• Re: 1905

    From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu Feb 20 21:13:59 2025
    XPost: sci.physics

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Maciej Wozniak wrote:

    W dniu 20.02.2025 o 17:55, The Starmaker pisze:
    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper, he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once.

    Why do you suppose that was????

    The answer is very simple...

    Albert Einstein HATED Isaac Newton with a PASSION!

    (including all his friends)

    You know how these religious gangsters behave, they got together and >>>>
    said..."LET'S FUCK UP THIS NEWTON MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"

    So, In Albert Einstein's 1905 paper, he didn't even 'mentioned' Gravity once...not even once!

    But the PASSION continued...

    Albert Einstein created a new theory of relativity that all it did was contained Gravity, with one little
    difference...the goal only was to FUCK UP DAT NEWTON GUY!!!

    Albert Einstein spent 10 years tearing everything he could to fuck up Isaac Newton gravity.

    (and all his religious gangster friends backed him up to this day) >>>>
    anti-Newtonianism they all were...

    For only one reason...Isaac Newton was a CHRISTIAN with a IQ of 190...

    and Einstein IQ was 160.

    His religious gangster community want Einstein on top of the totem pole..

    goal, to knock off Isaac Newton.

    and the beat goes on...

    Not only is there no MENTION on Gravity in Albert's Einstien's 1905 paper, but no one gives
    any explaination...WHY!

    The Answer IS, they didn't want to give Newton the time of day. He wasn't Jewish! They blackballed him!

    You know how these religious gangsters are...religious fanatics.

    The WORD was out! Don't even mention Newton's name...

    But, how could Abert Einstein continue on...

    so he struggled for ten years to come out with a complete opposite >>> of Newton's Gravity, and called it General Relativity!

    It's all about Gravity but you're not suppose to say that.

    General Relativity is just an anti-Newtonian paper.

    1905 paper, 1915 paper are both anti-Newtonian.

    One doesn't mention anything at all, and they other he tore his ass apart!

    DESPICABLE!

    So, Albert Einstein put a Secret Code in General Relativity...

    General
    Gravity

    Both contain 7 letters

    General=Gravity

    Both start with the letter G

    Both have 4 consonants

    Both have 4 vowels


    WAIT A MINUTE!!! Don'ts tells mes yous alls believe these similarities
    are just a...COINCIDENCE????

    As he thaught and wrote German - rather yes.

    Okay, you need more insight...

    "Newton's law of universal gravitation states that all objects in the universe attract each other due to gravity."

    Look closely at these two words (just as albert einstein did)

    "universal gravitation"

    The word "universal" in German is...general.

    Universal Gravity
    General Gravity
    General Relativity is all about...Gravity.

    Albert Einstein STOLED the title idea from Isacc Newton!

    Is it still just a...COINCIDENCE????

    'none are so blind as those who refuse to see'


    The word "general" translates to German is allgemein , and

    the German word allgemein translates to "universal" in English.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=what+does+general+translate+in+German+mean+universally

    Universal Gravity
    General Gravity
    General Relativity is all about...Gravity.

    General Relativity means universal gravity

    "Newton's law of universal gravitation..



    general
    'jen(?)r?l
    allgemein

    Translations of general
    noun
    der General
    general
    der Heerführer
    army commander, general
    adjective
    allgemein
    general, common, universal, overall, public, broad




    adjective
    allgemein
    general, common, universal, overall, public, broad




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From bertietaylor@21:1/5 to All on Fri Feb 21 09:23:01 2025
    XPost: sci.physics

    No worries, Arindam has explained gravity and the way the universe
    (eternal, infinite) works.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 7 00:21:11 2025
    Not only was there no mention
    of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

    there was no mention of...acceleration either.

    dat means the twin never came back!

    did the clock got older and died?



    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Wed May 7 09:16:23 2025
    The Starmaker wrote:

    Not only was there no mention
    of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

    there was no mention of...acceleration either.

    dat means the twin never came back!

    did the clock got older and died?


    The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.




