*Corresponding author: Sujak P, Independent Researcher, Czech Republic,
Tel:
518415648; E-mail: peter.sujak@email.cz
Received October 10, 2016; Accepted November 16, 2016; Published
November
18, 2016
Citation: Sujak P (2016) Call to Repel the Physical Theories of the 20th Century. J
Phys Math 7: 202. doi: 10.4172/2090-0902.1000202
Copyright: © 2016 Sujak P. This is an open-access article distributed
under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 3:42:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
"We often hear the argument that the justness of application of
quantum mechanics lies in the great accuracy of its math calculations.
But in fact, the quantum mechanics so as was the Ptolemay epicycles
is a procedure for finding of mathematical construction to the existing
experimental data which this mathematics has to arrive at. We can
always find the mathematical relationships that describe experimental
data or, if not, we can construct a new mathematics to describe the
experimental data. But finding such mathematical constructions
(theories) do not confirm the veracity of the basic physical principles
(models) upon which these construction are based."
Like SR and Lorentz applied to particle accelerators. It's A FACT that
SR has been "validated" in linear and circular CHARGED particle
accelerators, but ONLY to speeds lower than 0.3 c. From this limit up to
near c, the calculations are made BASED ON THE DETECTED ENERGY OF
CHARGED PARTICLES.
Physics DENY the fact that are dealing with CHARGED PARTICLES, and that
the energy transfer between accelerators and particles could be limited
JUST by the speed at which the EM electric fields can accelerate
particles. It's highly possible that such action IS NOT RELATED TO SR,
but to limits at which accelerating energy can be transferred to
particles, in a way that formulae ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FROM SR.
To mention the above possibility is considered heretic in the physics community, which is married to relativity like devote socialists or communists are married to the concepts of POPULISM. Every thing else is
just FAR RIGHT. That's the way the world has been functioning for the
last 140 years (politics and economy).
All of these and a lot more are regarded as heresies.
BUT: I'm not a member of the 'Church of physics' and do not know, what
is heretic and why.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 3:42:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:Right, by the energy as discussed by the Argentinian professor J.J.H.
"We often hear the argument that the justness of application of
quantum mechanics lies in the great accuracy of its math calculations.
But in fact, the quantum mechanics so as was the Ptolemay epicycles
is a procedure for finding of mathematical construction to the existing
experimental data which this mathematics has to arrive at. We can
always find the mathematical relationships that describe experimental
data or, if not, we can construct a new mathematics to describe the
experimental data. But finding such mathematical constructions
(theories) do not confirm the veracity of the basic physical principles
(models) upon which these construction are based."
Like SR and Lorentz applied to particle accelerators. It's A FACT that
SR has been "validated" in linear and circular CHARGED particle
accelerators, but ONLY to speeds lower than 0.3 c. From this limit up to
near c, the calculations are made BASED ON THE DETECTED ENERGY OF
CHARGED PARTICLES.
Physics DENY the fact that are dealing with CHARGED PARTICLES, and that
the energy transfer between accelerators and particles could be limited
JUST by the speed at which the EM electric fields can accelerate
particles. It's highly possible that such action IS NOT RELATED TO SR,
but to limits at which accelerating energy can be transferred to
particles, in a way that formulae ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FROM SR.
To mention the above possibility is considered heretic in the physics community, which is married to relativity like devote socialists or communists are married to the concepts of POPULISM. Every thing else is
just FAR RIGHT. That's the way the world has been functioning for the
last 140 years (politics and economy).
On Mon, 19 May 2025 3:42:07 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:You don't have him on your list of critics!
"We often hear the argument that the justness of application of
quantum mechanics lies in the great accuracy of its math calculations.
But in fact, the quantum mechanics so as was the Ptolemay epicycles
is a procedure for finding of mathematical construction to the existing
experimental data which this mathematics has to arrive at. We can
always find the mathematical relationships that describe experimental
data or, if not, we can construct a new mathematics to describe the
experimental data. But finding such mathematical constructions
(theories) do not confirm the veracity of the basic physical principles
(models) upon which these construction are based."
Like SR and Lorentz applied to particle accelerators. It's A FACT that
SR has been "validated" in linear and circular CHARGED particle
accelerators, but ONLY to speeds lower than 0.3 c. From this limit up to
near c, the calculations are made BASED ON THE DETECTED ENERGY OF
CHARGED PARTICLES.
Physics DENY the fact that are dealing with CHARGED PARTICLES, and that
the energy transfer between accelerators and particles could be limited
JUST by the speed at which the EM electric fields can accelerate
particles. It's highly possible that such action IS NOT RELATED TO SR,
but to limits at which accelerating energy can be transferred to
particles, in a way that formulae ARE SIMILAR TO THOSE FROM SR.
To mention the above possibility is considered heretic in the physics community, which is married to relativity like devote socialists or communists are married to the concepts of POPULISM. Every thing else is
just FAR RIGHT. That's the way the world has been functioning for the
last 140 years (politics and economy).
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 50:54:52 |
| Calls: | 10,397 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 14,067 |
| Messages: | 6,417,327 |
| Posted today: | 1 |