Mikko <
mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
On 2023-09-30 18:22:57 +0000, The Starmaker said:
Mikko wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 12:45:17â?¯PM UTC-7, George Hammond:
I presume you are talking about the 1,00+
ONLINE GAMBLING spams that just landed
on SPR
While that continues, sci.physics.research could be a useful
alternative.
Mikko
sci.physics.research SUCKS. They moderate your words. They decide
whether your postings
should be allowed or removed.
Of course, that is what it is a moderated group for.
Your words will not be edited though.
At worst you may draw moderator comments
that explain your misunderstandings.
In sci.physics.research there are discussions about the topics
of sci.physics.relativity and not much about anything else
so it might be worth of trying. The group is moderated but
apparetly quite liberally.
IMHO sci.physics.research has been going downhill
for the last couple of years.
Most of it is by now (semi)crackpot
with only a few rebuttals by people who know beter.
That 'liberal' moderation seems to be a matter of need.
They must accept what is mostly elementary misunderstandings
in order to have any flow at all.
Of course they will still reject almost all of the junk
that is routinely posted here.
There is very little room for overlap.
I see no future for sci.physics.research,
going the way it is going,
Jan
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)