Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no
reasonable basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith.
It's delusion.
Sylvia.
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no reasonable
basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith. It's delusion.
Sylvia.
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I dont have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no
reasonable basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith.
It's delusion.
Thanks for the update Miss Pandora.
On 7/04/2023 10:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I dont have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no reasonable
basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith. It's delusion.
Sylvia.
No, it's life, fool atheist.
Life does not exist according YOUR mind's reasonable basis, Ms Glorious
Mind.
The atheist is always a self-worshiper! My questions are, why and who >anointed them the self-glory?
One guess.
Thanks for the update Miss Pandora."Miss Pandora"?
Ah, another apologist for magic (or as David calls it,
"magick". Cool.
On 08-Apr-23 9:57 am, Michael McLean wrote:
On 7/04/2023 10:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no
reasonable basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith.
It's delusion.
Sylvia.
No, it's life, fool atheist.
Life does not exist according YOUR mind's reasonable basis, Ms
Glorious Mind.
The atheist is always a self-worshiper! My questions are, why and
who anointed them the self-glory?
One guess.
Michael
I don't really see how you reach the "atheist" conclusion.
Religion mostly seems to involve believing that something, God,
exists, without supporting evidence. There does not appear to be an expectation that something will happen as a consequence. Indeed, much
of the support for religious belief seems to form around explaining
the absence of things happening, such as protecting churches from earthquakes, despite the supposed existence of God.
OK, NOW you can probably reasonably conclude that I'm an atheist.
Sylvia.
On 7/04/2023 10:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no reasonable
basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith. It's delusion.
Sylvia.
No, it's life, fool atheist.
Life does not exist according YOUR mind's reasonable basis, Ms Glorious
Mind.
The atheist is always a self-worshiper! My questions are, why and who anointed them the self-glory?
One guess.
Michael
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 08-Apr-23 9:57 am, Michael McLean wrote:
On 7/04/2023 10:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no
reasonable basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith.
It's delusion.
Sylvia.
No, it's life, fool atheist.
Life does not exist according YOUR mind's reasonable basis, Ms
Glorious Mind.
The atheist is always a self-worshiper! My questions are, why and
who anointed them the self-glory?
One guess.
Michael
I don't really see how you reach the "atheist" conclusion.
Religion mostly seems to involve believing that something, God,
exists, without supporting evidence. There does not appear to be an
expectation that something will happen as a consequence. Indeed, much
of the support for religious belief seems to form around explaining
the absence of things happening, such as protecting churches from
earthquakes, despite the supposed existence of God.
OK, NOW you can probably reasonably conclude that I'm an atheist.
just ignore 'Mad Mike'
Sylvia.
On 08-Apr-23 9:57 am, Michael McLean wrote:
On 7/04/2023 10:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I don’t have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no reasonable
basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith. It's delusion.
Sylvia.
No, it's life, fool atheist.
Life does not exist according YOUR mind's reasonable basis, Ms
Glorious Mind.
The atheist is always a self-worshiper! My questions are, why and who
anointed them the self-glory?
One guess.
Michael
I don't really see how you reach the "atheist" conclusion.
Religion mostly seems to involve believing that something, God, exists, without supporting evidence.
There does not appear to be an expectation
that something will happen as a consequence.
Indeed, much of the support
for religious belief seems to form around explaining the absence of
things happening, such as protecting churches from earthquakes, despite
the supposed existence of God.
OK, NOW you can probably reasonably conclude that I'm an atheist.
Sylvia.
On 08-Apr-23 1:55 pm, Maximus wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 08-Apr-23 9:57 am, Michael McLean wrote:
On 7/04/2023 10:33 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 29-Mar-23 4:16 pm, David Dalton wrote:
Right now I dont have faith but do have hope that my global new
age onset magickal workings will have effect.
Having some expectation that something will happen with no
reasonable basis for thinking it will is neither hope, nor faith.
It's delusion.
Sylvia.
No, it's life, fool atheist.
Life does not exist according YOUR mind's reasonable basis, Ms
Glorious Mind.
The atheist is always a self-worshiper! My questions are, why and
who anointed them the self-glory?
One guess.
Michael
I don't really see how you reach the "atheist" conclusion.
