Le 23/03/2025 à 21:55, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor nurses...

poor trash

Nice signature.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

All but morons should be able to understand the following:

An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, it's c, right, poor trash?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 23.03.2025 o 22:06, Python pisze:

Le 23/03/2025 à 21:55, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor nurses...

slander
noun [ C or U ]
uk /ˈslɑːn.dər/ us /ˈslæn.dɚ/
a false spoken statement about someone that damages their reputation, or
the making of such a statement:

That's what The Shit is training its
doggies for.

poor trash

Nice signature.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Python wrote:

Le 23/03/2025 à 21:55, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :

UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor nurses...

poor trash

Nice signature.

just checking, but that's absolutely irrelevant. You seems a gay frog from canadistan. We are not talking with gays here in America.

please revise your deplorable attitude, and stop acting lika a frog, which
is gay, due agricultural pollution.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

All but morons should be able to understand the following:

An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer
is c, right, poor trash?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

All but morons should be able to understand the following:

An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer
is c, right, poor trash?

All but morons should be able - well, your moron guru \
was not able.
"observer's speed relative to the observed object can
affect the properties of the observed object" -
that was what he postulated.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

All but morons should be able to understand the following:

An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer
is c, right, poor trash?

All but morons should be able - well, your moron guru
was not able.
"observer's speed relative to the observed object can
affect the properties of the observed object" -
that was what he postulated.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Den 14.06.2025 19:22, skrev Maciej Woźniak:

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

All but morons should be able to understand the following:

An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.

Think about it. Obvious, no?

Thanks for confirming my words by demonstrating
that you belong to the mentioned group of people.

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!! UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer
is c, right, poor trash?

All but morons should be able - well, your moron guru
was not able.
"observer's speed relative to the observed object can
affect the properties of the observed object" -
that was what he postulated.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 6/15/2025 10:15 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:

Den 14.06.2025 19:22, skrev Maciej Woźniak:

W dniu 17.03.2025 o 20:42, Paul.B.Andersen pisze:

;
All but morons should be able to understand the following:
;
An observer's speed relative to the observed object can't
affect the properties of the observed object in any way.
But the observer's speed relative to the observed object can affect
the observer's measurements of the properties of the observed object.
;
Think about it. Obvious, no?

Thanks for confirming my words by demonstrating
that you belong to the mentioned group of people.

So, a, b or c?
C of course.

Think about something else, Paul.
if a measurement of a property of an observed
object gives a result different than the real
value of the property, the measurement is
a)valid
b)erroneous
c)UUUUUUU!!!UUUUUUU!!!!!!!!UUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PLONK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Let me guess, the correct relativistic answer
is c, right, poor trash?

All but morons should be able - well, your moron guru
was not able.
"observer's speed relative to the observed object can
affect the properties of the observed object" -
that was what he postulated.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)