• Re: Why the time kept at the ISS is UTC? And Einstein's time?

    From Paul B. Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 11 14:41:55 2024
    Den 08.12.2024 19:29, skrev rhertz:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time
    (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based
    on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
    days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live
    and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in Moscow.


    Of course UTC is used in manned space crafts and space vehicles
    that need to communicate with the Earth.


    So, for ISS, t = t'. Einstein's SR time is not even considered, even
    when there are several atomic clocks onboard.

    More yet, any space vehicle used to transport astro/cosmonauts keeps
    time using UTC/GMT.

    Yes, of course!


    Reality dictates that the world is used to t = t'.

    This is a meaningless statement.

    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf


    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 11 15:09:23 2024
    W dniu 11.12.2024 o 14:41, Paul B. Andersen pisze:
    Den 08.12.2024 19:29, skrev rhertz:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time
    (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based
    on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
    days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live
    and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at
    about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in
    Moscow.


    Of course UTC is used in manned space crafts and space vehicles
    that need to communicate with the Earth.

    Of course, "local time" invented by relativistic
    idiots is practically useless (and so is wannabe
    second defined by SI).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to Paul B. Andersen on Thu Dec 12 09:44:15 2024
    Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

    Den 08.12.2024 19:29, skrev rhertz:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based
    on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in Moscow.


    Of course UTC is used in manned space crafts and space vehicles
    that need to communicate with the Earth.


    So, for ISS, t = t'. Einstein's SR time is not even considered, even
    when there are several atomic clocks onboard.

    More yet, any space vehicle used to transport astro/cosmonauts keeps
    time using UTC/GMT.

    Yes, of course!


    Reality dictates that the world is used to t = t'.

    This is a meaningless statement.

    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf

    Our dear nutters will know next year. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Clock_Ensemble_in_Space>
    (atomic clocks to be placed on the ISS)

    Of course they will scream false, swindle, and crazy about the results,
    which you will hear about only from a bunch of swindling scientists,

    Jan

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 10:37:47 2024
    W dniu 12.12.2024 o 09:44, J. J. Lodder pisze:
    Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

    Den 08.12.2024 19:29, skrev rhertz:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time
    (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based >>> on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
    days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live >>> and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at >>> about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in >>> Moscow.


    Of course UTC is used in manned space crafts and space vehicles
    that need to communicate with the Earth.


    So, for ISS, t = t'. Einstein's SR time is not even considered, even
    when there are several atomic clocks onboard.

    More yet, any space vehicle used to transport astro/cosmonauts keeps
    time using UTC/GMT.

    Yes, of course!


    Reality dictates that the world is used to t = t'.

    This is a meaningless statement.

    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf

    Our dear nutters will know next year. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Clock_Ensemble_in_Space>
    (atomic clocks to be placed on the ISS)

    Of course they will scream false, swindle, and crazy about the results,

    and they will die hard insisting they're
    matching inconsistent mumble of their idiot
    guru.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Thu Dec 12 18:00:56 2024
    On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 8:44:15 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

    Den 08.12.2024 19:29, skrev rhertz:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time
    (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based >>> on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
    days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live >>> and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at >>> about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in >>> Moscow.


    Of course UTC is used in manned space crafts and space vehicles
    that need to communicate with the Earth.


    So, for ISS, t = t'. Einstein's SR time is not even considered, even
    when there are several atomic clocks onboard.

    More yet, any space vehicle used to transport astro/cosmonauts keeps
    time using UTC/GMT.

    Yes, of course!


    Reality dictates that the world is used to t = t'.

    This is a meaningless statement.

    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf

    Our dear nutters will know next year. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_Clock_Ensemble_in_Space>
    (atomic clocks to be placed on the ISS)

    Of course they will scream false, swindle, and crazy about the results,
    which you will hear about only from a bunch of swindling scientists,

    Jan
    Everyone agrees the atomic clocks run differently in space. It is absurd
    to claim that means you can infer time runs differently. The rocket fuel
    keeps burning at the same rate measured by Wozniak's clocks on Earth.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Paul B. Andersen on Thu Dec 12 17:56:50 2024
    On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:41:55 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 08.12.2024 19:29, skrev rhertz:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time
    (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based
    on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
    days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live
    and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at
    about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in
    Moscow.