Religion mostly seems to involve believing that something, God,
exists, without supporting evidence. There does not appear to be an
expectation that something will happen as a consequence. Indeed, much
of the support for religious belief seems to form around explaining
the absence of things happening, such as protecting churches from
earthquakes, despite the supposed existence of God.
OK, NOW you can probably reasonably conclude that I'm an atheist.
just ignore 'Mad Mike'
Sylvia.
I would, but sometimes it's fun to play with these people.
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
Thanks for the update Miss Pandora."Miss Pandora"?
Ah, another apologist for magic (or as David calls it,
"magick". Cool.
And a snip back at ya, Sylvy.
Piss off, fool atheist, you ain't got nothing to stand on but your
"self" glory, and I don't have time for fools anymore.
You are dying, moron. If the universe was eternal, so would everything around you be, and including you.
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
On 08-Apr-23 6:01 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
And a snip back at ya, Sylvy.
Piss off, fool atheist, you ain't got nothing to stand on but your
"self" glory, and I don't have time for fools anymore.
You are dying, moron. If the universe was eternal, so would
everything around you be, and including you.
Why couldn't the universe be cyclic - big bang - expansion - contraction
- big crunch - repeat?
Sylvia.
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
So much for the omnipotent deity thing.
On 8/04/2023 6:52 pm, Sylvia Else wrote:
On 08-Apr-23 6:01 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
And a snip back at ya, Sylvy.
Piss off, fool atheist, you ain't got nothing to stand on but your
"self" glory, and I don't have time for fools anymore.
You are dying, moron. If the universe was eternal, so would
everything around you be, and including you.
Why couldn't the universe be cyclic - big bang - expansion -
contraction - big crunch - repeat?
Sylvia.
Okay, I'll indulge you, a little further, but understand that I am sick
to death of listening to impossible nonsense, Sylvia.
No thing can create itself. Let that sink in. Nothing can "be" before it
is, in order to bring itself into "being".
And a snip back a ya, runaway girl.
NO THING CAN CREATE ITSELF, YOU FUCKIN' IDIOT ATHEIST!
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
On 09-Apr-23 1:07 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
And a snip back a ya, runaway girl.
NO THING CAN CREATE ITSELF, YOU FUCKIN' IDIOT ATHEIST!
I'm not saying it can. I'm just wondering why the universe cannot be
eternal if God can?
If the universe is eternal, then it did not need to be created, because
it was always there - just like God. And, of course, if the universe
didn't need to be created, then there's no need for a God.
Your entire thesis seems to be based on the premise that God can have a property - being eternal - that is denied to anything else for no
explained reason.
Sylvia.
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
Sylvia.
Michael McLean wrote:
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
<snip 5 year oldisms>
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
An eternal universe can have a beginning.
forever, it's eternal. If it has existed since infinity
ago and ends now, it's still eternal.
Eternal just means "having infinite duration". <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eternal>
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in
contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
Sylvia.
Or, can God create itself?
It depends on what kind of god the believer chooses to
invent.
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
An eternal universe can have a beginning. If it lasts
forever, it's eternal. If it has existed since infinity
ago and ends now, it's still eternal.
Eternal just means "having infinite duration". <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eternal>
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
Sylvia.
Or, can God create itself?
It depends on what kind of god the believer chooses to
invent.
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
Michael McLean wrote:
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in >contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
twang@the.noodle says...
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
An eternal universe can have a beginning. If it lasts
forever, it's eternal. If it has existed since infinity
ago and ends now, it's still eternal.
Eternal just means "having infinite duration". <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eternal>
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
Sylvia.
Or, can God create itself?
It depends on what kind of god the believer chooses to
invent.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infinity
twang@the.noodle says...
Michael McLean wrote:
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:22:27 +1000, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
<sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:He's using the first dictionary definition of "eternal",
In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
which implies "always existed and always will" and ignoring
the second, which does not:
From the OED:
"1.without beginning or end; lasting forever; always
existing (opposed to temporal): eternal life.
2.perpetual; ceaseless; endless: eternal quarreling;eternal
chatter."
IOW, word games.
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in
contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
In article <u2273i5t223mre4t6fn30o9d9lc2feq0sv@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
Michael McLean wrote:
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Michael McLean wrote:If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Nope. Try again.
