully grown (WHO, UNESCO data)
... Bear in mind that in 3rd world countries
growth stunting of 30 to 40%is not uncommon
due to famine and disease !
.
Now, 1/.85=1.18 or approximately 1.2 which
means the average world adult is SEEING a
world which is nearly
20% LARGER & FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS
Note that this includes both you and me !
.
And this unnerving circumstance has been
long since noticed and historically called "God"
for more than 5,000 years!
.
NOW ALL OF THIS MAY SOUND INTERESTING
but it's obvious to me, having discovered all us,
that there is actually something we can DO about
this universally UNNERVING situation –
.
I have proposed here on SPR that we convince the
V/R (Virtual Reality) community to simply program
a pair of high quality VR glasses so that the output
.
1 – reduces the size of the image by 20%
2 – reduces the speed of the image by 20%
.
And thus REVEAL the phenomenon of God to
the naked eye – for the first time in the history
of the world!.
.
THE IDEA IS – that by wearing these glasses
say watching spectator sports over a period of
weeks or months – the subject will eventually
notice that he's beginning to see a smaller and
slower world – even when he is not wearing
the VR glasses !
.
And I might add – it doesn't take much imagination
to see the impact that this will have on world
human inspiration – attitude, hope, confidence,
personality, etc. etc. – including particularly its
effect on world mental health
.
George
.
George Hammond wrote:5792 –
you don't even know how to rewrite a tensor which is curl. Good bye. You assume your matrix is flat. Stop posting matrices, thinking they are tensors.|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶ O̶F̶ G̶O̶D̶
|o o a² o. | = (d̶a̶/d̶t̶ ~ 5%/y̶e̶a̶r̶)
|o o o-1/a²| = (H̶O̶B̶B̶I̶T̶ M̶E̶T̶R̶I̶C̶)
.
Okay – in the FLRW (da/dt) is known as the HUBBLE CONSTANT
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:43:38 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't beAbsolutely.
trusted on its empirical merits.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept,
even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
Tom Roberts789 –
789 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
789 –[Cape Cod MA USA]
.
Dear (Dr). Tom Roberts –
.
While you are here – let me tell you something
that you may be only vaguely aware of – but has
now become a HARD SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT: –
The following metrics are ubiquitous in
modern Relativity: –
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. | = (Special Relativity)
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 7%/gigayear)
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 5%/year)
|ooo-1/a²| = (HOBBIT METRIC)
.
Okay – in the FLRW (da/dt) is known as the
HUBBLE CONSTANT
.
In the HOBBIT METRIC da/dt is known as the
"human growth rate "which is about 5%/year
for people under 20 years of age.
.
So what we see Is that Human Beings
experience TWO UNIVERSES: –
.
1 – the universe we see with the naked eye,
...... and is called the "subjective universe"
.
2 – the universe measured by Astrophysicists,
...... and is called the "objective universe"
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!
.
In particular the concept of "God" enters the
situation because the "apparent size and speed"
of the "subjective universe" varies from person
to person depending upon the AGE of the person!
.
While the size and speed of the objective universe
is determined by scientific measurement and does
NOT vary from person-to-person!
.
Now – while there is no God in the OBJECTIVE
universe – but there IS A GOD in the SUBJECTIVE
universe !.
.
The reason for this is because: –
.
NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH
.
In fact the world average adult is only about
85% fully grown (WHO, UNESCO data)
... Bear in mind that in 3rd world countries
growth stunting of 30 to 40%is not uncommon
due to famine and disease !
.
Now, 1/.85=1.18 or approximately 1.2 which
means the average world adult is SEEING a
world which is nearly
20% LARGER & FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS
Note that this includes both you and me !
.
And this unnerving circumstance has been
long since noticed and historically called "God"
for more than 5,000 years!
.
NOW ALL OF THIS MAY SOUND INTERESTING
but it's obvious to me, having discovered all us,
that there is actually something we can DO about
this universally UNNERVING situation –
.
I have proposed here on SPR that we convince the
V/R (Virtual Reality) community to simply program
a pair of high quality VR glasses so that the output
.
1 – reduces the size of the image by 20%
2 – reduces the speed of the image by 20%
.
And thus REVEAL the phenomenon of God to
the naked eye – for the first time in the history
of the world!.
.
THE IDEA IS – that by wearing these glasses
say watching spectator sports over a period of
weeks or months – the subject will eventually
notice that he's beginning to see a smaller and
slower world – even when he is not wearing
the VR glasses !
.
And I might add – it doesn't take much imagination
to see the impact that this will have on world
human inspiration – attitude, hope, confidence,
personality, etc. etc. – including particularly its
effect on world mental health
.
George
.
George Hammond wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:43:38 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be trusted on its empirical merits.Absolutely.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept, even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
Tom Roberts789 –
789 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
789 –[Cape Cod MA USA]
.
Dear (Dr). Tom Roberts –
.
While you are here – let me tell you something
that you may be only vaguely aware of – but has
now become a HARD SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT: –
The following metrics are ubiquitous inFor some reason that isn't clear to me...you keep forgetting that there
modern Relativity: –
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. | = (Special Relativity)
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 7%/gigayear)
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 5%/year)
|ooo-1/a²| = (HOBBIT METRIC)
.
Okay – in the FLRW (da/dt) is known as the
HUBBLE CONSTANT
.
In the HOBBIT METRIC da/dt is known as the
"human growth rate "which is about 5%/year
for people under 20 years of age.
.
So what we see Is that Human Beings
experience TWO UNIVERSES: –
.
1 – the universe we see with the naked eye,
...... and is called the "subjective universe"
.
2 – the universe measured by Astrophysicists,
...... and is called the "objective universe"
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!
.
In particular the concept of "God" enters the
situation because the "apparent size and speed"
of the "subjective universe" varies from person
to person depending upon the AGE of the person!
.
While the size and speed of the objective universe
is determined by scientific measurement and does
NOT vary from person-to-person!
.
Now – while there is no God in the OBJECTIVE
universe – but there IS A GOD in the SUBJECTIVE
universe !.
.
The reason for this is because: –
.
NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH
.
In fact the world average adult is only about
85% fully grown (WHO, UNESCO data)
... Bear in mind that in 3rd world countries
growth stunting of 30 to 40%is not uncommon
due to famine and disease !
.
Now, 1/.85=1.18 or approximately 1.2 which
means the average world adult is SEEING a
world which is nearly
20% LARGER & FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS
Note that this includes both you and me !
.
And this unnerving circumstance has been
long since noticed and historically called "God"
for more than 5,000 years!
.
NOW ALL OF THIS MAY SOUND INTERESTING
but it's obvious to me, having discovered all us,
that there is actually something we can DO about
this universally UNNERVING situation –
.
I have proposed here on SPR that we convince the
V/R (Virtual Reality) community to simply program
a pair of high quality VR glasses so that the output
.
1 – reduces the size of the image by 20%
2 – reduces the speed of the image by 20%
.
And thus REVEAL the phenomenon of God to
the naked eye – for the first time in the history
of the world!.
.
THE IDEA IS – that by wearing these glasses
say watching spectator sports over a period of
weeks or months – the subject will eventually
notice that he's beginning to see a smaller and
slower world – even when he is not wearing
the VR glasses !
.
And I might add – it doesn't take much imagination
to see the impact that this will have on world
human inspiration – attitude, hope, confidence,
personality, etc. etc. – including particularly its
effect on world mental health
.
George
.
is no God.
That which you believe is a God is simply something that evolve into
God.
--666 –
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN BE
WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
On 10/3/23 8:05 PM, George Hammond wrote:433 –
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN BE
WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
This is just plain not true.
But it is true that a 2nd rank tensor PROJECTED ONTO A GIVEN SET OF COORDINATES can be written as a matrix. The matrix is, of course,
coordinate dependent, unlike the tensor itself (which is inherently a geometric object independent of coordinates).
All this blather and nonsense has nothing whatsoever to do with hobbits
or God.
Tom Roberts
On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 12:20:36 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:435 –
On 10/3/23 8:05 PM, George Hammond wrote:
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN BE
WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
This is just plain not true.
But it is true that a 2nd rank tensor PROJECTED ONTO A GIVEN SET OF COORDINATES can be written as a matrix. The matrix is, of course, coordinate dependent, unlike the tensor itself (which is inherently a geometric object independent of coordinates).
All this blather and nonsense has nothing whatsoever to do with hobbits
or God.
Tom Roberts433 –
433 –[George E Hammond MS Physics]
433 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[George Hammond MS physics] wrote –
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN
knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN
BE WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
.
[Tom Roberts] wrote: –
"This is just plain not true."
.
[George Hammond MS Physics]: –
Hey Tom – don't be "picayune" –
I've sat through hundreds of hours of
Relativity in a PhD program at Northeastern
University – and I've seen multiple professors
write 2nd rank Relativity tensors as matrices
on the blackboard all day long! And Wikipedia
Relativity articles are full of them !
.
Here's a Physics Stack Exchange discussion
of the subject: – https://tinyurl.com/2h3es8s4
and they conclude, the same as me and every
other Relativist that: –
.
"Strictly speaking matrices and rank 2 tensors are
not quite the same thing, but there is a close
correspondence that works for most practical
purposes that physicists encounter"
.
