Den 31.01.2025 23:26, skrev LaurenceClarkCrossen:
E.g. "Relativity Laws for the Variation of Rates of Clocks Moving in
Free Space and GPS Positioning Errors Caused by Space-Weather Events" https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/45260.pdf
Did his graduate work at Princeton University = PhD in physical
chemistry.
I find it remarkable that a person with a PhD in physical chemistry
can be so ignorant of physics as his paper indicates.
There are _many_ misconceptions in Buenker's paper, but I will
only give one example:
About "time dilation":
-----------------------
From the Lorentz transform (LT) Buenker derives these two equations:
Δt' = γΔt (3) and Δt = γΔt' (5)
(The correct equations are: ∂t'/∂t = γ and ∂t/∂t' = γ )
Buenker writes:
"When one compares eq.(3) with eq. (5), it is evident that there
is something paradoxical about Einstein’s result. This comparison
seems to be telling us that each clock can be running slower than
the other at the same time. It is always the “moving” clock that
is running slower than its identical stationary counterpart, although
it is not self-evident how this distinction can be made unequivocally
based on the above derivations. Many authors [12-14] have taken this
result to be a clear indication that something is fundamentally wrong
with Einstein’s STR.
. . .
It is important see that the above symmetry in the predicted results
of the two observers represents a stark departure from the long-held
belief in the objectivity of measurement."
No clock runs "slow" or "fast", clocks always run at their proper rate.
It is all a matter of how their "rate" is measured.
(The proper time of the *moving" clock is compared to the coordinate
time of the "stationary" system.)
See:
https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual_time_dilation.pdf
His article shows how to enable instantaneous calibration of onboard
clocks in the GPS.
This stupidity is yours, not Buenker's.
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)