On Fri, 25 Apr 2025 02:52:36 -0400, George Hammond
<ghammond928@gmail.com> wrote:

MICROTUBULES CAUSE LIFE AFTER DEATH
.
GEORGE HAMMOND] MS Physics says:
.
YOU CAN'T FIND A LOGICAL ERROR IN THIS SCIENTIFIC CLAIM:
.
Only recently has it become possible "scientifically" to
show HOW the human body might be able to create such a
thing as an AFTERLIFE !

I say recently – and by that I mean since and because of
Prof. Stuart Hameroff's research on microtubules in the brain.

Hameroff has discovered that the water filled microtubules
of the brain provide and ultraviolet light transmission system
which connects all of the the neurons of the brain. Operating
at the speed of light and at the astoundingly high frequency of
ultraviolet light, 10^15 Hz !

Notice that this frequency is 10–TRILLION times higher
frequency than ordinary neuronal firing frequency!

Moreover, he has discovered that the so-called "memory bank"
of the brain is encoded in the tubulin molecules making up the
walls of these microtubules ! Thus, human memory recall works
by ultraviolet light speeding through the microtubules and reading
the memories off the walls! At the speed of light you can see that
the system can search almost the entire brain in a fraction of a
second !

Okay so Stuart Hameroff has discovered all of this stuff and
published it far and wide, with the help incidentally of no less of
a scientific Guru than Sir Roger Penrose (who is 91 at the time of
this writing BTW).

Okay, so knowing all of this stuff, what makes me think this
could cause such a thing as "Life after Death"?
Well, the answer is simply "SPEED". What I realized was that
the major problem with any theory of Life after Death is that there
are many causes of death that are VERY FAST ! Such as
LIGHTNING, BULLETS, TNT, or even an Atomic Bomb ! But if
we are talking about say, a 1-year Afterlife dream for instance –
how can the brain produce that if it is blown up by a 2000 pound
bomb in a a fraction of a second !?
And then I realized – that Stuart Hameroff had found the answer
to that riddle. The microtubule system is operating 10-trillion times
faster than the neuron firing system – which means that a one-year
neuronal dream transferred to the microtubule system would only
take about 1-MICROSECOND to play the entire one year dream in
the high-speed ultraviolet microtubule system! And that was the
answer to the high-speed death problem !
Even if your brain was vaporized by a 1 million ampere lightning
bold – your microtubule system could easily play the entire one year >afterlife dream in one microsecond !

And here's how works – if you have 2 computers say ,and one is
running a movie – and the other one is watching the movie –
you can crank up the speed of the 2 computers by a factor of
10- trillion say, and the observing computer watching the movie
won't even notice the difference, the only thing that matters is that
the 2 computers are always running at identically the same speed !
So if the neuronal brain watched a one-year movie it would appear
exactly the same as the microtubule brain watching the same
identical movie in 1-µs, instead of 1-year!

AND THAT IS HOW LIFE AFTER DEATH WORKS !!!!

Okay Ross –
Read that over and tell me what you think !
I think it's the world's first reasonable explanation
of how "Life after Death" actually works.

Finally of course, this only tells us how the Afterlife
WOULD work, it still doesn't tell us if this is how it
actually DOES work?

But this is DEFINITE PROGRESS, since we
now have in our hands a system that WOULD actually
produce Life after Death –

SO NOW WE KNOW WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR !!!!

George Hammond, MS Physics Hyannis MA USA 4/24/25

Key Logical Error: Mistaking Speed for Survival
Claim made:
Because microtubules operate at a speed 10-trillion times faster than
neuron firing, they can “play back” a full year-long afterlife dream
in just one microsecond, before the brain is destroyed.

Why that’s a problem:
? Speed of processing does not override physical destruction.

The fundamental mistake here is confusing computational speed with
resilience to physical damage.

?? Here’s the issue in plain terms:
Let’s say a bomb vaporizes your brain in 0.1 milliseconds. That’s 100 microseconds. The author says the brain only needs 1 microsecond to
play a whole afterlife movie. So far, this seems okay…

BUT:

The speed of thought or information transfer inside the brain doesn’t
mean that the brain can think or process after it’s been destroyed.

For that one microsecond of "afterlife simulation" to happen, the
entire system must still be intact and functional — and must remain so
for the full duration of that microsecond.

Realistically, a brain hit by lightning or a bomb doesn’t gently wait
one microsecond and then die. It's an instantaneous structural failure
— it’s gone before that hypothetical playback can even begin.

?? Analogy:
Imagine you're streaming a movie, but your entire computer melts
before the first frame appears. It doesn’t matter how fast the movie
could have played—it never even had a chance.

?? Additional Scientific Issues:
Hameroff and Penrose's theories (Orch-OR) are still highly speculative
and not widely accepted in neuroscience. They propose that
consciousness arises from quantum effects in microtubules—but this is
not proven.

Ultraviolet light transmission in microtubules is not an established
scientific fact. There's no solid evidence for this mechanism acting
as a memory retrieval or consciousness system.

? What’s a fair way to phrase this idea?
You could say:

“If it were possible for the brain to operate at extremely high speeds
just before death, and if the structure somehow remained intact for
even a microsecond, perhaps a flash of conscious experience could
occur—but this is speculative and assumes the brain doesn't suffer
immediate structural failure.”

?? Bottom Line:
Main error: Speed doesn’t matter if the hardware (brain) is instantly destroyed.

Secondary error: Treating unproven theories as facts.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)