And OBVIOUSLY my use of matrices is CLEARLY
one of those "PRACTICAL PURPOSES that
physicists encounter" !.
.
So much for that – my use of matrices is CORRECT
.
But while we're at it – you said in a recent post: –
.
[Tom Roberts] said –
"How stupid. Do you seriously think that the
structure of the universe is governed by the growth
of a human child???? That is the silliest thing I
have seen around here (!)."
Tom Roberts
.
[George Hammond] says –
Look – Alexander Friedmann was the genius
who told Einstein that he didn't have to worry about his
universe collapsing under gravity – because it was
actually EXPANDING and he told Einstein he could
use this metric to describe it: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (Astrophysics)
|o o o..-1.| = (Hubble constant = 7%/gigayear)
.
And after a lot of fuss Einstein agreed!
.
WHAT I'M SAYING TOM is simply this: –
.
There are 2 – universes: –
1 – the universe seen by the naked eye
2 – The Universe Measured by Astrophysics
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME !!!
.
The universe measured by Astrophysics is
identical for everyone
.
But the universe seen by the naked eye
varies from person to person depending on
there AGE
.
So the universe seen by "a human child",
to use your words, appears much
LARGER & FASTER than the world seen
by an adult !
.
And the HOBBIT METRIC, like the Friedman.
Metric DESCRIBES the universe "seen" by
a 12-year-old: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = (Hubble constant = 5%/year)
.
BECAUSE a=a(t) is a function of the child's
AGE – and only stops varying with time at
the age of adulthood – around 18 or 20.
.
The kid is not "altering the universe" by
simply looking at it – the HOBBIT METRIC
is not describing the real Astrophysical
universe – it is describing what the child
is SEEING !
.
I HOPE THAT CLEARS UP THE CONFUSION
.
MEANWHILE –
.
It turns out that the Hobbit Metric is actually a
scientific proof of God, because – people
never reach "full growth" (the world average
being around 85%) which means that nearly
20% of the world is actually INVISIBLE to the
average person – and this phenomenon has
long since been noticed – and is historically
referred to as the phenomenon of "God".
.
And I'm sure that's
"more than you wanted to know"
.
George
.
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 10:00:10 AM UTC-4, George Hammond wrote:436
On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 12:20:36 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 10/3/23 8:05 PM, George Hammond wrote:
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN BE WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
This is just plain not true.
But it is true that a 2nd rank tensor PROJECTED ONTO A GIVEN SET OF COORDINATES can be written as a matrix. The matrix is, of course, coordinate dependent, unlike the tensor itself (which is inherently a geometric object independent of coordinates).
All this blather and nonsense has nothing whatsoever to do with hobbits or God.
435 –Tom Roberts433 –
433 –[George E Hammond MS Physics]
433 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[George Hammond MS physics] wrote –
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN
knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN
BE WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
.
[Tom Roberts] wrote: –
"This is just plain not true."
.
[George Hammond MS Physics]: –
Hey Tom – don't be "picayune" –
I've sat through hundreds of hours of
Relativity in a PhD program at Northeastern
University – and I've seen multiple professors
write 2nd rank Relativity tensors as matrices
on the blackboard all day long! And Wikipedia
Relativity articles are full of them !
.
Here's a Physics Stack Exchange discussion
of the subject: – https://tinyurl.com/2h3es8s4
and they conclude, the same as me and every
other Relativist that: –
.
"Strictly speaking matrices and rank 2 tensors are
not quite the same thing, but there is a close
correspondence that works for most practical
purposes that physicists encounter"
.
And OBVIOUSLY my use of matrices is CLEARLY
one of those "PRACTICAL PURPOSES that
physicists encounter" !.
.
So much for that – my use of matrices is CORRECT
.
But while we're at it – you said in a recent post: –
.
[Tom Roberts] said –
"How stupid. Do you seriously think that the
structure of the universe is governed by the growth
of a human child???? That is the silliest thing I
have seen around here (!)."
Tom Roberts
.
[George Hammond] says –
Look – Alexander Friedmann was the genius
who told Einstein that he didn't have to worry about his
universe collapsing under gravity – because it was
actually EXPANDING and he told Einstein he could
use this metric to describe it: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (Astrophysics)
|o o o..-1.| = (Hubble constant = 7%/gigayear)
.
And after a lot of fuss Einstein agreed!
.
WHAT I'M SAYING TOM is simply this: –
.
There are 2 – universes: –
1 – the universe seen by the naked eye
2 – The Universe Measured by Astrophysics
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME !!!
.
The universe measured by Astrophysics is
identical for everyone
.
But the universe seen by the naked eye
varies from person to person depending on
there AGE
.
So the universe seen by "a human child",
to use your words, appears much
LARGER & FASTER than the world seen
by an adult !
.
And the HOBBIT METRIC, like the Friedman.
Metric DESCRIBES the universe "seen" by
a 12-year-old: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = (Hubble constant = 5%/year)
.
BECAUSE a=a(t) is a function of the child's
AGE – and only stops varying with time at
the age of adulthood – around 18 or 20.
.
The kid is not "altering the universe" by
simply looking at it – the HOBBIT METRIC
is not describing the real Astrophysical
universe – it is describing what the child
is SEEING !
.
I HOPE THAT CLEARS UP THE CONFUSION
.
MEANWHILE –
.
It turns out that the Hobbit Metric is actually a
scientific proof of God, because – people
never reach "full growth" (the world average
being around 85%) which means that nearly
20% of the world is actually INVISIBLE to the
average person – and this phenomenon has
long since been noticed – and is historically
referred to as the phenomenon of "God".
.
And I'm sure that's
"more than you wanted to know"
.
George
.
435 –[George E Hammond MS Physics]
435 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
A FICTITIOUS CONVERSATION
....................WITH
J.R. OPPENHEIMER'S GHOST
.
.....About: – The world's 1st
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
.
Cast of characters: –
.
JR – Julius Robert Oppenheimer
GE – George Edwin Hammond
.
[JR] –
Hi GE, they told me you've discovered
the world's first scientific proof of God!
.
[GE] –
Yes JR, I considered it to be a
"sweet little Physics problem"! They
say you once said that the A-Bomb was
a "sweet little Physics problem" !
.... By the way, are those Lucky Strikes
you're chain smoking?
.
[JR] –
Yes GE, and I see you're chain-smoking Camels !
.
[GE] –
Yes; I understand you're a devotee of the
Bhagavad-Gita? Do you think the Hindus
believe in God?
.
[JR] –
Yes, Krishna/Brahma is the Hindu name for God.
.
[GE] –
There are 7000 spoken languages in the world –
do you agree there must be 7000 different names
for God?
.
[JR] –
Obviously, no doubt about it !
.... But tell me something – you claim to have discovered
the world's first scientific proof of God – if so, and there is a "physically real God" – what exactly is "God" scientifically
speaking?
.
[GH]: –
.... Fair question – I'll tell you what God actually is –
God – is simply a "fully grown" human being!
.... WHO and UNESCO data have confirmed that the
world average adult is only about 85% fully grown –
and in the 3rd World growth stunting of 30 to 40%
is not uncommon, due to famine and disease!
.... The world has NEVER SEEN a 100% fully grown
human being – and such a person would be nothing
short of a walking, talking "God in the flesh"!
.
[JR] –
Well, that's a plausible theory, but how in the world
would you propose to actually "scientifically prove"
such a thing – that appears to be an impossibility !
.
[GE] –
Believe it or not JR – that fact has already been
proven by a library full of peer-reviewed academic
Psychometry data – and the people who actually
PROVED it – are not even AWARE that they have
done so !
.
[JR] –
Why are they unaware of it?
.
[GH] –
Because they are Psychologists and not Physicists!
They don't understand the scientific significance of
the immense data they have collected! Only a
PHYSICIST can tell him what it actually MEANS!
.
[JR] –
Well, okay, You're a Physicist, but what makes you
an expert in Psychometry!
.
[GE] –
I'm 81 years old – and I devoted 30 years to the
study of Psychometry – after taking an MS in Physics
and dropping out of a PhD physics program at
Northeastern University in Boston.!
.
[JR] –
No kidding! What on Earth made you decide to spend
30 years studying Psychometry ?
.
[GE] –
Well – I had a minor mental crackup when I was
around 40 – and quickly discovered that Psychologists
don't know any Physics – so I decided to become
an expert Psychologist besides being an MS in
Physics.
.
[JR] –
I can appreciate that – I had an ex-girlfriend who had
a mental crackup and committed suicide, but It think
Physicists are relatively immune to it because they are
so dedicated to physical reality and common sense!
.
[GE] –
Yes, Physicists are probably theoretically immune to
mental collapse – because after all, Physics is the
study of Reality!
.
[JR] –
Ditto that – but even so, I'll bet the highest echelons of
human health are probably the MOST resistant to mental
fallibility! Which is probably why THEY get elected to
public office! Notice that our political leaders are the most
healthy looking human specimens!
.
[GE] –
Yes, agreed!
.
[JR] –
Okay – what exactly is this "library sized" Psychometry
data that "scientifically proves" that God is simply a
"fully grown human being"?
.
[GE] –
2500 years ago Hippocrates the "Father of Medicine"
said he thought that humans had "4 Personalities"
and said he thought they were caused by 4–Humors
(4 fluids).
