Besides Richardson on electron theory,
been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
Similarly to Richardson providing context
into what are conventions and then thusly
the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
and many references to follow.
you're as crazy as "Dr" Hachel
Le 18/12/2024 à 09:29, Athel Cornish-Bowden a écrit :
you're as crazy as "Dr" Hachel
A lie and a defamation on the same line.
The enemies of Doctor Hachel do not skimp on the means.
R.H.
[ … ]
On 2024-12-17 19:08:49 +0000, Ross Finlayson quoted
56000 characters of quoted posts in order to post a few lines of comment:
Besides Richardson on electron theory,
been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
Similarly to Richardson providing context
into what are conventions and then thusly
the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
and many references to follow.
Why don't you ever snip anything? It's not worthwhile scrolling through
line after line of quotations in order to read what may or may not be a
few words of wisdom.
I don't think you're as crazy as Wozzie or George Hammond (MS physics, Hyannis) or "Dr" Hachel, etc., but in your own way you're just as
irritating.
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2024-12-17 19:08:49 +0000, Ross Finlayson quoted
56000 characters of quoted posts in order to post a few lines of comment: >>>
Besides Richardson on electron theory,
been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
Similarly to Richardson providing context
into what are conventions and then thusly
the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
and many references to follow.
Why don't you ever snip anything? It's not worthwhile scrolling through
line after line of quotations in order to read what may or may not be a
few words of wisdom.
I don't think you're as crazy as Wozzie or George Hammond (MS physics,
Hyannis) or "Dr" Hachel, etc., but in your own way you're just as
irritating.
That seems too optimistic an assesment to me,
On 2024-12-19 14:51:33 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2024-12-17 19:08:49 +0000, Ross Finlayson quoted
56000 characters of quoted posts in order to post a few lines of
comment:
Besides Richardson on electron theory,
been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
Similarly to Richardson providing context
into what are conventions and then thusly
the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
and many references to follow.
Why don't you ever snip anything? It's not worthwhile scrolling through
line after line of quotations in order to read what may or may not be a
few words of wisdom.
I don't think you're as crazy as Wozzie or George Hammond (MS physics,
Hyannis) or "Dr" Hachel, etc., but in your own way you're just as
irritating.
That seems too optimistic an assesment to me,
Probably because I rarely read to the end of the torrent of quoted text,
so I may fail to realize how nutty he is. Not as nutty as Wozzie, surely?
On 2024-12-19 14:51:33 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2024-12-17 19:08:49 +0000, Ross Finlayson quoted
56000 characters of quoted posts in order to post a few lines of comment: >>>
Besides Richardson on electron theory,
been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
Similarly to Richardson providing context
into what are conventions and then thusly
the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
and many references to follow.
Why don't you ever snip anything? It's not worthwhile scrolling through
line after line of quotations in order to read what may or may not be a
few words of wisdom.
I don't think you're as crazy as Wozzie or George Hammond (MS physics,
Hyannis) or "Dr" Hachel, etc., but in your own way you're just as
irritating.
That seems too optimistic an assesment to me,
Probably because I rarely read to the end of the torrent of quoted
text, so I may fail to realize how nutty he is. Not as nutty as Wozzie, surely?
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2024-12-19 14:51:33 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
On 2024-12-17 19:08:49 +0000, Ross Finlayson quoted
56000 characters of quoted posts in order to post a few lines of comment: >>>>>
Besides Richardson on electron theory,
been reading Tinkham on quantum mechanics.
Similarly to Richardson providing context
into what are conventions and then thusly
the derivations, Tinkham provides much context
and many references to follow.
Why don't you ever snip anything? It's not worthwhile scrolling through >>>> line after line of quotations in order to read what may or may not be a >>>> few words of wisdom.
I don't think you're as crazy as Wozzie or George Hammond (MS physics, >>>> Hyannis) or "Dr" Hachel, etc., but in your own way you're just as
irritating.
That seems too optimistic an assesment to me,
Probably because I rarely read to the end of the torrent of quoted
text, so I may fail to realize how nutty he is. Not as nutty as Wozzie,
surely?
Woz is beyond being nutty, as there is usualy no content there at all.
(I stopped looking at it long ago)
No better than the RHs afaics, just less abusive generally,
Jan
(skipping verbiage too)
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 495 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 43:34:07 |
| Calls: | 9,745 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 13,742 |
| Messages: | 6,183,986 |