George Hammond wrote:

On 11/30/2024 8:23 PM, George Hammond wrote:

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Research Note:
November 29, 2024
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

HOW CAN LIFE AFTER DEATH BE YEARS IF OUR BRAIN
IS VAPORIZED IN MICRO-SECS BY LIGHTNING, TNT, OR
ANÂ ATOMIC-BOMB ?

WELL, IT CAN STUPID-- IT'S CALLED RELATIVITY

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

George E. Hammond MS Physics
Hyannis Cape Cod MA USA
ghammond928@gmail.com

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Let me try and simplify my previous message.

The question at hand is this –

1. – WITHOUT GETTING "ESOTERIC" – we must
presume that IF there is life after death (LAD)
– then it MOST LIKELY occurs in the human brain.

2. – The problem is – some forms of death such
as Lightning, TNT, or an A-bomb explosion are so
fast (microseconds) that it is hard to see how the
brain could produce a 5 or 10 year Afterlife if the
brain can be vaporized in a split second?

3. – HOWEVER it turns out that the brain contains
"a 2nd nervous system" – namely, the water filled
MICROTUBULES that run along inside the neurons.

4. – And this microtubule system is 10 trillion times
FASTER than the neuronal firing system. You can see
an actual picture of this "microtubule system" here: –

https://www.academia.edu/44527322/ A_Simple_Car_Airbag_Model_of_Life_After_Death

There are 3 pictures of MICROTUBULES on this page !

5. – OKAY – SO THE POINT IS THIS –
if the neuronal system produces a dream
and it is the neuronal system which watches the
dream then the dream will be seen in real time!

The same is true of the microtubule system –

If the microtubule system produces a dream
and it is the microtubule system which watches the
dream than the dream will be seen in real time

OKAY, this is true even though the microtubule
system runs at 10^15 Hertz (UV light) while the
neuronal system only runs at around 1000 Hertz
(polarized nerve pulses) a 10 trillion to 1 speed
difference !

SO if the brain has a dream in EITHER system, it
will have the same "PROPER TIME" in BOTH
system – despite the fact that the microtubule
system runs 10 trillion times FASTER than the
neuronal system !

So the BOTTOM LINE is that the microtubule
system is so fast (UV light) that it can beat
(speed wise) ANY form of death – hence, it is
absolutely FAILSAFE !

NOW I SAY THIS IS A FORM OF RELATIVITY, even
though it doesn't even mention the word "GRAVITY".

I suspect however, that ultimately the cause of it
will be traced back to "quantum gravity at the
molecular level" – HOWEVER, in the meantime it
is clearly obvious that the phenomenon is
ACTUALLY SCIENTIFICALLY POSSIBLE and even
appears to be amazingly quite PLAUSIBLE--!

George Hammond, MS physics, Hyannis 12/1/24

.

The AFTERLIFE occurs in...The Eighth Dimension.







--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2024-12-13 02:38:40 +0000, George Hammond said:

On 12/10/2024 12:17 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

You should start a new religion. Yawn.

.
[Get real, "Mister Fractal"- - - -
.
I've discovered the first "scientifically acceptable" mechanism

"scientifically acceptable"? Which reputable scientific journal has
accepted it? Science? Nature? the Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the USA? Can you give a reference? If you can't manage a reference to a journal, can you name some established scientists who
have written to you congratulating you on your discovery?

of "Life after Death" - - - - and have even discovered WHY it

exists !

.
We don't need a NEW religion, I've proven that the one
we've got is SCIENTIFICALLY ACCURATE !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis 12/12/24

You know something, George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis, real scientists
don't parade their credentials at every opportunity. They let their
results and ideas speak for themselves.


--
Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 37 years; mainly
in England until 1987.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2024-12-13 17:34:44 +0000, George Hammond said:

On 12/13/2024 3:28 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

can you name some established scientists who have written to you
congratulating you on your discovery?

[George Hammond] MS Physics

Yes, here's a picture of me with HANS EYSENCK the "World's
most famous living Psychologist" at the time,

Big deal. I can show you a photo of me with a grandchild of Marie Curie
(Hélène Langevin-Joliot). Big deal. That tells you nothing about her
opinion of my science, or mine of hers.

Anyway, you chose a bad example. Maybe there was a time when Hans
Eysenck was the "World's most famous living Psychologist", but his
reputation has take a huge dive since he died, and he's probably
regarded by most experimental psychologists today as second only to
Cyril Burt as a fraudulent manipulator of his incompetently executed experiments, with "fourteen retractions and seventy-one expressions of
concern on papers from as far back as 1946". Not only that, but he
promoted racist views of a correlation between race and intelligence.
In addition, he believed in parapsychology and astrology -- possibly a
reason for his favourable impresson of your presentation in Montreal.