.... Turns out he was RIGHT about 4 personalities,
but he was wrong about the 4 fluids – turns out the 4
Personalities are caused by the "Cubic Cleavage"
of the brain – and I'm the one who DISCOVERED that
biological fact!
.
[JR] –
No kidding – how did you discover that?
.
[GE] –
Well, I began analyzing the 50 years Of Psychometry
data collected by a PhD Army of Psychometrists in
20 languages in 20 foreign countries – all of it being
Personality Questionnaire test results analyzed on
desktop computers.
.... What they would do is form a "correlation matrix"
of the test questions and then extract the Eigenvectors
of the correlation matrix. These were deemed to be the
"Personality Types" existing in the large pool of testees.
.... Turns out – that there is actually an "Eigenvector
Pyramid" in the data, consisting of: –
.
– ..about _30–1st Order eigenvectors
– exactly _13–2nd Order eigenvectors
– exactly __4–3rd Order eigenvectors
– exactly __1–4th Order eigenvector (dubbed the "GFP")
.
AND THEY HAD NO IDEA WHAT WAS
PHYSICALLY CAUSING ANY OF THEM !
.
[JR] –
No kidding – they had no theoretical explanation
of why there would be an "Eigenvector Pyramid"?
... And what does "GFP" stand for?
.
[GE] –
Yes – and they still have no idea today!
"GFP" stands for "General Factor of Personality, or
"General Factor of Psychology" if it includes IQ.
As far as I can see, reading hundreds of these papers,
is that the GFP loads highly on the Human Growth
Curve – the higher on the growth curve you are, the
higher you load on the GFP ! The really big healthy guys
like FDR, the king of England, or even Donald Trump
and Elon Musk, would load highly on the GFP.
.
[JR] –
What about you and me – do we load high on the GFP?
.
[GE] –
No, we are skinny, introverted, nervous, intellectuals –
we don't load high on the GFP – we load highly on IQ.
It's the highly popular, big and strong executive types
who load high on the GFP.
.
[JR] –
okay – let me guess – the next thing you going to tell me
is that the "GFP" is the God of the Bible – right?
.
[GE] –
You're a fast study JR – you guessed exactly right!!
.
[JR] –
Yeah, but that's just a guess – that's not scientific proof!
.
[GE] –
Yeah – but there's MORE: –
I'm the guy that figured out WHERE this
"Eigenvector Pyramid" biologically comes from !
.
[JR] –
Oh really? Do tell – where does this eigenvector pyramid
come from?
.
[GE] –
It comes from "CUBIC CLEAVAGE OF THE BRAIN" JR !
.
I discovered that the 4–3rd Order eigenvectors (above) are
actually Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the 4 Personalities
of the King James Bible ! And, that those 4 personalities,
which Hippocrates hypothesized 500 years BEFORE the
New Testament was written – are CAUSED by the same
thing that causes all higher animals, including Humans, to
have 4–LEGS !
.... If I asked you "why do all higher animals have 4 legs?"
What would you say JR?
.
[JR] –
Well it's pretty obvious – animals have 4 legs for the same
reason a CHAIR has 4 legs – it has to be stable on a
two-dimensional plane – that means 2 legs on each
dimension, and 2×2 = 4. Hence higher animals have 4
legs!
.
[GE] –
You're absolutely correct. It comes from the 3-D Cartesian
Structure of space itself. And in fact, I discovered and
published in the peer-reviewed literature, that this fact also
causes the human brain to be orthogonally cleaved by
3–orthogonal (XYZ) axes – the Central, Medial and
Transverse brain cleavages – thus the human brain is:
CUBICALLY CLEAVED into 8 lobes, forming 8–Corners
of a BOX !
.... And get this JR – a CUBE has 13 rotational
SYMMETRY AXES, and they are, bipolar, opposed, brain
lobes on each end of the symmetry axes – and that causes
13–Personality Axes – or simply put "13–Personalities"
in Man ! And believe it or not, these 13 personalities were
first discovered (or guessed at) by the Greeks who called
them famously "12 Olympian gods". Turns out the Greeks
were off by one, there are actually 13 !
I have published the "Cubic Brain Cleavage" discovery in
the peer-reviewed literature in 1994: –
ELSESVIER https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0732118X94901058
.
[JR] –
Well I'll be goddamned – that's the most amazing thing I
ever heard! But how do you know that these "opposed
brain lobes" actually cause different personality dimensions
– that looks like a hard thing to prove?
.
[GE] –
it would be – except for the fact that there have been
amazing advances in brain science since you died in 1967.
For one thing Roger Sperry discovered the "Lateralization
of the Brain" – the fact that the right and left half of the
brain have opposed personalities – and this has now been
commonly recognized
is the cause of the "political Left and Right" – the
Republicans and the Democrats – this divide is across the
Medial cleavage of the brain.
.... On top of the, it has been known for a long time that the
Central cleavage of the brain divides the front "motor" half
of the brain from the back "sensory" half of the brain.
.... Thirdly – there is a "transverse" cleavage, similar to the
2 other cleavages which form the spinal vertebra of the ribs
etc – and which divides the Cortex from the Limbic system
in the brain. This divides "intellectual" personality types
from "emotional" personality types.
.... Obviously from these psychological divisions it is easy
to identify the "13 personality types" caused by the cubic
cleavage of the brain.
.... And there is more – actual "neurological wiring" of these
13 lobes has been identified – mainly by the late and great
Jeffrey A Gray at the Institute of Psychiatry in London.
.... The first thing he discovered is that the "Septal Area"
located directly in the center of the "X" formed by the
Fornix – mediates the cross relationship between opposing
personalities!
.... He only identified one of the 13 personality differences
– but in a 1994 peer-reviewed paper I pointed out that the
fact that his "Septal Area" lies in the center of the Fornical
"X" indicates that the Septal Area mediates ALL–13
personality interactions – thus – the long lost
HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL
has been scientifically proven!
.... Well, would you believe that I received one of the
nastiest and irate letters ever written Science, from Jeffrey
Gray. God bless him – I really liked the guy, unfortunately
he died young, like you – in 2004, obviously from overwork.
.... So okay – the 13–cubic brain personalities are clearly
the "Olympian gods" of antiquity. And again, I point out that
since there are 7000 spoken languages – this means there
are 13×7000 = 91,000 different names for these 13–gods.
.
[JR] –
That's amazing, who knows about this besides you?
.
[GE] –
No one really! After all, it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE to publish
a paper entitled "The Scientific Proof of God" in any
reputable academic journal – they immediately presume
that the author must be a mental case or a crackpot!
.... About the only place that I can "publish it" is on the
Internet Discussion Groups such as sci.physics.relativity
where I have posted reports of most of it in recent years –
and on an academia.edu website located at: –
https://tinyurl.com/4jkdd34e
.
[JR] –
Yeah I can see the problem – no one would publish a
"Proof of God" written by an unknown nobody! You'd
have to get crucified at Calvary just to get anyone's
attention!
.... But back to the story – the explanation of the
13 Olympian gods (with 91,000 names) is pretty convincing –
and you're saying that the 13 x 13 matrix has 4 – higher
eigenvectors – what makes you so sure that those 4
eigenvectors are Mt,Mk,Lk,Jn?
.
[GH] –
Well it's pretty clear that Sperrian Lateralization causes
the political Right–Left while the blue-collar–white-collar
divide can be associated with the motor sensory divide in
the brain (blue-collar workers are more motor oriented
while white-collar workers are more sensory oriented) so
that just looking down at the top of the cubic brain – we can
see the biological origin of the "Bicameral Two-Party
System" – which is globally the number one most universal
form of Legislative Body.
.... It is from that fact, and since the 13 2nd orders have
already been identified as the "12 Olympian gods" – that I
identify the 4–3rd order eigenvectors as the Mt Mk Lk Jn of
the Christian Bible. Mt Mk Lk and Jn form the
bicameral/two-party system –Mt and Lk are lower and
upper house Republicans, while Mk and Jn are lower and
upper house Democrats!
.... And finally – if the 2nd order eigenvectors are the gods,
and the 3rd order eigenvectors are the 4 gospel saints –
so it seems reasonable to conclude that the top, final
eigenvector, the so-called GFP – is the God of the Bible !
The conclusion is inevitable – in fact, when it is recognized
that the GFP is caused by the human growth curve – and
that the Human Growth Curve is the "expansion factor" in
the following Space-Time Metric: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = (Hubble constant = da/dt = 5%/year)
.
It seems without a doubt, that we have actually discovered
that "God" finally has a purely SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of human subjective space-time.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
[JR] –
Whoa – wait a minute – where did that come from?
What is the metric of God? I've never seen that before?
.
[GH] –
.
[NOTE – unfinished manuscript – to be
continued at some future date]
.
PS – recent (2023) photo of George Hammond: –
Hyannis photo https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=24032271636371295&set=a.2412952588729845
.
George
.
On Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 11:25:07 AM UTC-4, George Hammond wrote:5656
On Sunday, October 8, 2023 at 10:00:10 AM UTC-4, George Hammond wrote:
On Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 12:20:36 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 10/3/23 8:05 PM, George Hammond wrote:
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN BE WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
This is just plain not true.
