Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would know
that it is definitely not "how it works".

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:10, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would
know that it is definitely not "how it works".

An idiot screaming "NOOOOOOOO!!!!", spitting
and slandering is not going to change the
facts, sorry, poor stinker.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Le 16/01/2025 à 20:22, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:10, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would
know that it is definitely not "how it works".

An idiot screaming "NOOOOOOOO!!!!", spitting
and slandering is not going to change the
facts, sorry

I didn't scream (you do), I didn't slander (you do). I've stated the
obvious, at least to anyone who has studied physics.

poor stinker.

Nice signature.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:24, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 20:22, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 20:10, Python pisze:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would
know that it is definitely not "how it works".

An idiot screaming "NOOOOOOOO!!!!", spitting
and slandering is not going to change the
facts, sorry

I didn't scream (you do), I didn't slander (you do).

Was it me talking about the nurses eager
to change your shitty sheets? Really,
you pathetic piece of shit?

Anyway, the case of your insane guru
demonstrates it clearly. An idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a
willow - and his obedient doggies
are preparing some new, better
definitons of pears and willows.
That's how your beloved physics
works, sorry, trash.Not even
talking about training idiots like
you to spit and slander at its
enemies.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Python <jp@python.invalid> wrote:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would know that it is definitely not "how it works".

[for the strayed-in, and perhaps misled kiddies, if any]

Indeed, relativity, or any other theory, has nothing to do with it.
It is pure empirism, about realising the best posible time standard.
Averaging the many atomic clocks to obtain TAI just takes
the observed clock rates into account.
The why of some clocks being systematically slow or fast,
with respect to the average of them all, doesn't come into it.

As a matter of fact BIPM begins the clock comparisons
with the computation of EAL, the Echelle Atomique Libre,
which is just an average that doesn't involve any corrections.
Next they compute TAI from that.

An empirical correlation of clock rate with altitude,
or more precisely with the Newtonian potential,
would work just as well for the purpose,

Jan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 22:25, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Python <jp@python.invalid> wrote:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would know >> that it is definitely not "how it works".

[for the strayed-in, and perhaps misled kiddies, if any]

Indeed, relativity, or any other theory, has nothing to do with it.
It is pure empirism

If an idiot says - simply must be true. No
postulates in The Shit! No definitions in
The Shit! No mathematics (with its axioms)
in The Shit!
Pure empirism, Nature Herself is speaking
through the mouths of relativistic idiots.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 22:37, Maciej Wozniak pisze:

W dniu 16.01.2025 o 22:25, J. J. Lodder pisze:

Python <jp@python.invalid> wrote:

Le 16/01/2025 à 17:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

That's how it works in physics: an idiot is
mumbling about pears growing on a willow -
and his obedient doggies are preparing some
new, better definitons of pears and willows.

And then pears growing on a willow are
confirmed; with a little help of new,
better definition of "confirming", of
course.

If you hadn't decided to stay as far as possible to physics you would
know
that it is definitely not "how it works".

[for the strayed-in, and perhaps misled kiddies, if any]

Indeed, relativity, or any other theory, has nothing to do with it.
It is pure empirism

If an idiot says - simply must be true. No
postulates in The Shit! No definitions in
The Shit! No mathematics (with its axioms)
in The Shit!
Pure empirism, Nature Herself is speaking
through the mouths of relativistic idiots.

And, of course - the fact that it is
Nature Herself speaking through him
is making a relativistic idiot unfailiable.
He can never be mistaken, like ordinary
mortal worms.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)