GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
> GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
> so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
> to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Because another value wouldn't work.
Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:;
;
; > GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
; > so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
; > to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
;
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
;
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
;
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
;
;
Because another value wouldn't work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfONckOPyaI
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Because another value wouldn't work.
Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Because another value wouldn't work.
Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
answer also.
Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
Why this value exactly (that is, btw, predicted by GR) ?
On 5/4/2025 8:10 PM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Because another value wouldn't work.
Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
Cutting off another question and pretending
not to notice it is not an answer too
Because it is so is not an
answer also.
Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
Why the same value of each and every satellite?
Why this value exactly (that is, btw, predicted by GR) ?
A lie, of course, according to The Shit
(and the whole of your moronic religion)
clocks should be SI, not (1 - 4.4647e-10)
of SI.
poor stinker.
Le 04/05/2025 à 20:44, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :satellite?
On 5/4/2025 8:10 PM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given
Because another value wouldn't work.
Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
Cutting off another question and pretending
not to notice it is not an answer too
Because it is so is not an
answer also.
Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
Why the same value of each and every satellite?
No answer?
A lie, of course, according to The Shit
(and the whole of your moronic religion)
clocks should be SI, not (1 - 4.4647e-10)
of SI.
Not a lie.
Le 04/05/2025 à 22:02, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :UTC.
On 5/4/2025 8:55 PM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 20:44, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 8:10 PM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with
satellite?
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given
Because another value wouldn't work.
Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
Cutting off another question and pretending
not to notice it is not an answer too
Because it is so is not an
answer also.
Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
Why the same value of each and every satellite?
No answer?
Sorry
On 5/4/2025 8:55 PM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 20:44, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 8:10 PM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 10:38, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Le 04/05/2025 à 09:27, Maciej Woźniak a écrit :
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
Well, if you "observe" dilating time - it's
not because your idiot guru has caught God's
balls, it's because he has inspired you to
invent a brandly new method of counting time.
Now: as your method is not only brandly new,
but also utterly idiotic - nobody really
wants to count time your way. Even you,
yourself are not really THAT stupid.
And time counted the old way doesn't want to
dilate. Too bad.
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Because another value wouldn't work.
Paraphrasing the question in not an answer.
Cutting off another question and pretending
not to notice it is not an answer too
Because it is so is not an
answer also.
Why "another value wouldn't work" ?
Why the same value of each and every satellite?
No answer?
Sorry
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
Because another value wouldn't work.
On 5/4/2025 3:27 PM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfONckOPyaI
See, poor trash: I've proven the mumble of
the idiot you're worshipping to be not even
consistent - and except spitting, insulting
or slandering you can do nothing about it.
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
Because another value wouldn't work.
Which means that Maciej Woźniak knows that to stay in sync with UTC
the GPS clock has to be adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
as predicted by GR.
On 5/6/2025 11:33 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
>> GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
>> so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
>> to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
> On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
>>
>> Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
> Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
>>
>> Because another value wouldn't work.
>>
Which means that Maciej Woźniak knows that to stay in sync with UTC
the GPS clock has to be adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
as predicted by GR.
Paul B. Andersen is impudently lying, of course,
as expected from a piece of fanatic shit. His beloved
GR did no way predict that clocks will ignore her own
SI ideological nonsense.
According to The Shit - UTC doesn't exist, clocks
run always the same "proper" rate (wanna a quoting where
you write this one yourself?
A lie has short legs, scum)
and the synchronization between clocks in relative
motion is impossible. Some sorry bullshit, sure, but those
are predictions of your insane religion.
On 5/6/2025 11:33 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
> On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>
>> GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
>> so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
>> to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
> On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
>>
>> Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
> Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
>>
>> Because another value wouldn't work.
>>
Which means that Maciej Woźniak knows that to stay in sync with UTC
the GPS clock has to be adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
as predicted by GR.
Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece of
lying shit can't lie constantly, so he (accidentally,
of course) admits that the real measurement by GPS
satellite clocks gives a mean solar day as 86400
seconds, against the prophecies of his absurd religion.
Den 06.05.2025 15:16, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
According to The Shit - UTC doesn't exist, clocks
run always the same "proper" rate (wanna a quoting where
you write this one yourself?
So Maciej Woźniak knows that according to GR, UTC doesn't exist!
Your knowledge is real impressing :-D
BTW, UTC is a theoretical coordinate-time, not what clocks show.
Only clocks on the geoid can be synchronous with UTC.
A lie has short legs, scum)
and the synchronization between clocks in relative
motion is impossible. Some sorry bullshit, sure, but those
are predictions of your insane religion.
Even you must know that all GPS clocks are synchronous,
or the GPS wouldn't work.
Den 06.05.2025 12:00, skrev Maciej Woźniak:satellite?
On 5/6/2025 11:33 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given
Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Woźniak:
Because another value wouldn't work.
Which means that Maciej Woźniak knows that to stay in sync with UTC
the GPS clock has to be adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
as predicted by GR.
Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece of
lying shit can't lie constantly, so he (accidentally,
of course) admits that the real measurement by GPS
satellite clocks gives a mean solar day as 86400
seconds, against the prophecies of his absurd religion.
Right.
According to GR, a clock in GPS orbit will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400⋅(1 + 4.4647e-10)s = 86400 s + 38.575 μs
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
You know this, of curse, because you know that the GPS clock
must be adjusted down by the "only factor that works",
namely (1 - 4.4647e-10) to measure a mean solar day to last 86400 s.
Then even you must understand that without the adjustment
the clock would measure the a solar day to last
86400/(1 - 4.4647e-10) = 86400 s + 38.575 μs.
Den 06.05.2025 12:00, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:
On 5/6/2025 11:33 AM, Paul B. Andersen wrote:
On 4/10/2025 10:41 PM, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
GPS clocks are adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
so the adjusted clock will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400 s, and the clock will stay in sync with UTC.
On 5/4/2025 9:43 AM, Python wrote:
Why 1 - 4.4647e-10 and not another value for every given satellite?
Den 04.05.2025 10:38, skrev Maciej Wo?niak:
Because another value wouldn't work.
Which means that Maciej Wo?niak knows that to stay in sync with UTC
the GPS clock has to be adjusted down by (1 - 4.4647e-10)
as predicted by GR.
Fortunately, even such a disgusting piece of
lying shit can't lie constantly, so he (accidentally,
of course) admits that the real measurement by GPS
satellite clocks gives a mean solar day as 86400
seconds, against the prophecies of his absurd religion.
Right.
According to GR, a clock in GPS orbit will measure a mean solar day
to last 86400?(1 + 4.4647e-10)s = 86400 s + 38.575 ?s
You know this, of curse, because you know that the GPS clock
must be adjusted down by the "only factor that works",
namely (1 - 4.4647e-10) to measure a mean solar day to last 86400 s.
Then even you must understand that without the adjustment
the clock would measure the a solar day to last
86400/(1 - 4.4647e-10) = 86400 s + 38.575 ?s.
Or don't you understand that:
86400?(1 + 4.4647e-10)?(1 - 4.4647e-10) = 86400.000000000000000000 ?
Make my day.
Answer gobbledygook as usual.
Correct. The mean solar day -is defined- to be either 864900,
or 86401 seconds. (on the rare days when a leap second ocurs
There is no possibility of actually measuring a mean solar day
to anywhere near the accuracy of an atomic clock.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 02:12:35 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,581 |