But it is true that a 2nd rank tensor PROJECTED ONTO A GIVEN SET OF COORDINATES can be written as a matrix. The matrix is, of course, coordinate dependent, unlike the tensor itself (which is inherently a geometric object independent of coordinates).
All this blather and nonsense has nothing whatsoever to do with hobbits
or God.
436435 –Tom Roberts433 –
433 –[George E Hammond MS Physics]
433 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[George Hammond MS physics] wrote –
ANY COMPETENT MATHEMATICIAN
knows that A 2ND RANK TENSOR CAN
BE WRITTEN AS A MATRIX
.
[Tom Roberts] wrote: –
"This is just plain not true."
.
[George Hammond MS Physics]: –
Hey Tom – don't be "picayune" –
I've sat through hundreds of hours of
Relativity in a PhD program at Northeastern
University – and I've seen multiple professors
write 2nd rank Relativity tensors as matrices
on the blackboard all day long! And Wikipedia
Relativity articles are full of them !
.
Here's a Physics Stack Exchange discussion
of the subject: – https://tinyurl.com/2h3es8s4
and they conclude, the same as me and every
other Relativist that: –
.
"Strictly speaking matrices and rank 2 tensors are
not quite the same thing, but there is a close
correspondence that works for most practical
purposes that physicists encounter"
.
And OBVIOUSLY my use of matrices is CLEARLY
one of those "PRACTICAL PURPOSES that
physicists encounter" !.
.
So much for that – my use of matrices is CORRECT
.
But while we're at it – you said in a recent post: –
.
[Tom Roberts] said –
"How stupid. Do you seriously think that the
structure of the universe is governed by the growth
of a human child???? That is the silliest thing I
have seen around here (!)."
Tom Roberts
.
[George Hammond] says –
Look – Alexander Friedmann was the genius
who told Einstein that he didn't have to worry about his
universe collapsing under gravity – because it was
actually EXPANDING and he told Einstein he could
use this metric to describe it: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (Astrophysics)
|o o o..-1.| = (Hubble constant = 7%/gigayear)
.
And after a lot of fuss Einstein agreed!
.
WHAT I'M SAYING TOM is simply this: –
.
There are 2 – universes: –
1 – the universe seen by the naked eye
2 – The Universe Measured by Astrophysics
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME !!!
.
The universe measured by Astrophysics is
identical for everyone
.
But the universe seen by the naked eye
varies from person to person depending on
there AGE
.
So the universe seen by "a human child",
to use your words, appears much
LARGER & FASTER than the world seen
by an adult !
.
And the HOBBIT METRIC, like the Friedman.
Metric DESCRIBES the universe "seen" by
a 12-year-old: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = (Hubble constant = 5%/year)
.
BECAUSE a=a(t) is a function of the child's
AGE – and only stops varying with time at
the age of adulthood – around 18 or 20.
.
The kid is not "altering the universe" by
simply looking at it – the HOBBIT METRIC
is not describing the real Astrophysical
universe – it is describing what the child
is SEEING !
.
I HOPE THAT CLEARS UP THE CONFUSION
.
MEANWHILE –
.
It turns out that the Hobbit Metric is actually a
scientific proof of God, because – people
never reach "full growth" (the world average
being around 85%) which means that nearly
20% of the world is actually INVISIBLE to the
average person – and this phenomenon has
long since been noticed – and is historically
referred to as the phenomenon of "God".
.
And I'm sure that's
"more than you wanted to know"
.
George
.
435 –[George E Hammond MS Physics]
435 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
A FICTITIOUS CONVERSATION
....................WITH
J.R. OPPENHEIMER'S GHOST
.
.....About: – The world's 1st
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
.
Cast of characters: –
.
JR – Julius Robert Oppenheimer
GE – George Edwin Hammond
.
[JR] –
Hi GE, they told me you've discovered
the world's first scientific proof of God!
.
[GE] –
Yes JR, I considered it to be a
"sweet little Physics problem"! They
say you once said that the A-Bomb was
a "sweet little Physics problem" !
.... By the way, are those Lucky Strikes
you're chain smoking?
.
[JR] –
Yes GE, and I see you're chain-smoking Camels !
.
[GE] –
Yes; I understand you're a devotee of the
Bhagavad-Gita? Do you think the Hindus
believe in God?
.
[JR] –
Yes, Krishna/Brahma is the Hindu name for God.
.
[GE] –
There are 7000 spoken languages in the world –
do you agree there must be 7000 different names
for God?
.
[JR] –
Obviously, no doubt about it !
.... But tell me something – you claim to have discovered
the world's first scientific proof of God – if so, and there is a "physically real God" – what exactly is "God" scientifically
speaking?
.
[GH]: –
.... Fair question – I'll tell you what God actually is –
God – is simply a "fully grown" human being!
.... WHO and UNESCO data have confirmed that the
world average adult is only about 85% fully grown –
and in the 3rd World growth stunting of 30 to 40%
is not uncommon, due to famine and disease!
.... The world has NEVER SEEN a 100% fully grown
human being – and such a person would be nothing
short of a walking, talking "God in the flesh"!
.
[JR] –
Well, that's a plausible theory, but how in the world
would you propose to actually "scientifically prove"
such a thing – that appears to be an impossibility !
.
[GE] –
Believe it or not JR – that fact has already been
proven by a library full of peer-reviewed academic
Psychometry data – and the people who actually
PROVED it – are not even AWARE that they have
done so !
.
[JR] –
Why are they unaware of it?
.
[GH] –
Because they are Psychologists and not Physicists!
They don't understand the scientific significance of
the immense data they have collected! Only a
PHYSICIST can tell him what it actually MEANS!
.
[JR] –
Well, okay, You're a Physicist, but what makes you
an expert in Psychometry!
.
[GE] –
I'm 81 years old – and I devoted 30 years to the
study of Psychometry – after taking an MS in Physics
and dropping out of a PhD physics program at
Northeastern University in Boston.!
.
[JR] –
No kidding! What on Earth made you decide to spend
30 years studying Psychometry ?
.
[GE] –
Well – I had a minor mental crackup when I was
around 40 – and quickly discovered that Psychologists
don't know any Physics – so I decided to become
an expert Psychologist besides being an MS in
Physics.
.
[JR] –
I can appreciate that – I had an ex-girlfriend who had
a mental crackup and committed suicide, but It think
Physicists are relatively immune to it because they are
so dedicated to physical reality and common sense!
.
[GE] –
Yes, Physicists are probably theoretically immune to
mental collapse – because after all, Physics is the
study of Reality!
.
[JR] –
Ditto that – but even so, I'll bet the highest echelons of
human health are probably the MOST resistant to mental
fallibility! Which is probably why THEY get elected to
public office! Notice that our political leaders are the most
healthy looking human specimens!
.
[GE] –
Yes, agreed!
.
[JR] –
Okay – what exactly is this "library sized" Psychometry
data that "scientifically proves" that God is simply a
"fully grown human being"?
.
[GE] –
2500 years ago Hippocrates the "Father of Medicine"
said he thought that humans had "4 Personalities"
and said he thought they were caused by 4–Humors
(4 fluids).
.... Turns out he was RIGHT about 4 personalities,
but he was wrong about the 4 fluids – turns out the 4
Personalities are caused by the "Cubic Cleavage"
of the brain – and I'm the one who DISCOVERED that
biological fact!
.
[JR] –
No kidding – how did you discover that?
.
[GE] –
Well, I began analyzing the 50 years Of Psychometry
data collected by a PhD Army of Psychometrists in
20 languages in 20 foreign countries – all of it being
Personality Questionnaire test results analyzed on
desktop computers.
.... What they would do is form a "correlation matrix"
of the test questions and then extract the Eigenvectors
of the correlation matrix. These were deemed to be the
"Personality Types" existing in the large pool of testees.
.... Turns out – that there is actually an "Eigenvector
Pyramid" in the data, consisting of: –
.
– ..about _30–1st Order eigenvectors
– exactly _13–2nd Order eigenvectors
– exactly __4–3rd Order eigenvectors
– exactly __1–4th Order eigenvector (dubbed the "GFP")
.
AND THEY HAD NO IDEA WHAT WAS
PHYSICALLY CAUSING ANY OF THEM !
.
[JR] –
No kidding – they had no theoretical explanation
of why there would be an "Eigenvector Pyramid"?
... And what does "GFP" stand for?
.
[GE] –
Yes – and they still have no idea today!
"GFP" stands for "General Factor of Personality, or
"General Factor of Psychology" if it includes IQ.
As far as I can see, reading hundreds of these papers,
is that the GFP loads highly on the Human Growth
Curve – the higher on the growth curve you are, the
higher you load on the GFP ! The really big healthy guys
like FDR, the king of England, or even Donald Trump
and Elon Musk, would load highly on the GFP.
.
[JR] –
What about you and me – do we load high on the GFP?
.
[GE] –
No, we are skinny, introverted, nervous, intellectuals –
we don't load high on the GFP – we load highly on IQ.
It's the highly popular, big and strong executive types
who load high on the GFP.
.
[JR] –
okay – let me guess – the next thing you going to tell me
is that the "GFP" is the God of the Bible – right?
.
[GE] –
You're a fast study JR – you guessed exactly right!!
.
