• New addition to the List of Critics of Relativity

    From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 10 18:55:38 2025
    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein’s relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption, misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to LaurenceClarkCrossen on Tue Jun 10 22:25:57 2025
    On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:55:38 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein’s relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption, misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Wonderful! Out with the depravity of relativity!

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. J. Lodder@21:1/5 to LaurenceClarkCrossen on Wed Jun 11 11:35:53 2025
    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption, misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    Jan

    --
    <https://journals.scholarpublishing.org/index.php/AIVP/issue/view/551>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Wed Jun 11 17:49:50 2025
    On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
    as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
    flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.

    --
    athel -- biochemist, not a physicist, but detector of crackpots

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to Athel Cornish-Bowden on Thu Jun 12 03:00:26 2025
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
    as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
    flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.

    And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
    quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.

    Sad.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bertitaylor@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 12 03:04:03 2025
    "So I said, fuck 'em, fuck 'em all.
    With THOSE jerks I shall NOT play ball."

    Woof woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Rotten eggs for relativists!

    Bertietaylor

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Bertitaylor on Thu Jun 12 20:42:45 2025
    On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 3:00:26 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:

    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the >>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if >>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
    as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
    flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
    journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
    respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.

    And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
    quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.

    Sad.

    WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

    Bertietaylor

    --
    Yes, the relativists commenting have no clue about the retarding
    political and social influences holding back science such as peer
    review.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Thu Jun 12 22:12:41 2025
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    Jan
    Are you aware that Aristotelian science was a political and religious
    dogma enforced by control over publications until the printing press?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Thu Jun 12 22:22:12 2025
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    Jan
    Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press about 1436 in Mainz,
    Germany.
    In 1616, Galileo was warned not to defend the heliocentric theory. In
    1633, he was placed on trial for heresy and was forced to publicly
    recant his belief in the heliocentric model.
    Do you think modern scientific establishments are any less selfish than
    the Church was?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to Athel Cornish-Bowden on Thu Jun 12 22:38:31 2025
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

    On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
    as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
    flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
    Peer review is a guarantee that it was carried out in a dark back room
    in secret.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Thu Jun 12 23:23:37 2025
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    Jan
    Would you like to explain how relativity can claim the equivalence of
    inertial and gravitational mass while claiming the mass velocity
    relationship? Do they not contradict?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From LaurenceClarkCrossen@21:1/5 to J. J. Lodder on Fri Jun 13 00:32:28 2025
    On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 9:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

    LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:

    Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology

    Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
    Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
    Relativity"
    European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.

    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
    with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    Jan
    They are mutually exclusive making relativity self-contradictory
    nonsense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 10:24:14 2025
    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 00:22 schrieb LaurenceClarkCrossen:
    ...
    "Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
    shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
    misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
    that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
    top."

    Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?

    I did, actually, but not at all of Einstein's papers.

    My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
    contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck,
    because Planck was a world class physicist.

    Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
    'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)

    I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.

    Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
    some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.

    Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
    different believe system (other than Judaism).

    Jan
    Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press about 1436 in Mainz,
    Germany.

    As far as I know, the printing press was known before.

    Gutenberg invented a scheme to use single reusable printing letters.

    ...

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul B. Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 13 20:59:55 2025
    Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:

    My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
    contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.

    Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
    'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)

    I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.

    Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
    some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.

    Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a different believe system (other than Judaism).


    Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?

    That would make sense, since 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
    is so ridiculous that it can only be written to make the Jew Einstein
    look stupid.

    --
    Paul :-J

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 09:17:55 2025
    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:59 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
    Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:

    My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
    contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by
    Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.

    Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
    'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation
    agent'.)

    I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.

    Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
    some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.

    Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
    different believe system (other than Judaism).


    Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?

    Most likely not.

    But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:

    There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg
    Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.

    To extend this, I had searched for an Englishmen, who would fit and
    found 'Noel Trevenen Huxley'.

    The reason for this guy are a little complicated.

    But mainly my assumption is based on the relation of other Huxleys to
    Naziism, which at that time was called 'Eugenics' in English.

    Head of 'Eugenics' was Julian Huxley, who was also an agent in
    Churchills naval secret service.

    They were both grandsons of Thomas Henry Huxley and that was 'Darwin's
    bulldog' ('inventor' of racism).

    The relation of Hitler to Churchill was Hitler's girlfriend Unity
    Valkyrie Mitford, who was Churchill's niece.

    The relation between Hitler and the Huxleys was a schoolmate of the real
    Hitler named Ludwig Wittgenstein, who was a member of the 'apostles' of Cambridge together with Aldous Huxley.


    ...


    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul.B.Andersen@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 10:36:15 2025
    Den 14.06.2025 09:17, skrev Thomas Heger:
    Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:59 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
    Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:

    My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
    contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by
    Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.

    Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
    'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation
    agent'.)

    I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.

    Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
    some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.

    Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
    different believe system (other than Judaism).


    Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?


    Most likely not.

    But not impossible?


    But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:

    There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg
    Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.

    I find it very reasonable that you think so.


    --
    Paul

    https://paulba.no/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Heger@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 15 10:10:48 2025
    Am Samstag000014, 14.06.2025 um 10:36 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:

    My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
    contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by
    Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.

    Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
    'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation
    agent'.)

    I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.

    Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was
    actually some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from
    birth.

    Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
    different believe system (other than Judaism).


    Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?


    Most likely not.

    But not impossible?

    Sure, but 'Donald Duck' would also be possible.


    But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:

    There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg
    Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.

    I find it very reasonable that you think so.

    You might be surprised, but Germans still think about Naziism and WWII.

    TH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)