    Of course UTC is used in manned space crafts and space vehicles
    that need to communicate with the Earth.


    So, for ISS, t = t'. Einstein's SR time is not even considered, even
    when there are several atomic clocks onboard.

    More yet, any space vehicle used to transport astro/cosmonauts keeps
    time using UTC/GMT.

    Yes, of course!


    Reality dictates that the world is used to t = t'.

    This is a meaningless statement.

    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf

    According to relativists here recently, the LT must be required due to
    the motion of the Earth, even though it is only 1/10,000th the speed of
    light.

    The GPS has to communicate with the Earth.

    Seconds defined by SI are defined by atomic clocks, so atomic clocks
    move at a different rate in space. Inferring that time runs at a
    different rate is absurd. The rate of combustion of rocket fuel remains
    the same.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul B. Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 20:26:05 2024
    Den 12.12.2024 18:56, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:41:55 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:


    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf


    According to relativists here recently, the LT must be required due to
    the motion of the Earth, even though it is only 1/10,000th the speed of light.

    What does this statement mean?
    Would "the motion of the Earth" not exist without the LT?

    You are a master of stating meaningless statements.


    The GPS has to communicate with the Earth.

    So what?
    Did you have a point with stating the bleeding obvious?


    Seconds defined by SI are defined by atomic clocks,

    Not quite.

    SI has defined the time unit second like this:
    "The duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding
    to the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the Cs-133 atom."

    A clock which ticks out seconds with the duration defined
    above will in the following be called an SI-clock.


    so atomic clocks
    move at a different rate in space.

    You probably meant to say:
    "atomic clocks run at a different rate in space"

    If the "atomic clock" is an SI-clock, this is wrong.

    SI-clocks always run at the rate one second per second (1Hz).
    By definition!

    Inferring that time runs at a different rate is absurd.

    Right!

    In physics, "time" must be measurable.
    The instrument we use to measure "time" is by definition "a clock".
    So (proper) "time" is what we measure with clocks.

    A second of "time" always lasts a second.
    Proper clocks (like SI-clocks) and thus "time" always run at
    the same rate 1Hz by definition.


    The rate of combustion of rocket fuel remains the same.

    Imprecise, but probably right.

    If the rocket burns a constant amount of fuel per second,
    the accelerating force will remain constant.

    Did you think SR/GR claim otherwise?


    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul B. Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 20:41:02 2024
    Den 12.12.2024 19:00, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    Everyone agrees the atomic clocks run differently in space.
    (differently = at different proper rates)

    Wrong.

    It is absurd
    to claim that means you can infer time runs differently.

    Right.

    The rocket fuel
    keeps burning at the same rate measured by Wozniak's clocks on Earth.

    You can't measure the rate of a clock "in space"
    with a clock on the Earth.


    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 20:37:49 2024
    W dniu 12.12.2024 o 20:26, Paul B. Andersen pisze:

    If the "atomic clock" is an SI-clock, this is wrong.

    But atomic clocks are not SI clocks, anyone can check GPS.
    Your bunch of idiots has no power to enforce your
    idiocies on the reality.



    SI-clocks always run at the rate one second per second (1Hz).

    Wrong; that's true that they run one (second of a
    relativistic idiot) per (second of a relativistic idiot),
    but seconds are something else.


    Inferring that time runs at a different rate is absurd.

    Right!

    In physics, "time" must be measurable.
    The instrument we use to measure "time" is by definition "a clock".


    A lie, as expected from relativistic scum. There
    is no such definition; and the main purpose of a
    clock is unrelated to your moronic physics. You
    only imagine you're the center the world is
    spinning around.



    A second of "time" always lasts a second.

    But an SI second lasts a second on earth and
    (9,192,631,770/9,192,631,774) of a second in
    a GPS satellite; anyone can check that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 12 21:21:37 2024
    W dniu 12.12.2024 o 20:41, Paul B. Andersen pisze:

    You can't measure the rate of a clock "in space"
    with a clock on the Earth.