[JR] –
Yeah, but that's just a guess – that's not scientific proof!
.
[GE] –
Yeah – but there's MORE: –
I'm the guy that figured out WHERE this
"Eigenvector Pyramid" biologically comes from !
.
[JR] –
Oh really? Do tell – where does this eigenvector pyramid
come from?
.
[GE] –
It comes from "CUBIC CLEAVAGE OF THE BRAIN" JR !
.
I discovered that the 4–3rd Order eigenvectors (above) are
actually Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, the 4 Personalities
of the King James Bible ! And, that those 4 personalities,
which Hippocrates hypothesized 500 years BEFORE the
New Testament was written – are CAUSED by the same
thing that causes all higher animals, including Humans, to
have 4–LEGS !
.... If I asked you "why do all higher animals have 4 legs?"
What would you say JR?
.
[JR] –
Well it's pretty obvious – animals have 4 legs for the same
reason a CHAIR has 4 legs – it has to be stable on a
two-dimensional plane – that means 2 legs on each
dimension, and 2×2 = 4. Hence higher animals have 4
legs!
.
[GE] –
You're absolutely correct. It comes from the 3-D Cartesian
Structure of space itself. And in fact, I discovered and
published in the peer-reviewed literature, that this fact also
causes the human brain to be orthogonally cleaved by
3–orthogonal (XYZ) axes – the Central, Medial and
Transverse brain cleavages – thus the human brain is:
CUBICALLY CLEAVED into 8 lobes, forming 8–Corners
of a BOX !
.... And get this JR – a CUBE has 13 rotational
SYMMETRY AXES, and they are, bipolar, opposed, brain
lobes on each end of the symmetry axes – and that causes 13–Personality Axes – or simply put "13–Personalities"
in Man ! And believe it or not, these 13 personalities were
first discovered (or guessed at) by the Greeks who called
them famously "12 Olympian gods". Turns out the Greeks
were off by one, there are actually 13 !
I have published the "Cubic Brain Cleavage" discovery in
the peer-reviewed literature in 1994: –
ELSESVIER https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0732118X94901058
.
[JR] –
Well I'll be goddamned – that's the most amazing thing I
ever heard! But how do you know that these "opposed
brain lobes" actually cause different personality dimensions
– that looks like a hard thing to prove?
.
[GE] –
it would be – except for the fact that there have been
amazing advances in brain science since you died in 1967.
For one thing Roger Sperry discovered the "Lateralization
of the Brain" – the fact that the right and left half of the
brain have opposed personalities – and this has now been
commonly recognized
is the cause of the "political Left and Right" – the
Republicans and the Democrats – this divide is across the
Medial cleavage of the brain.
.... On top of the, it has been known for a long time that the
Central cleavage of the brain divides the front "motor" half
of the brain from the back "sensory" half of the brain.
.... Thirdly – there is a "transverse" cleavage, similar to the
2 other cleavages which form the spinal vertebra of the ribs
etc – and which divides the Cortex from the Limbic system
in the brain. This divides "intellectual" personality types
from "emotional" personality types.
.... Obviously from these psychological divisions it is easy
to identify the "13 personality types" caused by the cubic
cleavage of the brain.
.... And there is more – actual "neurological wiring" of these
13 lobes has been identified – mainly by the late and great
Jeffrey A Gray at the Institute of Psychiatry in London.
.... The first thing he discovered is that the "Septal Area"
located directly in the center of the "X" formed by the
Fornix – mediates the cross relationship between opposing
personalities!
.... He only identified one of the 13 personality differences
– but in a 1994 peer-reviewed paper I pointed out that the
fact that his "Septal Area" lies in the center of the Fornical
"X" indicates that the Septal Area mediates ALL–13
personality interactions – thus – the long lost
HIPPOCRATIC STRUCTURAL MODEL
has been scientifically proven!
.... Well, would you believe that I received one of the
nastiest and irate letters ever written Science, from Jeffrey
Gray. God bless him – I really liked the guy, unfortunately
he died young, like you – in 2004, obviously from overwork.
.... So okay – the 13–cubic brain personalities are clearly
the "Olympian gods" of antiquity. And again, I point out that
since there are 7000 spoken languages – this means there
are 13×7000 = 91,000 different names for these 13–gods.
.
[JR] –
That's amazing, who knows about this besides you?
.
[GE] –
No one really! After all, it's virtually IMPOSSIBLE to publish
a paper entitled "The Scientific Proof of God" in any
reputable academic journal – they immediately presume
that the author must be a mental case or a crackpot!
.... About the only place that I can "publish it" is on the
Internet Discussion Groups such as sci.physics.relativity
where I have posted reports of most of it in recent years –
and on an academia.edu website located at: – https://tinyurl.com/4jkdd34e
.
[JR] –
Yeah I can see the problem – no one would publish a
"Proof of God" written by an unknown nobody! You'd
have to get crucified at Calvary just to get anyone's
attention!
.... But back to the story – the explanation of the
13 Olympian gods (with 91,000 names) is pretty convincing –
and you're saying that the 13 x 13 matrix has 4 – higher
eigenvectors – what makes you so sure that those 4
eigenvectors are Mt,Mk,Lk,Jn?
.
[GH] –
Well it's pretty clear that Sperrian Lateralization causes
the political Right–Left while the blue-collar–white-collar
divide can be associated with the motor sensory divide in
the brain (blue-collar workers are more motor oriented
while white-collar workers are more sensory oriented) so
that just looking down at the top of the cubic brain – we can
see the biological origin of the "Bicameral Two-Party
System" – which is globally the number one most universal
form of Legislative Body.
.... It is from that fact, and since the 13 2nd orders have
already been identified as the "12 Olympian gods" – that I
identify the 4–3rd order eigenvectors as the Mt Mk Lk Jn of
the Christian Bible. Mt Mk Lk and Jn form the
bicameral/two-party system –Mt and Lk are lower and
upper house Republicans, while Mk and Jn are lower and
upper house Democrats!
.... And finally – if the 2nd order eigenvectors are the gods,
and the 3rd order eigenvectors are the 4 gospel saints –
so it seems reasonable to conclude that the top, final
eigenvector, the so-called GFP – is the God of the Bible !
The conclusion is inevitable – in fact, when it is recognized
that the GFP is caused by the human growth curve – and
that the Human Growth Curve is the "expansion factor" in
the following Space-Time Metric: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = (Hubble constant = da/dt = 5%/year)
.
It seems without a doubt, that we have actually discovered
that "God" finally has a purely SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
God is a (large) Einsteinian curvature
of human subjective space-time.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
[JR] –
Whoa – wait a minute – where did that come from?
What is the metric of God? I've never seen that before?
.
[GH] –
.
[NOTE – unfinished manuscript – to be
continued at some future date]
.
PS – recent (2023) photo of George Hammond: –
Hyannis photo https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=24032271636371295&set=a.2412952588729845
.
George
.
436 –[George E Hammond MS Physics]
436 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JR] = The ghost of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
[GE] = George Edwin Hammond
.
[GE] –
Okay JR – we left off our discussion of the
Scientific Proof of God (SPOG) a few days ago
when I presented you with THIS METRIC: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = (Hubble constant = da/dt = 5%/year)
.
And you said: –
;
"[JR] – Whoa – wait a minute – where did that come from?
What is the "METRIC OF GOD"? I've never seen that before?"
.
[GE] –
Yes JR, you've never seen it before
BECAUSE I DISCOVERED IT – only
recently ! And I call it the HOBBIT METRIC !
.
Notice that the Hobbit Metric obviously cannot
describe REAL ASTROPHYSICAL space-time
because obviously – The Hobbit Metric does not
OBEY EINSTEIN's FIELD EQUATIONS of Gravity !
.
[JR\–
If it doesn't describe real Astrophysical space-time,
what kind of space-time does it DESCRIBE ?!!!
.
[GH] –
The Hobbit Metric – describes human "SUBJECTIVE"
space-time – IOW – it describes the space-time
you actually SEE when you wake up in the morning
and open your eyes !
... You see JR – there are actually 2–UNIVERSES: –
.
1 – the "objective" universe measured by Astrophysics.
2 – the "subjective" universe we see with the naked eye.
.
..................THEY ARE NOT IDENTICAL ! ! !
.
[JR] –
Why are they not identical?
.
[GE] –
BECAUSE the "objective" Astrophysical universe is
MEASURED by clocks and rulers – and is therefore
IDENTICAL to everyone.
.
BUT the "subjective" universe varies in SIZE & SPEED
from person to person depending upon their AGE –
a 5-year-old child for instance sees a much LARGER
& FASTER world than an adult!!
.
[JR] –
Okay – but how much larger & faster is the subjective
world of a 5-year-old compared to an adult? How do you
measure that !
.
[GH] –
The DIFFERENCE is well known measurement-wise –
because it follows the "Human Growth Curve" which is
well documented and measured by scientists. Human
growth can be approximated by a straight line for the
first 18 years of life – and because this growth is
approximately linear – the MAGNIFICATION of the
size and speed of the world can be quite accurately
representative as an "EXPANSION FACTOR" of
SUBJECTIVE space-time – similar to the famous
"expansion factor" that Friedmann proposed for the
expansion of the real Astrophysical universe!
