• Re: The proof of inconsistency of Einstein's Shit, - a bit differently

    From Richard Hachel@21:1/5 to All on Sun Mar 23 15:02:38 2025
    Le 23/03/2025 à 06:40, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
    So, let's "gedanke" an observer Bob
    crossing solar state with the speed
    of c/2. Bob is going to measure
    the length of a solar day.

    Now - is "Bob's result will be
    about 99766s" a valid consequence
    of your SR shit?

    Yes or no?

    It's much more complicated than you think, because you're starting from
    the principle of chronotropy dilation as a function of speed, but while
    that's sufficient for physicists, it's not for Hachel, who claims that
    position is crucial. Where is the rocket as it crosses the solar system?
    Is it fleeing the Earth? Is it orbiting the Sun?
    I repeat, there is a dilation of CHRONOTROPY (not to be confused with
    measured time) in time as a function of speed. But there is also a direct temporal Doppler effect to take into account.
    We arrive at the equation t'=t.(1+cosµ.v/c)/sqrt(1-v²/c²).
    And so I can't give you an answer if I don't have the rocket's
    displacement angle.

    R.H.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)