    Taboo!! The spirit of our Giant Guru will
    be VERY angry!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Paul B. Andersen on Thu Dec 12 21:17:25 2024
    On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:26:05 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 12.12.2024 18:56, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:41:55 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:


    The truth is that no clock which ticks out seconds as defined by SI
    will stay synchronous with UTC, unless it is on the Earth's geoid.

    This is so thoroughly experimentally verified that it can be
    considered to be a fact, and nothing to discuss.

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf


    According to relativists here recently, the LT must be required due to
    the motion of the Earth, even though it is only 1/10,000th the speed of
    light.

    What does this statement mean?
    Would "the motion of the Earth" not exist without the LT?

    You are a master of stating meaningless statements.


    The GPS has to communicate with the Earth.

    So what?
    Did you have a point with stating the bleeding obvious?


    Seconds defined by SI are defined by atomic clocks,

    Not quite.

    SI has defined the time unit second like this:
    "The duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding
    to the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the Cs-133 atom."

    A clock which ticks out seconds with the duration defined
    above will in the following be called an SI-clock.


    so atomic clocks
    move at a different rate in space.

    You probably meant to say:
    "atomic clocks run at a different rate in space"

    If the "atomic clock" is an SI-clock, this is wrong.

    SI-clocks always run at the rate one second per second (1Hz).
    By definition!

    Inferring that time runs at a different rate is absurd.

    Right!
    Then, you have no evidence of time dilation from the rate of the
    clocks—none at all from anywhere.

    In physics, "time" must be measurable.
    The instrument we use to measure "time" is by definition "a clock".
    So (proper) "time" is what we measure with clocks.

    A second of "time" always lasts a second.
    Proper clocks (like SI-clocks) and thus "time" always run at
    the same rate 1Hz by definition.


    The rate of combustion of rocket fuel remains the same.

    Imprecise, but probably right.

    If the rocket burns a constant amount of fuel per second,
    the accelerating force will remain constant.

    Did you think SR/GR claim otherwise?

    Here, Paul provides a good example of the deluded confusion of the
    relativists.
    If time itself dilated, then every rate of change would change in
    unison, including the rate at which the fuel burns. It burns at the same
    rate, so time does not dilate. What you are saying is the same as saying
    the astronaut at light speed is not aging at a different rate. Make up
    your mind. Relativity is so stupid and illogical.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Paul B. Andersen on Thu Dec 12 21:26:46 2024
    On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:41:02 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 12.12.2024 19:00, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    Everyone agrees the atomic clocks run differently in space.
    (differently = at different proper rates)

    Wrong.

    It is absurd
    to claim that means you can infer time runs differently.

    Right.

    The rocket fuel
    keeps burning at the same rate measured by Wozniak's clocks on Earth.

    You can't measure the rate of a clock "in space"
    with a clock on the Earth.

    Paul, you didn't have to let it all hang out for me to know what you
    have. Why don't you pull your pants up?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Paul B. Andersen on Thu Dec 12 21:28:31 2024
    On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:41:02 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 12.12.2024 19:00, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    Everyone agrees the atomic clocks run differently in space.
    (differently = at different proper rates)

    Wrong.

    It is absurd
    to claim that means you can infer time runs differently.

    Right.

    The rocket fuel
    keeps burning at the same rate measured by Wozniak's clocks on Earth.

    You can't measure the rate of a clock "in space"
    with a clock on the Earth.

    Emperor Einstein had no clothes, and his followers ought to buy belts to
    keep their pants up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sylvia Else@21:1/5 to rhertz on Fri Dec 13 15:10:28 2024
    On 09-Dec-24 2:29 am, rhertz wrote:
    The International Space Station (ISS) uses Coordinated Universal Time
    (UTC), also known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT), as its standard time.
    UTC is the scientific standard of timekeeping for the world and is based
    on atomic clocks.

    The ISS is a partnership between five space agencies from 15 countries.
    The station is continuously operated 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365
    days a year. Crews from the U.S., Russia, Japan, Canada, and Europe live
    and work on the ISS, which orbits Earth every 90 minutes.

    The shuttles also had UTC clocks so that the astronauts could easily
    figure out what the "official" time aboard ISS was.

