https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Which is completely irrelevant.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
Wozzie inadvertently misspelled "similarly"
to include the word "liar" within it. He
knows that he is that.
What an ignoramus is Wozzie! He somehow
deludes himself into believing that the
fast observer's measurements mean anything
at all to what is measured on earth, as if
the observer could change anything there.
“There are basically two groups of people.
People who accomplish things, and people who
claim to have accomplished things. The first
group is less crowded.” – Mark Twain
Wozzie is in the second group, which includes
many delusional fools like himself.
Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.
Thank you for not posting any more of your
delusional nonsense.
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 04:01, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Which is completely irrelevant.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
You didn't refer to that, what obviously
implies you admit. Right, poor halfbrain?
Wozzie inadvertently misspelled "similarly"
to include the word "liar" within it. He
knows that he is that.
What an ignoramus is Wozzie! He somehow
deludes himself into believing that the
fast observer's measurements mean anything
at all to what is measured on earth, as if
the observer could change anything there.
“There are basically two groups of people.
People who accomplish things, and people who
claim to have accomplished things. The first
group is less crowded.” – Mark Twain
Wozzie is in the second group, which includes
many delusional fools like himself.
See, trash - I've proven the moronic mumble
of your idiot guru to be not even consistent
and you can do nothing about it spsrt of
barking, insulting and slandering. But you
will do what you can for the glory of your
moronic church - that's what it's training
its doggies for, after all.
Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.
Thank you for not posting any more of your
delusional nonsense.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 04:01, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
Which is completely irrelevant.
Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.
You didn't refer to that, what obviously
implies you admit. Right, poor halfbrain?
But I did, so Wozzie lies again.
Maciej Wozniak lied:
[lies, slander and babbling deleted]
What an ignoramus is Wozzie! He somehow
deludes himself into believing that the
fast observer's measurements mean anything
at all to what is measured on earth, as if
the observer could change anything there.
And that's the proof that Wozzie's ignorant
babblings are refuted.
“There are basically two groups of people.
People who accomplish things, and people who
claim to have accomplished things. The first
group is less crowded.” – Mark Twain
Wozzie is in the second group, which includes
many delusional fools like himself.
Out of one side of his lying face he claims
that t' = t "proves" that relativity is wrong
and then out of the other side claims that
t' <> t "proves" that relativity is wrong.
All this proves is that Wozzie-fool is stupid
and he's a congenital liar.
“How much better would life be if a liar’s pants really did catch fire? -- Rebel Circus
"But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers,
and
whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have
their
part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the
second
death." -- Revelations 21:8
So it appears that they will, eventually.
[lies, slander and babbling deleted]
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 15:19, gharnagel pisze:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
Maciej Wozniak barked, lied, insulted and slandered:
W dniu 25.06.2024 o 15:19, gharnagel pisze:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
What an ignoramus is Wozzie! He somehow
deludes himself into believing that the
fast observer's measurements mean anything
at all to what is measured on earth, as if
the observer could change anything there.
And that's the proof that Wozzie's ignorant
babblings are refuted.
See, Trash-talker, the c/2 observer measures
the time dilated on earth: t' <> t and earth
observer measures the c/2 observer's time
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 01:38, gharnagel pisze:
Maciej Wozniak barked, lied, insulted and slandered:
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
What an ignoramus is Wozzie! He somehow
deludes himself into believing that the
fast observer's measurements mean anything
at all to what is measured on earth, as if
the observer could change anything there.
And that's the proof that Wozzie's ignorant
babblings are refuted.
See, Trash-talker, the c/2 observer measures
the time dilated on earth: t' <> t and earth
observer measures the c/2 observer's time
Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself, poor fanatic trash.
So, either your idiot guru has "refuted" basic
arithmetic (samely as he "refuted" basic geometry
later)
or he had 2 inconsistent predictions in his
moronic physics. Which one, Harrie?
Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself, poor fanatic trash.
No one is doing that. That was the definition
of the second in that long-ago day.
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 14:36, gharnagel pisze:
Wozzie-fool babbled:
Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself, poor fanatic trash.
No one is doing that. That was the definition
of the second in that long-ago day.
When your idiot guru lived and mumbled -
was "that long-ago day", actually, and
so his moronic mumble was inconsistent.
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
W dniu 26.06.2024 o 14:36, gharnagel pisze:
Wozzie-fool babbled:
Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself, poor fanatic trash.
No one is doing that. That was the definition
of the second in that long-ago day.
When your idiot guru lived and mumbled -
was "that long-ago day", actually, and
so his moronic mumble was inconsistent.
Wozzie is babbling complete nonsense. So he believes
that anyone compares X to X?
Python, call a nurse NOW!
Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself, poor fanatic trash.
Wozzie is babbling complete nonsense. So he believes
that anyone compares X to X?
No, I don't believe that anyone compares
X to X, I don't know what you're mumbling
about.
[Mumbling moronic demented Wozzie-blurb deleted
because of repetitious dishonest babbling]
Maciej Wozniak wrote:
Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself, poor fanatic trash.
Wozzie is babbling complete nonsense. So he believes
that anyone compares X to X?
No, I don't believe that anyone compares
X to X, I don't know what you're mumbling
about.
But that's exactly what this escapee from an asylum
for the mentally-disturbed claimed:
"Measuring a period of time is - comparing
it to the declared unit. In the physics
of your idiot guru - the declared unit was
1/86 400 of a solar day. Measuring a solar
day was - comparing it to 1/86 400 of
itself,"
And, as anyone can see - I said something
completely different than you insist
on.
See, trash - I've proven the
moronic mumble of your idiot guru to be
not even consistent and you can do nothing
about it apart of barking, insulting and
slandering. But you will do what you can
for the glory of your moronic church - that's
what it's training its doggies for, after all.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 485 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 130:46:45 |
| Calls: | 9,655 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,705 |
| Messages: | 6,166,483 |