Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein’s relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption, misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption, misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:49:50 +0000, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:Yes, the relativists commenting have no clue about the retarding
On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the >>>> Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if >>>> that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious
journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some
respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
And you cannot be a peer unless you are a deep devotee of relativity,
quantum and thermodynamics. In short, an anti-Science entity.
Sad.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
--
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:Are you aware that Aristotelian science was a political and religious
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
Jan
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:Johannes Gutenberg invented the printing press about 1436 in Mainz,
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
Jan
On 2025-06-11 09:35:53 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:Peer review is a guarantee that it was carried out in a dark back room
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
I hadn't previously, but I have now. Any journal that announces itself
as a "peer-reviewed open access online journal" is showing two red
flags right there. Anyay, the content is what one would expect. Serious journals don't say they're peer reviewed because that's assumed; some respectable journals have open access but "open access" is no guarantee.
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:Would you like to explain how relativity can claim the equivalence of
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
Jan
LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote:They are mutually exclusive making relativity self-contradictory
Darrell Bender New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Bender, D. (2025). "The Dying of a Principle: The Bending of Light, the
Oppenheimer-Snyder Gravitational Contraction, and the Postulate of
Relativity"
European Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 13(02). 505-546.
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions
with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
Jan
"Considering Einstein's relativity theories, which we have repeatedly
shown to be blatantly false, and the constant stream of corruption,
misinformation, propaganda, and lies supporting them by the institutions >>> with big names and the physicists themselves with even bigger names, if
that be possible, than the institutions. The fraud emanates from the
top."
Have you actually looked at this 'journal'?
JanJohannes Gutenberg invented the printing press about 1436 in Mainz,
Germany.
My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation agent'.)
I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a different believe system (other than Judaism).
Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by
Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation
agent'.)
I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
different believe system (other than Judaism).
Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?
Am Freitag000013, 13.06.2025 um 20:59 schrieb Paul B. Andersen:
Den 13.06.2025 10:24, skrev Thomas Heger:
My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by
Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation
agent'.)
I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was actually
some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from birth.
Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
different believe system (other than Judaism).
Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?
Most likely not.
But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:
There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg
Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.
My impression was, that 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'
contains far more errors than could possible be unrecognized by
Planck, because Planck was a world class physicist.
Therefore, I had assumed, that Einstein's text was meant as
'disinformation' (and therefore Einstein himself a 'disinformation
agent'.)
I had actually doubts, that his CV was correct.
Much more likely would have been, in my opinion, that he was
actually some sort of agent (of some unknown agency) and Swiss from
birth.
Also he could have had a different name and eventually belonged to a
different believe system (other than Judaism).
Maybe his name was Adolf Hitler?
Most likely not.
But not impossible?
But I have a theory about the true identity of Hitler, too:
There exists actually a book by the author from New Zealand 'Greg
Hallet' called 'Hitler was a British agent'.
I find it very reasonable that you think so.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 57:02:51 |
Calls: | 10,397 |
Calls today: | 5 |
Files: | 14,067 |
Messages: | 6,417,447 |
Posted today: | 1 |