... In the above Hobbit Metric the expansion factor
"a"=a(t) is about 5%/year – because human growth
under 20 is about 5%/year! And NOTICE that this is
a "CONTRACTION" of the size and speed of the world
seen by a growing person under 20.
.
[JR]
And you say this phenomenon EXPLAINS GOD ?
I mean – so the world contracts 5%/year in size and
speed – SO WHAT – what makes you think that
EXPLAINS GOD ?
.
[GE] –
GOOD QUESTION JR – and the ANSWER is this –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH ! ! ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
According to decades of WHO and UNESCO data
worldwide – the average world adult is only about
85% "fully grown" – that's the world average – and
BTW growth stunting of 30 to 40% is not uncommon
in the Third World due to famine and disease !
.
SO THIS MEANS – that the world which was being
slowly revealed to the growing child – STOPS being
REVEALED around age 18 – which means that 15%
of REALITY (or more in many cases) remains
INVISIBLE to the average world adult !
.
And get this JR – this remaining "invisible world" has
been NOTICED long ago – and the phenomenon has
historically been called "GOD" for over 5000 years !
.
[JR] –
You mean to tell me – that people who are 15 or 20%
higher on the growth curve – see 15 to 20% more of
REALITY – and people lower down on the growth curve?
.
[GE]
That's EXACTLY CORRECT JR – that's why you have to
lead a child by hand in heavy traffic – but here's where
the GOOD NEWS comes in !
.... I believe that a pair of "Virtual Reality Glasses" can
actually "cure the problem of God" !
.
[JR] –
Well V/R Glasses were invented 50 years after I died
in 1967 – so I don't know much about them. I have heard
however that this "Virtual Reality" is an EXTRAORDINARILY
realistic simulation of the real world – is that correct?
.
[GE] –
Yes – and it's obvious to me that we could simply program
the eyeglasse mounted cameras that are feeding the glasses
to DEMAGNIFY and SLOW DOWN the image by 15 or
20% and we would be able to SEE what the world looks like
to people who are 15 or 20% HIGHER on the growth curve
then we are – IN FACT – we could actually crank up the
glasses to "FULL DEMAGNIFICATION" and we would actually
SEE HEAVEN ITSELF !!!
.
[JR] –
And I suppose of course that you could likewise slow down
the incoming sound also, right !
.
[GE]
No problem! Of course you can't do anything about
"magnifying" the FEEL OF REALITY – I mean the glasses
won't reduce The Strength of Gravity by 15 or 20% !
.
[JR] –
Yeah, it won't be exactly a 100% duplication of
being "100% Fully Grown" – but I would imagine
it would be a pretty DRAMATIC effect once you realize
what it ACTUALLY IS that you are looking at!
.
[GE] –
Yes JR – I think the "Age of psychology and religion"
is about to hand over the reins to the
"Age of Scientific Religion" – fully universal and uniform
irregardless of race, gender, age, or anything else!
.
[JR] –
Bravo for that GE – the Jews have had a pretty tough
time for 5000 years trying to cope with the problem!
.
[GE] –
Yes – it's amazing how most people don't even realize
who the "Jews" actually are – that they are actually the
people who are –
.
"halfway between the white
and the brown race"
.
That they are actually the world's "race lawyers" and
have been for thousands of years. They get it from both
sides – blue eyed blonde Nazis on one side and brown
eyed dark haired Terrorists on the other side – both trying
to kill the Lawyers ! Even after writing the world's most
famous law book – called the King James Bible!
.
Anyway JR – I hope these "V/R God Glasses" are a
beginning of the final "scientific rationalization of
World Religion
.
[JR] –
Good luck !
.
George
.
On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 1:37:21 AM UTC-4, The Starmaker wrote:
George Hammond wrote:
On Sunday, October 1, 2023 at 9:43:38 PM UTC-4, Tom Roberts wrote:
On 10/1/23 2:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
Hubble's law is an example of an empirical law that shouldn't be trusted on its empirical merits.Absolutely.
The value of the Hubble constant has fluctuated wildly,Hmmm. In the current most-favored cosmological model, Lambda-CDM, the "Hubble constant" is not constant at all, and what is called "the Hubble
constant" is merely the value it happens to have today.
This is merely one more example of antiquated nomenclature being kept, even though it is now a wildly incorrect description.
Tom Roberts789 –
789 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
789 –[Cape Cod MA USA]
.
Dear (Dr). Tom Roberts –
.
While you are here – let me tell you something
that you may be only vaguely aware of – but has
now become a HARD SCIENTIFIC PROVEN FACT: –
The following metrics are ubiquitous inFor some reason that isn't clear to me...you keep forgetting that there
modern Relativity: –
.
| 1 o o o. |
| o 1 o o. | = EINSTEIN METRIC
| o o 1 o. | = (Special Relativity)
| o o o -1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = FRIEDMANN (FLRW) METRIC
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 7%/gigayear)
|o o o..-1.|
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (da/dt ~ 5%/year)
|ooo-1/a²| = (HOBBIT METRIC)
.
Okay – in the FLRW (da/dt) is known as the
HUBBLE CONSTANT
.
In the HOBBIT METRIC da/dt is known as the
"human growth rate "which is about 5%/year
for people under 20 years of age.
.
So what we see Is that Human Beings
experience TWO UNIVERSES: –
.
1 – the universe we see with the naked eye,
...... and is called the "subjective universe"
.
2 – the universe measured by Astrophysicists,
...... and is called the "objective universe"
.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING!
.
In particular the concept of "God" enters the
situation because the "apparent size and speed"
of the "subjective universe" varies from person
to person depending upon the AGE of the person!
.
While the size and speed of the objective universe
is determined by scientific measurement and does
NOT vary from person-to-person!
.
Now – while there is no God in the OBJECTIVE
universe – but there IS A GOD in the SUBJECTIVE
universe !.
.
The reason for this is because: –
.
NO ONE EVER REACHES FULL GROWTH
.
In fact the world average adult is only about
85% fully grown (WHO, UNESCO data)
... Bear in mind that in 3rd world countries
growth stunting of 30 to 40%is not uncommon
due to famine and disease !
.
Now, 1/.85=1.18 or approximately 1.2 which
means the average world adult is SEEING a
world which is nearly
20% LARGER & FASTER
THAN IT ACTUALLY IS
Note that this includes both you and me !
.
And this unnerving circumstance has been
long since noticed and historically called "God"
for more than 5,000 years!
.
NOW ALL OF THIS MAY SOUND INTERESTING
but it's obvious to me, having discovered all us,
that there is actually something we can DO about
this universally UNNERVING situation –
.
I have proposed here on SPR that we convince the
V/R (Virtual Reality) community to simply program
a pair of high quality VR glasses so that the output
.
1 – reduces the size of the image by 20%
2 – reduces the speed of the image by 20%
.
And thus REVEAL the phenomenon of God to
the naked eye – for the first time in the history
of the world!.
.
THE IDEA IS – that by wearing these glasses
say watching spectator sports over a period of
weeks or months – the subject will eventually
notice that he's beginning to see a smaller and
slower world – even when he is not wearing
the VR glasses !
.
And I might add – it doesn't take much imagination
to see the impact that this will have on world
human inspiration – attitude, hope, confidence,
personality, etc. etc. – including particularly its
effect on world mental health
.
George
.
is no God.
That which you believe is a God is simply something that evolve into
God.
137--666 –
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable, and challenge the unchallengeable.
666 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[STARMAKER] wrote: –
"you keep forgetting that
there is no God."
.
[Geo. Hammond] wrote: –
You keep forgetting that the
HOBBIT METRIC is actually the
Metric of God: –.
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = THE METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | = (aka Hobbit Metric)
|ooo-1/a²| = ("Hubble constant" = da/dt = 5%/year)
.
And a LIBRARY SIZED peer-reviewed academic
literature – proves that this metric is scientifically
CORRECT !!
.
THEREFORE it is the: –
.
WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD.
.
And I'm not going to argue with you because
YOU HAVE NO SCIENTIFIC CREDENTIALS
.
THEREFORE my intention is to: –
ACTUALLY PRODUCE A PAIR OF V/R: –
VIRTUAL REALITY "GOD GLASSES"
.
Which any VR laboratory could put together
and program with the Hobbit Metric in a
couple of days using existing VR glasses !.
.
These glasses will allow people to actually: –
SEE GOD with their own eyes !
And since "SEEING IS BELIEVING": –
.
Arguments from people like you,and
Richard Dawkins will come to an end !
.
Needless to say the first V/R company
to do so will make a fortune with practically
ZERO financial investment !
.
George
.
[... lots of nonsense omitted]
Don't tell me there isn't ONE SINGLE SCIENTIST
on SPR who could say ANYTHING INTELLIGENT
about this HISTORIC DISCOVERY !
On 10/27/23 3:59 PM, George Hammond wrote:138
[... lots of nonsense omitted]The only intelligent thing possible to say is that it is all complete
Don't tell me there isn't ONE SINGLE SCIENTIST
on SPR who could say ANYTHING INTELLIGENT
about this HISTORIC DISCOVERY !
and utter nonsense.
Tom Roberts
THIS IS NOT A JOKE
THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:3232
THIS IS NOT A JOKEActually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
.
UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
THIS IS NOT A JOKEActually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
.
UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.3232
3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
.
Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
7000 different spoken names for "God" –
– to which you replied: –
.
[Paul Alsing] replied: –
"George... do you just make t
his stuff up as you go along?
Only one god with 7000 names?
It sure looks like you do, to me!
.
[Geo. Hammond] –
And your reply leaves me wondering
whether "simple logic" is perhaps
beyond your comprehension?
.... I mean: –,
.
(7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
.
or is that mathematical calculation
beyond your comprehension?
.
George
On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 9:28:32 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:3335
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
THIS IS NOT A JOKEActually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
.
UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
You are assuming, George, without a shred of evidence, that there is only one god... and in science, evidence rules. Got any?There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.3232
3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
.
Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
7000 different spoken names for "God" –
– to which you replied: –
.
[Paul Alsing] replied: –
"George... do you just make t
his stuff up as you go along?
Only one god with 7000 names?
It sure looks like you do, to me!
.
[Geo. Hammond] –
And your reply leaves me wondering
whether "simple logic" is perhaps
beyond your comprehension?
.... I mean: –,
.
(7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
.
or is that mathematical calculation
beyond your comprehension?
.
George
On Saturday, October 28, 2023 at 9:28:32 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:3336
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 10:16:38 PM UTC-4, Paul Alsing wrote:
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 1:59:41 PM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
THIS IS NOT A JOKEActually, it is a joke, but it is definitely not funny..
THE WORLD'S FIRST SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD HAS BEEN DISCOVERED.
No scientific theory can ever be proven, they can only be supported by evidence in the form of observations and/or experiments. If you don't have these you've got nothing, nothing at all.
.
UNPUBLISHABLE ANYWHERE EXCEPT HERE.
You are assuming, George, without a shred of evidence, that there is only one god... and in science, evidence rules. Got any?There are plenty of places that will publish anything you write, if the price is right.3232
3232 –[Geo. Hammond]
3232 –[Cape Cod USA]
.
Uuh – Dear Paul Asing, I previously pointed out to you
that there are 7000 spoken languages in the world
and therefore by simple multiplication there must be
7000 different spoken names for "God" –
– to which you replied: –
.
[Paul Alsing] replied: –
"George... do you just make t
his stuff up as you go along?
Only one god with 7000 names?
It sure looks like you do, to me!
.
[Geo. Hammond] –
And your reply leaves me wondering
whether "simple logic" is perhaps
beyond your comprehension?
.... I mean: –,
.
(7000 languages) X (1 God) = (7000 names for God)
.
or is that mathematical calculation
beyond your comprehension?
.
George
~1/137
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
First discovered by the physicist and scientific
author George E Hammond in 2020.
.
Since Hammond is writing this post for
sci.physics.relativity (SPR) which is an
unmoderated undergraduate level Science
USENET discussion list. – (And the only place
where Hammond has managed to publish his
discovery – other than his website which is
located at:
.
https://tinyurl.com/4jkdd34e ).
.
He has decided to give the "God metric" a more
comprehensible and familiar name for the benefit
of lesser scientifically educated readers.
..
"HOBBITS" first appeared '37 in JRR Tolkien's
book The Hobbits but became known worldwide
in his '49 book "The Lord of the Rings" in which
Hobbits appear again. This book has sold 150
million copies – probably one of the largest
selling books since the Bible !!
.
THE REASON OF COURSE is because HOBBITS
are all about the real physical scientific effect of the
"Hammond God Metric" on the Human Race! – It
turns us all into "Hobbits" – in the opinion of Tolkien !
.
BUT WHAT I'M HERE TO TELL YOU ABOUT –
is that Tolkien's famous "Hobbit World" can now
be ACTUALLY SEEN by human beings !
And it turns out we are ALL HOBBITS !
.
I have proposed that it would be quite simple for the
V/R (Virtual Reality) community to simply program
in the "Hammond God Metric" (a.k.a. Hobbit Metric)
above into a current state-of-the-art pair of
VIRTUAL REALITY GLASSES and we will immediately
actually see "Hobbit World" !
.
I have described this in detail on SPR in a post entitled
"Einstein V/R "God glasses" a copy of which can be
seen here: –
.
https://www.academia.edu/105260075/Einstein_Virtual_Reality_God_Glasses_
.
Okay – "Hobbit World" actually exists, or Tolkien wouldn't
have sold 150 million copies of his book describing it !.
.
All I can say is that as soon as the V/R community programs
a pair of VR glasses with the "Hammond God Metric"
(a.k.a. The Hobbit Metric) the VR industry will promptly sell
1.5 BILLION pairs of VR "God Glasses" ! As many as
cell phones !
.
THIS METRIC reduces the SIZE and SPEED of the world
by 20% – and this is exactly the scientific description of
what "HOBBIT WORLD" actually is !
.
Not only are people smaller and slower they appear to
"float or bounce along" as they walk and move – because
gravity itself appears reduced by 20%.
.
Okay, all for now
.
George
.
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:26:13 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:999
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 1:08:34 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~What is a?
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
But there is. Assuming I did my calculations correctly,--~
Jan
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | ......(a.k.a. "HOBBIT METRIC)
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
[JanPB] asked: –
"What matter distribution does this describe?"
"What is a?"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
[George]
There IS NO "matter" in this space-time!
the energy density is nonzero unless a is constant
(in which case this is the flat Minkowski geometry).
Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2
(units of G = c = 1).
This spacetime is a "MASSLESS IMAGE"Can't be, see above.
(a PICTURE of the universe) which exists only in
the human mind (in the brain somewhere).
--
Jan
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 7:01:43 PM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:9991
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 8:26:13 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 1:08:34 AM UTC-4, JanPB wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15 AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~What is a?
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds² = a²(dx²+dy²+dz²) - dt²/a²
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
But there is. Assuming I did my calculations correctly,--~
Jan
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. | ......(a.k.a. "HOBBIT METRIC)
|ooo-1/a²|
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
[JanPB] asked: –
"What matter distribution does this describe?"
"What is a?"
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
[George]
There IS NO "matter" in this space-time!
the energy density is nonzero unless a is constant
(in which case this is the flat Minkowski geometry).
Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2
(units of G = c = 1).
This spacetime is a "MASSLESS IMAGE"Can't be, see above.
(a PICTURE of the universe) which exists only in
the human mind (in the brain somewhere).
--999
Jan
999 –[George Hammond MS physics]
999 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH]: –
Hi JanPB – on September 8, 2023 you posted the
following message: –
"Specifically, the 00-component of the energy-momentum is:
T_00 = (3/(8 pi)) (da/dt)^2"
.
[GH]: – to which I replied that "Tuv=0" because there is no
"mass, momentum, or energy" in "Subjective Space-Time"
.
[GH]: – Upon further investigation, it turns out that: –
"YOU may be RIGHT, and I may be WRONG" about this !
.
[GH]: – It has occurred to me lately, that the "Friedmann
Expansion" term a(t) may in fact cause "GRAVITY" to exist
in Subjective Spacetime even though the space-time
mass density = 0 – – – a fact which you apparently
realized in your equation cited above !
..... Apparently, the existence of the "Friedman Expansion"
term a=a(t), causes a "curvature" in subjective space-time,
and as Einstein tells us – "if a space-time is curved" it means
that there is GRAVITY in the space-time !! Certainly this is
the case in the famous FLRW where the Friedman expansion
term causes a gravitational effect !
.
[GH]: – THEREFORE I am tending to agree with you that
Tuv is NOT equal to zero in this case as I had assumed !
.
[GH]: – Now, Einstein's equation is: Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And as you know I have given guv in this case as: –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
,
Meanwhile a MAXIMA computer program calculates the Ricci
tensor Ruv for this metric to be: –
.
|3a.² o o o. |
|o 3a.² o o. | = Ruv = Ricci tensor for the Hobbit Metric
|o o 3a.² o. |
|o o o 3a.² |
.
--------------------------------------------------------
Where a.=da/dt,
and I have ignored terms involving a..=d²a/dt² . --------------------------------------------------------
.... And meanwhile likewise ignoring (a..) terms the
Scalar Curvature R for the Hobbit Metric is given by
MAXIMA (computer program) to be: –
.
R = 12 a.² (Scalar Curvature for the Hobbit Metric)
.
So now we are in a position to write the
Einstein field equations which are
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv – which becomes the
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (FOG): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = Field Equations of God (FOG)
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1-2/a²)|
.
Which tells us that not only the energy term (T44) of the
stress – energy tensor is nonzero – but the 3 diagonal
"pressure" terms are also nonzero !
.
NOW ONCE AGAIN: – we have to remind anyone
reading this, that there IS NO mass, energy, momentum,
pressure, etc. etc. in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" !
Because "subjective spacetime" is only our "mental image"
of "real" space-time, that we see when we wake up in the
morning and open our eyes. Subjective Space-Time is
only an "image" – a "mental picture" of actual physical
reality. Therefore there is only a "picture of mass" and a
"picture of momentum" and a "picture of pressure"
and it is this mere "picture" of reality that is actually
undergoing a "Friedmann expansion" (a=a(t)) which
gives us a "picture of curvature" and therefore a
"picture of gravity" – there is no actual real "gravity"
in the mental picture of reality that is in our head !
.
