XPost: sci.physics, sci.math

If A is atomic weight and N is atomic number then the number of
electrons E holding the N protons in the nucleus is

E = A - N

Now E may not be an integer. That indicates the electrons for a
particular atom nucleus do not have unit charge on the average.

Woof woof woof woof-woof woof woof-woof nice to have one's own formula!

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op 30/06/2025 om 21:23 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:

Den 30.06.2025 11:57, skrev Bertitaylor:

comprehend that we have posited that a neutron is a tight electron
proton.

β− decay is when a neutron in the core changes to a proton
by emitting an electron.
You claim that this proves that a neutron is a proton and
an electron in tight bond.

β+ decay is when a proton in the core changes to a neutron
by emitting a positron.
Does this prove that a proton is a neutron and a positron
in tight bond?

Or that particle transforms are time-reversible (within the limits of
later and previous interactions) and that β- and β+ are time mirrors of
each other?

--
guido wugi

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Den 30.06.2025 11:57, skrev Bertitaylor:

comprehend that we have posited that a neutron is a tight electron
proton.

β− decay is when a neutron in the core changes to a proton
by emitting an electron.
You claim that this proves that a neutron is a proton and
an electron in tight bond.

β+ decay is when a proton in the core changes to a neutron
by emitting a positron.
Does this prove that a proton is a neutron and a positron
in tight bond?


--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Den 30.06.2025 21:33, skrev guido wugi:

Op 30/06/2025 om 21:23 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:

β− decay is when a neutron in the core changes to a proton
by emitting an electron.

β+ decay is when a proton in the core changes to a neutron
by emitting a positron.

Or that particle transforms are time-reversible (within the limits of
later and previous interactions) and that β- and β+ are time mirrors of each other?

It is not time reversible in the sense that a β− decay can be
'undone' by a β+ decay so we get the same isotope back.

Example of β− decay:
Carbon-14 with 6 protons and 8 neutrons decays into
Nitrogen-14 with 7 protons and 7 neutrons + electron and antineutrino Nitrogen-14 is stable

Example of β+ decay:
Carbon-10 with 6 protons and 4 neutrons decays into
Boron-10 with 5 protons and 5 neutrons + positron and neutrino
Boron-10 is stable

Note that the decay tend to make the number of protons and neurons
(more) equal.
Isotopes with equal (or more balanced) number of protons and neutrons
tend to be stable.

--
Paul

https://paulba.no/

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Op 1/07/2025 om 21:28 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:

Den 30.06.2025 21:33, skrev guido wugi:

Op 30/06/2025 om 21:23 schreef Paul.B.Andersen:

β− decay is when a neutron in the core changes to a proton
by emitting an electron.

β+ decay is when a proton in the core changes to a neutron
by emitting a positron.

Or that particle transforms are time-reversible (within the limits of
later and previous interactions) and that β- and β+ are time mirrors
of each other?

It is not time reversible in the sense that a β− decay can be
'undone' by a β+ decay so we get the same isotope back.

Example of β− decay:
Carbon-14   with 6 protons and 8 neutrons decays into
Nitrogen-14 with 7 protons and 7 neutrons + electron and antineutrino Nitrogen-14 is stable

Example of β+ decay:
Carbon-10 with 6 protons and 4 neutrons decays into
Boron-10  with 5 protons and 5 neutrons + positron and neutrino
Boron-10  is stable

Note that the decay tend to make the number of protons and neurons
(more) equal.
Isotopes with equal (or more balanced) number of protons and neutrons
tend to be stable.

Thank you for the examples, kindof reminding me of things I never
assimilated in nuclear chemistry courses or whatever it was called at
that time ;-)

--
guido wugi

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics

Natural Idiots really need Artificial Idiocy to maintain dogmas and
doctrines.

WOOF woof-woof woof woof-woof woof

Bertietaylor

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: sci.physics

Just chant e=mcc 666 times, robot worshipping Penisnino.

Woof

--

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)