On 11/04/2023 3:03 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 11:22:27 +1000, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else
<sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:He's using the first dictionary definition of "eternal",
In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
which implies "always existed and always will" and ignoring
the second, which does not:
From the OED:
"1.without beginning or end; lasting forever; always
existing (opposed to temporal): eternal life.
2.perpetual; ceaseless; endless: eternal quarreling;eternal
chatter."
IOW, word games.
One thing is for sure, you won't continue to be an eternal wank nowhere man!
How's that? :-).
in sci.skeptic, posted by Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
In article <2rs43i1cs7g6r661rrq234pj0ngcc4s7k9@4ax.com>,
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
He's using the first dictionary definition of "eternal",
which implies "always existed and always will" and ignoring
the second, which does not:
From the OED:
"1.without beginning or end; lasting forever; always
existing (opposed to temporal): eternal life.
2.perpetual; ceaseless; endless: eternal quarreling;eternal
chatter."
IOW, word games.
On 11/04/2023 8:23 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Michael McLean wrote:If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an >>>>>>>>>>> eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Nope. Try again.
Moron fool atheist!
Michael McLean wrote:
On 11/04/2023 8:23 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Michael McLean wrote:If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an >>>>>>>>>>>>> eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Nope. Try again.
Moron fool atheist!
Nope. Try again.
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Michael McLean wrote:
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
Nope. Try again.
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Sylvia Else wrote:
On 10-Apr-23 2:02 am, Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote:
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being." >>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to?
It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an
eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
You mean God cannot create an eternal universe that had no beginning?
An eternal universe can have a beginning. If it lasts
forever, it's eternal. If it has existed since infinity
ago and ends now, it's still eternal.
Eternal just means "having infinite duration". <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/eternal>
In any case, we already know that "omnipotence" contains a built-in contradiction. Can God create something that He cannot destroy? Etc.
Sylvia.
Or, can God create itself?
It depends on what kind of god the believer chooses to
invent.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infinity
Nope. Irrelevant, but thanks for playing.
Michael McLean wrote:
On 11/04/2023 8:23 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Michael McLean wrote:If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that?
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an >>>>>>>>>>> eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Nope. Try again.
Moron fool atheist!
Nope. Try again.
Michael McLean <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> wrote:
On 11/04/2023 4:52 pm, El Kabong wrote:
Michael McLean wrote:
On 11/04/2023 8:23 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...Nope. Try again.
Michael McLean wrote:If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that? >>>
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....?
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an >>>>>>>>>>>>> eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not >>>>>>>>>>> omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Moron fool atheist!
Nope. Try again.
There you go, you self-created fool.
Nope.
You really struggle to focus, don't you. Have you ever
been evaluated for ADHD?
On 11/04/2023 4:52 pm, El Kabong wrote:
Michael McLean wrote:
On 11/04/2023 8:23 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...Nope. Try again.
Michael McLean wrote:If it has a beginning it can't be eternal. What is so hard about that? >>>
On 10/04/2023 7:03 am, El Kabong wrote:
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:
twang@the.noodle says...
Skeeter wrote:It wouldn't be eternal if it was created.
In article <k9cbpdFl0e1U4@mid.individual.net>, sylvia@email.invalid says...
On 08-Apr-23 2:52 pm, Michael McLean wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Everything is the consequence of something. No thing can create itself.
It needs a cause. Thus eternal God or nothing would be here. No thing
can "be" before it is in order to bring itself into "being."
So, God can be eternal, but nothing else can, because.....? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sylvia.
He created it?
Could God create an eternal universe if he wanted to? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you mean no, God isn't powerful enough to create an >>>>>>>>>>>>> eternal universe.
Twist it around as usual.
You said it, not me.
If it was created it cannot be eternal.
Of course it can. Any omnipotent god can create
something that lasts forever. If he can't, he's not
omnipotent and he needs to go back to god school.
If it was created it had a beginning.
So?
Spnak!
You are running away again, skeetzoid.
Do you see how easy Skeeter kicks your ass? :-).
I see how both of you do a lot of talking.
It's your way of diving into the weeds when
you can't hold your own.
Why didn't you invent an omnipotent god?
Moron fool atheist!
Nope. Try again.
There you go, you self-created fool.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 493 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 161:20:13 |
Calls: | 9,700 |
Files: | 13,732 |
Messages: | 6,179,757 |