Moreover, he had no training in physics that I could discover, and was
thus no more a physicist than I am -- probably less, as I had several
years of physics education.

who invited me to
address the same audience from the same podium as him for
half an hour at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology in
Montreal in 1996 !
SEE PHOTO OF ME WITH HANS EYSENCK HERE:--
. https://www.academia.edu/10591150/How_George_Hammond_discovered_the_worlds_first_Scientific_Proof_of_God

.

You know something, George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis, real scientists
don't parade their credentials at every opportunity. They let their
results and ideas speak for themselves.

[George Hammond] MS Physics
Look Athel, YOU ARE NOT A PHYSICIST, you are a BIOCHEMIST

as I have said many times in my signature (see below). (Not always, as
I often forget to set my signature according to the group I am posting
to.)

Sci.physics.relativity is a PHYSICS discussion list, not a biochemistry discussion list.... If you want to parade around and tell people what to
do, I suggest you post it to a BIOCHEMISTRY discussion list !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Hyannis 12/13/24

--
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2024-12-16 14:56:39 +0000, George Hammond said:

.
A FACSIMILE COPY OF THE HAMMOND PAPER POSTED HERE:---
. https://www.academia.edu/33773402/The_Cartesian_theory_Unification_of_Eysenck_and_Gray

. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

So please take notice Dr. ATHEL CORNIH BOWDEN; you have asked reviously: "scientifically acceptable"? Which reputable scientific journal has
accepted it?" and there you have your answer......New Ideas In
Psychology. Vol. 12(2), 1994 pp. 153-167, Pergamon Press unamously
accepted and published the paper ! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Hmm. "In addition the author has researched the notion that the Four
Gospel Canon of the Bible is in fact the theological identification of
the Structural Model. Indeed, the Cross of Christianity itself is quite
likely the symbolic representation of the Cartesian structure of the
mind (Hammond, 1988, 1989). The effects of this discovery on science,
religion and government can be expected to be far reaching."

No comment

--
athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

George Hammond wrote:

On 12/16/2024 5:45 PM, Python wrote:

Le 16/12/2024 à 22:28, "Chris M. Thomasson" a écrit :

;^) My kook detector is going off the charts! lol. ;^)

It's in your pocket, right?

[George Hammond] MS Physics
.
Hi Python,
Do you have any academic credentials (BS, MS, Phd)?
Would you know what the Schrödinger equation is?
.
Thomasson is a renowned computer graphics Artist
(Fractal graphics) but as a result has adopted the nasty
habit of harassing credentialed scientists on S.P.R. !
.
Geo. Hammond MS Physics Hyannis 12/17/24

What I don't understand...'Mr. George Hammond',

when you got your (BS, MS, Phd in physics, and gradutated)...

you went straight from college to being a homeless person (for how much? more than 10 years??)


HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN????


what do you make of dat?


wats the story??


you cannot make dis up!








--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

George Hammond wrote:

On 1/11/2025 3:53 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 1/11/2025 12:51 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

 > [George Hammond] MS Physics
.
WRONG - - -
   I am telling you that IF the "CZAR BOMBA" the Russian's biggest >>> nuclear bomb in the world (50 megatons) went off while "DUCT TAPED"
to your head - - - you could still: - - - GO TO HEAVEN FOR 10 YEARS !

Why not 11?

Lets say you are wrong, and its 12.666 years, then what? Then just,
kaput after that?

[George Hammond] MS Physics, Cape Cod USA
.
Look Chris - - - it is known that the theoretical lifespan of a
human being is somewhere around "80 years", more or less !
.
Furthermore, it is known that the world average adult is only
about "85% fully grown" (WHO, UNESCO, data)
.
And since 100% - 85% = 15%, and since (.15) (80yrs)=12 years
we see that the "AVERAGE AFTERLIFE" is around 12 years
since the Afterlife represents the amount of time we were
"short changed" in actual life !
Whether it is 10, 11, 12.666 .. years, etc. doesn't make any
difference for this discussion !.
.
BUT THE REAL BONER YOU HAVE MADE .... Is the assumption
that after the Afterlife, "life is KAPUT"...
.
This is a stupid presumption, made by people who DON'T KNOW
that : - - -
.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
E T E R N A L ----- L I F E-
.
I S A T I M E (D- I -L -A -T -I- O- N)
.
N O T A T I M E (D- U- R- A- T -I -O -N) ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
.
Of course people cannot LIVE FOREVER --- DON'T BE STUPID
---- how could there be progressive evolution of the human body
if people lived forever ===== DON'T BE RIDICULOUS !!!
.
ETERNAL LIFE refers to "reaching 100% full growth" in which case
we see "true 100% time, and true 100% speed" because there is no
"mental time dilation" in our brains due to less than "full growth" !
.
ETERNAL LIFE refers to living life at "full biological speed",
meaning "full biological growth"... Which the human race has yet
to achieve !
.
George Hammond MS Physics Cape Cod MA USA 1/11/25
.

Coming from a guy who graduated from Physics skool and automaticall got
a ten year degree in...homeleness!

a lot of good your phd did...

it is the road of all physics phds.




--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)