1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. SCI.PHYSICS.RELATIVITY

  • =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEUgPSAzLzQgbWPCsiBvciBFID0gbWPCsj8gVGhlIGZvcmdvdHRl?= =?

    From Paul.B.Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 1 12:38:44 2024
    Den 01.12.2024 01:28, skrev rhertz:

    Now, E = 3/4 mc² or E = mc²?  Which one would the physics community
    adopt?

    Hmmm....

    You know the answer.

    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul.B.Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 3 14:15:01 2024
    On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 18:22:50 +0000, rhertz wrote:


    BREAKING NEWS: E = mc² HAS BEEN PROVEN FALSE. TOTAL COLLAPSE OF THE
    SCIENTIFIC ESTABLISMENT!


    What would follow to this news, even if actually E = 0.99 mc²?

    If you believe that E = const mc²
    where const is any number, and the constant c is the speed
    of light in the inertial frame where m is stationary,
    then you believe that the speed of light is invariant.

    Is this what you believe?


    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)