On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among
us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise
known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has
ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group
such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.

predict something that differs from the standard model, confirm it with experimentation.

--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 01.11.2024 o 08:06, Athel Cornish-Bowden pisze:

On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among
us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise
known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group such a
magnet for nutters?

Simple: that's because the teachings of
your bunch of idiots violate common sense,
basic math and some basic definitions
applied by sane people and very important
for them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum
fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius
rebel among us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is
not hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not
only LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee
(otherwise known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician
humanity has ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots.
Why is this group such a magnet for nutters? Not even
talk.origins has so many.

might be that.... personality disorder? what is it called?
grandiosity and stuff.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among
us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise
known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has
ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group
such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.

Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining
about a lack of nutters.

This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here,
who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters
had a more or less coherent alternative theory.
(Intelligent Design)

With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery collapsed.
(as you well know)
The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability.
They don't have an alternative to teach.
So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse.

Jan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 04.11.2024 o 10:21, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among
us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only
LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise
known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has
ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group
such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.

Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining
about a lack of nutters.

This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here,
who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters
had a more or less coherent alternative theory.
(Intelligent Design)

With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery collapsed.
(as you well know)
The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability.
They don't have an alternative to teach.
So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse.

It would be sure much better and easier
for relativistic doggies to fight me if I
had some idiocies comparable to theirs.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 04.11.2024 o 10:21, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum
fallacy.

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius
rebel among
us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not
hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not
only
LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee
(otherwise
known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician
humanity has
ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this
group
such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.

Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining
about a lack of nutters.

This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here,
who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters
had a more or less coherent alternative theory.
(Intelligent Design)

With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery
collapsed.
(as you well know)
The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability.
They don't have an alternative to teach.
So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse.

It would be sure much better and easier
for relativistic doggies to fight me if I
had some  idiocies comparable to theirs.

what is it about relativity that you disagree? speed of light
constant in all reference frames?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 04.11.2024 o 17:17, kazu pisze:

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

W dniu 04.11.2024 o 10:21, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:

On 2024-10-31 18:54:56 +0000, kazu said:

LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

Dawn Flood: "solitary cranks" is only a case of ad populum fallacy. >>>>>

as much as i would like to believe there is a super genius rebel among >>>>> us who is decades ahead of his peers, good will is not hunting here.

There are several self-proclaimed super geniuses among us: not only
LaurenceClarkCrossen, but also "Dr" Hachel, Arindam Banerjee (otherwise >>>> known as bertietaylor), Wozniak (the greatest logician humanity has
ever known), rhertz, the Starmaker. All crackpots. Why is this group
such a magnet for nutters? Not even talk.origins has so many.

Indeed, the regulars in t.o. are even complaining
about a lack of nutters.

This is understandable. Unlike the nutters here,
who are merely against it all, the t.o. nutters
had a more or less coherent alternative theory.
(Intelligent Design)

With the collapse of intelligent design much of the nuttery collapsed.
(as you well know)
The nutterdom here has no such claim at respectability.
They don't have an alternative to teach.
So, beig pure nuttery, it is less prone to collapse.

It would be sure much better and easier
for relativistic doggies to fight me if I
had some  idiocies comparable to theirs.

what is it about relativity that you disagree? speed of light constant
in all reference frames?

That wouldn't be disagreeing; even your insane guru
was unable to stick to such an absurd for a long time
and his GR has withdrawn from it.

And what I disagree? First - pretending that
desynchronized clocks are somehow better than
synchronized ones, because of some moronic symmetry;
second - rejecting basic [Euclidean] math.
Third - last but not least - your mad, fanatic
arrogance.







--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)