    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Thu May 8 12:19:47 2025
    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Not only was there no mention
    of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

    there was no mention of...acceleration either.

    dat means the twin never came back!

    did the clock got older and died?


    The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.

    Now, in the British movie:

    You see, we live
    in a complex social world.

    Einstein put mass and energy together,
    we got the atom bomb.

    Now, if you were a Russian politician
    and had a child with a brain, say...

    ...ten times more efficient than
    Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...

    ...to any two British scientists
    who crawled out of the wood?

    Of course I wouldn't.



    Children of the Damned (1964)




    The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.

    It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)



    Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
    Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)


    https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif

    https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor

    https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg

    https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1


    In 1930
    Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1

    (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)


    of course you don't know, you are not ALLOWED to know.


    Yous are not even suppose to talk about it...

    see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil..

    wat a bunch of monkeys!










    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue May 13 15:38:23 2025
    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Not only was there no mention
    of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

    there was no mention of...acceleration either.

    dat means the twin never came back!

    did the clock got older and died?


    The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.

    Now, in the British movie:

    You see, we live
    in a complex social world.

    Einstein put mass and energy together,
    we got the atom bomb.

    Now, if you were a Russian politician
    and had a child with a brain, say...

    ...ten times more efficient than
    Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...

    ...to any two British scientists
    who crawled out of the wood?

    Of course I wouldn't.



    Children of the Damned (1964)

    The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.

    It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)

    Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
    Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)

    https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif

    https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor

    https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg

    https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1

    In 1930
    Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1

    (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)

    I forgot to add:

    "Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear
    reactor—
    "an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or Szilard." (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and Elkana, p. 391.)

    Of course, the irony was...there was no irony.

    Now, since ALL of yous are ignorant of the Manhattan Project History...

    Albert Einstein didn't want the money for the (1930) patent, he told
    Zilgard to keep any money he got for it.


    But the Manhattan Project didn't want to give Zilgard money for it.
    (buts yous problabys don'ts knows WHYs eithers)



    Beside dat they didn't like him...





    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Starmaker@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Tue May 13 15:15:26 2025
    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    The Starmaker wrote:

    Not only was there no mention
    of Gravity in Einstein't 1905 relativity paper..

    there was no mention of...acceleration either.

    dat means the twin never came back!

    did the clock got older and died?


    The only thing Albert Einstein got right in his 1905 paper is the formula for the atomic bomb.

    Now, in the British movie:

    You see, we live
    in a complex social world.

    Einstein put mass and energy together,
    we got the atom bomb.

    Now, if you were a Russian politician
    and had a child with a brain, say...

    ...ten times more efficient than
    Einstein's, would you gaily let her out...

    ...to any two British scientists
    who crawled out of the wood?

    Of course I wouldn't.



    Children of the Damned (1964)

    The British know (and the Japanese know) that Albert Einstein is the bomb maker.

    It's only these stupid bumbling Americans that think otherwise. (they think what they are told to think) (dats called textbook science)

    Did you know, Did You Know...In 1930
    Albert Einstein created a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)

    https://energyeducation.ca/wiki/images/e/e7/Lmfbr.gif

    https://energyeducation.ca/encyclopedia/Breeder_reactor

    https://archive.nytimes.com/screenshots/www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/06/18/world/asia/JAPAN_NUCLEAR.jpg

    https://www.base.bund.de/en/nuclear-safety/nuclear-technology/alternative-reactor-concepts/alternative-reactor-concepts.html

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280696122699778/photo/1

    https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148279328121090048/photo/1

    In 1930
    Albert Einstein filed a secret patent for the FIRST breeder reactor: https://x.com/Starmaker111/status/1148280108349714434/photo/1

    (with actual parts of the patent were used by the Manhattan project reactor)

    I forgot to add:

    "Never used in refrigerators, their pump was later adapted for the
    circulation of coolants in the controversial fast-breeder nuclear
    reactor—
    "an irony that would not have been lost on either Einstein or Szilard." (Bernard Feld, Einstein and Nuclear Weapons, Holton and Elkana, p. 391.)






    Of course, the irony was...there was no irony.








    --
    The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
    to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
    and challenge the unchallengeable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)