On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 20:52:20 +0000, rhertz wrote:

This is a comparison of einstenian and newtonian kinematics. In the
moving frame, the distance (0, x') is measured from an observer at the
origin of the frame at rest.

CASE: Light moving from 0 to x' in the moving frame.

---------------------------------------------------------------------- Einstein SR. Light behave as wave, and c is the maximun speed.

c (t₁ - t₀) = c Δt₁₀ = v Δt₁₀ + x' ; PERCEIVED by observer at rest (no
speed addition).
(c - v) Δt₁₀ = x' ; Δt₁₀ = x'/(c - v) ; Mathematical time dilation
(by calculation).
c Δτ₁₀ = c (τ₁ - τ₀) = x' ; Δτ₁₀ = x'/c ; MEASURED by observer in the
moving frame

Δt₁₀ and Δτ₁₀ are different and depend on the observer location.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Newton. Light behave as corpuscles (photons?). It's allowed c + v

(c + v) Δt₁₀ = v Δt₁₀ + x' ; PERCEIVED by observer at rest (addition of
velocities)
(c + v) Δt₁₀ - v Δt₁₀ = x' ; Δt₁₀ = x'/c ; No time dilation (by
calculation).
c Δτ₁₀ = x' ; Δτ₁₀ = x'/c ; MEASURED by observer in the moving frame

Δt₁₀ and Δτ₁₀ are equal for observers at rest or moving at v speed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

In astronomy (Cassini, others), there are evidences that radar-ranging experiments with Venus and Mars, the speed of light is added to the
speed v (between Earth and these planets). Known since 1965.

That c+v is possible destroys relativity and cosmology, as Hubble's
results have to be RE-INTERPRETED.

It's hard for relativists to accept this, as 110 years of lies with einstenian physics COLLAPSE completely.

A very thin vertical dipole with a ground plane behind it has a gain of
12 db while as per math it should have 9db maximum.

That is possible when aether is present such that a certain cross
section provides the gain as is found from the aperture of a horn
antenna.

This proof of aether gets rid of quantum theory thus making light fully
wave motion with aether as medium.

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Mr. Hertz:

"That c+v is possible destroys relativity and cosmology, as Hubble's
results have to be RE-INTERPRETED."

Light cannot behave as a particle in a medium such as the atmosphere
because its speed is constrained to that of the medium like sound. It
cannot act like a wave in a vacuum without a medium. Somehow, it must do
both. That Sirius and the Sun are moving at 5.5 km/sec towards each
other can only be known this way. When the light in space encounters interstellar gas, it is slowed to the speed of light in gas, forming compression waves saving the information of the relative motion of 5.5
km/sec.

Einstein's train and lightning experiment claiming the bolt ahead is
seen simultaneously as the one behind is an irrational denial of
relative motion. He presumes time dilation to conclude it in a
surreptitious petitio principii.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Mr. Hertz:

"That c+v is possible destroys relativity and cosmology, as Hubble's
results have to be RE-INTERPRETED."

Light cannot behave as a particle in a medium such as the atmosphere
because its speed is constrained to that of the medium like sound. It
cannot act like a wave in a vacuum without a medium. Somehow, it must do both. That Sirius and the Sun are moving at 5.5 km/sec towards each
other can only be known this way. When the light in space encounters interstellar gas, it is slowed to the speed of light in gas, forming compression waves saving the information of the relative motion of 5.5 km/sec.

Einstein's train and lightning experiment claiming the bolt ahead is
seen simultaneously as the one behind is an irrational denial of
relative motion. He presumes time dilation to conclude it in a
surreptitious petitio principii.

Light is a particle.


par-ti-cle


Light doesn't wave.

There are no light waves, only particles.

Where do yous people get the idea that light is acts, or behaves. or pretends...that's it's a wave?



--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Richard Hachel: Re: "The two lightnings will be simultaneous for the
station master, but ALSO for the traveler." Sound is constrained to one
speed in the atmosphere. The person walking towards the ambulance will
hear the siren at S + 3 mph. You are denying that. You are making an
irrational denial of relative motion, as shown by the analogy to sound.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Starmaker: Thank you. That's a very base and stalwart stance to take!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Mr. Hertz: Everyone must be compelled to accept that light has a
wave-particle duality, so it is impossible to understand it as one or
the other. The speed of light in a vacuum would have to be added to the emitter, just as a particle would. It must form compression waves in a
medium because it is constrained to the speed of the medium, such as air
or intergalactic gas. As with sound, the speed of light must be combined
with that of the observer as long as we are rational.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

R.H.: Re: "What is a "photon" really?

It is an instantaneous transaction of a quantum of energy between an
atomic source and an atomic receiver IN the receiver's frame of
reference."

I like the above description because the photon must have waves within
itself.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)