• Re: About relativistic doggies doctoring the "evidence" against basic m

    From Richard Hachel@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 19 11:46:00 2024
    Le 19/12/2024 à 08:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

    1905 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
    "counterexamples" against Euclidean
    prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
    on Earth surface.

    Relativistic doggies have invented them -
    after their idiot guru announced EG false.
    Yes - doctoring evidence, classics of
    ideology oriented branches of science.

    There is a bit of that.

    A lot of physicists believe in Albert Einstein and his shaky theory like Muslims believe in Aôôôllah and his prophet Mu'hammad.

    It is obvious to anyone with a clear eye that Albert Einstein is a kind of religious media creation, and it is strange to note that 1905 is the same
    date as the repudiation of the Church in the State.

    They took Jesus Christ out of the State to put Albert Einstein in it.

    Now mind you, I am not saying that the theory of relativity is wrong, not
    at all, I have thought about it with interest for forty years,
    and just as I am not the last of the morons in theology, I am not the last
    of the morons in science either.

    I am simply saying that Henri Poincaré was a world authority, and that
    his work in mathematics and science was pure genius. I am simply saying
    that Albert Einstein copied it (simply because he had a copyist's position
    in Bern and that is where Poinaré and others sent their papers) but that
    in doing so, he did not understand the theory perfectly, and that he made
    it deviate more than he made it progress.

    That is what I think is right.

    Except that by saying this, I am offending the faith of physicists, who
    like to believe in chimeras, and who take science for a kind of religion borrowed from science fiction.

    R.H.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 19 15:02:07 2024
    W dniu 19.12.2024 o 12:46, Richard Hachel pisze:
    Le 19/12/2024 à 08:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

    1905 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
    "counterexamples" against Euclidean
    prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
    on Earth surface.

    Relativistic doggies have invented them -
    after their idiot guru announced EG false.
    Yes - doctoring evidence, classics of
    ideology oriented branches of science.

    There is a bit of that.

    There is whole of that - since their
    idiot guru has announced basic [Euclidean]
    math false his obedient doggies have doctored
    "evidence" against it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Python@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 20 00:50:42 2024
    Le 19/12/2024 à 08:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37157/37157-pdf.pdf

    1905 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
    "counterexamples" against Euclidean
    prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
    on Earth surface.

    Relativistic doggies have invented them -
    after their idiot guru announced EG false.
    Yes - doctoring evidence, classics of
    ideology oriented branches of science.

    Nobody "announced Euclidean Geometry false".

    As a matter of fact the consistency of SR has been shown equivalent to the consistency of EG.

    Ask any professional logician if you have any doubt and, unfortunately,
    cannot check the proof by yourself, Wozniak.

    Why do you insist that much of making a fool or yourself, Wozniak? What's
    the point?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Maciej Wozniak@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 20 06:31:27 2024
    W dniu 20.12.2024 o 01:50, Python pisze:
    Le 19/12/2024 à 08:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
    https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37157/37157-pdf.pdf

    1905 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
    "counterexamples" against Euclidean
    prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
    on Earth surface.

    Relativistic doggies have invented them -
    after their idiot guru announced EG false.
    Yes - doctoring evidence, classics of
    ideology oriented branches of science.

    Nobody "announced Euclidean Geometry false".

    Nonononono! No false! We just have announced it's
    claims are not valid for the reality! False? Noooooooo.


    As a matter of fact the consistency of SR has been shown equivalent to
    the consistency of EG.

    Well, that's a plain lie, loved by relativistic
    fanatics.
    What has been really really shown is that consistency
    of some (not very significant) part of The Shit is
    equivalent to the consistency of EG.
    BTW, are you still ignoring plain velocity calculation
    and insist Gdańsk and Warsaw arre in relativew rest-
    because so?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)