    It's a compromise for the Americans and Russians. The crew day begins at about two in the morning in Houston and ends at about eleven at night in Moscow.


    So, for ISS, t = t'. Einstein's SR time is not even considered, even
    when there are several atomic clocks onboard.

    For most practical purposes, the general relativity corrections to
    clocks on the ISS are irrelevant. Ordinary clocks are not even accurate
    enough for the corrections to be meaningful.

    The corrections only matter when, well to pull an example out of thin
    air, you need to know exactly where satellites are and when signals were transmitted from them, so that you can calculate where you are on Earth
    based on the signals from several satellites.

    Sylvia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 08:44:43 2024
    W dniu 13.12.2024 o 08:10, Sylvia Else pisze:
    2
    For most practical purposes, the general relativity corrections to

    There are NO general relativity corrections.
    Your mad religion is forbidding them. That's
    the whole concept of "time dilation": if
    clocks desynchronize (what can be no way any
    surprise for anyone) - we may either assume it's
    a clock error and correct them - or assume
    that's exactly what we need/expect from the
    clocks and have dilation.
    Yes, Your time dilation is THAT stupid. That's
    why common sense has been was objeting so
    fiercely.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 11:44:41 2024
    W dniu 13.12.2024 o 11:31, Paul B. Andersen pisze:

    Pin this on the wall above your desk:

    ############################################################ #          ACCORDING TO GR:                                #
    # Clocks, and thus "time", always run at their proper rate.# ############################################################

    Pin that yourself, and then notice: clocks of
    GPS do not, they run 9 192 631 774 instead
    9 192 631 770.
    Good bye, The Shit, common sense was warning
    your idiot guru.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul B. Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 13 11:31:31 2024
    Den 12.12.2024 22:17, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:26:05 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 12.12.2024 18:56, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:

    Inferring that time runs at a different rate is absurd.


    Right!
    A second of "time" always lasts a second.
    Proper clocks (like SI-clocks) and thus "time" always run at
    the same rate 1Hz by definition.


    The rate of combustion of rocket fuel remains the same.

    If the rocket burns a constant amount of fuel per second,
    the accelerating force will remain constant.

    Did you think SR/GR claim otherwise?


    Above I said several times that clocks and thus time always
    run at their proper rate. "Time" doesn't "dilate".

    Your response:

    Here, Paul provides a good example of the deluded confusion of the relativists.

    You don't read what you are responding to, do you? :-D
    You didn't notice that we agree!

    If time itself dilated, then every rate of change would change in
    unison, including the rate at which the fuel burns.

    Right!

    We agree that time doesn't "dilate".

    You are wrong when you believe that GR say otherwise.

    :-D

    Pin this on the wall above your desk:

    ############################################################
    # ACCORDING TO GR: #
    # Clocks, and thus "time", always run at their proper rate.# ############################################################

    -------------------------

    We don't agree about everything, though.

    If I thought you were able to read a text,
    I would have asked you to read this:

    https://paulba.no/pdf/Clock_rate.pdf

    But you aren't, so I won't.

    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul.B.Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 15 11:11:18 2024
    Den 12.12.2024 22:26, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 19:41:02 +0000, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Den 12.12.2024 19:00, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    Everyone agrees the atomic clocks run differently in space.
      (differently = at different proper rates)

    Wrong.

    It is absurd
    to claim that means you can infer time runs differently.

    Right.

    The rocket fuel
    keeps burning at the same rate measured by Wozniak's clocks on Earth.

    You can't measure the rate of a clock "in space"
    with a clock on the Earth.>>
    Paul, you didn't have to let it all hang out for me to know what you
    have. Why don't you pull your pants up?

    Any particular reason for why you don't even try to give
    a rational response?

    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 15 11:57:15 2024
    W dniu 15.12.2024 o 11:11, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

    You can't measure the rate of a clock "in space"
    with a clock on the Earth.>>
    Paul, you didn't have to let it all hang out for me to know what you
    have. Why don't you pull your pants up?

    Any particular reason for why you don't even try to give
    a rational response?

    A wild, completely baseless assertion of a
    brainwashed fanatic idiot doesn't deserve any.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)