https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Doctor Who was thinking very hard :

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

You guys just have to find donkeys with more money, and demonstrate
your product to them.

Nanosats are cheap, build one with solar panels (cheaper than nuclear reactors), and use your device to raise its orbit. Piece of cake, and
maybe a Russian oligarch will come to you.

/dps

--
I have always been glad we weren't killed that night. I do not know
any particular reason, but I have always been glad.
_Roughing It_, Mark Twain

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work,
regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is irrelevant.

Sylvia.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work, >regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is >irrelevant.

Sylvia.

you are affected by senile dementia aggravated by a moronic form of
sarcasm!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work, >regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is >irrelevant.

Sylvia.

what a troll !

still you are being a physics donkey.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work, >regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is >irrelevant.

Sylvia.

go to study physics !

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Wednesday, Doctor Who quipped:

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work,
regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is
irrelevant.

Sylvia.

go to study physics !

People who study physics learn that there is no free lunch.

/dps

--
You could try being nicer and politer

instead, and see how that works out.

-- Katy Jennison

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:19:58 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:

Wednesday, Doctor Who quipped:

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system,
that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work,
regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is
irrelevant.

Sylvia.

go to study physics !

People who study physics learn that there is no free lunch.

/dps

yes that is standard physics, not experimental physics.

Only if you assist to a PNN test you will be convinced that it worls,
thus you will never believe us because you can't assist to a PNN test.

Now go away!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Doctor Who explained :

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:19:58 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:

Wednesday, Doctor Who quipped:

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system, >>>>> that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work,
regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is
irrelevant.

Sylvia.

go to study physics !

People who study physics learn that there is no free lunch.

/dps

yes that is standard physics, not experimental physics.

Only if you assist to a PNN test you will be convinced that it worls,
thus you will never believe us because you can't assist to a PNN test.

Now go away!

Fly me to the moon!

/dps

--
Killing a mouse was hardly a Nobel Prize-worthy exercise, and Lawrence
went apopleptic when he learned a lousy rodent had peed away all his
precious heavy water.
_The Disappearing Spoon_, Sam Kean

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:38:58 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:

Doctor Who explained :

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:19:58 -0700, Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com>
wrote:

Wednesday, Doctor Who quipped:

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:27:27 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> >>>> wrote:

On 13-Apr-23 4:00 am, Doctor Who wrote:

On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:36:03 -0700 (PDT), Dean Markley
<damarkley@gmail.com> wrote:

https://blog.thespaceacademy.org/2023/04/nasa-to-test-nuclear-rocket-engine-that.html?fbclid=IwAR1lBe0yG_dUV7O8vgqKP6IodSyrJ1jCUGyS6Sgrss9hk0G5TN5w9iJvqUM

so when we reclaiim a nuclear reactor for our own propulsion system, >>>>>> that is not crazy, it is all possible and in line with current
developments.

but you guys still are donkeys

and lallo

The concern about your engine is that the thrust part does not work, >>>>> regardless of how much power you put into it. So the nuclear part is >>>>> irrelevant.

Sylvia.

go to study physics !

People who study physics learn that there is no free lunch.

/dps

yes that is standard physics, not experimental physics.

Only if you assist to a PNN test you will be convinced that it worls,
thus you will never believe us because you can't assist to a PNN test.

Now go away!

Fly me to the moon!

/dps

I'll fly you to the asylum for the mentally retarded.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)