Am Mittwoch000002, 02.04.2025 um 07:36 schrieb Maciej Wozniak:
Muon is a quantum particle, isn't it?
How, precisely, does a relativistic
idiot assign a local time to a quantum
particle? Is a quantum particle local?
All particles are 'quantum objects'.
That would mean 'particles are timelike stable patterns' (and not really 'material things').
'Timelike stable' means, they would be stable within their own local
frame of reference, which is comoving with that particle.
But 'local time' for the particle isn't necessarily the local time of an observer on the surface of planet Earth.
Actually any 'direction of time' is possible, which can be local
somewhere to some kind of object, even if that would be 'backwards' for
the observer on Earth.
So an 'anti-particle' moves backwards in time in an 'anti-world', where everything behaves like seen in a mirror.
But also 'sideways timelines' should be possible, which is certainly odd
and difficult to understand.
Such an object (particle) from a different 'time domain' can have very
strange feature (like e.g. muons), if they show up in our world, to
which they do not belong.
TH
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)