• Re: The HOAX of E=mc?. Documented history since 1898.

    From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to rhertz on Sat Oct 26 10:19:53 2024
    rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

    That there was a relationship between energy and mass was suspected
    since the last years of XIX century.

    By 1899, Poincaré derived such a relationship by using a thought
    experiment with a "light cannon" and its recoil, once it shot a pulse of light. By equating the energy of the light pulse and the recoil of such
    a cannon, it lead him to attribute to electromagnetic radiation a mass
    equal to E/c? where E is the total energy of the radiation.

    https://www.bjp-bg.com/papers/bjp2019_2_081-093.pdf

    But Thomson, Lorentz, Heaviside and many others were closing the
    approach to this concept by using measurements of the recently
    discovered electron.

    This was known by 1900 (values in c.g.s. system):

    1. (Lorentz and others): Energy of an electron at rest E = e?/R

    2. Charge e (Planck 1900): e = 4.69E-10 esu (g^1/2 cm^3/2 s^-1)

    3. Ratio e/m (Thomson 1900): e/m = 6.32766E+17 esu/g

    OR m/e = 1.58036E-18 g/esu

    4. Mass of electron (1900): m = (m/e) e = 7.4119E-28 g

    5. Radius of an electron (1907, Rutherford, others): R = 1.11E-14 cm

    6. Energy stored in an electron (1907): E = 1.976E-05 erg or g.cm?/s?

    [snip nonsense about relativity based on your misconceptions]

    Your complete cluelessness wrt physics and the history of it
    is coming through again.
    In 1900, Lorentz, Thomson, and friends didn't have an idea
    of what the electron mass or charge might be.
    All they had, from Thomson's measurements of 1897,
    was the e/m ratio.
    The electron mass was completey unknown until Millikan, (in 1909)
    measured the electron charge.
    The smallness of the electron mass came as a complete surprise.

    Lorentz' 'electrons' like in his 'Theory of electrons'
    have nothing to do with actual electrons.
    That's why Lorentz and Einstein couldn't and didn't discuss
    the electron mass at all.
    They were not predicting the mass,
    they were predicting (correctly of course)
    how the mass should vary with velocity,
    (in the terms of 1900)

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to rhertz on Wed Nov 13 23:26:34 2024
    rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

    That there was a relationship between energy and mass was suspected
    since the last years of XIX century.

    By 1899, Poincaré derived such a relationship by using a thought
    experiment with a "light cannon" and its recoil, once it shot a pulse of light. By equating the energy of the light pulse and the recoil of such
    a cannon, it lead him to attribute to electromagnetic radiation a mass
    equal to E/c? where E is the total energy of the radiation.

    https://www.bjp-bg.com/papers/bjp2019_2_081-093.pdf

    There you go again, clueless as usual.
    Maxwell himself already predicted radiation pressure,
    and he knew that EM fields must have energy.
    Again, 'everyone' knew that in the late 19th century.
    It was used extensively to extend thermodynamics
    to include EM fields.
    Maxwell was hardly original in this.
    Kepler already postullated radiation pressure,
    from the observation of comet tails being blown away from the sun,
    but he could not quantify it.
    Lebedev confirmed Maxwell's prediction quantitatively in 1900.
    Poincare's thought experiment is merely a demonstration,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Ross Finlayson on Thu Nov 14 11:51:42 2024
    Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 11/13/2024 02:26 PM, J. J. Lodder wrote:
    rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote:

    That there was a relationship between energy and mass was suspected
    since the last years of XIX century.

    By 1899, Poincaré derived such a relationship by using a thought
    experiment with a "light cannon" and its recoil, once it shot a pulse of >> light. By equating the energy of the light pulse and the recoil of such
    a cannon, it lead him to attribute to electromagnetic radiation a mass
    equal to E/c? where E is the total energy of the radiation.

    https://www.bjp-bg.com/papers/bjp2019_2_081-093.pdf

    There you go again, clueless as usual.
    Maxwell himself already predicted radiation pressure,
    and he knew that EM fields must have energy.
    Again, 'everyone' knew that in the late 19th century.
    It was used extensively to extend thermodynamics
    to include EM fields.
    Maxwell was hardly original in this.
    Kepler already postullated radiation pressure,
    from the observation of comet tails being blown away from the sun,
    but he could not quantify it.
    Lebedev confirmed Maxwell's prediction quantitatively in 1900.
    Poincare's thought experiment is merely a demonstration,

    Jan


    Yeah, according to SR, the latest in the line of "solar sail"
    experiments should be doing perfectly fine.

    ??? Why latest? Radiation pressure (and radiation recoil)
    is routinely observed and accounted for
    in the observation and calculation of satellite orbits.
    It may cost real money, in fuel for station keeping,
    so it must be real,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)