Okay – as I've said many times before "God is entirely
Psychological" – it is a property of the human brain
(incomplete brain growth) – but NOW HOWEVER we
see that the "FOG Equations" demonstrate that the
phenomenon of God can be traced directly to the
actual field equations of physical variables! So "God"
so called is not only a property of the human brain,
it is a property of the material physical universe –
which should not surprise us since the brain itself
is a material property of the universe.
.
Meanwhile, JanPB – if you see any mistakes in my
arithmetic above – please let me know – and you remain
the ONLY PERSON ON RECORD who has ever made
a correction to this theory, (Tuv does not = 0) !
.
George
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:999 2
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
Jan
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:9993
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some
Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:3?
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some
Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some
Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): –
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a
"crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
"Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God |o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a
"crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
"Well, he was a psychologist...""Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God |o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a
"crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
As was B.F. Skinner.
"Got you there."
No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:666
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
"Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could...""Well, he was a psychologist...""Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a
"crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
As was B.F. Skinner.
"Got you there."
No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'. Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:35:21 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
666"Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could...""Well, he was a psychologist...""Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a "crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
As was B.F. Skinner.
"Got you there."
No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'. Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
666 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA\
.
[GH] –
HEY RHUBARB – your last post is recognizably
incoherent – and I'm wondering: – are you
possibly psychotic or mentally retarded?
.
John Rawls has been dead for 20 years,
which means you're over 40, if you say you
knew him professionally?.
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:35:21 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric
with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
666"Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could...""Well, he was a psychologist...""Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics –
and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a "crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
As was B.F. Skinner.
"Got you there."
No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'. Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
666 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA\
.
[GH] –
HEY RHUBARB – your last post is recognizably
incoherent – and I'm wondering: – are you
possibly psychotic or mentally retarded?
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 9:47:23 AM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:555
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:35:21 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
"Uh, no. I was related to him. Aren't you related to Skinner?"666"Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could...""Well, he was a psychologist...""Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains
are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics – and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?"
.
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning –
as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by
clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric
causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a "crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
As was B.F. Skinner.
"Got you there."
No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'.
Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
666 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA\
.
[GH] –
HEY RHUBARB – your last post is recognizably
incoherent – and I'm wondering: – are you
possibly psychotic or mentally retarded?
.
John Rawls has been dead for 20 years,
which means you're over 40, if you say you
knew him professionally?.
"Why, yes."
"Like you're HIV-positive?"
"What?"
"Is one, or the other, of those statements not a factual reality? Or are both statements about you true?"
"Huh, wow..."
"I wouldn't want to libel you."
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 5:02:15 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 9:47:23 AM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 4:35:21 PM UTC-5, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 1:33:09 PM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Friday, November 24, 2023 at 8:33:44 AM UTC-8, Jeffrey Rubard wrote:
On Thursday, November 23, 2023 at 7:16:21 PM UTC-8, George Hammond wrote:
On Tuesday, November 21, 2023 at 3:22:15 PM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Monday, November 20, 2023 at 10:13:02 AM UTC-5, George Hammond wrote:
On Friday, September 8, 2023 at 5:16:23 AM UTC-4, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:48:26?PM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
JanPB <fil...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thursday, September 7, 2023 at 11:31:15?AM UTC-7, George Hammond wrote:
~
George E Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
.
Research Note: 9-7-23 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
THE HOBBIT METRIC (a?,a?,a?,-1/a?) zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
The "Hobbit metric" is also widely known
as the "Hammond God metric": –
.
ds? = a?(dx?+dy?+dz?) - dt?/a?
.
|a? o o o. |
|o a? o o. | = HAMMOND METRIC OF GOD
|o o a? o. |
|ooo-1/a?|
What matter distribution does this describe?
Empty space. It is no more than the Minkowsky metric with an inconvenient choice of units,
Yes, assuming "a" is constant.What else?
That's the question :-)If it isn't, it is up to god (or Hammond)
to produce an equation describing what it depends on,
555"Uh, no. I was related to him. Aren't you related to Skinner?"666"Well, excuse me, perhaps I knew that B.F. Skinner very well, and your ingrate self could...""Well, he was a psychologist...""Ooh, ahh, Hans Eysenck." #idontmeanit3?9993Jan999 2
999 2 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
999 2 –] Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[JanPB] wrote:-
"So it (God) is a part of the world of matter then (brains are made of physical matter)".
.
[GH] says –
Apparently more than simply just that, JanPB !
.
Apparently, "God" is formulated into the mathematical
laws of Physics, themselves !
.
.... So in that sense – "the God of the Bible" is not merely
a function of the brain – but it is actually described by the
universal mathematical laws of physics !
.... This gives some justification for the position of some Theologians who believe that there is an
"Astrophysical God of the Universe" !
.
..... A result that I certainly never thought
that I would ever Theoretically justify !
.
This conclusion is arrived at with the discovery of the: – .
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. | (3a.²) = k Tuv = (F.O.G.) Field Equations of God
|o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o (1+2/a²)|
.
Which is simply EINSTEIN's EQUATION: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
Which I have computed for the
HOBBIT METRIC (a²,a²,a²,-1/a²)
using the MAXIMA computer program
(see my previous 2 posts above)
.
Wait 'til Richard Dawkins hears about this !
.
George
.
9993 –[George Hammond MS Physics]
9993 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] – I have inserted The Hobbit Metric –
.
|a² o o o. |
|o a² o o. | = guv = HOBBIT METRIC OF GOD
|o o a² o. |
|ooo-1/a²|
.
into Einstein's field equations which are: –
.
Ruv-1/2 R guv = kTuv
.
And it yields this equation for the stress–Energy
tensor Tuv – which I call the "FOG EQUATION"
(Field Equation of God) –
.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
FIELD EQUATIONS of GOD (F.O.G.): – zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
.
|(1-2a²) o o o. |
|o (1-2a²) o o. |(3a.²)=kTuv=(F.O.G.)Field Equations of God |o o (1-2a²) o. |
|o o o(1+2/a²)|
..
AND THE QUESTION IS: –
– WHAT DOES THIS EQUATION MEAN ?
.
And at this point we must move from mathematics to physics – and ask ourselves "what is the physical explanation of this?" .
In the first place – we know there is –
NO energy,
NO momentum,
and NO mass
in "SUBJECTIVE SPACETIME" – because subjective space-time
is simply a "mental image", a "mental picture" of what
the naked eye sees when you open your eyes in the morning – as opposed to "objective" space-time which is measured by clocks and rulers – THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS !.
.
HOWEVER we have discovered that there is a
"Friedmann type of expansion factor a(t)=5%/yr in
Subjective Space-Time – simply because people
under 20 grow 5% per year – and this a(t) in the metric causes a "CURVATURE" in subjective space-time,
– and Einstein says that a space-time that has
"curvature" Has Gravity ! Although, we can't be sure
that "subjective space-time" reacts to a "Friedmann
expansion factor" (Hubble constant) in the same way
that "objective space-time" does ??
.
Therefore I have put the Hobbit Metric into Einstein's
Field Equations to calculate Tuv which should
describe the source of this "subjective gravity".
.
Now no one knows, including me, if this procedure
is theoretically VALID ?
.
IF ANY PHYSICIST OUT THERE HAS ANY IDEAS
I CERTAINLY WOULD BE INTERESTED !
.
George
.
3? – [George Hammond MS Physics]
3? – [Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
Dear Jeffrey Rubard
(alt.philosophy.debate)
.
https://tinyurl.com/54tbmw63.
.
Here's a picture of me with Prof. Hans Eysenck
at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology
in 1996 in Montréal Canada.
.
We were both Invited Speakers and spoke to the
same audience, from the same podium, for
half an hour!
.
We were both invited by the late Prof. Peter Miranda
chairman of the psychology department at URI, who
was chairman of the symposium.
.
Do you really think that I would be an invited co–speaker
with the world's most famous living psychologist if I was a "crackpot" as you have alleged ?
.
George
.
As was B.F. Skinner.
"Got you there."
No, you "Freedom Republican" types are going to have to stop your Baader-Meinhof impersonation, 'behaviorism' or not.
Hold up, Queenie. I could sure imagine that, and be 'less than impressed'.
Furthermore, maybe I personally knew the philosopher John Rawls *quite well* personally, and could say...
nothing exactly intelligent based on this? Like you say nothing exactly intelligent?
Dangerous d-mbfuck, that's what you've been all these long years.
666 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
666 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA\
.
[GH] –
HEY RHUBARB – your last post is recognizably
incoherent – and I'm wondering: – are you
possibly psychotic or mentally retarded?
.
John Rawls has been dead for 20 years,
which means you're over 40, if you say you
knew him professionally?.
"Why, yes."
"Like you're HIV-positive?"
"What?"
"Is one, or the other, of those statements not a factual reality? Or are both statements about you true?"
"Huh, wow..."
"I wouldn't want to libel you."
555 –[Geo. Hammond MS Physics]
555 –[Cape Cod Massachusetts USA]
.
[GH] –
.... You're psycho/echolalia – Screw – get off this
thread, you're ignorant of mathematical physics !
.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 493 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 153:34:44 |
| Calls: | 9,700 |
| Calls today: | 10 |
| Files: | 13,732 |
| Messages: | 6,179,215 |
| Posted today: | 1 |