You literally wrote "overheat" here:
Jordon Molokovsky schrieb:
you assume too much. The 'overheat' is merely based
on the size of memory required, and the number of
instructions sent to the CPU's decoder, together with
data, occupying the bus, through the pipeline, ignoring the
pipeline etc. Not directly related to time. And 'stacks'
ARE memory, not something to 'afford as excess' fucking stoopid.
Maybe you russian bots should use a better ChatGPT translator?
Alton Grammatakakis schrieb:
Mild Shock wrote:
The problem of L1, L2, L3, cache trashing through writes, is not
overheating, but it gets awfully slow,
creating an overhead not overheating.
so fooling around needlessly in CPU's cache is not increasing the temperature.. ; get yourself a proper education, before opening your
stupid mouth.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)